雅虎财经


伦敦——投资者表示,在美国两家领先的石油公司本月宣布以美洲为重点的重大收购之后,埃克森美孚或雪佛龙收购欧洲大型石油公司的前景已经减弱。

分析:埃克森美孚和雪佛龙交易后大型跨大西洋石油合并的可能性较小 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:路透社

过去两年,由于欧洲石油巨头的表现不及美国竞争对手,有关雪佛龙和埃克森美孚可能试图收购竞争对手英国石油公司和壳牌公司的猜测愈演愈烈。

投资者惩罚了欧洲公司转向可再生能源和低碳能源的做法,同时奖励了美国公司专注于石油和天然气生产的做法,这些公司去年创造了创纪录的利润。

石油行业上一次经历大规模整合时代是在 20 世纪 90 年代末,当时埃克森美孚、壳牌、英国石油公司和法国的 TotalEnergies 与竞争对手合并,创建了大型综合公司。这些收购是在油价暴跌之后进行的,油价暴跌削弱了许多公司的实力。

如今,去年与乌克兰战争相关的能源价格飙升将利润推至历史新高,各大巨头都坐拥大量现金。

埃克森美孚和雪佛龙没有冒险投资勘探和开发,而是收购了公司以增加产量,并专注于财务纪律和回报股东。

美国最大石油生产商埃克森美孚10月11日表示,已同意以价值595亿美元的全股票交易收购先锋自然资源公司,这将使其成为美国最大油田的最大生产商,并确保十年来的低油价。成本生产。

周一,在雪佛龙宣布同意以 530 亿美元收购美国竞争对手生产商 Hess 几个小时后,英国石油公司 (BP) 股价下跌 2%。投资者表示,市场上一些人预计雪佛龙将收购该公司。

一位熟悉该问题的资深行业消息人士以及分析师和投资者对美国即将收购欧洲竞争对手的行为不以为然。

“像雪佛龙收购英国石油公司这样的重大收购现在不太可能发生。专业咨询公司 MKP Advisors 的董事总经理泰勒·特布斯 (Tyler Tebbs) 表示,这实在太大了,雪佛龙将在几年内因收购赫斯而束手无策。

他补充说,在收购先锋公司之后,埃克森美孚也处于类似的境地。

“超额折扣”

Exane BNP Paribas分析师卢卡斯·赫尔曼(Lucas Herrmann)在9月19日的一份报告中表示,英国石油公司首席执行官伯纳德·卢尼(Bernard Looney)上个月意外辞职,使该公司面临被收购的风险。

他表示,与美国竞争对手相比,英国石油公司的交易价格比同行“大幅折扣”,因此可能很便宜。

周一,英国石油公司 (BP) 的市值约为 1130 亿美元,而壳牌 (Shell) 的市值为 2200 亿美元。雪佛龙的市值为 3180 亿美元,埃克森美孚的市值为 4400 亿美元。

自 2020 年初 COVID-19 疫情爆发后,欧洲公司削减了股息,并且一些投资者担心支出转向回报率较低的低碳业务对利润的影响,壳牌和英国石油公司的股价表现逊于美国竞争对手比化石燃料。

尽管英国石油公司和壳牌公司都拥有大型石油和天然气生产、炼油、零售和贸易业务,这些业务很适合雪佛龙和埃克森美孚的业务,但它们的许多可再生能源业务不会引起美国公司的兴趣,三位投资者在接受路透社采访时表示一位不愿透露姓名的人士表示。

他们补充说,从监管和反垄断的角度来看,这种规模的结合也将很复杂。

欧盟比美国政府更努力地推动石油和天然气公司寻找化石燃料的替代商业模式并接受能源转型。

一些欧洲投资者还呼吁能源公司改变其商业模式,以帮助应对气候变化。其他寻求短期回报的股东敦促重新关注石油和天然气,促使壳牌和英国石油公司推迟其转型目标。

 

(罗恩·布索报道;西蒙·韦伯和芭芭拉·刘易斯编辑)


原文链接/oilandgas360

Yahoo Finance


LONDON – The prospect of Exxon Mobil or Chevron buying European majors has receded after the two leading U.S. oil companies announced major acquisitions focused on the Americas this month, investors said.

Analysis: Mega transatlantic oil mergers less likely after Exxon, Chevron deals- oil and gas 360

Source: Reuters

Speculation that Chevron and Exxon might try to buy rivals BP and Shell intensified over the last two years as the European majors underperformed their U.S. rivals.

Investors punished the European companies for their pivot towards renewables and low carbon energy while rewarding the U.S. companies’ focus on oil and gas production that drove record profits last year.

The oil industry last went through an era of major consolidation in the late 1990s when Exxon, Shell, BP and France’s TotalEnergies merged with rivals to create huge integrated companies. The acquisitions followed a collapse in oil prices that weakened many companies.

Today, the majors are sitting on piles of cash after a surge in energy prices linked to the Ukraine war pushed profits to record highs last year.

Rather than taking the risk of investing in exploration and development, Exxon and Chevron have bought companies to increase production and focused on financial discipline and rewarding shareholders.

Exxon, the largest U.S. oil producer, said on Oct. 11 it had agreed to buy Pioneer Natural Resources in an all-stock deal valued at $59.5 billion that would make it the biggest producer in the largest U.S. oilfield and secure a decade of low-cost production.

BP’s shares dropped by 2% on Monday, hours after Chevron announced it had agreed to buy U.S. rival producer Hess for $53 billion. Investors said some in the market had expected Chevron would buy the company.

A senior industry source close to the issue, as well as analysts and investors dismissed any imminent U.S. purchase of European rivals.

“A major acquisition like Chevron buying BP is unlikely now. It would simply be too big, and Chevron are going to have their hands tied with the Hess acquisition for a few years,” Tyler Tebbs, managing director at MKP Advisors, a specialist advisory firm, said.

He added Exxon was in a similar position following the Pioneer deal.

‘EXAGGERATED DISCOUNT’

The unexpected resignation of BP CEO Bernard Looney last month had exposed the company to the risk of takeovers, Exane BNP Paribas analyst Lucas Herrmann said in a Sept. 19 note.

He said BP, more than peers, was trading at an “exaggerated discount” to U.S. rivals, making it potentially a bargain.

BP’s market capitalisation was around $113 billion on Monday, while Shell’s stood at $220 billion. Chevron’s market capitalisation was $318 billion, and Exxon’s was $440 billion.

Shares of Shell and BP have underperformed their U.S. rivals since the European companies cut their dividend after the COVID-19 epidemic took hold in early 2020 and as some investors worried about the impact on profits of a spending shift towards low carbon businesses that provided lower returns than fossil fuels.

While BP and Shell both have large oil and gas production, refining, retail and trading businesses, which could fit well with Chevron and Exxon’s operations, many of their renewables operations would not interest the U.S. companies, three investors who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity said.

A combination of that scale would also be complex from a regulatory and anti-trust perspective, they added.

The European Union has pushed oil and gas companies harder than the U.S. government to find alternative business models to fossil fuels and to embrace the energy transition.

Some European investors have also campaigned for energy companies to shift their business models to help tackle climate change. Other shareholders, seeking short-term returns, have urged a returned focus to oil and gas, prompting Shell and BP to roll back their transition targets.

 

(Reporting by Ron Bousso; Editing by Simon Webb and Barbara Lewis)