石油价格


哈马斯周末袭击以色列后,周一战争溢价重返石油市场,这场袭击颠覆了世界上最重要的石油出口地区中东的地缘政治格局,并埋葬了即将到来的战争的希望。沙特与以色列的和解可能会缓解紧张的石油市场。

哈马斯袭击使中东战争溢价重返石油市场 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:石油价格

周六哈马斯袭击事件发生之际,包括大型石油生产国阿联酋(阿联酋)在内的几个中东国家刚刚开始与以色列实现关系正常化。据报道,美国政府还在致力于实现沙特与以色列关系正常化。

周五,《华尔街日报》 报道称 ,由于自愿减产,世界最大原油出口国沙特阿拉伯可能愿意在明年初提高石油产量,目前产量约为每天 900 万桶 (bpd)如果油价太高,将增加 100 万桶/日的产量,以赢得美国国会的善意。如果达成一项可能的协议,沙特阿拉伯将承认以色列,以换取与美国达成防务协议。

周六和接下来的几天,很明显,协议可能会胎死腹中,而油价的地缘政治风险再次集中在中东。

哈马斯的袭击打破了该地区的相对平静,沙特阿拉伯和伊朗 恢复了外交关系 ,阿联酋和伊朗也改善了关系,分析人士认为这是该地区紧张局势缓和的迹象。

袭击发生后,以色列 向哈马斯宣战 ,并开始对周六哈马斯武装分子入侵其领土进行报复。

分析人士将密切关注以色列是否公开指责伊朗直接或间接参与袭击,以及冲突是否会从以色列和加沙地带蔓延到更广泛的中东地区。

“这不亚于以色列的 9/11,”欧亚集团总裁伊恩·布雷默 (Ian Bremmer)  周六表示。

接下来会发生的事情可能包括“该地区的战争(可能会扩大)、大量平民伤亡,以及以色列与沙特的协议(即将完成)现已结束,”布雷默补充道。

哈马斯袭击发生后,沙特阿拉伯 呼吁 “立即停止双方之间的升级,保护平民并保持克制。”但它也“回顾了其对爆炸危险的多次警告”继续占领、剥夺巴勒斯坦人民的合法权利以及一再有系统地挑衅其神圣性,导致局势恶化。”

分析人士表示,局势可能得到遏制,但现在所有的目光都将集中在伊朗身上。

“到目前为止,没有迹象表明伊朗和真主党计划加入。以色列银行前副行长、现任特拉维夫大学经济学名誉教授兹维·埃克斯坦 (Zvi Eckstein) 告诉CNBC,“只要情况确实如此,全球影响就有限” 

 分析师称,由于美国制裁力度减弱,伊朗石油供应 近几个月来一直在增加,但可能会再次开始萎缩。

ING大宗商品策略主管沃伦·帕特森 (Warren Patterson) 表示 ,“美国采取较为温和的态度可能是出于对能源价格上涨的担忧。” 然而,如果伊朗与这些袭击有直接或间接的联系,美国就很难维持这一立场。”

ING 表示,如果这些制裁的执行更加严格,可能会导致至少 50 万桶/日的石油供应损失,这将消除目前预计的 2024 年石油供应过剩。

受欢迎的对冲基金经理皮埃尔·安杜兰德表示,哈马斯的袭击“最终可能会对供应和价格产生影响” 

“市场最终将不得不请求更多的沙特供应,但我相信,在布伦特原油价格低于 110 美元时,这种情况不会发生,”他补充道。

由于伊朗也是哈马斯袭击以色列的幕后黑手,美国政府很有可能开始对伊朗石油出口实施更严格的制裁。这将进一步收紧石油市场,”Andurand 周六在 X 上写道。

“而且这导致与伊朗发生直接冲突的可能性也不为零。”

 

作者:Oilprice.com 的 Tsvetana Paraskova


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


War premium returned to the oil market on Monday after the weekend attack by Hamas on Israel, which upended—again—the geopolitical landscape in the world’s most important oil-exporting region, the Middle East, and buried hopes of an imminent Saudi-Israel rapprochement that could ease the tight oil market.

Hamas attack brings Middle East war premium back to oil markets- oil and gas 360

Source: Oil Price

The Hamas attack on Saturday took place just as several Middle Eastern countries, including the large oil producer the United Arab Emirates (UAE), had started to normalize relations with Israel. The U.S. Administration was also reportedly working on a Saudi-Israel normalization in relations.

On Friday, The Wall Street Journal reported that Saudi Arabia, the world’s top crude oil exporter, could be willing to raise early next year its oil production— currently at around 9 million barrels per day (bpd) due to a voluntary cut of 1 million bpd—if oil prices are too high, to win goodwill at U.S. Congress. A possible agreement would have led to Saudi Arabia recognizing Israel in exchange for a defense deal with the United States.

On Saturday and the following days, it became clear that a deal could be dead in the water and that the geopolitical risks to oil prices were once again focused on the Middle East.

The Hamas attack breached the relative calmness in the region which has seen Saudi Arabia and Iran restore diplomatic relations and the UAE and Iran improving relations in what analysts believed to be a sign of de-escalation of the tensions in the region.

After the attacks, Israel declared war on Hamas and began to retaliate for the Saturday incursions of Hamas fighters on its territory.

Analysts will be closely watching if Israel publicly blames Iran for direct or indirect involvement in the attacks, and if the conflict will spread from Israel and the Gaza Strip to the wider Middle Eastern region.

“This is no less than Israel’s 9/11,” Ian Bremmer, the president of Eurasia Group, said on Saturday.

What would happen next could include “War in the region (which could expand), massive civilian casualties, and the Israeli-Saudi deal (which was close to getting done) is now over,” Bremmer added.

In the wake of the Hamas attack, Saudi Arabia called for “an immediate halt to the escalation between the two sides, the protection of civilians, and restraint.” But it also “recalls its repeated warnings of the dangers of the explosion of the situation as a result of the continuation of the occupation, the deprivation of the Palestinian people of their legitimate rights, and the repetition of systematic provocations against its sanctities.”

The situation could be contained, but all eyes would be now on Iran, analysts say.

“So far there is no sign that Iran and Hezbollah plan to join. As long as this is the case the global impact is limited,” Zvi Eckstein, former deputy governor at the Bank of Israel and currently emeritus professor of economics at Tel Aviv University, told CNBC.

Oil supply from Iran, which has been rising in recent months due to weaker enforcement of the U.S. sanctions, could begin to shrink again, analysts say.

According to Warren Patterson, Head of Commodities Strategy at ING, “The softer approach from the US is likely due to concern over rising energy prices. However, it would be difficult to see the US maintaining this stance if Iran is connected to these attacks, whether directly or indirectly.”

If the enforcement of these sanctions becomes stricter, it could lead to a potential loss of at least 500,000 bpd of oil supply, which would wipe out the currently anticipated surplus for 2024, according to ING.

The Hamas attack “could eventually have an impact on supply and prices,” popular hedge fund manager Pierre Andurand said.

“The market will eventually have to beg for more Saudi supply, which I believe, will not happen sub $110 Brent,” he added.

“As Iran is also behind Hamas’ attacks on Israel, there is a good probability that the US administration will start enforcing those sanctions on Iranian oil exports more tightly. That would further tighten the oil market,” Andurand wrote on X on Saturday.

“Also the probability that this will lead to direct conflict with Iran is not zero.”

 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com