石油繁荣?“那种繁荣?”

一篇暗示石油行业正在蓬勃发展的文章让油田和投资 Reddit 用户感到失望。以下是发生的事情——删除了脏话、表情符号等。

这件事发生在“Wewzee1”将《纽约时报》的一篇报道作为“礼物”发布在 Reddit 的 r/Oil 频道上时,这意味着任何人都可以阅读它,而无需订阅《纽约时报》。

《纽约时报》文章:“石油工业为何蓬勃发展?”

Newzee1 于 7 月 17 日分享了该帖子,并获得了社交媒体上评论多于点赞的评价 - 截至 7 月 21 日共获得 56 个净赞同票和 70 条评论。

“那种繁荣?”Nystrom19 回答道。“TI 的价格为 80 美元,远接近历史最高价。过去 12 个月,许多其他商品的价格接近或目前处于历史最高价。”

EntrepreneurFunny469 写道,“当我连续三年不间断地工作时,我认为这是一种繁荣。”

“哈哈。是的,这个行业的历史就是这样艰难,”Nystrom19 回答道。

7 月 22 日,芝加哥商品交易所的 WTI 八月交割合约价格为每桶 80 美元,高于 2020 年春季的即月合约价格每桶 20 美元。

据纽约证券交易所称,石油股指数 XOI 的历史可以追溯到 1983 年,目前处于历史最高水平。7 月 22 日,该指数为 2,035 美元,高于 2020 年 10 月的 564 美元,当时最低价格为 2003 年 12 月。

不过,这些公司都是综合性勘探与生产公司、跨国独立勘探与生产公司和炼油厂。没有一家是专注于美国的陆上独立公司。

误导性的“收支平衡”

DoomScroll81 指出,WTI 价格上涨对石油行业来说并不是件好事。“上次油价达到每桶 120 美元和每百万吨立方英尺 8 美元还是在 2000 年代初期。”

I3luntI3rigade 指出“2012 年至 2013 年曾出现过一次小幅上涨”,但实际上一直持续到 2014 年夏季,油价一度超过 100 美元,直到 OPEC 试图通过不减产来满足美国供应增长的需求,从而赶走美国生产商。

到 2016 年初,WTI 价格跌至每桶 30 美元以下。

OSUjeff97 写道:“当你的盈亏平衡点在 40 美元左右时,70 到 90 美元 [WTI] 的价格相当不错。而且这比那些导致需求破坏和政治压力的 100 美元以上的大幅上涨更具可持续性。”

“我将花费 70 至 90 美元,而一间“房间”最多可花费 120 美元,随后不可避免地会崩溃。”

但 Nystrom19 答复说“盈亏平衡” “有点误导,因为消耗是真实的,而资本支出是必要的”。

此外,收入来源中还有大量的天然气。“天然气价格一落千丈,情况糟糕透顶。劳动力和设备成本也大幅上涨。”

Healthy_Article_2237 补充道,“所有东西的成本都更高了,而且钻井的质量也下降了,因为遗憾的是,我们钻探的许多最好的产品都是在价格下跌的年份生产的。”

OzarksExplorer 写道,钻井数量比一年前减少了 91 个。“怎么样?”

RDJobsit 回答说,“因为现在 40 台钻机就能完成过去 100 台钻机才能完成的工作。”

“一切都在蓬勃发展”

DoomScroll81 写道,“在我的世界角落里,上游/勘探业务并没有蓬勃发展。当然,如果你是米德兰或特拉华盆地的海上钻井工人或泵工,那么你的工作量比独臂裱糊工还要大。”

但他补充道,这个行业不只限于二叠纪盆地。“从我所处的位置和我整天接到的电话来看,我认识的失业地质学家、工程师和土地勘探员比我能数得出来的还要多。”

“新项目的资金是不可能找到的。我手头有一堆很棒的钻井项目,投资回报率都很高。我说的是二叠纪盆地的 5 倍到 10 倍的回报率,我连看都找不到。”

投资回报率以 50 美元的 WTI 价格和 2 美元的天然气价格为基础。

“十五年前,我会击败私募股权管理团队和家族理财室,争取这些完全相同的项目。现在,所有资金都想谈论的是碳封存和氢气。[翻白眼表情符号。]

“没有人愿意再用石油和天然气来获取利润了。”

“仅仅因为为埃克森美孚雪佛龙西方石油公司工作的那些并购电子表格操作员——你知道,那些只知道如何为其他人不断减少的储量支付过高价格的人——做得很好,这并不意味着我们这些在这个行业中实际工作的人做得很好。”

他总结道,“轰隆隆?我的[脏话]。[翻白眼表情符号]。”

后来,他解释说,他加入这些评论并不是为了挑衅。相反,“我只是今天过得不顺,而之前与私募股权公司打交道的日子又不堪重负,所以需要发泄一下。”

AndyWfu86 回复道,“作为上述三家公司之一的退休电子表格管理员 [提到的 E&Ps],我感觉受到了攻击。[脸上带着喜极而泣的表情符号]。”

原文链接/HartEnergy

An Oil Boom? ‘What Boom?’

Frustrations were clear among oilfield and investment Redditors in response to an article that suggested the oil industry is booming. Here’s what happened—expletives deleted, emojis and all.

It happened when “Newzee1” posted a New York Times story on Reddit’s r/Oil channel as a “gift article,” meaning anyone could read it without an NYT subscription.

The NYT article: “Why is the Oil Industry Booming?”

Newzee1 shared it on July 17 and got ratioed--social-media speak for receiving more comments than likes—with 56 net upvotes by July 21 and 70 comments.

“What boom?” replied Nystrom19. “WTI is at $80—nowhere near the all-time high. Many other commodities have been near or are currently at all-time highs the past 12 months.”

EntrepreneurFunny469 wrote, “I consider it a boom when I work for three years uninterrupted.”

“Haha. Yeah, that’s how rough the industry had been historically,” Nystrom19 replied.

The August-delivery contract for WTI was $80 on CMEGroup July 22, up from a prompt-month contract of $20 in the spring of 2020.

The oil-stock index, XOI, which dates back to 1983, is at an all-time high, according to the NYSE. The index on July 22 was $2,035, up from the $564 in October 2020 that was as low as in December 2003.

The components are all integrated E&Ps, multi-national independent E&Ps and refiners, though. None is an onshore U.S.-focused independent.

Misleading ‘breakevens’

DoomScroll81 noted that higher WTI prices haven’t worked out well for the oil business. “The last time we hit $120 a barrel and $8 an Mcf was in the naughty aughties.”

I3luntI3rigade noted “there was a tiny one in 2012-‘13,” which actually continued into the summer of 2014 to more than $100 until OPEC tried to flush out U.S. producers by not cutting back to accommodate U.S. supply growth.

WTI tanked to less than $30 by early 2016.

OSUjeff97 wrote that “$70 to $90 [WTI] is pretty damn good when your breakevens are in the $40s. And it’s a lot more sustainable than those huge spikes above $100 that lead to demand destruction and political pressure.

“I’ll take a long stretch of $70-$90 versus a ‘boom’ up to $120 followed by the inevitable crash.”

But Nystrom19 replied that “breakevens” are “kind of misleading because depletion is real and capex is necessary.”

Also, there is a lot of natural gas in the revenue stream. “Natgas pricing is in the dumpster—as bad as it gets. Labor and equipment costs have ballooned also.”

Healthy_Article_2237 added, “Everything costs more and the quality of wells being drilled has gone down because, sadly, we drilled a lot of our best stuff in years when the price was down.”

OzarksExplorer wrote that the rig count is down by 91 from a year ago. “Boom?”

RDJobsit replied, “Because 40 rigs are doing now what 100 rigs used to do.”

‘Nothing’s booming’

DoomScroll81 wrote, “Nothing’s booming in my corner of the world—the upstream/exploration side of the business. Sure, if you’re a rig hand or a pumper in the Midland or Delaware basins, you’re working harder than a one-armed paper hanger.”

But the industry is more than the Permian Basin, he added. “From where I’m sitting and the phone calls I get all day, I know more out-of-work geologists, engineers and landmen than I can shake a stick at.

“Money for new projects is impossible to find. I’ve got a stack of amazing drilling projects with stupid good ROI’s [returns on investments]. I’m talking 5x to 10x returns in the freaking Permian that I can’t get anyone to even look at.”

The ROI’s are based on $50 WTI flat and $2 natgas.

“Fifteen years ago, I would have been beating off private equity management teams and family offices … for these exact same projects. Now, all the money wants to talk about [is] carbon sequestration and hydrogen. [Face with rolling eyes emoji.]

“No one wants to get their hands or their money ‘dirty’ with oil and gas anymore.

“Just because the [profanity] M&A spreadsheet jockeys that work for Exxon [Mobil], Chevron [Corp.] and Oxy [Occidental Petroleum]—you know, the ones who only know how to overpay for other people’s declining reserves—are doing great, that doesn’t mean those of us who do the actual work in this business are doing okay.”

He concluded, “Booming? My [profanity]. [Face with rolling eyes emoji.]”

Later, he explained that he didn’t join the comments to troll. Rather, “I just had a rough day preceded by a countless number of other rough days with private equity [profanity] and needed to vent.”

AndyWfu86 replied, “As a retired spreadsheet jockey for one of those three [mentioned E&Ps], I feel attacked. [Face with tears of joy emoji].”