石油价格


受严格的资本纪律和盈利改善的吸引,投资者正在重返石油和天然气领域。石油行业的债务和股票市场融资正在增加,至少在美国是这样。尽管如此,全球对新供应的长期投资不足正在损害未来的能源安全。

遵守纪律的石油和天然气公司成功赢回投资者 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:路透社

英国《金融时报》最近的一项 分析 显示,美国小型石油和天然气公司已经成功赢回了股票和债券市场投资者的信任。石油价格水平可能是部分原因,但根据顾问和法律顾问的说法,更重要的部分是对资本纪律的新关注,正如行业所证明的那样。

由于这种关注,债务和股票投资者似乎已经放心,烧钱的日子已经一去不复返了。这一趋势也包括油田服务提供商,近年来,对于他们来说,筹款部门尤其具有挑战性。

“公司确实非常关注股东回报,”皮克林能源合作伙伴董事总经理乔什·马丁告诉英国《金融时报》。“他们非常有纪律,他们通过支付股息和回购股票来做出正确的决定。这正在赢得投资者重返该行业。”

这一趋势似乎表明 ESG 投资也并非那么普遍。今年,专注于低碳能源的投资基金创纪录的资金外流进一步强化了这一建议。今年上半年,这些基金流入了 34 亿美元,但由于公司业绩疲弱和外部挑战,仅第三季度就流出了 14 亿美元。

那么,投资界正在发生的事情是,虽然投资者正在抛售石油和天然气的竞争对手,但许多人又回到了同样的石油和天然气领域,以在油价可能很快达到每桶 100 美元的地缘政治背景下享受稳定和丰厚的股息。桶。石油和天然气公司对此很聪明。

根据英国《金融时报》的分析,接受新投资者奖励的石油和天然气公司正在利用这些现金为旧债务再融资或为适度收购提供资金。不再有花钱的冲动,就像不再有明天一样。无论最近的价格走势如何,纪律似乎仍然是重中之重。

“有些公司正在利用它进行明智的补强收购,试图巩固自己在特定地理区域的地位”。“但是]公司在专注于以下方面的行为方式基本上仍然相同:资本纪律和股东回报,”吉布森邓恩律师事务所资本市场联席主席希拉里霍姆斯告诉英国《金融时报》。

尽管美国出现了这些积极的趋势,但全球石油投资形势仍然脆弱。欧佩克一再警告新石油和天然气生产投资持续不足,但最大的上市石油公司所在地西方的政治风向继续吹动适当的转型。该行业面临的压力越来越大。

最新警告来自能源委员会行业高管网络的首席执行官。 艾米·米勒在接受《石油经济学家》采访时 表示,投资即将成为石油和天然气行业的致命弱点,而缺乏足够资金的情况在未来几年将变得更加严重。

OPEC最近 在一份报告中表示 ,到2045年全球行业需要投资14万亿美元,以确保全球有足够的液态碳氢化合物供应。该卡特尔表示,这是因为石油需求在未来几年和几十年内将继续增长,到当年将达到每天 1.16 亿桶。

将投资重新投入美国石油领域可能会在一定程度上确保未来有足够的供应。该国已经是最大的石油生产国和不断增长的出口国。尽管如此,仅有美国还不够。投资需要回流到世界其他地区的项目。确实,它正在回归,只是玩家不同了。

在非洲,中国和当地银行正在介入,取代西方银行,尤其是欧洲银行,这些银行正在回避非洲大陆的石油和天然气开发。就像在中东一样,大型石油公司也在那里,无论政治议程如何,他们都有现金用于新的开发项目。

美国石油债权人和股权投资者的回归是石油行业复苏的一个方面,目前石油行业正处于濒临死亡的状态。石油巨头今年对其转型计划进行了调整,由于投资回报不佳,基本上推迟了上述转型。欧盟未能就逐步取消石油和天然气补贴的最后期限达成一致。美国的投资基金最近 将其能源股持有量扩大 至3月份以来的最高水平。

石油和天然气投资正在回归。这可能是对风能和太阳能公司以及电动汽车制造商今年转型期最严峻的现实检验,尽管政府政策推动了对其产品的高需求,但风能和太阳能公司以及电动汽车制造商今年仍难以实现盈利。只是因为市场提醒这些行业,不存在恒定的原材料价格。

 

作者:Irina Slav for Oilprice.com


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


Investors are returning to oil and gas, drawn in by strict capital discipline and improving bottom lines. Fundraising on debt and equity markets is on the rise for the oil industry, at least in the United States. Still, the global chronic underinvestment in new supply is compromising future energy security.

Disciplined oil & gas companies successful in winning back investors- oil and gas 360

Source: Reuters

A recent analysis by the Financial Times showed that small oil and gas companies in the U.S. have managed to win back the trust of investors in equity and bond markets. Oil price levels may be part of the reason, but the bigger part, according to consultants and legal advisors, is the new focus on capital discipline, as demonstrated by the industry.

Thanks to that focus, debt and equity investors appear to have been reassured that the days of cash-burning are over for good. The trend includes oilfield service providers, too, for whom the recent years have been especially challenging in the fundraising department.

“Companies are really keeping their focus on shareholder returns,” Pickering Energy Partners managing director Josh Martin told the FT. “They’re very disciplined, they’re making the right decisions by paying out dividends and buying back shares. This is winning the investors back to the sector.”

The trend appears to suggest that ESG investing is not that ubiquitous, too. The suggestion has been reinforced this year by record outflows from investment funds focused on low-carbon energy. The first half of the year saw inflows of $3.4 billion in those funds, but the third quarter alone saw outflows of $1.4 billion amid weaker company performance and external challenges.

What is happening in the investment world, then, is that while investors are dumping the competitors of oil and gas, many are returning to those same oil and gas to enjoy stable and generous dividends in a geopolitical context where oil prices might soon hit $100 per barrel. And oil and gas companies are being smart about it.

Per the FT analysis, oil and gas companies at the receiving end of the new investor bounty are using the cash to refinance old debt or fund modest acquisitions. There is no urge to spend like there is no tomorrow anymore. Discipline appears to have remained the top priority regardless of recent price movements.

“Some are using it to do smart bolt-on acquisitions, trying to shore up their positions in particular geographic areas . . . [but] companies are still fundamentally behaving the same ways in terms of focus on capital discipline and shareholder returns,” Hillary Holmes, capital markets co-chair at legal firm Gibson Dunn, told the FT.

Even with these positive trends in the U.S., the global oil investment situation remains fragile. OPEC has repeatedly warned against continued underinvestment in new oil and gas production, but political winds in the West, where the biggest public oil companies are based, continue blowing due transition. And pressure on the industry is mounting.

The latest warning came from the CEO of the Energy Council—an industry executive network. Speaking to Petroleum Economist, Amy Miller said investment was about to become the Achilles’ heel of the oil and gas industry, and the lack of sufficient funding was about to become worse in the coming years.

OPEC recently said in a report that the global industry needs investments of $14 trillion by 2045 to secure enough supply of liquid hydrocarbons for the world. That, the cartel said, was because oil demand would continue rising in the coming years and decades, reaching 116 million barrels daily by that year.

Returning investment to the U.S. oil patch could go some way to ensuring enough future supply. The country is already the biggest oil producer and a growing exporter. Still, just the U.S. won’t be enough. Investment needs to return to projects in other parts of the world. Indeed, it is returning, only the players are different.

In Africa, Chinese and local lenders are stepping in to replace Western, especially European banks, which are shunning oil and gas developments on the continent. Big Oil is also there, as it is in the Middle East, with the cash to spend on new developments regardless of the political agenda.

The return of creditors and equity investors in U.S. oil is one aspect of a sort of revival for the oil industry amid a flurry of forecasts that it is on its deathbed. Big Oil this year made adjustments to its transition plans, basically delaying said transition due to poor returns on investments in it. The EU failed to agree on a deadline for the phaseout of oil and gas subsidies. And investment funds in the U.S. recently expanded their energy stock holdings to the highest since March.

Oil and gas investments are returning. This is probably the starkest reality check for the transition that has seen wind and solar companies and EV makers struggle this year to turn a profit despite high demand for their products driven by government policies. Just because markets reminded those industries that there is no such thing as constant raw material prices.

 

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com