石油价格


国际能源署 (IEA) 最近发布了 《 2024 年石油 报告》,该报告研究了全球石油供应安全、炼油、贸易和投资的动态。该报告引起了媒体的广泛关注,因为该报告预测到 2030 年石油产量将达到“比预计的全球需求高出惊人的 800 万桶/天”。

报告指出,电动汽车的普及、可再生能源利用率的提高以及中国石油消费量增速的下降是这一预测趋势的主要推动因素。不过,国际能源署仍预计石油需求将增长。国际能源署认为,从 2024 年全球 1.032 亿桶/日的石油需求量来看,到 2029 年,石油需求量将增长至 1.056 亿桶/日,到 2030 年将略微下降至 1.055 亿桶/日(报告中的表 2)。

预计供应增长将主要由非 OPEC+ 国家推动,尤其是美国、巴西、圭亚那和加拿大,这些国家的石油产量预计将达到创纪录水平。预计到 2030 年,非 OPEC+ 国家的石油供应量将增加 600 万桶/天。

相比之下,OPEC+产量预计将保持相对稳定,自愿减产是维持市场稳定的重要因素。预计这种不平衡将对地缘政治产生深远影响,并可能削弱OPEC影响油价的能力。

国际能源署通过查看已公布的项目来预测供应量。然而,要预测供应过剩,国际能源署还必须对现有油田的枯竭、未来的发现和需求趋势做出假设。

2016 年,彭博社在 《又一场石油危机即将来临,而且可能不会有复苏》中做出了类似的预测。该文章研究了电动汽车销售趋势,并写道:“如果这种增长水平持续下去,200 万桶需求减少的崩盘触发基准可能最早在 2023 年到来。”我 对彭博社文章中的假设表示异议 ,并得出结论:

“因此,到 2023 年,不要惊讶地发现,尽管电动汽车持续增长,但原油需求却在增长,而不是像彭博社文章所说的那样每天低 200 万桶。”

事实也确实如此。2023 年全球石油需求量比彭博社 2016 年做出预测时高出约 500 万桶/天,而且我们知道 2023 年的油价肯定不会预示供应过剩。

但想想如果市场对彭博预测信以为真,会发生什么。如果石油项目的投资因为预测的供应过剩而枯竭,那么到 2023 年,油价可能不是平均每桶 78 美元,而是平均每桶 130-150 美元,因为供应不足。价格波动可能是错误预测的结果。

彭博社了解到,最重要的是,这些预测很难做出。事实上,如果你在 2005 年预测美国石油产量将在未来十年内以任何国家中最快的速度增长,世界各地的能源分析师都会笑。但事实确实如此。

我不知道国际能源署的预测是否准确。但我知道,在过去 10 个月中,美国石油产量(尽管仍接近创纪录水平)已经趋于平稳。美国大部分最佳致密油田都已钻探完毕。美国石油产量可能已达到稳定水平,而国际能源署预计到 2030 年,美国石油产量将再增加 200 万桶/天。

国际能源署的预测背后有很多假设。只要有一两个假设是错误的,国际能源署对“惊人”过剩的预测就可能错得惊人。

 

作者:Robert Rapier,来源:  rrapier.com

 


原文链接/OilandGas360

Oil Price


The International Energy Agency (IEA) recently released its Oil 2024 report, which examines the global dynamics for oil supply security, refining, trade, and investment. The report received considerable media attention because of the projection that by 2030 oil production will reach “a staggering 8 million barrels per day above projected global demand.”

The report cites the proliferation of electric vehicles, the growing utilization of renewable energy, and China’s declining oil consumption growth are key contributors to this projected trend. However, the IEA still expects oil demand to grow. From a global base of 103.2 million barrels per day (BPD) in 2024, the IEA believes demand will grow to 105.6 million BPD by 2029 and decrease slightly to 105.5 million BPD in 2030 (Table 2 in the report).

Supply growth is expected to be largely driven by non-OPEC+ countries, particularly the United States, Brazil, Guyana, and Canada, which are projected to pump at record levels. Non-OPEC+ countries are predicted to add 6 million BPD of supply by 2030.

In contrast, OPEC+ output is expected to remain relatively steady, with voluntary production cuts being a significant factor in maintaining market stability. The imbalance is projected to have far-reaching implications for geopolitics and may diminish OPEC’s capacity to influence oil prices.

The IEA makes its supply projections in part by looking at announced projects. However, to project a supply excess, the IEA also must make assumptions regarding depletion in existing fields, future discoveries, and demand trends.

In 2016, Bloomberg made a similar prediction in Another Oil Crash Is Coming, and There May Be No Recovery. The article looked at trends of electric vehicle sales, and wrote “If that level of growth continues, the crash-triggering benchmark of 2 million barrels of reduced demand could come as early as 2023.” I took exception to the assumptions that were made in the Bloomberg article and concluded:

“Thus, don’t be surprised in 2023 to see that instead of crude oil demand being 2 million bpd lower than today per the Bloomberg article, we see that oil demand grew despite the continued growth of electric vehicles.”

That is in fact what happened. Global oil demand in 2023 was around 5 million BPD higher than it was in 2016 when Bloomberg made the prediction, and as we know oil prices in 2023 certainly didn’t signal an oversupply.

But consider what might have happened if the markets took the Bloomberg projections at face value. If investments in oil projects had dried up because of the predicted supply excess, instead of oil prices averaging $78 per barrel in 2023, they might have averaged $130-$150 as supply fell short of demand. Volatile prices can be a consequence of wrong projections.

The bottom line is that it is hard to make these projections, as Bloomberg learned. For that matter, if you had predicted in 2005 that U.S. oil production would grow at the fastest rate of any country over the next decade, energy analysts everywhere would have laughed. But that’s exactly what happened.

I don’t know if the IEA projection will prove to be accurate. I do know that over the past 10 months, U.S. oil production — although still near record levels — has flattened. Most of the best tight oil sites in the U.S. have been drilled. U.S. oil production may be reaching a plateau, while the IEA is projecting another 2 million BPD of growth in the U.S. by 2030.

There are many assumptions behind the IEA’s projection. All it takes is for one or two of those assumptions to be wrong, and the IEA’s projections of a “staggering” excess could be staggeringly wrong.

 

By Robert Rapier via rrapier.com