沙子管理/控制

UKCS 固体管理系统的远程监控

在无人平台上实现了 1,000 多个小时的远程监控连续生产,这是北海首次实现独立的海上固体管理。

远程操作由挪威卑尔根的陆上操作中心进行管理。
远程操作由挪威卑尔根的陆上操作中心进行管理。
资料来源:Ilja C. Hendel。

由于粘土和支撑剂的生产,北海南部的一口井被关闭。在关闭之前,该工厂每天的产量为 1,199 B。运营商面临的挑战是清理油井并恢复生产。该运营商希望提高可持续性指标并尽可能减少排放。

所使用的平台通常是无人安装(NUI),这进一步增加了项目的复杂性。这种类型的平台意味着任何船员都不能过夜,并导致需要提前考虑一些新的挑战。

1.远程监控能力至关重要。

2. 可靠、准确的信息流是规划白天工作流程的关键。

3. 工作时间减少到每天 12 小时,因此维护和固体物的清空必须在白天进行。

4. 用于装配和组装的起重机能力有限。

上述考虑因素,再加上去除船上人员 (POB) 的能力、固体处理的效率以及紧凑的占地面积,意味着 DualFlow 5K PSI 除砂器被选为操作员的首选设备。

提前规划

计划进行为期 7 周的井筒清理以恢复生产,同时清除粘土/支撑剂固体。在此期间,FourPhase 团队还监测了油井的动态。

了解海上空间限制是关键。为了启动该项目,我们编写了一份可行性报告来获取基本的油井数据,其中包括流量、石油/天然气特性、压力、温度、预期固体产量和预期侵蚀率。安排了一次现场考察,以确定铺设区域、管道布线、连接、公用设施和钻井平台的可能性。还进行了模拟来评估流动和侵蚀性能,并确保计划的工作在除砂器的操作窗口内。通过提前创建 3D 装备模拟,确定可以实现高效的装备。这一阶段还提高了物流效率,因为对设备和管道的精确测量确保了将尽可能少的多余材料运往海外。这种方法进一步提高了项目的 ESG 指标。

执行

除砂器在一个装置中包含两个获得专利的单线旋风分离器。当一个容器被隔离和冲洗时,生产会通过另一个容器继续进行,提供经过验证的 99.8% 的分离效率和 20μm 至 10μm 固体的动态范围,高达 20,000 B/D 和 20 MMscf/D。其结果是连续生产和更好的资产管理,因为数据可以管理侵蚀的早期阶段。由于其设计,它能够独特地应对该项目带来的具体挑战。

该系统由操作员附近的控制平台进行监控,如果出现紧急情况,可以关闭油井。卑尔根的运营和技术中心以及 FourPhase 阿伯丁设施远程监控系统的关键运行参数。

从 POB 的角度来看,该解决方案消除了传统上劳动密集型的手动操作,例如阀门操作和冲洗操作。这些操作可以自动运行,也可以通过远程单击按钮来运行。取消此类操作直接减少了 POB 和相关排放。

为了确保远程监控成功,控制平台和岸上之间必须建立安全的远程连接。这意味着需要定制接口。人机界面适应了客户特定的界面。这包括设置警报以提醒关键指标,包括固体产量、流量、容器压力和空气供应。除砂器的中央控制装置可与任何客户界面集成,在本例中为客户 SCADA(监控和数据采集)系统。这种集成使得远程访问能够查看操作员 SCADA 系统的页面。在集成过程中,遵循网络安全协议以确保只读访问。

最新一代的系统还标配预测性维护。通过从近 600 个 I/O(输入/输出)数据点收集的实时数据来支持预测性维护计划,以优化每次清理操作。此功能的好处是进一步消除侵蚀风险,减少设备磨损并提高安全指标。

预计该井会产生大量固体,因此需要定期进行固体冲洗,因此需要频繁前往平台。据预测,按照估计的固体生产率,可能需要每 5 至 6 天进行一次旅行。

安装后,除砂器无需海上常驻船员,从而减少了 POB 中的四人。在装配和调试阶段,一艘步行上班船位于 NUI 旁边,以满足船员的需求。此后,只需由 FourPhase 主管定期进行冲洗和检查即可。每天 12 小时的作业窗口意味着船员将被送往近海进行船舶冲洗/系统检查。

由于该平台是 NUI,除砂器需要在卑尔根拆卸,然后才能运输以进行调动。这对于该系统来说是第一次。为了实现这一目标,必须拆除该装置的一个旋风容器以满足起重机的重量限制(8 吨)。一旦它被提升到 NUI 上,就会通过舱口降下并放置在井湾区域,供船员重新组装。通往井湾铺设区域的通道非常狭窄,这意味着系统的紧凑占地面积(2×2 m 或 6.7×6.7 英尺)是选择该技术的关键原因。

在通常无人值守的海上设施上安装沙子管理系统。
在通常无人值守的海上设施上安装沙子管理系统。

结果

该系统提供了无固体的生产流程,同时还降低了运营成本。它被配置为自主运行,以去除生产流程中的固体,确保系统中没有支撑剂。在整个项目中,产生的固体量远远低于预期。这使得无需前往近海冲洗旋风分离器容器,从而减少 POB。六周后,当油井达到稳定生产状态时,系统被安装完毕。该井继续以干预前的水平生产。

从井中采集的流体样品显示平均粒径为 4 至 100 μm。在无人平台上实现了超过 1,000 小时的远程监控连续生产,这是北海首次实现独立固体管理。通过实现连续生产,生产率保持在较高水平。然而,随着从多个地点成功管理远程监控,主要成就是人员离岸成本和相关旅行排放量显着降低。

下一章

该项目的下一阶段是进一步开发系统的远程监控方面并进行部署。英国和挪威地区目前正在计划在多个平台上进行远程操作。下一步重要的一步是将第三方系统集成到 FourPhase 生态系统中,以允许完全远程操作的生产流程恢复。作为市场上第一个具有远程操作功能的海上自动化固体管理系统,该系统能够完全消除 POB,并在钻机基础设施允许的情况下完全远程操作。最新一代的控制系统可以远程操作所有 FourPhase 设备。

随着该行业进一步迈向固体管理数字化,该技术将为边缘油田和海上 NUI 的使用带来新的可能性。这些项目成功的关键无疑是创建安全连接和强大的数据流。


脴yvind Heradstveit是 FourPhase 的首席执行官。他是一位经验丰富的机械工程师和企业家,对利用技术和数据的力量发展更可持续的石油和天然气行业特别感兴趣。在加入 FourPhase 之前,他曾在 Mechanica-Oceaneering 和 Malm Orstad 工作。

原文链接/jpt
Sand management/control

Remote Monitoring of a Solids-Management System in the UKCS

Over 1,000 hours of remotely monitored continuous production was achieved on an unmanned platform—a first for standalone offshore solids management in the North Sea.

Remote operations managed from onshore operations centre in Bergen, Norway.
Remote operations managed from onshore operations centre in Bergen, Norway.
Source: Ilja C. Hendel.

A well in the Southern North Sea was shut in due to clay and proppant production. Before it was shut in, it had been producing 1,199 B/D. The challenge presented by the operator was to clean out the well and reestablish production. The operator wanted to boost sustainability metrics and reduce emissions as much as possible.

Adding further complexity to the project, the platform in use was a normally unmanned installation (NUI). This type of platform meant no crew could stay overnight and resulted in several new challenges being considered upfront.

1. Remote monitoring abilities were crucial.

2. A reliable, accurate information flow was key for planning workflow during the day.

3. The work window was reduced to 12 hours per day, so maintenance and the emptying of solids had to be carried out during the day.

4. Limited crane capacity was available for the rig-up and assembly.

The above considerations, coupled with the ability to remove personnel on board (POB), the efficiency of solids handling, and compact footprint, meant the DualFlow 5K PSI desander was selected as the equipment of choice by the operator.

Advance Planning

A 7-week wellbore cleanup was planned to reinstate production while also removing the clay/proppant solids. During this time, the FourPhase team also monitored the well performance.

Understanding the space constraints offshore was key. To kick off the project, a feasibility report was developed to capture basic well data, which included flow rates, oil/gas properties, pressure, temperature, expected solids production, and expected erosional rates. A site visit was arranged to identify laydown areas, pipework routing, connections, utilities, and rig‑up possibilities. Simulations were also carried out to assess the flow and erosional performance and to ensure the planned work was within the operational window of the desander. By creating a 3D rig-up simulation in advance, it was determined that an efficient rig-up could be achieved. This stage also created logistical efficiencies, as accurate measurements for equipment and piping ensured that minimum excess material was shipped offshore. This approach further boosted the ESG metrics of the projects.

Implementation

The desander contains two patented, single-liner cyclones in one unit. As one vessel is isolated and flushed, production continues through the other, delivering a proven separation efficiency of 99.8% and a dynamic range of 20-μm to 10‑mm solids up to 20,000 B/D and 20 MMscf/D. The result is continuous production and better asset management because the data allow early stages of erosion to be managed. Due to its design, it was uniquely able to tackle the specific challenges posed by this project.

The system was monitored by the operator’s nearby control platform, where the well could be shut in if there was an emergency. The Operations and Technology Centre in Bergen, along with the FourPhase Aberdeen facilities, remotely monitored the system’s key operating parameters.

From a POB perspective, the solution removed traditionally labor-intensive manual operations such as valve manipulation and flushing operations. These operations were run automatically or with a click of a button remotely. Removal of such operations directly reduced POB and associated emissions.

To ensure the remote monitoring was a success, it was imperative that there was a secure remote connection between the control platform and onshore. This meant that bespoke interfaces were required. A human-machine interface was adapted to the customer-specific interface. This included setting alarms to alert for key metrics including solids production, flow, vessel pressure, and air supply. The desander’s central control integrates with any customer interface and, in this case, the customer SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) system. This integration enabled remote access to view a page of the operator’s SCADA system. During integration, cybersecurity protocols were followed to ensure read-only access.

The latest generation of the system also includes predictive maintenance as standard. A predictive maintenance program is supported through real-time data gathered from almost 600 I/O (input/output) data points to optimize each cleanup operation. The benefit of this feature is that the risk of erosion is further removed, reducing wear and tear on equipment, and boosting safety metrics.

It was anticipated that there was a high solids production from the well, which would require regular solids flushing and, therefore, frequent trips to the platform. It was predicted that at the estimated solids production rate, trips could be required every 5–6 days.

Once installed, the desander removed the need for permanent crew offshore, resulting in a four-man reduction in POB. During the rig-up and commissioning stage, a walk-to-work vessel was positioned alongside the NUI to cater to the needs of the crew. Afterwards, only periodic visits by a FourPhase supervisor were required for flushing and inspection. The 12-hour daily operations window meant that the crew would be shuttled offshore for the vessel flushing /system inspection.

Since the platform was a NUI, the desander would need to be disassembled in Bergen before being transported for mobilization. This was a first for the system. To achieve this, one cyclonic vessel of the unit had to be removed to meet the weight restrictions of the crane (8 tonnes). Once it was lifted onto the NUI, it was then lowered through a hatch and placed in the well-bay area for reassembly by its crew. There was very tight access to the well-bay laydown area, meaning that the compact footprint of the system (2×2 m or 6.7×6.7 ft) was a key reason that the technology was selected.

Rigging up the sand-management system on a normally unmanned installation offshore.
Rigging up the sand-management system on a normally unmanned installation offshore.

The Result

The system delivered solids-free production flow while also reducing operational costs. It was configured to operate autonomously to remove solids from the production flow, guaranteeing that there were no proppants in the system. Throughout the project, the volume of solids produced was far less than expected. This resulted in no offshore visits to flush the cyclone vessels, thus reducing POB. After 6 weeks, when the well reached a steady state of production, the system was rigged down. The well continues to produce at pre-intervention levels.

A fluid sample taken from the well showed an average particle size of 4 to 100 μm. Over 1,000 hours of remotely monitored continuous production was achieved on the unmanned platform—a first for standalone solids management in the North Sea. By achieving continuous production, the production rate was kept at a higher rate. However, with remote monitoring successfully managed from multiple locations, the headline achievement was a significant reduction in personnel offshore costs and associated travel emissions.

The Next Chapter

The next stage of the project is to further develop the remote monitoring aspects of the system and to deploy it. Remote operations on several platforms are now being planned, both in the UK and Norwegian sectors. The important next step is to integrate third-party systems into the FourPhase ecosystem to permit fully remotely operated production flow recovery. As the first offshore automated solids-management system with remote operation capabilities available on the market, the system has the capability to remove POB completely and be fully remote where the rig’s infrastructure allows. The latest generation of the control system enables remote operation of all FourPhase equipment.

As the industry moves further toward the digitalization of solids management, the technology will open new possibilities with regards to marginal fields and the use of NUIs offshore. The key to these projects’ success is undoubtedly the creation of a secure connection and strong data flow.


Øyvind Heradstveit is the CEO of FourPhase. He is an experienced mechanical engineer and entrepreneur, with a particular interest in developing a more sustainable oil and gas industry using the power of technology and data. Prior to FourPhase, he worked at Mechanica-Oceaneering and Malm Orstad.