地层损害

编队损坏-2023

虽然地层损害领域正在进行的技术研究和技术开发主要集中在钻井和生产过程中的关键损害机制场景,例如钻井液引起的损害、结垢、粘土膨胀、细粉运移以及流体/介质的不相容性。除了常规砂岩和碳酸盐岩储层中的流体和流体/岩石之外,在低渗透非常规储层以及碳捕集和封存方面也出现了新的研究活动和知识应用的增加。

编队伤害焦点介绍

在石油和天然气井的生命周期中识别、预防和修复地层损害是我们行业充分发挥油井潜力的关键。事实证明,提高对潜在损害机制的认识以及实验室测试设备和方法的改进有助于有效预防和修复常规油藏生产井和注入井的地层损害。虽然地层损害领域正在进行的技术研究和技术开发主要集中在钻井和生产过程中的关键损害机制场景,例如钻井液引起的损害、结垢、粘土膨胀、细粉运移以及流体/介质的不相容性。除了常规砂岩和碳酸盐岩储层中的流体和流体/岩石之外,低渗透非常规储层和碳捕集与封存(CCS)方面也出现了新的研究活动和知识应用的增加。

在低渗透性非常规油藏中,水力压裂已被证明有助于经济和成功的开发。需要注入大量压裂液水来放置所需量的支撑剂以产生和维持裂缝导流能力,从而增加了压裂液引起地层损害的风险。正在部署新的实验室研究和现场试验,以在压裂液中选择合适的预防性添加剂并优化返排工艺,以防止胶凝材料、减摩化学品和水堵塞造成的地层损害,以及生产过程中结垢和石蜡造成的地层损害。

识别和预防影响地下 CO2 注入过程中注入能力的地层损害机制对于 CCS 和 CO2 提高采收率至关重要。

请欣赏今年入选的论文,其中一些突出了我的评论以及我们行业在常规油藏地层损害识别、预防和修复方面所取得的创新和成功,这有望为非常规油藏开发和开发领域带来成功。减少碳排放。

本月的技术论文

兼容性岩心驱替研究探索致密油藏中的地层损害

模型描述了细粉破碎和运移造成的地层损害

蜡沉积造成的地层损害导致页岩产量下降

推荐补充阅读

IPTC 22543 Holln 砂岩中的地层损害:从实验室到现场实施的诊断、评估和增产实践,厄瓜多尔 Sacha 油田, 作者:Alvaro Izurieta、Halliburton 等人。

SPE 208852 了解在孔中运行筛管时的流体交换——地层和完井损害风险的模拟 ,作者:Axis 的 Michael Byrne 等人。

SPE 210763 二氧化碳注入过程中与地层干涸和细粉运移相关的近井眼损害,作者:Liam Alchin,阿德莱德大学等人。


Amit Singh, SPE,是雪佛龙油井增产技术的首席顾问。他是一位技术专家,倡导水力压裂、酸增产和完井设计优化新技术和战略的开发和实施。在 2012 年加入雪佛龙之前,辛格在印度和美国的 ONGC、BJ Services 和贝克休斯拥有 12 年的工作经验。他拥有丹巴德印度理工学院石油工程学士学位。Singh 发表了 30 多篇技术论文,并在多个国际会议和研讨会上发表演讲。他是 2021-22 年度 SPE 杰出讲师。Singh 是SPE Production & Operations杂志的副主编、 JPT编辑审查委员会成员,并且是多个 SPE 会议和研讨会的组委会成员。可以通过amit.singh@chevron.com联系 Singh

原文链接/jpt
Formation damage

Formation Damage-2023

While the ongoing technical studies and technology developments in the area of formation damage are heavily focused on key damage-mechanism scenarios during drilling and production, such as drilling-fluid-induced damage, scaling, clay swelling, fines migration, and incompatibility of fluid/fluid and fluid/rock in conventional sandstone and carbonate reservoirs, there are new research activities and increased applications of learnings in low-permeability unconventional reservoirs and carbon capture and storage.

Formation Damage focus intro

Identification, prevention, and remediation of formation damage during the life cycle of oil and gas wells are key for our industry to allow wells to perform to their full potential. Increased awareness of potential damage mechanisms along with improvements in laboratory testing equipment and methodologies have proven to be instrumental in efficient prevention and remediation of formation damage in production and injection wells in conventional reservoirs. While the ongoing technical studies and technology developments in the area of formation damage are heavily focused on key damage-mechanism scenarios during drilling and production, such as drilling-fluid-induced damage, scaling, clay swelling, fines migration, and incompatibility of fluid/fluid and fluid/rock in conventional sandstone and carbonate reservoirs, there are new research activities and increased applications of learnings in low-permeability unconventional reservoirs and carbon capture and storage (CCS).

In low-permeability unconventional reservoirs, hydraulic fracturing has proven instrumental for economic and successful development. Injection of a large volume of fracturing fluid water is necessary to place the required quantity of proppant to generate and maintain fracture conductivity, thereby increasing the risk of fracturing-fluid-induced formation damage. New laboratory studies and field trials to select suitable preventive additives in fracturing fluid and optimize flowback processes are being deployed to prevent formation damage not only from gelling materials, friction-reducer chemicals, and water blockage but also from scaling and paraffin during production.

Identification and prevention of formation-damage mechanisms affecting injectivity during CO2 injection in subsurface for CCS and CO2 enhanced oil recovery are critical.

Enjoy the papers chosen this year, some of which highlight my comments and the innovation and successes achieved by our industry in identification, prevention, and remediation of formation damage in conventional reservoirs, which is expected to bring success in area of unconventional-reservoir development and carbon reduction.

This Month’s Technical Papers

Compatibility Coreflood Studies Explore Formation Damage in Tight Reservoirs

Model Characterizes Formation Damage Caused by Fines Breakage and Migration

Formation Damage Caused by Wax Deposition Results in Shale Production Decline

Recommended Additional Reading

IPTC 22543 Formation Damage in the Hollín Sandstone: Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Stimulation Practices From Laboratory to Field Implementation, Sacha Field, Ecuador by Alvaro Izurieta, Halliburton, et al.

SPE 208852 Understanding Fluid Exchange as Screens Are Run in Hole—Mitigation of Formation and Completion Damage Risks by Michael Byrne, Axis, et al.

SPE 210763 Near-Wellbore Damage Associated With Formation Dry-Out and Fines Migration During CO2 Injectionby Liam Alchin, The University of Adelaide, et al.


Amit Singh, SPE, is a principal adviser for well stimulation technologies at Chevron. He is a technical expert and champions development and implementation of new technology and strategy for hydraulic fracturing, acid stimulation, and completion-design optimization. Before joining Chevron in 2012, Singh had 12 years of experience working for ONGC, BJ Services, and Baker Hughes in India and the US. He holds a BTech degree in petroleum engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology in Dhanbad. Singh has published more than 30 technical papers and has been a speaker at multiple international conferences and workshops. He was an SPE Distinguished Lecturer for 2021–22. Singh is an associate editor for the SPE Production & Operations journal, serves on the JPT Editorial Review Board, and has been a member of the organizing committees for several SPE conferences and workshops. Singh can be reached at amit.singh@chevron.com.