2023 年 7 月
特别关注:二叠纪盆地技术

移动电力微电网满足高强度压裂的电力需求

远程电子压裂技术使运营商能够利用高且可变的功率负载来削减成本并减少排放。
Eric Guth / Profrac Services Geoff Bland / 生命周期电力

随着清洁燃烧、电动压裂船队的激增,如何为下一代技术提供最佳动力也面临着挑战。虽然从电网获取电力仍然是许多运营商的首要目标,但在电网发电能够有效处理多井压力泵所需的负载之前,必须克服许多重大障碍。  

这些负载的能耗可能是其他钻井和生产活动的 10 倍。从长远来看,在 10 井平台上运行 500 至 600 马力的电动潜水泵 (ESP) 总共可产生约 5 兆瓦 (MW) 的电力。与单个电动压裂装置所需的 22 兆瓦以上电力相比,这相形见绌,足以为大约 4,000 户家庭供电。  

电子压裂挑战。 完井活动通常位于电网限制的区域,例如二叠纪盆地,那里只有基本的基础设施。即使利用当地变电站是可行的,距离限制以及无法满足当代压裂作业所象征的高速率/高压和长分支井的更高功率需求,同时仍维持对其他项目的承诺公用事业客户限制了该选项的可行性。此外,处理压裂阶段开始和完成时产生的间歇性电力负载曲线提出了特别艰巨的挑战。   

双赢的解决方案。 在强大且易于部署的航改涡轮发电机发展的支持下,经过现场验证的解决方案以移动微电网的形式出现。它们可以实现远程压力泵送,并允许运营商充分利用电压裂的经济和环境效益,图 1。  

图 1. PowerPath 微电网布局,在二叠纪盆地的一个五平台项目上远程进行电力压裂操作。
图 1. PowerPath 微电网布局,在二叠纪盆地的一个五平台项目上远程进行电力压裂操作。

具体来说,拖车式天然气涡轮机直接安装在生产井上,现场天然气用于提供高达 35 MW 的铭牌电力容量。产生的电流通过专门安装的电源线流向在 3 英里或更远半径内运行的每个电力或电子压裂装置。一旦完井工作结束,生产人员接手,微电网和压裂装置就会迅速转移到另一个多平台位置重复该过程。值得注意的是,当涡轮机由滞留气体提供动力时,微电网是最有利的,这些滞留气体无法从压裂现场输送,否则会被燃烧,从而消除燃料成本,同时帮助推进运营商的脱碳目标。  

与传统的柴油压裂车队相比,现场数据显示,在二叠纪盆地的西德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州部署电动压裂技术时,使用井气可以为运营商节省超过 2500 万美元的总费用。每年的燃料成本,取决于所需的泵送马力和当前的商品定价,同时大幅减少温室气体排放。与 Tier II 柴油机队的比较分析表明,电动压裂扩散燃烧可能被引导至火炬烟囱的现场气体,能够将二氧化碳当量 (CO 2 e ) 排放量减少高达 60%,氮氧化物 (NO x ) 排放量减少 89 %和颗粒物高达94%,图2与 Tier II 柴油机队相比,在不使用火炬气时,CO 2 e 排放量仍减少 29%,而 NO x和颗粒物排放率保持不变。   

  

图 2. Clean Fleet 电子压裂装置与 Tier II 柴油机队在火炬和非火炬条件下二氧化碳当量 (CO2e )、氮氧化物 (NOx) 和颗粒物排放量的比较减少量。
图 2. Clean Fleet 电子压裂装置与 Tier II 柴油机队在火炬和非火炬条件下二氧化碳当量 (CO2e )、氮氧化物 (NOx) 和颗粒物排放量的比较减少量。

E-压裂演化。近十年前,电动压裂船队在非常规油气田的首次亮相可以比作交流动力钻机的突破性发展,但它的发展速度要快得多。由于柴油驱动抽油机的高运营成本和普遍的净零排放要求,自 2020 年以来电动压裂的出现成倍增加,成为整体油田电气化推动的关键要素。1,2,3,4       

电动压裂旨在取代全柴油压裂船队,每年可取代 1000 万加仑以上的燃料,5 即使商品价格大幅波动,这也是水力压裂作业总成本的重要组成部分。此外,电动压裂技术大大降低了柴油压裂技术的高温室气体排放率。具体来说,电子压裂技术通过用电动机和变频驱动器 (VFD) 取代传统压裂拖车中的发动机、变速箱以及相关的润滑油和过滤器,有效降低成本和排放,而变频驱动器通常通过燃气涡轮机接收电力。据估计,1 Mcf 天然气可替代约 8 加仑柴油。5    

2014 年,突破性的 Clean Fleet 电动压裂技术的推出伴随着一系列电缆、笨重的涡轮机和小型电动机,这些电动机的动力按照当今的标准来说都不足。这些早期机组需要不少于四台 5.7 兆瓦的涡轮机,这些涡轮机最初设计为一次在特定位置运行数月。因此,舰队复员和动员过程可能需要一周以上的时间。随后的几代人专注于冷凝设备,使分布更加灵活,以及旨在增加现代压力泵所需的马力和电力输出的举措。  

如今,最新一代的技术(图 3)配备了每个动力端 3,000 马力的电机、每个泵拖车一根电缆以及新一代超级移动发电装置,从而使车队能够在更短的时间内在泵站之间移动。超过 48 小时,并且能够在美国一些 HHP 最密集的环境中高效运行,包括高压特拉华州和海恩斯维尔页岩地区。与早期版本相比,最新一代电动压裂车队通过专门的快速部署系统安装,该系统消除了约 96 根电缆,并将变压器集成到泵拖车上,同时将泵送能力提高了 67%。 

图3.新一代清洁舰队在二叠纪盆地展开部署。
图3.新一代清洁舰队在二叠纪盆地展开部署。

此外,e-frac spread 具有自动将泵速率调整至 0.1 bpm 的固有能力,并消除了柴油压裂机组的恒定传输换档特性,从而实现更精确的控制,从而有助于提高压裂作业的质量。     

然而,电子压裂技术的稳步发展也带来了获得足够电力容量的难题。虽然依靠电力购买协议 (PPA) 下的公用事业发电似乎是一种理想的解决方案,因为变电站的设计旨在最大限度地减少浪费的热量和排放,但该选项要么无法产生足够的马力,要么无法处理与发电相关的间歇性负载曲线。电动压裂车队,特别是在更偏远的作业区域。6   安装永久性公用变电站在很大程度上成本高昂,但它也限制了设定点的运行范围,这同样会禁止使用滞留气体并随后消除可能在规定覆盖区域之外发生的火炬。   

新一代涡轮机。在更高强度的压裂项目和电动压裂的发展的交叉点上,涡轮机技术也取得了显着的进步,从功率容量较低的笨重、起重机安装的机器到铭牌容量高出七倍的便携式设备。特别是在过去的两年里,开发重点集中在移动性和功率密度上,使得拖车式涡轮机能够在几小时内启动和恢复,同时产生高达 35 MW 的电力,图4然而,实际消耗的燃料明显较少,因为所使用的气体由给定时间的电力负载决定,如图 5 所示此外,由于占地面积更小,便携式涡轮机需要更少的连接和现场人员,从而使拆卸和安装更安全、更快捷。  

图 4. 最新的拖车式涡轮机可产生高达 35 MW 的铭牌功率容量,用于远程压力泵送操作。
图 4. 最新的拖车式涡轮机可产生高达 35 MW 的铭牌功率容量,用于远程压力泵送操作。
图 5. 第八代移动涡轮机在各种电力负载下的天然气消耗量。
图 5. 第八代移动涡轮机在各种电力负载下的天然气消耗量。

这些新一代涡轮机设计用于使用未经处理的现场天然气运行,与其他天然气燃烧技术相比,可以接受各种质量的气体。在井气供应不太可能出现中断的情况下,最新的涡轮机还设计为利用其他碳氢化合物,例如压缩天然气和液化天然气(CNG/LNG),甚至 CNG-氢气混合物。在运行时,这些领先的套件具有接近零的甲烷泄漏,氮氧化物排放率低至 0.15g/bhp-hr(克每制动马力小时)。     

随着最近出现的同步压裂,高功率涡轮机的移动性和较低的占地面积也被证明是一个决定性的优势,而两口井同时增产,需要单次压裂以提供高达 60,000 hhp 的功率。为了在典型的同步压裂作业中产生以 10,500 psi 和 160 bpm 泵送所需的 40 MW 功率,可以将双 35 MW 涡轮机组并排放置在高效且功率密集的现场占地面积中。     

移动涡轮机技术的进步进一步推进了PowerPath微电网和相关技术,有效地实现了利用现场气体进行远程电力压裂,而无需依赖当地公用事业。此外,一旦便携式涡轮机和电子压裂装置移动到下一个位置,电力线可以保留在原位,并且电缆可以重新用于将电力传输到生产和相关设备。  

解决电力负载、现场噪音问题。模块化、获得多项专利的微电网系统通过能够通过专用电力线远程执行高强度压裂的发电和配电网络来满足高且不间断的电力需求。微电网布局包括许多相关技术,从现场降噪到解决电压裂的独特挑战,特别关注导致电力负载经常变化的内在压力和速率变化。 

众所周知,涡轮机在稳定的高负载下运行效率最高,如工业和发电厂所示,它们通常以最大容量的 98% 至 99% 恒定运行,而在不断波动的压裂条件下不可能维持负载率。在泵送压裂液的过程中,井口压力可能会在没有警告的情况下急剧上升或下降,需要不断修改 VFD 电机施加的扭矩,从而从涡轮机获取不断变化的功率负载。同样,泵送速率可以不断增加或减少。  

专门设计的开关设备(任何电网的核心技术)充当单个电气集线器,旨在同步一个或多个电源产生的电源,并将该电力分配给平台上的各个电气设备,包括任何正确安装的电气设备。辅助第三方设备。7专有开关设备能够通过电力线接受高达 60 MW 的电力,其配置可根据任何给定时间所需的电力负载实现涡轮机负载共享和优化。然后,该电力被输送至电动搅拌机和 3,000 马力 VFD 控制电机,驱动典型的新一代 Clean Fleet 撒布机上的 10 台压裂双泵机。    

除了通过对马力输出进行更多控制来执行压力泵送作业外,电动压裂机组本质上比柴油驱动的压裂机组安静得多,对于远离现场的同样安静的涡轮机来说更是如此。现场监测显示 Clean Fleet 地点的平均声压降低了 69%,低频噪声 (dBc) 降低了 95%。除了船员的安全和舒适之外,在城市范围和住宅区内作业时,降噪也至关重要,尤其是在宾夕法尼亚州、西弗吉尼亚州和俄亥俄州人口稠密的马塞勒斯-尤蒂卡页岩区等地区。     

微电网暴民,遣散程序。压裂前规划可确保架空电力线的尺寸适当,以满足明显更高的电力需求,同时电气工程师优化从生产井延伸的 2-3 英里电力线的布线,涡轮机将在生产井连接到生产井。分离的气体排出管线,到达目标垫。  

电线杆上的立管使电缆能够降低到地面并轻松连接到开关设备。从那里开始,安装和装配就相当简单,只需要很少的连接,通常需要不到 48 小时即可完成。涡轮机和相关设备的远程定位使得压裂扩散能够独立于微电网安装进行调动。当压裂扩散在同一微电网项目区域内流动时,车队部署到下一个压裂点的时间通常会缩短至不到 24 小时。  

在压力泵操作期间,涡轮机输出受到 24/7 的监控,供电数据直接转发给压裂人员。该操作可以包括多种应急选项,包括在发生任何燃料中断时临时供应 CNG 或 LNG,这通常不会造成重大问题。出于经济考虑,应急燃料很少使用。       

一旦活跃微电网区域的竣工计划完成,电力供应和涡轮机就会迅速断开并用卡车运送到下一个地点。特别是在西德克萨斯州等电网面临挑战的地区,需要电力增产设备,电线杆仍处于压裂后状态,可用于传输气源产生的电力,以驱动 ESP 和其他低功率油田设备。电线杆就位后,就可以简单地串接适当尺寸的电缆并引入能够为非压裂活动提供足够兆瓦电力的小型发电机。   

成本、排放领域回顾。在 PowerPath 项目开始时,每个客户都会收到专门设计的计算器。使他们能够对燃料消耗、成本以及排放量进行建模,并与在电动压裂施工相同条件下运行的 Tier IV 柴油机队进行直接比较。虽然燃料消耗随完工效率和马力要求而变化,但计算得出的估计显示,在增加了用于发电、燃气调节等的电子车队后,二叠纪盆地每年可节省高达 1700 万美元的净成本。这些数字假设柴油成本为 4.00 美元/加仑,现场天然气成本为 2.50 美元/Mcf。  

在二叠纪盆地更为成熟的米德兰次盆地,泵送压力平均为 7,500 至 8,500 psi,与柴油同类产品相比,Clean Fleet 压裂技术每年可节省超过 1100 万美元的完井成本。新墨西哥州东南部和德克萨斯州西部的特拉华次盆地的节省幅度更大,这些地区通常需要 10,500 至 11,500 psi 的较高泵压,每年潜在的净节省可能超过 1700 万美元。假设每年抽水 300 天,米德兰和特拉华州的节省分别为 35,000 美元/天和 51,700 美元/天。  

在米德兰市范围内的一个微电网、多垫压裂项目中,操作员在 30 天内净节省了 207 万美元,相当于每天节省 69,000 美元。该项目总共需要进行 532 级压裂,平均每日抽油时间为 19.4 小时,功率为 365,000 马力/小时,最大涡轮机功率为 20 兆瓦。同样,使用天然气运行电动车队可减少 2,073 吨 CO 2e排放。由于该地点位于城市范围内,运营商通常还面临噪音问题。然而,由于电动车队的安静特性,运营商能够减少噪音抑制租金和邻居投诉。  

在其他地方,在受到严格监管的 Marcellus 页岩油区,另一家运营商节省了 390 万美元的燃料成本,同时从大气中消除了 3,184 吨 CO 2e 。该项目在 60 天内总共包含 574 个阶段,平均每天抽水 18.4 小时,平均功率为 407,000 马力/小时/天,最大涡轮机功率为 19 兆瓦。此外,二叠纪和马塞勒斯地区已完成的电子压裂项目记录了大气中 CO 2 的平均吨减少量,范围为 20% 至 26%。  

参考 

  1. Jacobs, T.,“随着柴油价格下降,电动压裂船队在美国页岩油市场的份额从 3% 上升至 30%”,《石油技术杂志》,2020 年 5 月 11 日。 
  2. Cookson, C.,“压力泵开发了利用天然气运行的新方法”,《美国石油与天然气报道》, 2023 年 3 月。 
  3. 童志匡勇范春李涛王建李勇钱建,“页岩气回收的环保电动水力压裂:效率、经济性和现场应用程序”,于 2022 年 1 月在阿曼马斯喀特举行的 SPE 国际水力压裂技术会议暨展览会上发表。 
  4. S&P Global,“电力水力压裂的潜力”,S&P 博客,2019 年 9 月 11 日。  
  5. Cookson, C.,“现代压裂船队交付油井速度更快,消耗的燃料更少”,《美国石油和天然气报道》, 2023 年 1 月。  
  6. Rassenfoss , S.,“ATCE:电力为油田运营的未来提供动力”,《石油技术杂志》,2021 年 9 月 21 日。 
关于作者
埃里克·古斯
普罗压裂服务
Eric Guth 是 ProFrac Services LLC 的电子压裂产品线经理,他的主要职责是担任该公司 Clean Fleet 电动压裂技术的主题专家。他拥有超过九年的行业经验,其中包括在 ProFrac 于 2022 年 11 月收购的 US Well Services 工作了七年多的经验,在那里他通过现场职位晋升为区域经理,后来成为技术销售工程师。Guth 先生在宾夕法尼亚州庞克瑟托尼的 Universal Well Services 开始了他的油田职业生涯。他拥有宾夕法尼亚州立大学地球科学学士学位。
杰夫·布兰德
生命周期功率
Geoff Bland 是 Life Cycle Power 业务开发副总裁,专门负责公司的快速部署双燃料涡轮机技术计划。他于 2022 年 11 月加入 Life Cycle,担任工程和运营总监。在此之前,他在 Aggreko 任职超过 14 年,并晋升为电力和天然气产品经理。他此前曾分别在 Proven Energy 和 Dyson 担任高级机械设计工程师和设计工程师。Bland 先生拥有剑桥大学先进设计、制造和管理硕士学位以及格拉斯哥大学产品设计工程硕士学位。
相关文章 来自档案
原文链接/worldoil
July 2023
Special focus: Permian basin technology

Mobile electric microgrids address power demands of high-intensity fracing

Remote e-frac technology enables operators to wield high and variable power loads to slash costs and reduce emissions.
Eric Guth / Profrac Services Geoff Bland / Life Cycle Power

Concurrent with the proliferation of clean-burning, electric-driven frac fleets is the challenge of how to optimally power this next-generation technology. While accessing power from the grid remains among the top goals for many operators, a number of significant hurdles must be overcome before grid-generated electricity can effectively handle the loads required for multi-well pressure pumping.  

Those loads can be 10 times more power-intensive than other drilling and production activities. For perspective, running 500-to-600-hp electric submersible pumps (ESPs) on a 10-well pad pulls an aggregate of around 5 megawatts (MW) of electrical power. This is dwarfed by the 22-plus MW demanded of a single, electric frac spread, which is sufficient to power approximately 4,000 homes.  

E-frac challenge. Completion activity is often located in grid-restricted plays, such as the Permian basin, where  only basic infrastructure is in place. Even when tapping into a local substation is feasible, distance constraints—as well as the inability to meet the higher power demanded of the high-rate/high-pressure and long-lateral wells emblematic of contemporary frac jobs, while maintaining commitments to other utility customers—limit the viability of that option. Moreover, handling the intermittent power load profile that comes from starting and completing a frac stage poses a particularly daunting challenge.   

Win-win solution. Bolstered by the development of powerful and easily deployable aeroderivative turbine generators, a field-proven solution has emerged in the form of mobile microgrids. They enable remote pressure pumping and allow operators to fully capitalize on the economic and environmental benefits of electric fracing, Fig. 1 

Fig. 1. A PowerPath microgrid layout with electric fracing operations conducted remotely on a five-pad project in the Permian basin.
Fig. 1. A PowerPath microgrid layout with electric fracing operations conducted remotely on a five-pad project in the Permian basin.

Specifically, trailer-mounted natural gas-fired turbines are installed directly at producing wells, with the field gas used to deliver up to 35 MW of nameplate electrical capacity. The generated currents flow through specially installed power lines to each electric, or e-frac, spread operating within a 3-mi radius or more. Once the completions are wrapped up, and the production crews take over, the microgrids and frac spreads are quickly mobilized to another multi-pad location to repeat the process. Notably, the microgrids are most beneficial when the turbines are powered with stranded gas that could not be piped from the frac site and would otherwise be flared, thereby eliminating fuel costs while helping advance operators' decarbonization objectives.  

Compared to conventional diesel-fueled frac fleets, field-based data show that using well gas in the deployment of the electric fracing technology across the West Texas and New Mexico reaches of the Permian basin can save an operator more than $25 million, gross, in yearly fuel costs, depending on the pumping horsepower required and current commodity pricing, while substantially reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Comparative analysis with Tier II diesel fleets show that electric frac spreads burning field gas that likely would have been directed to flare stacks are capable of reducing carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e ) emissions up to 60%, nitrogen oxide (NOx) by 89% and particulate matter up to 94%, Fig. 2. When flared gas is not utilized, CO2e emissions are still reduced by 29%, while NOx and particulate emissions rates are unchanged, compared to a Tier II diesel fleet.   

  

Fig. 2. Comparative reductions in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e ), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter emissions between a Clean Fleet e-fracing spread and a Tier II diesel fleet in flaring and non-flaring conditions.
Fig. 2. Comparative reductions in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e ), nitrogen oxide (NOx) and particulate matter emissions between a Clean Fleet e-fracing spread and a Tier II diesel fleet in flaring and non-flaring conditions.

E-frac evolution. The debut of electric frac fleets in unconventional oil and gas fields nearly a decade ago can be likened to the groundbreaking development of AC-powered drilling rigs, but it has come at a much more accelerated pace. Precipitated by the high operating costs of loud, diesel-driven pumping units and universal, net-zero emission mandates, the appearance of electric fracing spreads has multiplied since 2020, to emerge as a key element in the overall oilfield electrification push.1,2,3,4       

Conceived to displace all-diesel frac fleets, electric-powered fracing displaces upwards of 10 million gal of fuel/yr,5 which, even with whipsawing commodity prices, represents a significant component in the total costs of a hydraulic fracing job. Furthermore, electric frac spreads slash the high greenhouse gas emission rates of their diesel-fueled counterparts. Specifically, e-frac technology effectively cuts costs and emissions by replacing the engine, transmission and associated lubes and filters in a conventional frac trailer with an electric motor and variable frequency drive (VFD), which typically receive power via gas-fueled turbines. It has been estimated that one Mcf of gas can displace around 8 gal of diesel.5    

The inauguration of the groundbreaking Clean Fleet electric frac technology in 2014 was accompanied by an array of cables, cumbersome turbines and small electric motors that were underpowered by today's standards. Those earlier-generation fleets required no less than four  5.7-MW turbines, which were originally designed to be in a specific location for months at a time. Accordingly, the fleet demobilization and mobilization process could take upwards of a week. Subsequent generations focused on condensing equipment, making the spreads more nimble, along with initiatives aimed at increasing the horsepower and electrical power output necessary for modern pressure pumping.  

Today, the newest generation technology (Fig. 3) is powered with 3,000-hhp motors per power end, a single power cable per pump trailer, and new-generation hyper mobile power generation units, thus enabling  the fleet to mobilize between pads in less than 48 hr and to perform efficiently in some of the most hhp-intensive environments in the U.S., including the high-pressure Delaware and Haynesville shale areas. Compared to earlier versions, the latest-generation electric frac fleets are installed through a specialized rapid deployment system that has eliminated some 96 cables and integrated the transformer onto the pump trailer, all while boosting pumping capabilities by 67%. 

Fig. 3. The new-generation Clean Fleet spread on location in the Permian basin.
Fig. 3. The new-generation Clean Fleet spread on location in the Permian basin.

Conjointly, the inherent capacity of an e-frac spread to automatically adjust pump rates down to 0.1 bpm and eliminate the constant transmission shifts characteristic of diesel frac fleets, enables more precise control, thus helping elevate the quality of the frac job.     

The steady advancement of e-frac technology, however, came with the formidable issue of accessing sufficient electrical capacity. While relying on utility-generated electricity under power purchase agreements (PPA) would appear an ideal solution, as substations are designed to minimize wasted heat and emissions, that option is either unavailable to generate sufficient horsepower or unable to handle the intermittent load profile associated with electric frac fleets, particularly in more remote operating areas.6   Installing a permanent utility substation is largely  cost-prohibitive, but it also restricts the operational reach from the set point, which likewise would prohibit the use of stranded gas and the subsequent elimination of flaring that may be occurring  outside the prescribed coverage area.   

New generation turbines. Meeting at the intersection of higher-intensity frac programs and the growth of electric frac spreads, turbine technology likewise has advanced significantly from cumbersome, crane-mounted machines with lower power capacity to portable packages with up to seven times higher nameplate capacity. Over the past two years especially, development has focused on mobility and power density, resulting in trailer-mounted turbines capable of mobilizing and demobilizing in a matter of hours while generating up to 35 MW of power, Fig. 4. The actual fuel consumed, however, is appreciably less, as the gas used is dictated by the electrical load at a given time, Fig.5. Furthermore, along with a smaller footprint, portable turbines require fewer connections and field personnel, making teardowns and installations safer and faster.  

Fig. 4. The latest trailer-mounted turbines generate up to 35 MW of nameplate power capacity for remote pressure pumping operations.
Fig. 4. The latest trailer-mounted turbines generate up to 35 MW of nameplate power capacity for remote pressure pumping operations.
Fig. 5. The natural gas consumption of a Gen 8 mobile turbine under various electrical power loads.
Fig. 5. The natural gas consumption of a Gen 8 mobile turbine under various electrical power loads.

These new-generation turbines are engineered to run on untreated field gas and can accept a wide range of gas qualities compared to other natural gas-burning technologies. In an unlikely disruption of well gas supply, the latest turbines are also engineered to utilize other hydrocarbons, such as compressed and liquefied natural gas (CNG/LNG) and even CNG-hydrogen blends. While in operation, these leading-edge packages have near-zero methane slip, with NOx emission rates as low as 0.15g/bhp-hr (grams per brake-horsepower hour).     

The mobility and lower footprint of high-power turbines have also proved to be a decided advantage with the more recent emergence of simul-fracs, whereas two wells are stimulated simultaneously, requiring a single frac spread to deliver up to 60,000 hhp. To generate the 40 MW needed to pump at 10,500 psi and 160 bpm in a typical simul-frac job, dual 35-MW turbine packages can be placed side-by-side in an efficient and power-dense onsite footprint.     

The advancements in mobile turbine technology further advanced the PowerPath microgrid and associated technologies, effectively enabling remote electric fracing with field gas without having to depend on local utilities. Moreover, once the portable turbines and e-frac spreads are moved to the next location, the power lines can remain in place and the cables repurposed to transmit power to production and associated equipment.  

Addressing power loads, site noise. The modular, multi-patented microgrid system meets the high and undisrupted power demand by way of an electrical generation and distribution network capable of remotely executing high-intensity fracing through fit-for-purpose power lines. The microgrid layout   comprises a number of associated technologies that range from on-site noise dampening to addressing the unique challenges of electric fracing, with particular attention directed to intrinsic pressure and rate variations that lead to oft-changing power loads. 

It is common knowledge that turbines operate most efficiently under unwavering high loads, as illustrated in industrial and power plants, where they typically run at a constant 98% to 99% of maximum capacity—a load rate impossible to sustain in ever-fluctuating fracing conditions. Over the course of pumping frac fluid, wellhead pressures can spike or drop precipitously without warning, requiring constant modification of the torque applied from VFD motors, thus drawing ever changing power loads from the turbines. Pumping rates, likewise, can constantly increase or decrease.  

A specially engineered switchgear—a core technology in any electrical network—acts as a single electrical hub designed to synchronize power supply generated from one or more sources and distribute that power to the various pieces of electric equipment on the pad, including any properly installed  ancillary third-party gear.7 Capable of accepting up to 60 MW of  electricity through the power lines, the proprietary switchgear is configured to enable turbine load sharing and optimization, depending on the power loads required at any given time. This power is then fed to the electric blenders and 3,000-hhp VFD-controlled electrical motors driving the 10 frac double pumpers on a typical new-generation Clean Fleet spread.    

Apart from executing the pressure pumping exercise with more control over the horsepower output, electric-driven frac fleets are intrinsically much quieter than diesel-powered spreads, even more so with the similarly quiet turbines located remotely from the site. Field monitoring has shown a 69% reduction in average sound pressure at a Clean Fleet location and a 95% reduction in low-frequency noise (dBc). Along with crew safety and comfort, noise reduction is critical when operating within city limits and residential areas, even more so in areas like the populous Marcellus-Utica shale play in Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio.     

Microgrid mob, demob procedure. Pre-frac planning ensures the overhead power lines are properly sized to meet the significantly higher power demand, while electrical engineers optimize routing for the 2-3 mi of power lines that will run from the producing well, where the turbines will be connected to the separated gas off-take line, to the targeted pad(s).  

Riser drops on the power poles enable the cables to be lowered to the ground and easily connected to the switchgear. From there, installation and rig-up is rather straightforward, requiring few connections and normally taking less than 48 hr to complete. The remote positioning of the turbine and associated equipment enables the frac spreads to be mobilized independently of the microgrid installation. When the frac spread is mobilizing within the same microgrid project area, the fleet deployment time to the next pad is often reduced to less than 24 hr.  

During the pressure pumping operation, turbine output is monitored 24/7, with data on the power supplied forwarded directly to the frac crew. The operation can include multiple contingency options, including provisional CNG or LNG supplies in the event of any fuel disruptions, which typically do not pose a significant concern. Owing to economic considerations, the fuel contingencies are seldom used.       

Once the completions program is completed for the active microgrid region, the electric spreads and turbines are quickly disconnected and trucked to the next location. Especially in grid-challenged areas like West Texas, where electric production boosting equipment is required, the power poles remain post-frac and available to transfer power generated from the gas source to drive ESPs and other lower-power oilfield equipment. With the poles in place, it is a simple matter to string properly sized cables and bring in smaller generators capable of delivering sufficient megawatts of power for non-fracing activities.   

Costs, emissions field recaps. At the onset of a PowerPath project, each client receives specially designed calculators. enabling them to model fuel consumption and costs, and emissions outputs, with direct comparisons to Tier IV diesel fleets operating under the same conditions as the electric-driven frac spreads. While fuel consumption varies with completion efficiency and horsepower requirements, calculated estimates show annual net savings of up to $17 million in the Permian basin, after e-fleet adders to cover power generation, gas conditioning and the like. These numbers assume diesel costs of $4.00/gal and field gas costs of $2.50/Mcf.  

In the Permian's more mature Midland sub-basin, where pumping pressures average 7,500 to 8,500 psi, Clean Fleet frac spreads can shave more than $11 million/yr off of completions costs, compared to their diesel counterparts. The savings are even greater in the Delaware sub-basin of southeastern New Mexico and far West Texas, which typically requires higher pumping pressures of 10,500 to 11,500 psi, where potential net savings can exceed $17 million/yr. Assuming 300 pumping days/yr, the Midland and Delaware savings break down to $35,000/day and $51,700/day, respectively.  

In one microgrid, multi-pad frac program within the city limits of Midland, an operator saved a net $2.070 million in a 30-day period, translating to  $69,000/day savings. The project entailed a cumulative 532 fraced stages, averaging 19.4 daily pumping hours at 365,000 hp-hr/day, pulling 20 MW of maximum turbine power. Running the electric fleet on natural gas, likewise, cut 2,073 metric tons of CO2e emissions. Owing to the location being within city limits, the operator also normally struggled with noise concerns. However, with the quiet nature of the electric fleet, the operator was able to reduce noise abatement rentals and neighbor complaints.  

Elsewhere, in the tightly regulated Marcellus shale play, another operator saved $3.9 million in fuel costs, while removing 3,184 metric tons of  CO2e from the atmosphere. That project encompassed a total of 574 stages over 60 days, averaging 18.4 pumping hours/day at an average 407,000 hp/hr/day and maximum turbine power of 19 MW. Moreover, completed e-frac projects in both the Permian and Marcellus regions documented averaged metric ton reductions in atmospheric CO2 , ranging from 20% to 26%.  

REFERENCES 

  1. Jacobs, T., "Electric frac fleets rise from 3% to 30% of U.S. shale market amid diesel drop," Journal of Petroleum Technology, May 11, 2020. 
  2. Cookson, C., "Pressure pumpers develop new ways to run on natural gas," American Oil & Gas Reporter, March 2023. 
  3. Tong, Z., Y. Kuang, C. Fan, T. Li, J. Wang, Y. Li, J. Qian, "Eco-friendly, electric-powered hydraulic fracturing towards shale-gas recovery: Efficiency, economics and field application,” presented at the SPE International Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference & Exhibition, Muscat, Oman, January 2022. 
  4. S&P Global, "The potential of electric fracking," S&P blog, Sept. 11,2019.  
  5. Cookson, C., "Modern frac fleets deliver wells faster and consume less fuel," American Oil and Gas Reporter, January 2023.  
  6. Rassenfoss, S., "ATCE: Electric power charges the future of oilfield operations," Journal of Petroleum Technology, Sept. 21, 2021. 
About the Authors
Eric Guth
Profrac Services
Eric Guth is e-frac product line manager for ProFrac Services LLC, where his primary responsibility is serving as subject matter expert for the company's Clean Fleet electric fracing technologies. He has more than nine years of industry experience, including more than seven years at U.S. Well Services, which ProFrac acquired in November 2022, where he moved up through field roles to become a district manager and later technical sales engineer. Mr. Guth began his oilfield career with Universal Well Services in Punxsutawney, Pa. He holds a BS degree in geoscience from Penn State University.
Geoff Bland
Life Cycle Power
Geoff Bland is V.P. of business development for Life Cycle Power, where he specializes in the company's rapidly deployable dual-fuel turbine technology initiatives. He joined Life Cycle in November 2022 as director of engineering and operations, after a more-than-14-year tenure at Aggreko, where he rose to the position of product manager of power and natural gas. He previously worked as a senior mechanical design engineer and design engineer at Proven Energy and Dyson, respectively. Mr. Bland holds a MPhil degree in advanced design, manufacture and management from the University of Cambridge and a MEng degree in product design engineering from the University of Glasgow.
Related Articles FROM THE ARCHIVE