钻孔

拜登禁止在 6.25 亿英亩联邦水域进行海上钻探

该决定援引了1953年的一项法律,这将使新任美国总统唐纳德·特朗普很难推翻该决定。

墨西哥湾英雄.jpg
美国总统乔·拜登的钻探禁令将影响美国东海岸和西海岸、墨西哥湾东部和阿拉斯加北部白令海。
来源:Getty Images

作为其政府任期内的最后一项举措之一,美国总统乔·拜登宣布了一项行政命令,永久禁止未来在超过 6.25 亿英亩的美国水域进行海上石油和天然气开发。

总统的声明指出,石油和天然气勘探将对美国​​东海岸和西海岸、墨西哥湾东部和阿拉斯加白令海北部的沿海社区和企业构成风险。

拜登在一份声明中说:“气候危机继续威胁全国各地的社区,我们正在向清洁能源经济转型,现在是时候为我们的子孙后代保护这些海岸了。”

拜登的法案保护了三个不同海洋和沿海地区近 3.34 亿英亩的土地:从加拿大边境到佛罗里达州南端的大西洋外大陆架 (OCS);东部墨西哥湾;加利福尼亚州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州沿岸的太平洋海岸;以及阿拉斯加近海北白令海气候复原区的剩余部分。

目前,美国东大西洋沿岸联邦水域没有活跃的石油和天然气租约。此外,自 1969 年以来,加利福尼亚州一直暂停在其州水域发放新的租约,该地区的最后一次联邦租约出售已于 1984 年撤销。几十年来,这些州的各州长一直呼吁全面保护其海岸。

北白令海气候复原区于 2016 年建立,是世界上最大的海洋哺乳动物迁徙区之一。石油和天然气开发的批评者认为,这些水域的勘探活动可能会破坏该地区土著部落的粮食安全。

拜登的行动援引了 1953 年的《OCS 土地法》,该法赋予总统权力,可以撤回未来石油和天然气租赁和开发的联邦水域。然而,该法律并没有明确赋予总统撤销该行动并重新开发联邦水域的权力。

美国当选总统唐纳德·特朗普已经表达了撤销该决定的意图。但根据目前对该法律的解释,他将要求美国国会进行干预,并再次授权开放联邦水域进行开发。

拜登指出, 2010 年发生的深水地平线漏油事故造成 11 人死亡,数百万桶石油流入墨西哥湾,他表示“保护美国的海岸和海洋是正确的做法,将有助于社区和经济在未来几代中繁荣发展”。

拜登强调,钻探禁令得到了两党的支持,并引用了从加利福尼亚州到佛罗里达州的社区和民选官员的话。然而,尽管该决定得到了广泛认可,但它还是引起了行业团体的强烈反对。

美国石油协会(API)首席执行官迈克·萨默斯对此作出严厉斥责,他指出,“美国选民发出了支持国内能源开发的明确信息,但现任政府却利用任期最后几天,竭尽全力限制国内能源开发”。

美国国家海洋工业协会主席埃里克·米利托赞同 API 领导人的观点,他认为,“这种禁令会对我们的资源设置政治障碍,威胁我们的经济和国家安全。即使某些领域没有直接利益,联邦政府也必须保持灵活性来调整其能源政策。全面禁令只会将能源生产和经济机会转移到国外,无意中以牺牲美国利益为代价支持俄罗斯等国家。”

尽管批评人士警告称此举可能带来经济后果,但预计此举对石油和天然气行业的直接影响微乎其微。

拜登为这一决定辩护,他说,“在平衡美国海洋的诸多用途和好处时,我很清楚,我撤出的地区相对较小的化石燃料潜力不足以弥补新的租赁和钻探带来的环境、公共健康和经济风险。”

原文链接/JPT
Drilling

Biden Bans Offshore Drilling on 625 Million Acres of Federal Waters

The decision invokes a 1953 law that will make it difficult for incoming US President Donald Trump to reverse.

gulf-of-mexico-hero.jpg
US President Joe Biden's drilling ban will affect the US East and West Coasts, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and Alaska’s Northern Bering Sea.
Source: Getty Images

As one of the final acts of his administration, US President Joe Biden announced an executive action to permanently ban future offshore oil and gas development on more than 625 million acres of US waters.

The president's statement cited the risks that oil and gas exploration would pose to coastal communities and businesses along the East and West Coasts of the US, the eastern Gulf of Mexico (GOM), and Alaska's Northern Bering Sea.

“As the climate crisis continues to threaten communities across the country and we are transitioning to a clean energy economy, now is the time to protect these coasts for our children and grandchildren," Biden said in a statement.

Biden’s act safeguards nearly 334 million acres within three distinct ocean and coastal regions: the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) from the Canadian border to the southern tip of Florida; the eastern GOM; the Pacific Coast along California, Oregon, and Washington; and the remaining portion of the Northern Bering Sea Climate Resilience Area offshore Alaska.

There are currently no active oil and natural gas leases in US federal waters off the eastern Atlantic Coast. Additionally, California has had a moratorium on issuing new leases in its state waters since 1969, and the last federal lease sale in the area was withdrawn in 1984. Various governors of these states have called for full protection of their coasts for decades.

The Northern Bering Sea Climate Resilience Area was established in 2016 and includes one of the largest marine mammal migrations in the world. Critics of oil and gas development have argued that exploration activities in these waters could disrupt the food security of native tribes in the area.

Biden's action invokes the 1953 OCS Lands Act, a law that gives presidential authority to withdraw federal waters from future oil and gas leasing and development. The law, however, does not give presidents explicit authority to revoke the action and place federal waters back into development.

US President-elect Donald Trump has already expressed his intention to reverse the action. But under the current interpretation of the law, he would require the US Congress to intervene and grant the authority to open federal waters for development once again.

While pointing to the Deepwater Horizon disaster in 2010 that killed 11 people and discharged millions of barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, Biden said that “protecting America’s coasts and oceans is the right thing to do and will help communities and the economy to flourish for generations to come.”

Biden emphasized that the drilling ban enjoys bipartisan support, citing communities and elected officials from California to Florida. Despite the claim of broad approval, however, the decision has invited backlash from industry groups.

Mike Sommers, CEO of the American Petroleum Institute (API), issued a sharp rebuke, stating, “American voters sent a clear message in support of domestic energy development, and yet the current administration is using its final days in office to cement a record of doing everything possible to restrict it.”

Erik Milito, president of the National Ocean Industries Association, echoed the API leader, arguing that, “such moratoriums threaten our economic and national security by creating political barriers to our own resources. Even if there’s no immediate interest in some areas, it’s crucial for the federal government to maintain the flexibility to adapt its energy policy. … Blanket bans only serve to transfer energy production and economic opportunities abroad, inadvertently bolstering countries like Russia at the expense of US interests.”

While critics warn of potential economic consequences, the action is anticipated to have minimal immediate effect on the oil and gas industry.

Biden defended the decision, stating, “In balancing the many uses and benefits of America’s oceans, it is clear to me that the relatively minimal fossil fuel potential in the areas I am withdrawing do not justify the environmental, public health, and economic risks that would come from new leasing and drilling.”