伍德麦肯齐:石油和矿业公司必须采取新战略以实现低碳转型

作者:
, 《油田技术》副主编


随着能源和自然资源行业的公司努力在满足股东回报和满足利益相关者低碳需求之间找到平衡,新的战略正在出现,这可能成为推动资本配置决策朝着增长和缩小估值差距的催化剂。伍德麦肯兹 (Wood Mackenzie) 的新地平线报告“推动变革”。“去年,能源安全已经超越了可持续性,”伍德麦肯兹公司研究部高级副总裁汤姆·埃拉科特 (Tom Ellacott) 表示。“公司也受益于最近的大宗商品价格和利润率,创造了创纪录的现金流。”

“这并不是说脱碳目标无法实现,优先事项也不能改变。但为了刺激活动,需要重新调整低碳技术投资的当前风险和回报,以及政府利益相关者和金融机构的新激励措施。没有一个答案,但聪明的石油、天然气和自然资源公司将意识到,保护现状将是一个错误,并开始管理其投资组合,以反映管理遗留产出和碳管理的平衡方法。

报告称,企业可以通过三种关键方式应对这一复杂的动态:培育传统摇钱树,同时转变为转型增长思维,将转型风险和回报纳入差异化的投资门槛率,以及使用新的商业模式来实现增长和关闭估价折扣。

改变风险回报平衡

石油和天然气公司和矿业公司的预期再投资率(投资占运营现金流的百分比)在 40% 至 50% 之间,落后于追求增长的公用事业公司的投资率。自过去十年中期以来,这两个行业的再投资率一直呈下降趋势。

这在很大程度上是由于资本限制和大规模回购等策略对公司和投资者来说是成功的。自 2021 年底以来,石油和天然气以及金属和采矿业的表现分别优于大盘 44% 和 16%。

“实际上,改变投资者情绪的唯一方法是进一步改变风险回报方程,”埃拉科特说。“我们必须以多种方式看待这一点。例如,政府支持计划(例如美国的通货膨胀法案)、欧洲碳边界调整机制(European Carbon Border adjustment Mechanism)等法规,或客户驱动的市场创建(例如消费者愿意为低碳能源支付溢价)。金融机构也可以发挥重要作用,通过提高借款利率来惩罚变化缓慢的公司。这一切都有望推动新的投资拐点,从而促进更多的低碳能源活动。”

管理投资拐点

由于资本的大力注入,风能和太阳能已经度过了拐点,并正在迅速扩大规模。能源转型支持系统——金属、CCUS、生物能源、氢和充电基础设施也必须达到类似的目标。

“政策的演变是一个很大的未知数。几十年来,企业可能会面临高碳氢化合物回报与低风险、低回报转型项目之间的资本配置困境。”Wood Mackenzie 公司金属和采矿业务主管詹姆斯·怀特塞德 (James Whiteside) 表示。“公司需要制定强有力的战略来应对能源转型不断发展的监管环境,而不是追逐胡萝卜或回避大棒。锂和稀土元素等最容易受到转型影响的金属比镍、铜和铝等成熟商品吸引了更多媒体关注。但正是这些贱金属需要调动最多的增长资本来实现气候目标。”

根据该报告,公司董事会可以通过三种关键途径来应对这种动态:

关注传统的摇钱树,同时转变为转型增长思维。投资者期望公司通过关注其遗留投资组合来平衡短期回报需求,同时实施低碳转型计划。低碳利润中心开始支持“并取代”传统摇钱树的可见性可能会成为重估触发器,将市场转变为转型增长思维。公司可以缩减股票回购规模来为这一转变提供资金。矿业巨头和国际石油公司将 1570 亿美元(即其运营现金流的 30%)用于 2022 年回购。公司仍可增加基本股息,并将再投资率提高至 60% 以上。

调整门槛利率以反映转型风险和回报。内部门槛利率需要遵循外部资本成本、风险和长期增长潜力的差异。转型投资低“回报”的部分原因在于风险规避和选择性。商业风险较大的低碳项目可能会获得更高的回报,例如包含碳价格风险的 CCUS 开发。在不确定时期,公司需要更大的选择组合来管理风险。

利用并购 (M&A) 和新的商业模式来实现增长并缩小估值折扣。主要石油公司已经在利用并购来加速向低碳业务的扩张,例如生物燃料、沼气和可再生能源。然而,分配给低碳并购的总体资本仍然有限。矿业巨头还继续采取低风险的方式收购转型型商品。新的或修改的商业模式可以帮助减少转型估值折扣,并支持资本成本和风险回报状况截然不同的企业的有效资本配置。

埃拉科特表示:“如果与经过风险调整和透明的门槛利率相结合,转型增长思维并不意味着放弃资本纪律。” “根据公司的规模、投资组合构成、地域重点和遗留技能,不同的课程有不同的选择。这个奖项值得为之奋斗,它可以弯曲碳曲线,将世界气温限制在远低于 2°C。平衡、有纪律、以转型为重点的投资方法可以可持续地增加企业现金流,从而提高公司估值。”

请在此处阅读整个报告

在线阅读文章:https://www.oilfieldtechnology.com/drilling-and-product/20042023/wood-mackenzie-oil-and-mining-companies-must-adapt-new-strategies-to-deliver-low-碳转变/

 

本文已被标记为以下内容:

石油和天然气新闻


原文链接/oilfieldtechnology

Wood Mackenzie: Oil and mining companies must adapt new strategies to deliver low-carbon transition

Published by , Deputy Editor
Oilfield Technology,


As companies in the energy and natural resource sector struggle to find the balance between satisfying shareholder returns and meeting stakeholder low-carbon demands, new strategies are emerging that could be the catalyst to drive capital allocation decisions toward growth and closing valuation gaps, according to ‘Fuelling Change’ a new Horizons report from Wood Mackenzie. “In the last year, energy security has trumped sustainability,” said Tom Ellacott, Senior Vice President, Corporate Research for Wood Mackenzie. “Companies too have benefitted from recent commodity prices and margins to deliver record cash flow.”

“That is not to say that decarbonisation goals cannot be met and priorities cannot change. But to spur activity, there needs to be a recalibration of current risks and rewards for investment in low carbon technologies, as well as new incentives from both government stakeholders and financial institutions. There’s no one answer, but smart oil and gas and natural resources companies will realise that protecting the status quo would be a mistake and start to manage their portfolios to reflect a balanced approach of managing legacy output and carbon management.”

According to the report, companies can address this complex dynamic in three key ways: nurturing legacy cash cows while simultaneously shifting to a transition-growth mindset, incorporating transition risks and rewards into differentiated investment hurdles rates and using new business models to enable growth and close valuation discounts.

Shifting risk-reward balance

Expected reinvestment rates (investment as a percentage of operating cash flow) in oil and gas companies and miners of between 40% and 50% trail the investment rates of utilities chasing growth. Reinvestment rates in both sectors have been trending down since the middle of the last decade.

In a large part, this has been due to strategies such as capital restraint and massive buybacks that have been successful for companies and investors. The oil and gas and metals and mining sectors have outperformed the broader market by 44% and 16%, respectively, since the end of 2021.

“Realistically, the only way to change investor sentiment is to bring about further shifts in the risk-reward equation,” said Ellacott. “We will have to see this in a variety of ways. Examples are government support schemes like the Inflation Reduction Act in the US, regulations such as The European Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, or customer-driven market creation, such as a willingness from consumers to pay premiums for low-carbon energy. Financial institutions could also play a big part by punishing slow-to-change companies with higher borrowing rates. This will all hopefully drive new investment inflection points that will catalyse more activity for low-carbon energies.”

Managing investment inflection points

Wind and solar have passed through inflection points and are scaling rapidly, thanks to strong infusions of capital. A similar point will have to be reached for the energy transition support system – metals, CCUS, bioenergy, hydrogen and charging infrastructure.

“The evolution of policy is a big unknown. Companies may face the capital allocation dilemma of high hydrocarbon returns versus lower-risk, lower-return transition-enabling projects for decades yet,” said James Whiteside, Head of Corporate Metals and Mining for Wood Mackenzie. “Rather than chasing carrots or ducking sticks, companies need to develop robust strategies to navigate the unfolding regulatory landscape of the energy transition. The metals most exposed to the transition, such as lithium and rare earth elements, have garnered more media attention than established commodities such as nickel, copper and aluminium. But it is these base metals that need to mobilise the most growth capital to achieve climate goals.”

According to the report, there are three key routes for corporate boards to navigate this dynamic:

Tend to the legacy cash cows while shifting to a transition growth mindset. Investors expect companies to balance the need for returns in the short term by tending to their legacy portfolio, while delivering low carbon transformation plans. Visibility of low-carbon profit centres starting to support – and supplant – the legacy cash cows could be a revaluation trigger that shifts the market to a transition growth mindset. Companies can scale back share buybacks to fund the shift. The mining majors and international oil companies allocated US$157 billion, or 30% of their operating cash flow, to buybacks in 2022. Companies could still grow base dividends and lift reinvestment rates to over 60%.

Bend hurdle rates to reflect transition risks and rewards. Internal hurdle rates need to follow the divergence in external costs of capital, risk and long-term growth potential. Part of the low ‘return’ of transitional investment is risk avoidance and optionality. Higher returns could be up for grabs in low-carbon projects with greater commercial risk, such as CCUS developments that include carbon price risk. In times of uncertainty, companies need a bigger portfolio of options to manage risk.

Use Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) and new business models to enable growth and close valuation discounts. Major oil companies are already using M&A to accelerate expansion into low-carbon businesses, such as biofuels, biogas and renewable power. However, overall capital allocated to low-carbon M&A remains limited. Mining majors also continue to take a low-risk approach to acquisitions of transition-focused commodities. New or modified business models can help reduce the transition valuation discount and support efficient capital allocation in businesses with quite different costs of capital and risk-reward profiles.

“A transition growth mindset does not mean abandoning capital discipline if combined with risk-adjusted and transparent hurdle rates,” said Ellacott. “There are different horses for different courses, depending on a company’s scale, portfolio make-up, geographical focus and legacy skillset. The prize is worth fighting for, bending the carbon curve to limit the world’s temperatures to well below 2°C. And a balanced, disciplined, transition-focused investment approach could grow corporate cash flows sustainably, boosting company valuations.”

Read the entire report here.

Read the article online at: https://www.oilfieldtechnology.com/drilling-and-production/20042023/wood-mackenzie-oil-and-mining-companies-must-adapt-new-strategies-to-deliver-low-carbon-transition/

 

This article has been tagged under the following:

Oil & gas news