加速恢复

深度学习技术优化碳捕集、利用与封存项目中的封存和石油生产

图 1'不同 WAG 乘数场景下不同领域的效率得分。
图 1'不同 WAG 乘数场景下不同领域的效率得分。
来源:SPE 227168。

在二氧化碳驱油(CO₂ EOR)项目中,水气交替(WAG)工艺的优化对于最大化石油采收率和碳封存效率至关重要。由于设计空间庞大且不确定性高,传统的基于仿真模型的优化方法较为繁琐。本研究应用深度学习模型——时间融合变换器(TFT),利用来自六个传统CO₂ EOR项目的现场数据,对一系列WAG方案下的石油产量和CO₂封存效率进行多元预测

介绍

本研究提出了一种新颖的数据驱动框架,利用时间分辨力(TFT)预测二叠纪盆地六个传统二氧化碳驱油(EOR)油田未来12个月的二氧化碳注入量增量石油产量:东真空油田(EV)、丹佛单元(DU)、沃森圣安德烈斯油田(WSA)、塞米诺尔圣安德烈斯单元(SSAU)、斯卡里地区峡谷礁运营商(SACROC)单元和兰格利韦伯砂岩油田(RWS)。选择这些油田的原因是它们拥有较长的生产历史、公开数据以及多样化的作业特性。生产和注入数据均从历史出版物和技术论文中数字化,并经过预处理以分离出二氧化碳注入引起的增量石油产量变化对于每个油田,使用指数递减曲线外推注水趋势以估计基线性能;差异归因于二氧化碳注入的响应。

为了评估短期作业策略,我们通过改变气水比(GWR)为每个油田创建了五种不同的水气交替(WAG)方案。这些方案被输入到TFT模型中,该模型基于历史数据进行训练,并用于预测月度石油和二氧化碳产量

SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
继续阅读,了解 SPE 会员资格
SPE会员:请在页面顶部登录以访问此会员专属内容。如果您还不是会员,但觉得JPT的内容很有价值,我们鼓励您加入SPE会员社区,以获得完整访问权限。
原文链接/JPT
Enhanced recovery

Deep-Learning Technique Optimizes Sequestration, Oil Production in CCUS Projects

Fig. 1—Efficiency scores for different fields in different WAG-multiplier scenarios.
Fig. 1—Efficiency scores for different fields in different WAG-multiplier scenarios.
Source: SPE 227168.

Optimization of water-alternating-gas (WAG) processes is critical for maximizing both oil recovery and carbon-sequestration efficiency in CO2 enhanced oil recovery (EOR) projects. Conventional optimization using simulation models can be cumbersome because of the vast design space and high uncertainty. In this study, a deep-learning model, the temporal fusion transformer (TFT), is applied for multivariate forecasting of oil production and CO2-sequestration efficiency across a range of WAG scenarios using field data from six legacy CO2 EOR projects.

Introduction

In this study, a novel, data-driven framework is presented that leverages TFT to forecast 12 months of CO2 and incremental oil production across six legacy CO2 EOR fields in the Permian Basin: East Vacuum (EV), Denver Unit (DU), Wasson San Andres (WSA), Seminole San Andres Unit (SSAU), Scurry Area Canyon Reef Operators (SACROC) Unit, and Rangely Weber Sand (RWS). These fields were selected because of their long production histories, public data availability, and diverse operational characteristics. Production and injection data were digitized from historical publications and technical papers and preprocessed to isolate the incremental oil response to CO2. For each field, the waterflood trend was extrapolated using an exponential decline curve to estimate baseline performance; the difference was attributed to CO2 injection response.

To evaluate short-term operational strategies, five different WAG scenarios were created per field by varying the gas/water ratio (GWR). These scenarios were input into the TFT model, which was trained on historical data and used to forecast monthly oil and CO2 production.

×
SPE_logo_CMYK_trans_sm.png
Continue Reading with SPE Membership
SPE Members: Please sign in at the top of the page for access to this member-exclusive content. If you are not a member and you find JPT content valuable, we encourage you to become a part of the SPE member community to gain full access.