石油价格


主流气候叙事与全球能源行业的现实之间存在着巨大的不匹配。尽管能源行业内部人士和环保人士都声称能源行业正在大力投资于更清洁的替代品,并且化石燃料的消亡即将到来,但大型石油公司的账簿却讲述了一个不同的故事。

关于石油死亡的报道是否被过分夸大了? - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:路透社

“石油工业的消亡被过分夸大了,”咨询公司 ClearView Energy 的董事总经理凯文·布克 (Kevin Book) 表示。“需求的现实和替代方案的局限性并没有改变。”

10 月,国际能源署 (IEA) 预测,煤炭、石油和天然气将开始最终衰退,时间早于其 旗舰年度报告《2023 年世界能源展望》之前的预测。该报告发现,仅凭目前已经实施的气候和能源政策,煤炭、石油和天然气的需求预计将在 2030 年达到峰值。这一预测令人震惊——该报告标志着需求首次达到  顶峰每种燃料都已在这十年内进行了预测。

但现实可能比这些数字显示的要混乱一些。石油利润正在飙升,许多超级巨头正计划加大对未来化石燃料开采的投资。美国经历了创纪录的一年, 雪佛龙 和 埃克森美孚 正忙着收购拥有未开发储量的竞争对手,这表明他们认为自己不太担心所谓的迫在眉睫的石油峰值威胁。

不言而喻,世界不可能一夜之间抛弃化石燃料,获得负担得起且可靠的基本负荷能源对于缓解能源转型和避免痛苦的能源冲击至关重要。 埃克森美孚在回复 IEA 2050 年净零排放 (NZE) 报告时表示,“社会不太可能接受永久实现 IEA [情景] 等情景所需的全球生活水平下降 ”该方案为将全球气温上升限制在 1.5 摄氏度以内奠定了基础。但许多批评者认为,石油巨头正在利用这种论点作为借口,甚至是一种恐吓策略,以继续投资于开采,而不是寻找更好的能源替代品。

事实上,许多超级巨头非但没有继续加紧努力实现全球气候目标,反而 背弃了之前的承诺 ,或者根本没有实现这些承诺。今年早些时候,BP 宣布将大幅削减其到 2030 年将能源生产碳排放量减少 35% 至 50% 的承诺,降至 20% 至 30%。尽管他们的行动意义重大,但石油和天然气行业的发言人仍然承诺减少排放并与脱碳运动合作。

这种矛盾在今年正在阿拉伯联合酋长国迪拜世博城举行的 COP28 联合国气候变化大会上表现得尤为明显,会议场地是用石油财富支付的,位于世界上最发达的地区之一。著名的石油国家。阿联酋谈判团队“谨慎乐观”地表示,它相信 COP28 可能会带来在未来几十年内逐步减少化石燃料的承诺,而事实证明,这一成就在之前的 COP 上是不可能实现的。然而,甚至没有人建议设定一个硬性日期或对“减少”化石燃料提出挑战。

“减少”化石燃料是一个有争议的话题,因为碳捕获等技术是石油和天然气公司脱碳计划的核心平台,但在很大程度上遭到了环保人士的忽视。俄勒冈州民主党参议员杰夫·默克利(Jeff Merkley)对这种“99%的绿色清洗”策略不屑一顾,他说:“他们试图做的是保护他们既定的化石资产所有权。”

那么石油峰值即将到来吗?或不?似乎 更大的市场力量 正在将石油、天然气和煤炭推向渡渡鸟的方向,但同样明显的是,开采这些产品仍然可以赚钱。在这种情况发生改变之前,总会有人愿意进行钻探。

作者:Haley Zaremba,Oilprice.com


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


There is a great mismatch between dominant climate narratives and the reality of the global energy sector. While energy industry insiders and environmentalists alike claim that the energy industry is heavily investing in cleaner alternatives and that the death of fossil fuels is just around the corner, Big Oil’s ledgers tell a different story.

Have reports of oil’s death been greatly exaggerated?- oil and gas 360

Source: Reuters

“The death of the oil industry has been greatly overstated,” said Kevin Book, managing director at the consulting firm ClearView Energy. “The realities of demand and the limitations of alternatives haven’t changed.”

In October, The International Energy Agency (IEA) predicted that coal, oil, and gas are all due to begin their terminal decline earlier than previously predicted in the World Energy Outlook 2023, its flagship annual report. The report found that with just the climate and energy policies that are already in place today, demand for coal, oil, and gas are each expected to peak by 2030. This projection comes as a shock – the report marks the first time that demand for each fuel has been predicted within this decade.

But reality might be a bit messier than those figures suggest. Oil profits are soaring, and many supermajors are planning to ramp up investments in future extraction of fossil fuels. The United States had a record year, and Chevron and Exxon Mobil are busily acquiring rivals with untapped reserves, indicating that they think they are none too concerned about the alleged looming threat of peak oil.

It goes without saying that the world can’t ditch fossil fuels overnight, and access to affordable and reliable baseload energies will be necessary to ease the energy transition and avoid painful energy shocks. “It is highly unlikely that society would accept the degradation in global standard of living required to permanently achieve a scenario like the IEA [scenario]”, Exxon said in its reply to the IEA’s 2050 net-zero emissions (NZE) scenario, which lays out a pathway for limiting the global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius. But many critics feel that Big Oil is using this line of argument as an excuse and even a scare tactic to continue investing in extraction rather than in finding better energy alternatives.

Indeed, instead of continuing to intensify their efforts toward meeting global climate goals, many supermajors have been walking back their previous pledges or merely failing to achieve them. Earlier this year, BP announced that it would be slashing its promise to reduce carbon emissions from its energy production by 35 to 50 percent by 2030 to just 20 to 30 percent. But while their actions speak volumes, spokespeople for the oil and gas industry continue to avow their commitment to reducing emissions and collaborating with the decarbonization movement.

This contradiction is highly visible at this year’s COP28 United Nations Climate Change Conference currently taking place in Dubai’s Expo City in the United Arab Emirates in a conference venue paid for with oil wealth in the middle of one of the world’s most prominent petro-states. The UAE negotiating team has said with “cautious optimism” that it believes COP28 could result in a commitment to phasing down fossil fuels over the coming decades, an accomplishment that has proved to be impossible in previous COPs. However, no one is even suggesting that a hard date be set or that “abated” fossil fuels be challenged.

“Abated” fossil fuels are a contentious topic as technologies like carbon capture are a central platform of the decarbonization plans of oil and gas companies, but are largely dismissed by environmentalists. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) has dismissed such tactics as “99 percent greenwashing,” saying: “What they’re trying to do is protect their established ownership of fossil assets.”

So is peak oil right around the corner? Or not? It seems that larger market forces are pushing oil, gas, and coal in the direction of the dodo, but it’s just as clear that there is still money to be made in their extraction. And until that changes, there will always be someone willing to drill.

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com