分析师:切萨皮克-西南交易可能创造美国顶级页岩气勘探与生产

分析师表示,切萨皮克能源公司和西南能源公司的合并将创建美国最大的天然气勘探与生产公司。但数十亿美元的组合也可能会引起监管机构的审查。

专家表示,切萨皮克能源公司和西南能源公司的合并将创建一个一流的公共页岩气勘探与生产项目。

据报道,总部位于俄克拉荷马城的切萨皮克能源公司正在与总部位于德克萨斯州斯普林的西南能源公司就潜在收购进行讨论。据路透社报道,交易谈判处于初步阶段,尚不确定两家勘探生产公司能否达成协议

两家公司之间的交易价值可能超过 110 亿美元,其中包括承担债务。

总的来说,专家认为这两家天然气公司之间的交易是有意义的。Truist Securities 分析师表示,此次合并将打造一家在页岩钻探效率和天然气运输方面具有优势地位的勘探生产公司。

合并后的公司还可以在墨西哥湾沿岸扩张的液化天然气行业中更好地竞争。

两家公司已经将大量天然气产量转移到墨西哥湾沿岸市场。今年早些时候,切萨皮克与 Gunvor Group Ltd.签署了为期 15 年的液化天然气供应协议;切萨皮克将从海恩斯维尔页岩获取天然气进行液化并从 2027 年开始运送到贡沃尔。

Truist Securities 分析师在 10 月份的一份报告中表示:“我们认为,对于大多数以天然气为主的勘探与生产公司来说,液化天然气合同讨论仍然是首要问题,这项潜在交易将使这家备考公司成为该集团中定位最好的公司。” 17 报告。

两家公司在各自的地理足迹之间也具有协同效应。切萨皮克和西南航空是仅有的两家在海恩斯维尔和马塞勒斯页岩都有生产的公开交易的天然气生产商。

第一资本证券分析师 10 月 17 日表示,这些勘探和生产项目在海恩斯维尔地区有“相当大的面积重叠”,在阿巴拉契亚地区有“一定程度的相邻”。

然而,两家天然气公司的合并以及随后权力集中在阿巴拉契亚市场可能会带来一些监管挑战。

由于联邦贸易委员会 (FTC) 致力于解决反垄断问题,阿巴拉契亚天然气生产商EQT Corp.以 52 亿美元收购了 Tug Hill Inc. 和 XcL Midstream,数月来一直陷入监管繁文缛节

FTC 于 8 月中旬解决了对 EQT 与 Tug Hill 交易的审查,几天后该交易完成

“我们不知道联邦贸易委员会开始划定市场份额的百分比,但我们听说 35% 是一个不错的猜测,”第一资本证券分析师表示。“我们也不确定市场到底是什么。是按县、按流域还是全国范围?”

尽管该交易可能面临监管障碍,但第一资本的初步分析表明,该交易可能会获得批准。

如果价格合适的话

分析师认为,如果最终达成交易,很有可能是全股票交易。埃克森美孚公司 以价值近 600 亿美元的全股票交易收购二叠纪盆地巨头先锋自然资源公司 (Pioneer Natural Resources) 的重磅交易就是这种情况。

切萨皮克以大约 110 亿美元的价格(即每股约 7 美元的西南航空股票)收购西南航空,与西南航空 10 月 16 日每股 6.77 美元的收盘价相比,几乎没有溢价。

分析师表示,如果 SWN 股票的最终价格接近每股 7.50 美元至 8 美元,他们不会感到惊讶。

切萨皮克的市值目前约为 120 亿美元,而西南航空的市值约为 80 亿美元。合并后的公司价值约为 200 亿美元。

第一资本证券分析师在一份分析报告中表示,“我们覆盖范围内的公司中,只有八家公司的市值较大。” “在专注于天然气的同行中,只有 [ Coterra ] 的规模更大,约为 215 亿美元。”

为天然气荣耀而持有

在过去一年左右的时间里,天然气生产商面临着严重的价格波动。由于俄罗斯入侵乌克兰等地缘政治和宏观经济因素的综合作用,以及随着全球摆脱 COVID-19 低迷的影响,需求迅速增长,天然气价格在 2022 年飙升。

根据美国能源情报署的数据,去年夏天天然气价格飙升至 9 美元/MMBtu 以上。天然气勘探开发相应提高产量并追高价格。

但自那以后,由于供应过剩、需求疲软以及库存水平高于平均水平,天然气价格大幅下跌。

EIA 在最新预测中指出,亨利中心天然气价格预计到 2023 年平均价格将达到 2.61 美元,比去年的平均价格 6.42 美元下降近 60%。

在这段低价时期,天然气生产商一直盯着隧道尽头的曙光:墨西哥湾沿岸液化天然气开发商的需求不断增长。

根据 East Daley Analytics 的数据,2023 年至 2030 年间,美国液化天然气出口所需的天然气需求预计将增长17.4 Bcf/d。EIA数据显示,2022年液化天然气出口总峰值能力约为13.9 Bcf/d。

由于需求增长如此巨大,美国一些最熟练的天然气生产商想知道所有这些天然气将来自哪里

需求的大幅上升预计将在未来几年大幅推高天然气价格,而天然气价格上涨可能会推动以天然气为主的勘探与生产公司进行更多并购。

“虽然由于地缘政治担忧和埃克森美孚公司上周收购[Pioneer],石油最近成为头条新闻,但考虑到天然气价格上涨的可见性,我们对天然气方面并购的增加并不感到惊讶。 Siebert Williams Shank & Co 股票研究董事总经理 Gabriele Sorbara 表示,2025 年以后的液化天然气需求。


有关的

Rockcliff首席执行官谈美国液化天然气:“所有这些天然气都来自哪里?”

原文链接/hartenergy

Analysts: Chesapeake-Southwestern Deal Could Create Top US Shale Gas E&P

A merger between Chesapeake Energy Corp. and Southwestern Energy Co. would create the nation’s largest natural gas E&P, analysts say. But a multibillion-dollar combination could also draw scrutiny from regulators.

A combination between Chesapeake Energy and Southwestern Energy would create a premier public shale gas E&P, experts say.

Oklahoma City-based Chesapeake Energy Corp. is reportedly in discussions with Spring, Texas-based Southwestern Energy Co. about a potential acquisition. The deal talks are preliminary and there’s no certainty the two E&Ps will reach a deal, Reuters reported.

A deal between the companies could be valued at more than $11 billion, including the assumption of debt.

Experts, by and large, think a deal between the two natural gas players would make sense. Analysts at Truist Securities said the combination would create an E&P with advantaged positions in shale drilling efficiencies and gas transportation.

The merged company could also better compete in the LNG sector expanding along the Gulf Coast.

Both companies already offload a significant amount of their gas production into the Gulf Coast market. Earlier this year, Chesapeake inked a 15-year LNG supply agreement with Gunvor Group Ltd.; Chesapeake will source gas from the Haynesville Shale for liquefaction and delivery to Gunvor beginning in 2027.

“With LNG contract discussions remaining front and center for most gas-focused E&P companies, this potential deal would transform the pro forma company to become the best positioned name in the group, in our view,” Truist Securities analysts said in an Oct. 17 report.

The two companies also have synergies between their respective geographic footprints. Chesapeake and Southwestern are the only two publicly traded gas producers with production in both the Haynesville and the Marcellus Shale.

The E&Ps have “considerable acreage overlap” in the Haynesville and “some degree of adjacency” in Appalachia, Capital One Securities analysts said Oct. 17.

However, a combination between the two gas companies—and the subsequent concentration of power in the Appalachian market—might present some regulatory challenges.

Fellow Appalachian gas producer EQT Corp. had its $5.2 billion acquisition of Tug Hill Inc. and XcL Midstream entangled in regulatory red tape for months as the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) worked to resolve antitrust concerns.

The FTC resolved its review of the EQT-Tug Hill deal in mid-August, and the deal closed days later.

“We don't know the percentage of market share at which the FTC begins to draw a line in the sand, but we have heard that 35% is as good a guess as any,” Capital One Securities analysts said. “We also aren't sure what exactly constitutes a market. Is it by county, or by basin, or across the country?”

Though the deal could potentially face regulatory hurdles, Capital One’s initial analysis indicates the deal would likely get greenlit.

If the price is right

If a deal comes together, analysts think there’s a good chance it could be an all-stock transaction. That was the case with Exxon Mobil Corp.’s blockbuster deal to acquire Permian Basin giant Pioneer Natural Resources in an all-stock transaction valued at nearly $60 billion.

Chesapeake acquiring Southwestern for a roughly $11 billion purchase price, or about $7 per share of Southwestern stock, would imply little to no premium takeout compared to Southwestern’s closing price of $6.77 per share on Oct. 16.

Analysts said they wouldn’t be surprised to see a final price closer to between $7.50 and $8 per share of SWN stock.

Chesapeake’s market capitalization is currently about $12 billion, while Southwestern’s market cap is around $8 billion. A combined company would sit around $20 billion.

“Only eight companies in our coverage group are larger by market cap,” Capital One Securities analysts said in an analyst report. “Among gas-focused peers, only [Coterra] would be larger at ~$21.5 billion.”

Holding for gas glory

Gas producers have been exposed to severe price volatility in the past year or so. Natural gas prices skyrocketed in 2022 due to a confluence of geopolitical and macroeconomic factors like Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and rapidly rising demand as the globe emerged from the doldrums of the COVID-19 downturn.

Natural gas prices spiked to more than $9/MMBtu last summer, according to data from the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Gas E&Ps raised output and chased high prices accordingly.

But natural gas prices have collapsed dramatically since then, fueled by oversupply, weakening demand and higher-than-average levels of storage inventory.

Henry Hub natural gas prices are expected to average $2.61 in 2023—down nearly 60% from an average of $6.42 last year, the EIA laid out in its most recent forecast.

Throughout this period of low prices, gas producers have kept their eyes fixated on the proverbial light at the end of the tunnel: rising demand from Gulf Coast LNG developers.

Gas demand to fuel U.S. LNG exports is forecasted to grow by 17.4 Bcf/d between 2023 and 2030, according to East Daley Analytics data. Total peak LNG export capacity in 2022 was about 13.9 Bcf/d, EIA figures show.

It’s such a huge amount of demand growth, some of the nation’s most adept gas producers wonder where all of that gas is going to come from.

That significant uptick in demand is expected to deliver a major lift to natural gas prices in the years to come and higher natural gas prices could fuel more M&A by gas-focused E&Ps.

“While oil has dominated headlines lately on the back of geopolitical concerns and Exxon Mobil Corporation’s acquisition of [Pioneer] last week, we would not be surprised with an increase in M&A on the natural gas side given the visibility to improved prices from LNG demand in 2025+,” said Gabriele Sorbara, managing director of equity research at Siebert Williams Shank & Co.


RELATED

Rockcliff CEO on US LNG: ‘Where Is All This Gas Going to Come From?’