“太多”参与者:油田服务感受到二叠纪并购危机——阿拉斯联邦

第二季度达拉斯联储能源调查显示,在历史性的勘探与生产整合之后,二叠纪的油田服务和设备供应商正在竞相吸引数量不断减少的上游客户。

二叠纪盆地的油田服务和设备供应商正在相互竞争,以吸引越来越少的勘探与生产客户。

根据6月26日发布的第二季度达拉斯联储能源调查结果,历史性的上游整合已对下游产生了广泛的影响——从油田服务到能源行业就业,再到未来美国产量增长的前景。

生产商的整合在美国最大的产油区——产量丰富的二叠纪盆地最为明显。

埃克森美孚 于 5 月初完成了以 600 亿美元收购米德兰盆地巨头先锋自然资源公司的交易。

与此同时,Diamondback EnergyOccidental Petroleum正在努力完成对Endeavor Energy ResourcesCrownRock LP的收购。这两笔交易都面临美国联邦贸易委员会 (FTC) 的监管审查。

康菲石油公司马拉松石油公司的合作也将整合大片二叠纪油田

许多最活跃、最出色的美国运营商在不到一年的时间内就被抢购一空,为这些运营商提供服务的油田公司正感受到压力。

一位油田服务高管在接受达拉斯联储调查时表示,“石油和天然气运营商的整合正在挤压所有服务供应过剩的供应商市场,这将需要供应商群体的整合或大规模破产,以调整市场规模。”

服务业的同行们也强烈表达了同样的担忧。

另一位高管写道:“太多的设备供应商在争夺太少的 E&P 客户。如果服务或设备供应商之间不进行整合,就会出现价格竞争。”

该高管继续说道,“联邦贸易委员会继续批准这些合并令人意外,并最终将损害二叠纪盆地。”

看到了形势的严峻,一些大型油田服务公司已经开始合并。

今年4月,国际服务巨头SLB宣布以77亿美元的全股票收购ChampionX

去年, Patterson-UTINexTier Oilfield Solutions合并,合并价值达 54 亿美元。

在海上服务领域,Noble Corp.以 16 亿美元收购了Diamond Offshore Drilling 。

达拉斯联储第二季度的调查涵盖了来自德克萨斯州、新墨西哥州南部和路易斯安那州北部的 138 家能源公司的回复。调查回复收集于 6 月 12 日至 6 月 20 日之间。


有关的

Patterson-UTI 为勘探与生产业务整合后的活动“起因”做好准备


生产影响

油田服务业者确信一件事:上游整合将给他们带来麻烦。但调查受访者不确定勘探与生产整合将如何影响美国石油和天然气生产的长期发展。

 达拉斯联储表示,如果未来五年勘探与生产行业整合持续有增无减,48%的受访者表示美国石油产量将“略有下降”。

约 22% 的受访者表示,持续整合不会产生“影响”,而另有 22% 的受访者认为产出将“略有增长”。

整合似乎对小型生产商的影响更大,而不是大型生产商。所有日产量在 10 万桶或以上的勘探与生产公司的高管都表示,行业整合不会对美国石油和天然气产量预测产生“影响”。

规模效益在二叠纪盆地也得到了体现,这里的运营商已经度过了长期的天然气价格低迷期。

西德克萨斯州瓦哈天然气交易中心的现货价格频繁跌至负值区域。

二叠纪盆地的天然气价格非常低,以至于大多数大型勘探与生产公司都没有将天然气价格或经济因素考虑在其钻探计划中。

在拥有二叠纪业务的大型勘探与生产公司中,58% 的受访者表示,瓦哈枢纽天然气价格低廉不会对他们今年的二叠纪钻井和完井计划产生影响;33% 的受访者表示,会产生轻微的负面影响,而 8% 的受访者表示,会产生重大负面影响。

在日产量为 10,000 桶或更少的小型勘探与生产公司中,50% 的公司报告称,较低的 Waha 天然气价格将对其钻探计划产生轻微的负面影响;31% 的公司报告称没有影响,而 19% 的公司报告称产生了显著的负面影响。


有关的

达拉斯联储能源调查:二叠纪盆地盈亏平衡成本上升

原文链接/HartEnergy

‘Too Many’ Players: Oilfield Services Feel Permian M&A Crunch—Dallas Fed

After a historic run of E&P consolidation, oilfield services and equipment providers in the Permian are competing to woo a dwindling number of upstream customers, according to the second-quarter Dallas Fed Energy Survey.

Oilfield services and equipment providers in the Permian Basin are competing against one another to woo a dwindling number of E&P customers.

According to the second-quarter Dallas Fed Energy Survey published June 26, a historic run of upstream consolidation has had broad downstream effects—from oilfield services to energy industry employment to the outlook for future U.S. production growth.

Consolidation by producers has been most evident in the prolific Permian Basin, the nation’s top oil-producing region.

Exxon Mobil closed a $60 billion acquisition of Midland Basin giant Pioneer Natural Resources in early May.

Meanwhile, Diamondback Energy and Occidental Petroleum are working to close their own respective acquisitions of Endeavor Energy Resources and CrownRock LP. Both deals are facing regulatory scrutiny by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC).

A tie-up between ConocoPhillips and Marathon Oil will also consolidate huge swathes of Permian acreage.

Many of the most active and prodigious U.S. operators have gotten snapped up in less than a year, and the oilfield players that serviced those operators are feeling the pressure.

“Oil and gas operator consolidation is squeezing an over-supplied vendor market for all services, which will require consolidation or extensive bankruptcy in the vendor pool to rightsize the market,” one oilfield services executive said in response to the Dallas Fed’s survey.

Those concerns were echoed loudly by services industry peers.

“Too many equipment providers are chasing too few E&P customers,” another executive wrote. “Without consolidation within service or equipment providers, it will be a race to the bottom for pricing.”

“The continued approval of these mergers by the [FTC] is surprising and will ultimately harm the Permian Basin,” the executive continued.

Seeing the writing on the wall, a handful of large oilfield services players have started to merge.

In April, international services giant SLB announced a $7.7 billion all-stock acquisition of ChampionX.

Patterson-UTI and NexTier Oilfield Solutions combined last year in a merger valued at $5.4 billion.

In the offshore services space, Noble Corp. is scooping up Diamond Offshore Drilling for $1.6 billion.

The Dallas Fed’s second-quarter survey included responses from 138 energy firms across Texas, southern New Mexico and northern Louisiana. Survey responses were collected between June 12 and June 20.


RELATED

Patterson-UTI Braces for Activity ‘Pause’ After E&P Consolidations


Production impact

Oilfield services players are sure about one thing: upstream consolidation spells trouble for their neck of the woods. But survey respondents are uncertain how E&P consolidation will impact U.S. oil and gas production over the long term.

 If E&P industry consolidation were to continue unabated for the next five years, 48% of respondents said that U.S. oil production would be “slightly lower,” according to the Dallas Fed.

Around 22% reported there would be “no impact” from the continued consolidation, while another 22% believe output would be “slightly higher.”

Consolidation seems to be weighing more on the small producers, rather than the big players. All executives from E&P firms producing 100,000 bbl/d or more said there would be “no impact” to U.S. oil and gas production forecasts due to industry consolidation.

The benefits of scale are also being brought to bear in the Permian, where operators have weathered a prolonged period of depressed natural gas prices.

Spot prices at the West Texas Waha gas trading hub have frequently dipped into negative territory.

Natural gas prices are so low in the Permian that most large E&Ps don’t factor natural gas pricing or economics into their drilling plans.

Among the large E&Ps with Permian presences, 58% of respondents reported that low Waha hub gas prices would have no impact on their Permian drilling and completion plans this year; 33% said it would have a slightly negative impact, while 8% said it would have significant negative impacts.

Among small E&Ps—producing 10,000 bbl/d or fewer—50% reported that low Waha gas prices would have a slightly negative impact on their drilling plans; 31% reported no impact, while 19% reported a significantly negative impact.


RELATED

Dallas Fed Energy Survey: Permian Basin Breakeven Costs Moving Up