Blackcomb 在 2026 年二叠纪管道竞赛中领先

随着 WhiteWater Midstream 宣布建设 Blackcomb 管道,Energy Transfer、Targa Resources 和 Kinder Morgan 等公司提议的其他管道也可能会被推迟到以后建设,甚至被取消。

一位分析师表示,最新的二叠纪盆地天然气管道项目有望赢得下一条管道建设的竞赛,并可能击败其他一些提案。

7 月 31 日,WhiteWater Midstream宣布已就 Blackcomb 管道做出最终投资决定 (FID),解答了米德兰和特拉华盆地 E&P 公司数月来一直在询问的天然气输送问题。

由白水公司运营的马特洪峰快线 (Matterhorn Express) 将于 2024 年投入使用,日产能为 25 亿立方英尺,预计该地区的天然气出口量要到 2026 年才会再次达到产能。马特洪峰快线的投入使用日期为 9 月。

布莱克科姆将填补那里的空缺。该管道将把天然气从西德克萨斯州输送到墨西哥湾沿岸的管道网络。该管道的日产能为 25 亿立方英尺,将能够处理该地区预计在 2026 年生产的额外天然气。

至少有另外四个项目已公开提议做大致相同的事情,但没有一个在 7 月 31 日之前达成最终投资决定。由于在德克萨斯州修建一条大型州内管道大约需要两年时间,因此今年做出最终投资决定的决定对于确保管道在 2026 年之前完工至关重要。

其他提议的项目包括Energy Transfer 的Warrior、Targa 的Apex、私营公司Moss Lake 的DeLa Express 和Kinder Morgan 的Gulf Coast Express (GCX) 扩建项目。

East Daley Analytics 的分析师亚历克斯·加福德 (Alex Gafford) 表示,“除了 GCX 潜在的扩张机会之外,这一 FID 使得这些项目不太可能实现。”

Blackcomb 管道的另一个潜在优势是其路线。Gafford 表示,该管道预计将采用与 WhiteWater 惠斯勒管道类似的路径,这意味着 Blackcomb 背后的合作伙伴已经具备该地区地形和安装方面的专业知识。

惠斯勒输油管道的拥有者Whitewater、MPLXEnbridge以及 Targa Resources 的一家附属公司组成合资企业 (JV) 建设该输油管道。

在剩余的项目中,GCX 扩建最有可能在 2026 年之前完成,因为它是一个规模较小的项目。扩建将为现有的管道增加 500 MMcf/d 的天然气产能。据 East Daley 称,Kinder Morgan 表示,与 GCX 客户的谈判正在进行中,但尚未做出最终决定。

加福德表示,未来两年内,其他线路的开通可能性较小。“阿加在这个项目上的合作使得 Apex 的开通可能性特别小。”

在宣布 Blackcomb 计划之前,Targa 曾提议建设 Apex 管道。该公司高管今年早些时候曾指出,他们预计管道将于今年夏天达成最终投资决定,但不一定非要建设 Apex 管道。

Energy Transfer 的 Warrior Pipeline 是一个较短的项目,它将向北德克萨斯州地区输送天然气,并与该公司的庞大网络相连。另一个已提出的大型管道项目 DeLa Express 预计要到 2028 年才会投入使用,这意味着它没有参与今年的 FID 竞标。

与其他项目相比,黑梳山管道的开发方式有所不同。支持其他管道的公司已经公开讨论过他们的计划,有些甚至已经讨论了很多年。

加福德表示,Hart Energy 无法找到 2024 年 5 月之前有关 Blackcomb 项目的提及,这意味着运营该项目的合资公司在公开宣布之前已经悄悄地获得了客户。

Blackcomb 的预期价格并未随项目一同公布。在公司第二季度收益会议上,Targa 高管表示,他们预计不会花费超过 2 亿美元的资金来购买该管道的资本投资份额,因为该管道预计将通过项目融资。

二叠纪盆地的另一个重要项目是ONEOK 的20 亿立方英尺/天 Saguaro 管道,它不一定与其他项目竞争。拟建的管道将把二叠纪天然气输送到墨西哥边境,然后通过管道输送到墨西哥西海岸拟建的液化天然气出口终端。

拟建的液化天然气工厂尚未达成最终投资决定。加福德表示,他预计萨瓜罗项目要到 2029 年才能投产。

在 8 月 6 日 ONEOK 的第二季度财报电话会议上,高管们表示,公司预计 2024 年不会在该项目上花费任何资本支出。不过,他们认为这条生产线仍然是一个很好的机会。

ONEOK 商业天然气管道高级副总裁查尔斯·凯利 (Charles Kelley) 表示:“这确实是一个具有商业潜力的项目,拥有世界级的客户,而且具有很大的商业意义。你们有二叠纪的供应。液化天然气需求拉动对亚洲市场具有竞争优势。”

原文链接/HartEnergy

Blackcomb Takes Lead in Permian Pipeline Race for 2026

With WhiteWater Midstream’s announced Blackcomb, other proposed lines by Energy Transfer, Targa Resources and Kinder Morgan’s may shift to a later date or be scrapped.

The latest Permian Basin natural gas pipeline project is poised to win the race for the next line to be built and could wipe some other proposals off the table, an analyst said.

On July 31, WhiteWater Midstream announced that a final investment decision (FID) had been reached for the Blackcomb Pipeline, answering the natural gas takeaway question Midland and Delaware basin E&Ps had been asking for months.

With the WhiteWater-operated Matterhorn Express coming online in 2024 with 2.5 Bcf/d of capacity, the region's natural gas egress is not expected to hit capacity again until 2026. Matterhorn has an in-service date in September.

Blackcomb will take up the slack from there. The line will move natural gas out of West Texas to pipeline networks along the Gulf Coast. With 2.5 Bcf/d capacity, the line will be able to handle the additional natural gas the region is expected to produce in the 2026 timeframe.

At least four other projects had been publicly proposed to do roughly the same thing, but none had reached an FID before July 31. Since building a large intrastate pipeline in Texas takes about two years to build, the decision to make an FID this year was crucial in order for a line to be ready by 2026.

The other proposed projects were Energy Transfer’s Warrior, Targa’s Apex, private company Moss Lake’s DeLa Express and Kinder Morgan’s Gulf Coast Express (GCX) expansion project.

“This FID makes these projects unlikely, aside from potentially GCX’s expansion opportunity,” said Alex Gafford, an analyst at East Daley Analytics.

One further potential advantage of the Blackcomb pipeline will be the route. The line is expected to follow a path similar to WhiteWater’s Whistler pipeline, meaning the partners behind Blackcomb already have expertise on the terrain and installation in the area, Gafford said.

Whitewater, MPLX and Enbridge, the consortium that owns the Whistler Pipeline, along with an affiliate of Targa Resources, are part of a joint venture (JV) to build the pipeline.

Of the remaining projects, the GCX expansion is most likely to still happen by 2026 because it’s a smaller-scale project. The expansion would add 500 MMcf/d of natural gas capacity to a line already in place. According to East Daley, Kinder Morgan has stated that talks with GCX customers are ongoing, but no final decision has been made.

The other lines are much less probable over the next two years, Gafford said. “Targa’s partnership on this project makes Apex especially unlikely.”

Prior to the Blackcomb announcement, Targa had proposed the Apex Pipeline. Executives at the company had noted earlier in the year that they expected a pipeline to reach FID this summer, but that it wouldn’t not necessarily be for Apex.

Energy Transfer’s Warrior Pipeline is a shorter project that would deliver gas to the North Texas area and connect with the company’s extensive network. The other large pipeline project that has been proposed, the DeLa Express, is not slated for an in-service date until 2028, meaning it wasn’t part in the running this year for an FID.

Blackcomb followed a different development approach than the other projects. The companies backing other pipelines had discussed their plans publicly, in some cases, for years.

Hart Energy was unable to find a mention of the Blackcomb project further back than May 2024, meaning the JV running the project quietly secured its customers before moving forward with a public announcement, Gafford said.

The expected price for Blackcomb was not announced with the project. During the company’s second quarter earnings meeting, Targa executives said they did not expect to spend more than $200 million for their share of the line’s capital investment because the pipeline is expected to be project financed.

One other major project in the Permian, ONEOK’s 2 Bcf/d Saguaro Pipeline, isn’t necessarily competing with the other projects. The proposed line would deliver Permian natural gas to the Mexican border, where it would then be piped to a proposed LNG export terminal on Mexico’s west coast.

The proposed LNG plant has not reached FID. Gafford said he did not expect Saguaro to come online until 2029.

During ONEOK’s second-quarter earnings call on Aug. 6, executives said the company did not expect any capex spending on the project in 2024. However, they felt the line remains a good opportunity.

“This really is a commercially strong project with world-class customers, and it makes great commercial sense,” said Charles Kelley, ONEOK’s senior vice president of commercial natural gas pipelines. “You've got Permian supplies. LNG demand pull is competitively advantaged to the Asian markets.”