新型资产支持债券吸引页岩油行业远离银行贷款

斯科特·卡彭特 2022 年 10 月 28 日

(彭博社)“随着大银行减少对石油和天然气钻探商的贷款,一些美国能源公司正在依靠一种新型债券来获得所需的融资。 

这些债券由公司的石油和天然气储量支持,这意味着生产商实质上是用油井收入来换取预付现金。被称为“已证实的开发中生产”证券化的债务可以让页岩钻探商减少借款费用,以换取在能源价格上涨时放弃一些可能的收益。  

今年,各公司已出售或正在出售价值 40 亿美元的 PDP 证券化产品。根据惠誉评级的数据,这一数字高于过去三年的 14 亿美元总额。第一个此类债券于 2019 年出售。 

能源公司现在普遍削减借贷,因为它们现金充裕。彭博社汇编的数据显示,从 2018 年到 2021 年,石油和天然气公司的新增贷款下降了 30% 以上,今年有望再次下降。银行还面临来自 监管机构 和投资者的压力,要求其削减对这个因在繁荣时期过度支出而臭名昭著的行业的贷款。     

但许多能源公司仍然需要融资。总部位于科罗拉多州的乔纳能源公司 (Jonah Energy) 本月出售了价值 7.5 亿美元的 PDP 证券化产品,以约 2,400 口油气井(几乎是该公司拥有的所有油井)的收益权为支持。该钻探公司将为其PDP证券化支付约8%的收益率,平均期限为三年。 

相比之下,英国石油和天然气钻探公司 EnQuest Plc 本月以 12% 的收益率出售了无担保五年期债券。 

通过出售 PDP 证券化,乔纳成功地节省了大量资金,更令人印象深刻的是,就在几年前,该公司还无法偿还其债务。2020年,在疫情爆发初期,该公司 重组了 资产负债表,以削减债务、筹集股本并将公司大部分股权​​移交给一些前票据持有人。   

证券化还具有其他优势,尤其是在能源价格下跌时。一种常见的替代融资形式,即基于储备的贷款,也由公司的油井作为担保。通过这些贷款,银行每六个月就会估算支持贷款的石油和天然气井的价值。 

如果资产价值下降,公司就必须削减借款或提供更多抵押品。即使在价格上涨的景气时期,钻探商也可能看不到他们的借贷基础上升,这意味着企业可能无权借入更多资金。海恩斯和布恩律师事务所对储备贷款市场借款人和贷款人的调查显示  ,强劲的石油和天然气价格近期并未导致借贷基础增加。

通过 PDP 证券化,抵押品不会被重新估值。  

“这是一种更持久的资本来源,”惠誉董事总经理格雷格·卡班斯说。

 根据Jonah 总裁兼首席执行官汤姆·哈特 (Tom Hart) 的声明,Jonah 正在利用其证券化交易的收益为其现有的储备贷款再融资 。他表示,这笔交易“使我们拥有强大的资产负债表,可以抓住我们土地上拥有的重要钻探机会以及可能出现的战略机遇”。

但这些交易也有缺点。为了保护 PDP 证券化投资者的利益,出售这些债券的公司通常会进行衍生品交易,从而有效地在债券存续期内从资产中获得稳定的收入,并减少能源价格上涨带来的潜在收益。出售这些衍生品的银行承担石油和天然气价格下跌的风险,并从价格上涨中获益。华尔街公司可以使用期权和其他工具对冲风险。 

这些衍生品是埃克森美孚等大型综合性石油和天然气公司避免出售 PDP 证券的原因之一:他们不想放弃潜在收益。到目前为止,该领域主要由规模较小的私营公司主导,其中一些公司已经进行了多次证券化。其中包括专注于怀俄明州的天然气生产商 PureWest Energy 和总部位于丹佛的 Raisa Energy,后者在北美拥有和租赁石油资产。多元化能源公司(Diversified Energy)在阿巴拉契亚拥有一个 庞大的 油井帝国,目前已经完成了六口井的开发。  

除了来自监管机构的压力外,银行还面临 来自投资者的压力,要求银行 削减对从环境、社会或治理角度来看存在风险的业务的投资。 

Hunton Andrews Kurth 律师事务所合伙人 Michael O'eary 表示:“如今,下水银行愿意向上游石油和天然气行业提供贷款,部分原因是出于 ESG 和其他方面的考虑  。 PDP 证券化。 

原文链接/worldoil

Novel asset-backed bonds lure shale sector away from bank loans

Scott Carpenter October 28, 2022

(Bloomberg) — As big banks pull back on lending to oil and gas drillers, some U.S. energy companies are relying on a novel kind of bond to get the financing they need. 

The bonds are backed by the companies’ oil and gas reserves, meaning producers are essentially pledging income from their wells in exchange for up-front cash. The debt known as “proved developing producing” securitizations can allow shale drillers to pay less to borrow, in exchange for giving up some of their possible gains if energy prices rise.  

Companies this year have sold, or are in the middle of selling, $4 billion of PDP securitizations. That’s up from just $1.4 billion total over the previous three years, according to data from Fitch Ratings. The first such bond was sold in 2019. 

Energy companies are broadly cutting back on borrowing now because they are awash in cash. New loans to oil and gas firms fell more than 30% from 2018 to 2021 and are on track to fall again this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Banks have also been under pressure from regulators and investors to cut back on lending to an industry that is notorious for overspending during booms that get followed by busts.     

But many energy companies still need financing. Colorado-based Jonah Energy sold a $750 million PDP securitization this month, backed by the rights to proceeds from about 2,400 oil and gas wells -- virtually all the wells it owns. The driller will pay a yield of about 8% for its PDP securitization with an average life of three years. 

In contrast, UK-based oil and gas driller EnQuest Plc this month sold unsecured five-year bonds at a yield of 12%. 

By selling a PDP securitization, Jonah managed to garner substantial savings, all the more impressive because just a few years ago the company couldn’t pay its obligations. In 2020, during the early stage of the pandemic, the company restructured its balance sheet to cut its debt, raise equity and hand over a majority of the company to some former noteholders.   

The securitizations offer other advantages as well, most notably when energy prices drop. A common alternative form of financing, known as reserve-based loans, is also secured by a company’s wells. With these loans, every six months, banks estimate the value of the oil and gas wells backing the loan. 

If the assets have declined in value, companies have to cut their borrowings or offer more collateral. And even in good times, when prices are rising, drillers may not see their borrowing bases rise, meaning the corporations may not be entitled to borrow more. According to a survey of borrowers and lenders in the reserve-based loan market from Haynes and Boone, a law firm, strong oil and gas prices haven’t been resulting in borrowing base increases recently.

With PDP securitizations, collateral doesn’t get re-valued.  

“This is a more permanent source of capital,” said Greg Kabance, a managing director at Fitch.

Jonah is using the proceeds from its securitized deal to refinance its existing reserve-based loan, according to a statement from Tom Hart, Jonah’s president and CEO. The deal “positions us with a strong balance sheet to pursue the significant drilling opportunities that we have on our acreage and strategic opportunities that may come our way,” he said.

But there are downsides to these deals too. To protect investors in PDP securitizations, companies selling these bonds usually enter derivatives transactions that effectively give them steady income from the assets over the life of the bonds, and reduce their potential gains from energy price increases. The banks that sell these derivatives bear the risk of oil and gas prices falling and reap the benefits of prices rising. The Wall Street firms can hedge their exposure using options and other instruments. 

These derivatives are one reason why big, integrated oil and gas firms like Exxon Mobil Corp. have avoided selling PDP securities: they don’t want to give up their potential gains. So far, the space has been dominated mostly by smaller, private firms, some of which have done multiple securitizations. They include Wyoming-focused gas producer PureWest Energy and Denver-based Raisa Energy, which owns and leases oil assets across North America. Diversified Energy, the owner of a vast empire of wells in Appalachia, has completed six.  

In addition to pressure from regulators, banks have faced pressure from investors to cut exposure to businesses that are seen as risky from an environmental, social or governance perspective. 

“Fewer banks these days are willing to lend into the upstream oil and gas industry, in part of because of ESG and other concerns,” said Michael O’Leary, a partner at law firm Hunton Andrews Kurth, who has written about PDP securitizations.