Hillebrand:Deep Utica 是“舞会上最火辣的约会对象”

Huntley & Huntley 在 Deep Utica 的生产成果让 E&P 夸耀其“新热点”,可以与 Marcellus 的最佳产量相媲美。


宾夕法尼亚州 E&P Huntley & Huntley 公司首席执行官迈克·希勒布兰德 (Mike Hillebrand) 表示,Deep Utica 正在巩固其作为阿巴拉契亚盆地新热点的声誉。

在全国或全球范围内,她可能尚未引起轰动,但在同一个学区,“每个人都想带她去参加舞会”,他在哈特能源DUG 阿巴拉契亚会议与博览会上告诉特约执行主编尼莎·达邦 (Nissa Darbonne) 。

希勒布兰德表示,亨特利和亨特利公司在尤蒂卡深层油井的开采成果可与马塞勒斯油井的开采成果相媲美。

“他们被震撼了。”


有关的

宾夕法尼亚州深尤蒂卡韦尔斯“吸烟”马塞勒斯 ROR


该公司在寻找深尤蒂卡地区钻探的正确方案时,尝试了“各种科学方法”。这些成果提升了勘探与生产公司作为一家小型运营商的竞争力。

随着该地区的核心库存被消耗殆尽,以及诸如母子干涉等问题成为焦点,像 Huntley & Huntley 这样的 E&P 公司正在适应削减成本和寻找资源。

在这次独家采访中,希勒布兰德深入探讨了尤蒂卡深处以及亨特利和亨特利在阿巴拉契亚保持竞争力所采用的策略。

哈特能源公司执行特约编辑妮莎·达邦尼 (Nissa Darbonne):大家好,感谢您接受我们的采访。我是哈特能源公司执行特约编辑妮莎·达邦尼 (Nissa Darbonne),今天我采访的是迈克·希尔布兰德 (Mike Hillebrand)。迈克是总部位于阿巴拉契亚的亨特利和亨特利公司 (Huntley & Huntley) 的首席执行官。他们最近以 18 亿美元的价格将旗下的奥林巴斯能源公司 (Olympus Energy)出售给了EQT 。

我们正在匹兹堡的DUG Appalachia拜访 Mike。Mike ,谢谢你加入我们。

MH:谢谢。

ND:今天上午早些时候的会议上,很多与会者对Deep Utica油田很感兴趣。所以,Olympus Energy在出售给EQT之前,已经钻了一些Deep Utica油井。能跟大家讲讲你的经验吗?

MH:嗯,我要感谢CNX 公司。他们把这个项目放在我们这片区域,也就是匹兹堡以北而不是以南的地方。在此之前,不仅是 2014 年的第一口 Gaut 井,之后 CNX 还在尤蒂卡钻了几口深井,这需要一个学习的过程。这不像钻 Marcellus 盐层那么容易。那里有很厚的盐层,钻井难度很大。但在他们来到我们匹兹堡东北部这片区域(我们称之为走廊)之前,一直到克利尔菲尔德县东北部,“尤蒂卡深层”项目已经在俄亥俄州开展了。在尤蒂卡更深的地层,也就是深度 105 到 14,000 英尺的地方,华盛顿格林县的几家公司都曾涉足其中。除了钻穿盐层的困难之外,还有一个曲线类型不一致的问题。因此,当 CNX 进军城市北部并钻出第一口井时,每个人都持怀疑态度。

CNX 坚定信心,继续水平钻探,并取得了相当惊人的成果。接下来的问题是,成本很高。这种做法可以重复吗?第一次钻探会得到假阴性结果吗?或者在南部的一些地区,他们钻了一个不好的井,然后又钻了一个好的井。所以,在资源勘探中,你必须拥有一致的典型曲线。因此,CNX 坚定信心,继续在尤蒂卡地区进行更多钻探,证明了典型曲线的一致性,并通过钻探的学习曲线证明了成本可以降低。因此,我们紧邻他们约 9,000 英亩的勘探区,而我们拥有 100,000 英亩的勘探区,并且在租赁谈判中拥有所有权利。所以我们决定效仿我们的兄弟公司 CNX,抓住机会,我们都是 Marcellus,我们会问:我们是否能在相同的面积、相同的井场、相同的收集系统上建立一个叠层勘探区,以测试尤蒂卡的深层勘探。在 1919 年,我们做到了。我们投入了各种科学研究,拥有最长的核心部分,一切仍然紧密,我们投入了所能想到的每一点科学研究来匹配我们的“我们对那个深度也有非常好的 3D 覆盖,比马塞勒斯还要多”。

所以从第一个井开始我们就学到了很多技术知识。我们的井非常模仿 CNX 的做法。在与 EQT 合作进行 Exodus 项目时,我们完成了五口井的钻探,最后两口都是 15,000 英尺深,这在当时创下了管道输送和完井的记录。所以大约有 14 口井在生产,Deep Utica 井的生产数据显示,产量曲线非常一致,为 30 亿立方英尺到 35 亿立方英尺/千英尺,压力梯度非常高——就像 Haynesville 一样——压力允许你在将压力从我们所说的 12,500 或 13,000 磅降至 1,000 磅时,拥有非常平稳的流态。我们每天的井流量达到 2000 万到 2500 万立方英尺,持续了一年多。

因此,我们最后的15,000英尺油井,我们一直在降低成本——目标是每英尺1,850美元到1,880美元左右,并有望降至每英尺1,650美元。任何低于每英尺2,000美元的价格都非常经济。与奥林巴斯竞争的是最后一处未开发的一级油井马塞勒斯(Marcellus),其储量为每千立方英尺30多亿立方英尺。我们在马塞勒斯油井中铺设了非常长的水平段,使其经济性与10,000英尺的Deep Utica油井并驾齐驱。我们被我们最好的马塞勒斯油井惊艳到了。

所以在游戏初期,但作为遍布全国的核心位置,从东北部到宾夕法尼亚州西南部,从马塞勒斯到海恩斯维尔以及其他地区,都预留了来自二叠纪的伴生气。我看到的早期数据表明,纯干气占主导地位,而德克萨斯州东部和海恩斯维尔博西尔的大型油井则面临非常非常困难的钻井环境。15,000英尺到16,000英尺的井底压力高于300华氏度。从贝克休斯到斯伦贝谢Max,所有导向工具的温度都在280华氏度到300华氏度之间,而我们的温度正好在280华氏度。因此,在目前的导向技术下,我们不会像德克萨斯州东部那样造成爆炸。因此,他们的油井成本因压力升高而飙升。但高压也存在同样的现象。干气意味着在一段时间内产量曲线持平。我想说,除非出现新的工具来与东德克萨斯州、路易斯安那州海恩斯维尔的核心地区竞争,否则没有一个钻井点能在3.5美元的天然气到井口价格下运作。如果没有液化天然气的供应,要想让路易斯安那州蓬勃发展,就必须实现这一点。但在我们这片区域,我们以1.5美元的天然气到井口价格获得了令人难以置信的双倍内部收益率,这比我们马塞勒斯在尤蒂卡深层油田的内部收益率高得多。

所以这是一件新鲜事。很少有人知道,但就在同一学区,人们都在谈论新的约会对象,每个人都想带她去参加舞会。这就是“尤蒂卡深处”(Deep Utica)。但我认为,无论是在全国还是全球,还没有太多人知道​​“尤蒂卡深处”正在发生的事情。

ND:好吧,说到每个人都想参加舞会,今天上午的会议上还有一位与会者问道,考虑到所有的整合,不仅在阿巴拉契亚山脉,而且在整个美国本土 48 个州,特别是在阿巴拉契亚山脉,中型、小型运营商如何在那里竞争?

MH:我们有一年运行着两座钻井平台,一个压裂小组,但实际上只有一座钻井平台和一支压裂小组。我们的资本支出每年约为4亿美元。这耗费了我们所有的资源,包括大量的石油和天然气,你懂的,故事的结局就是这样,但也有一些艰难的时期,比如“我们的游轮还能撑住吗?”,但我们最终还是朝着自由现金流的方向发展。债务最终会偿还,但那是资本雄厚的故事。在我们刚进入的时候,我们能够做到我们想做的事情。现在,各个参与者的立场都大致相同。整合对于拓展这类业务很有意义,对于新进入者来说,如果你考虑页岩气和水平开发,你将不得不远离已经在开发的领域,这意味着新的领域和新的风险。

就马塞勒斯而言,从宾夕法尼亚州东北部到西南部,马塞勒斯拥有一系列的矿区,其基础设施、数据等一切都已具备低成本长壁开采的条件。你所看到的常识性现象是,从西南部到阿姆斯特朗县,再从东北部延伸到卡尔曼县和中心县,马塞勒斯的矿区将逐渐向低层矿区扩张。由于基础设施和测试的互联互通,这两个地区将逐渐发展。没有人会直接跳到中间地带,铺设一条50英里长的管道,到达一个州际公路,由于马塞勒斯两大枢纽的协同效应,他们无法与那里的矿区竞争。所以我认为你会看到低层矿区的自然增长,新区域的出现以及现代技术对如何完井、在哪里着陆以及如何在长壁开采理念下运作的理解,将自然而然地从西南部发展,并从西北部或东北部回流到马塞勒斯。

其他走廊,比如海恩斯维尔走廊,基本上都已经钻探了核心井。我们走廊内的“父子”问题是个大问题,但没人愿意谈论。海恩斯维尔走廊肯定是更长的水平井,你一代一代地钻探,3000英尺、6000英尺、12000英尺,现在又钻探到26000英尺。你在第一代井旁边的排水沟里作业。当你从山脚回到山上时,这种影响会波及到已经枯竭的第一代井、曾祖父母井,一直到孩子出生的父母井。所以最终可能会是,我继续在同样的基础设施、同样的钻井平台和同样的地点开采未开发的资源,而这会损害前几代人投资的资本。现在技术正在研究马蹄铁,我能否通过马蹄铁转弯来绕过这些东西,从而避免出现大的亲子问题?

所以这些核心就是核心。每个核心都有相同的情况,最终窗口都会出现在新的空间。所以对于像我们这样的公司来说,我们必须进入新的领域,思考长壁开采。但我们也处于核心地位,我认为我们已经失去了一代半的长壁开采人才,而石油地质学家,我爱我们的年轻人,他们是我们的未来,但他们身处一个不了解石油和天然气的世界,25岁就参加社交俱乐部,开着路虎赚大钱,有时候你需要审视一下自己的简历,确保自己能够维持生计,因为这个行业有高潮也有低谷,而这些东西很快就会枯竭。

我对我们这个行业感到担忧的一点是,水平钻头技术进步如此之快,而长壁采矿工业工程师们又该做什么呢?不再有勘探思维了,再也没有了。

因此,对于拥有传统资产的公司来说,长壁开采之所以能对华尔街和更大的公司有利,是因为它们能够将巨额资本投入使用,并以长壁开采的思维方式获得预期的增长和丰厚回报。这些公司不会像你们那样,一年只钻10口或20口井。我宁愿整天钻毫达西致密砂岩,也不愿整天钻纳达西长壁开采页岩。如果岩石的渗透率比我高1000倍,就能让我以真正的勘探思维完成10口或20口井的开采计划。我会整天钻探,就像把一列法国火车推到一根稻草上,在全国各地寻找像我们公司这样的地块。而我们正致力于做到这一点。

ND:太棒了。谢谢你,Mike。

MH:谢谢。

ND:感谢您的收看。敬请关注,获取更多切实可行的能源情报。

评论

添加新评论

本次对话将根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客服团队。

原文链接/HartEnergy

Hillebrand: Deep Utica is the ‘New Hot Date to the Prom’

Huntley & Huntley’s production results in the Deep Utica have the E&P bragging about its “new hot date” rivaling the best in the Marcellus.


The Deep Utica is cementing its reputation as the new hot date of the Appalachian Basin, said Mike Hillebrand, CEO of Pennsylvania-based E&P Huntley & Huntley.

Nationally or globally she might not have yet exploded onto the scene, but in the same school district, “everyone wants to take her to the prom,” he told Nissa Darbonne, executive editor-at-large, at Hart Energy’s DUG Appalachia Conference & Expo.

The results of Huntley & Huntley’s wells in the Deep Utica rivaled its best in the Marcellus, Hillebrand said.

“We were blown away.”


RELATED

Pennsylvania’s Deep Utica Wells ‘Smoking’ Marcellus RORs


The company tried out “all kinds of science” when figuring out the right formula to drill in the Deep Utica. The results boosted the E&P’s competitiveness as a smaller operator.

As core inventory in the region gets eaten up and issues like parent-child interference are brought to the forefront, E&Ps like Huntley & Huntley are adapting to cut costs and find resource.

Hillebrand dives deeper into the Deep Utica and the strategies Huntley & Huntley uses to remain competitive in Appalachia in this exclusive interview.

Nissa Darbonne, executive editor-at-large, Hart Energy: Hi, thank you for joining us. I'm Nissa Darbonne, executive editor-at-large for Hart Energy, and I'm visiting today with Mike Hillebrand. Mike is CEO of Appalachian-based Huntley & Huntley. They recently sold their Olympus Energy to EQT for $1.8 billion.

We're visiting with Mike here at DUG Appalachia in Pittsburgh. Mike, thanks for joining us.

MH: Thank you.

ND: In the session earlier this morning in the conference, there was a lot of attendee interest in the Deep Utica. So Olympus Energy, before selling to EQT, had drilled some Deep Utica wells. Tell everyone what was your experience?

MH: Well, I want to thank CNX. They initiated it in our neck of the woods, kind of north of Pittsburgh versus south of Pittsburgh. And prior to, not just the first Gaut well in ‘14, but then subsequent to that, CNX had drilled several deep Utica wells, and there's a learning curve. It's not as easy as drilling the Marcellus. There's a very thick salt section that applies some drilling challenges. But prior to them coming to our neck of the woods of northeast of Pittsburgh, call it corridor, up to northeast Clearfield County, the Deep Utica have been happening in Ohio. In the deeper Utica, call it ten-five to 14,000 feet was dabbled by several companies in Washington, Greene County. And beyond the difficulties of drilling through that salt, there was a problem of an inconsistent type curve. And so when CNX stepped it to north of the city, they drilled the first well, everybody was pretty skeptical.

CNX kept the faith and drilled it horizontal and got a pretty incredible result. The question then was, okay, costs are high. Is this repeatable? Are you going to get a false negative on the first one? Or in some cases south, they've drill a bad one and then offset and get a good one. And so in a resource play, you have to have consistent type curves. And so CNX kept the faith and kept drilling additional Utica and proved that the type curve was consistent and proved through their learning curve of the drilling that the cost could come down. And so we were right next door to their about 9,000-acre play with our a 100,000-acre play and had all rights in our leasing negotiations. So we decided to follow our brother company, CNX, and take the chance, well we were all Marcellus, that: Do we have a stack play on our same acreage, same pads, same gathering system to test the deep Utica. In ‘19, we did that. Threw all kinds of science at it, have the longest core section, all still tight, every bit of science that we could come up with we threw at it to match our … we had very good 3D coverage of that depth as well, more than the Marcellus.

So learned a lot technically on the very first one. And ours mimicked very much what CNX was doing. At the time of Exodus with EQT, we had five drilled and the last two were both 15,000 footers, which were both the record at that time for getting piped down and completing. And so there's about 14 producing, enough production data Deep Utica wells to show very consistent type curves of 3 [Bcf] to 3.5 Bcf per thousand, with a very, very high pressure gradient that—like the Haynesville, it's very much like the Haynesville—pressure allows you to have a very flat flow regime while you bring that pressure from, we call it 12,500, 13,000 pounds down to 1,000 pounds. And we're getting wells flowing 20 [million], 25 million a day, every day, for over a year.

And so our last 15,000 footers, we were bringing the cost way—the goals were around $1,850 to $1,880 a foot with line of sight of getting down to $1,650 a foot. And anything below $2,000 a foot was highly economic. Competing with … Olympus had the last Tier 1 of undeveloped Marcellus of 3-plus Bcf per thousand. And we were running very long laterals in our Marcellus and putting them economically side by side of 10,000-foot Deep Utica. And we were blown away, our best Marcellus.

And so early in the game, but as core positions throughout the country of northeast, number one Marcellus to southwest Pennsylvania, Marcellus to the Haynesville and others, set aside associated gas from the Permian. Pure dry gas plays for the early numbers that I see, while bigger wells in East Texas and the deep Haynesville Bossier there, very, very difficult drilling environment. You have 15,000-foot to 16,000-ft bottom hole pressure is higher than 300 Fahrenheit. All of the steering tools from Baker Hughes to Schlumberger Max at 280 [F], 300 [F], we are right at 280 [F]. And so within the current technology of steering, we're not blowing things up like they are in east Texas. So their well costs are through the roof for higher pressure. But the same phenomenon is high pressure. And dry gas means a flat production profile for some period of time. And I would say unless new tools come about to compete with East Texas, Haynesville, the core of Haynesville in Louisiana, there's not a drill site, one that won't work under $3.50 gas to the wellhead. And without LNG coming, that's going to have to happen to fire up Louisiana. But our neck of the woods, we were in netting $1.50 gas price to the wellhead and getting incredible, double, what our Marcellus was on internal rates of return in the Deep Utica.

So it's a new thing. Very few people know about it, yet it's kind of in base and same school district, people are talking about the new hot date, and everyone wants to take her to the prom. And so that's the Deep Utica. But I don't think nationally or globally yet too many people know about what's happening in the Deep Utica.

ND: Well, speaking of everyone wanting to go to the prom, an attendee also asked in the conference this morning, considering all of the consolidation, not just in Appalachia but across the Lower 48, but in  Appalachia in particular, how does a mid-size, a small-size operator compete out there?

MH: We had two rigs running one year, one frac crew, but one rig, one frac crew. Our capex was around $400 million a year. It took us everything we had and a lot of oil and gas, you got the ending story, but there were ugly periods of time of ‘will our cruise ship even make it?’ But we built it up heading towards free cash flow. Debt was going to be paid down, but that's a story of big capital. And at the time of our entrance, we were able to do what we did. Now positions are fairly sandbox-identified from one player to the next. And consolidation makes sense to expand those kind of things that a new entrant, if you're thinking shale play and horizontal development, you're going to have to step away from the corridors that are already in development, which means new areas and new risk.

And in the case of the Marcellus, there's a whole sequence of Marcellus from northeast Pennsylvania to southwest, that infrastructure, data, everything's in place for low-cost longwall mining, that the common sense thing that you're seeing is expand into lower UR-per-thousand Marcellus from the southwest going into Armstrong County, coming from the northeast, backing into Cullman County, Centre County. And those two will slowly advance because of connecting to infrastructure and testing. Nobody's going to jump right into the middle where they got to run a 50-mile pipeline to get to an interstate someplace where they can't compete due to the synergies of the two big hubs of Marcellus. So I think you're just going to see a natural growth into lower UR, new areas and modern technology understandings of how to complete, where to land and just how to function under longwall mining mentality, will just be a natural growth from the southwest and a natural reversion from the northwest or northeast in the Marcellus.

Other corridors are, the Haynesville is pretty much, the core is drilled. And parent-child problems within our own corridors are big problems that nobody really likes to talk about. The Haynesville for sure, longer laterals, you're going by generations of 3,000-footers, 6,000-footers, 12,000-footers to now do a 26,000 footer. You're running in French drains beside first generation other wells. And as you come back from toe to hill, that impact is felt on the depleted first, the great grandparents all the way down to the parents of where the children are being born. So there could be an end game to, I'm reaching further out on untapped resource acreage going by same infrastructure, same drill pads, same sites to the detriment of the capital invested in the early generations. And the technology's now looking at horseshoes, and can I go around this stuff in a horseshoe turn to where I don't have big parent-child problems?

So those cores are the cores. And every core has its same situation that eventually the windows are going to be in new spaces. And so for a company like ours, we got to step into new areas and think longwall mining. But we're also at core, I think we've lost a generation and a half of longwall mining to where petroleum geologists, and I love our youth, they're our future, but they're in a world that they don't understand oil and gas of in social clubs and range rovers at 25 years old and making big money, that there are times where look at your resume and make sure you can sustain yourself because this industry has highs and lows to where those things dry up at a heartbeat.

And one of the fears I have within our industry is there's so much advancement in the horizontal drill bit and what to do dedicated to this longwall mining industrial engineer. No more exploration thought, no more.

And so for companies that have conventional assets, what makes longwall mining work for Wall Street and for bigger companies is the ability to put big capital to work and get expected growth and big returns in a longwall mining mentality. Those companies won't function on ten wells or 20 wells a year where you have, I'll take millidarcy tight sands over nanodarcy longwall mining shale all day long. Give me a 1,000 to 1 advantage in permeability in a rock that can give me a 10-well or 20-well program with real exploration mindsets. I'll take that all day long, advancing a French train over a straw in areas across the country for spaces like our company. And we're aiming to do that.

ND: Super. Thank you, Mike.

MH: Thank you.

ND: And thank you for joining us. Stay tuned here for more actionable energy intelligence.

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.