达拉斯联储能源调查:二叠纪盆地盈亏平衡成本上升

根据达拉斯联储第一季度能源调查,美国最热门石油行业的盈亏平衡成本继续上升,但原油生产商仍在赚钱。对于天然气生产商来说,情况更为严峻。

达拉斯联储首先带来了坏消息:二叠纪盆地的盈亏平衡价格继续上涨。

好消息是,在当前的油价环境下,几乎每个人都在赚钱。

达拉斯联邦储备银行第一季度能源调查显示,美国生产商需要平均 64 美元/桶的 WTI 价格才能有利地钻探新井,该调查衡量了德克萨斯州、新墨西哥州南部和路易斯安那州北部约 200 家石油和天然气公司的情绪。

这高于一年前达拉斯联邦储备银行上次向行业高管提出问题时所需的 62 美元/桶 WTI 平均价格。

不同盆地的钻井成本和盈亏平衡水平各不相同。在美国最大的原油产区二叠纪地区,平均价格为 65 美元/桶,同比增长 4 美元/桶。

即使在二叠纪盆地的不同地区,盈亏平衡价格也有所不同。米德兰盆地的成本最低,盈亏平衡价格平均为 62 美元/桶。

二叠纪特拉华盆地的盈亏平衡价格上涨(WTI 平均价格为 64 美元/桶),该盆地从德克萨斯州西部延伸到新墨西哥州东南部。

在二叠纪盆地的其他地区(中央盆地平台和该区域的延伸、边缘部分),价格重新调整,平均利润达到 70 美元/桶。

在钻探有利可图的油井时,规模也很重要。原油产量为 10,000 桶/日或以上的大型生产商需要平均 58 美元/桶的 WTI 价格进行钻探。

原油产量低于 10,000 桶/天的小型生产商需要平均 67 美元/桶的 WTI 价格才能实现经济钻探。

但达拉斯联储报告称,由于调查期间 WTI 现货价格平均为 82.52 美元/桶,“调查中的几乎所有公司都可以以当前价格钻探新井并盈利”。

对资产负债表和库存深度的规模需求正在推动美国上游领域的火热交易市场。

成本相对较低的米德兰盆地吸引了大大小小的勘探与生产企业的大量关注。埃克森美孚以 645 亿美元收购先锋自然资源公司 (Pioneer Natural Resources) 将成为米德兰盆地最大的土地所有者和石油生产商之一。

另外两家主要的米德兰生产商最近也被抢购一空:Endeavour Energy Resources 被Diamondback Energy 以 260 亿美元收购,而 CrownRock LP 则被Occidental Petroleum 以 120 亿美元分拆

达拉斯联邦储备银行高级商业经济学家库纳尔·帕特尔 (Kunal Patel) 在 3 月 27 日的媒体吹风会上表示,“大型和小型公司之间的盈亏平衡差异可能凸显了油田规模经济的好处,因为它允许更连续的面积头寸”以及更好地与服务公司和供应商协商价格的能力。”


有关的

ONEOK首席执行官:提高二叠纪液化天然气产能“打造竞争优势”


气满了

石油生产商仍在大宗商品价格的健康区间内努力钻探新油井并从中获利。但美国所有天然气勘探与生产企业的情况并非如此。

调查受访者继续对美国天然气生产商当前的低价周期感到遗憾。

在调查收集期间,亨利中心现货价格平均为 1.44 美元/MMBtu。根据美国能源情报署的数据,2 月份亨利中心平均价格为 1.72 美元/MMBtu,经通胀调整后创下历史新低。

存储库存供应过剩和美国各地相对温和的冬季天气导致价格低迷。但价格持续走低的另一个主要原因是与钻探油井相关的天然气量创历史新高(通常称为伴生气)。

天然气领域面临的挑战促使运营商重新考虑如何分配支出。

“原油市场继续保持建设性,”一位匿名调查受访者评论道。 “我们减少了天然气投资组合的资本投资,增加了石油投资组合的资本投资。”

“天然气目前的定价等于或低于生产成本,”另一位受访者表示。

但生产商继续看好未来的天然气宏观:调查受访者预计到 2024 年底亨利中心价格平均为 2.59 美元/MMBtu。两年后,生产商预计现货价格为 3.18 美元/MMBtu。


有关的

EIA:天然气价格持续走低归咎于伴生气量


暂停以表示担忧?

拜登政府一月下旬暂停对美国新液化天然气出口终端进行认证的举动引起了一些调查受访者的谴责。其他生产商和分析师并不那么担心暂停对长期液化天然气市场的影响。

“由于需求、供应和大宗商品定价都可能发生变化,因此很难预测未来几年液化天然气出口暂停的影响,”一位受访者表示。

但调查受访者普遍谴责了他们认为的政府在选举年的“正当信号”和“放荡”。

达拉斯联储表示,暂停可能会对未来国内天然气生产产生更广泛的影响。

在主要关注天然气生产的勘探与生产受访者中,48% 预计其公司五年后的天然气产量将略低于宣布暂停之前的预期。

另外 24% 的人预计其天然气产量将显着低于暂停前的预期,而 24% 的人预计暂停不会产生影响。

拜登暂停液化天然气展望 达拉斯联储
达拉斯联储调查的近一半以天然气为导向的勘探与生产公司预计,五年后他们公司的天然气产量将略低于拜登政府宣布“天然气暂停”之前的预期。(来源:达拉斯联储能源调查)

美国能源部长詹妮弗·格兰霍姆本月早些时候在标准普尔全球会议 CERAWeek 上发表讲话,表示暂停认证“将在一年后成为过去”。

一位受访者表示:“我们对液化天然气暂停问题的无影响答案是假设暂停在明年内解除。” “随着更长的暂停或未来的禁令,我们预计会对美国天然气定价产生负面影响。”


有关的

CERAWeek:能源部长在行业强烈抗议中为液化天然气暂停辩护

原文链接/hartenergy

Dallas Fed Energy Survey: Permian Basin Breakeven Costs Moving Up

Breakeven costs in America’s hottest oil play continue to rise, but crude producers are still making money, according to the first-quarter Dallas Fed Energy Survey. The situation is more dire for natural gas producers.

The Dallas Fed led with the bad news first: breakeven prices to profitably drill in the Permian Basin continue to rise.

The good news is nearly everyone is making money in the current oil price environment.

U.S. producers need an average $64/bbl WTI price to profitably drill new wells, according to the Dallas Fed’s first-quarter energy survey, which measures the sentiments of around 200 oil and gas firms across Texas, southern New Mexico and northern Louisiana.

That’s up from an average $62/bbl WTI price needed a year ago when the Dallas Fed last posed the question to industry executives.

Drilling costs and breakeven levels vary across basins. In the Permian—the nation’s top crude oil-producing region—breakeven prices average $65/bbl, an increase of $4/bbl year over year.

And breakeven prices vary even within different parts of the Permian itself. Costs are lowest in the Midland Basin, where breakeven prices average $62/bbl.

Breakeven prices move up in the Permian’s Delaware Basin ($64/bbl WTI average), which extends from West Texas into southeastern New Mexico.

In other areas of the Permian—the Central Basin Platform and extensional, fringier parts of the play—breakeven prices to turn a profit average $70/bbl.

Scale also matters when it comes to drilling profitable wells. Larger producers, with crude oil output of 10,000 bbl/d or more, required an average $58/bbl WTI price to drill.

Smaller producers that fall below 10,000 bbl/d of crude output need an average $67/bbl WTI price to economically drill.

But with WTI spot prices averaging $82.52/bbl during the survey period, “almost all firms in the survey can profitably drill a new well at current prices,” the Dallas Fed reported.

The need for scale, both on the balance sheet and in inventory depth, is fueling a red-hot dealmaking market in the U.S. upstream space.

The relatively low-cost Midland Basin is attracting huge amounts of attention from E&Ps large and small. Exxon Mobil’s $64.5 billion acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources will yield one of the largest landowners and oil producers in the Midland Basin.

Two other major Midland producers were also recently snapped up: Endeavor Energy Resources was acquired by Diamondback Energy for $26 billion, while CrownRock LP was carved out by Occidental Petroleum for $12 billion.

“The difference in the breakevens between large and small firms potentially highlights the benefits of economies of scale in the oilfield,” Dallas Fed Senior Business Economist Kunal Patel said in a March 27 media briefing, “as it allows more contiguous acreage positions and the ability to better negotiate rates with service firms and suppliers.”


RELATED

ONEOK CEO: ‘Huge Competitive Advantage’ to Upping Permian NGL Capacity


Gassed up

Oil producers are still working within a healthy band of commodity prices to profitably drill new wells. The same can’t be said for all U.S. natural gas E&Ps.

Survey respondents continued to lament the current cycle of low prices befalling U.S. natural gas producers.

Henry Hub spot prices averaged $1.44/MMBtu during the survey collection period. February’s Henry Hub average of $1.72/MMBtu was an inflation-adjusted record low, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

Oversupplied storage inventories and relatively mild winter weather across the U.S. have contributed to the depressed prices. But another major culprit for the sticky low prices is record-high volumes of gas associated with drilling oil wells—often referred to as associated gas.

The challenges facing the natural gas space have operators rethinking where they allocate their spending.

“Crude oil markets have continued to be constructive,” one anonymous survey respondent commented. “We have decreased capital investments in our natural gas portfolio and increased capital investments in our oil portfolio.”

“Natural gas is currently pricing at or below costs of production,” another respondent said.

But producers continue to be bullish on the future gas macro: Survey respondents expect Henry Hub prices to average $2.59/MMBtu by the end of 2024. Two years from now, producers expect spot prices of $3.18/MMBtu.


RELATED

EIA: Blame Associated Gas Volumes for Sticky Low NatGas Prices


Pause for concern?

The Biden administration’s move in late January to pause certification of new U.S. LNG export terminals drew condemnation from some survey respondents. Other producers and analysts aren’t so worried about the effect of the pause on the long-term LNG market.

“The LNG export pause effect is difficult to forecast several years into the future as both demand, supply and commodity pricing can all change,” one respondent said.

But survey respondents generally blasted what they view as “virtue signaling” and “pandering” by the administration during an election year.

And the pause could have broader implications on future domestic gas production, according to the Dallas Fed.

Among E&P respondents primarily focused on gas production, 48% expect their firm’s gas output five years from now to be slightly lower than their expectations before the pause was announced.

Another 24% expect their gas production to be significantly lower than their pre-pause expectations, while 24% expect no impact from the pause.

Biden LNG Pause Outlook Dallas Fed
Nearly half of gas-directed E&Ps surveyed by the Dallas Fed expect their firm’s gas output five years from now to be slightly lower than their expectations before the Biden administration’s “LNG pause” was announced. (Source: Dallas Fed Energy Survey)

U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm, speaking during the CERAWeek by S&P Global conference earlier this month, suggested the certification pause “will be well in the rearview mirror” a year from now.

“Our no-impact answer to the LNG pause question assumes that the pause is lifted within the next year,” a respondent said. “With a longer pause or a future ban, we would expect a negative impact to U.S. natural gas pricing.”


RELATED

CERAWeek: Energy Secretary Defends LNG Pause Amid Industry Outcry