雅虎财经


雪佛龙收购赫斯 HES.N 的交易 将释放价值 150 亿美元的税收优惠,这些优惠一度被扔进会计垃圾箱,因为合并后的公司将利用赫斯过去的亏损来削减未来的付款。税务专家。

雪佛龙收购赫斯恢复数十亿美元的税盾 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:路透社

 税盾是雪佛龙上个月大规模收购赫斯的一个鲜为人知的优势 。税收优惠预计将为这家美国第二大石油和天然气生产商在未来几年提供数亿美元的额外年度现金流。

美国大学科戈德商学院会计学教授唐纳德·威廉姆森表示,“税收优惠无疑是雪佛龙对赫斯估值的一个因素。” “赫斯的损失将使雪佛龙能够在几年内大幅降低税率。”

1918 年《税收法》首先允许企业将亏损结转为税收优惠,以消除收入随时间的大幅波动。但只有当一家公司最终能够赚到足够的钱来缴纳巨额税款时,这些损失才会派上用场。

根据 Hess 在 2017 年的报告中提供的解释,在两家公司同意这项 530 亿美元的全股票交易之前,Hess 前几年的净运营亏损超过 150 亿美元,并且由于利润低和亏损严重而无法利用这些亏损。其财务报表。

这家独立石油和天然气钻探公司在2016年因油价暴跌而遭受重创,至今未能完全恢复。

雪佛龙首席财务官皮埃尔·布雷伯 (Pierre Breber) 在 10 月 23 日交易后不久的电话会议上告诉分析师,雪佛龙将从赫斯过去的损失中受益。

“当你合并这些公司时,我们在美国的收入会增加,我们可以利用这些净运营亏损,”他说。

该公司拒绝提供有关福利规模的任何细节。

威廉姆森解释说,1986 年的税法改革限制了公司每年可以将多少净营业亏损计入其税单,这一规定旨在阻止企业仅仅为了贩卖净营业亏损而进行收购。

该限额的计算方法是将收购价值乘以美国国税局每月公布的适用联邦税率 (AFR)。

威廉姆森表示,在雪佛龙的案例中,针对美国所得税的净营业损失限额可能高达每年 19.3 亿美元。

当该损失限额乘以 21% 的美国联邦税率时,底线效应就是每年可能超过 4 亿美元的额外现金流。

纳税人的焦虑

纳税人维权人士已经对低企业税率感到沮丧,他们对这项福利提出了批评。

“雪佛龙和其他美国公司从净经营亏损中获得的税收优惠绝对会破坏我们的联邦预算,”美国进步中心分析师让·罗斯说。“这是提高企业所得税税率的有力且适当的理由。”

根据国会预算办公室的数据,去年企业税收总额达到创纪录的 4,250 亿美元。

过去十年,雪佛龙目前的美国联邦税支出平均每年为4000万美元。根据公司财务报表,去年该公司当前的联邦税支出为17.2亿美元,占美国210亿美元收入的8.2% 。

美国顶级石油公司埃克森美孚 (XOM.N)  2022 年支付的美国收入比例甚至更小。根据埃克森美孚的财务报表,该公司去年的联邦税收支出为 6.96 亿美元,占美国收入 283 亿美元的 2.5%。

埃克森美孚上个月以 600 亿美元收购Pioneer Resources PXD.N,也将能够在一定程度上削减未来的税款 

截至去年底,先锋公司可用于抵消未来美国联邦税的净运营亏损为 11 亿美元。

然而,埃克森美孚首席执行官达伦·伍兹告诉路透社,税收优惠并不是该公司决定收购先锋的一个因素。

“它太小了,”伍兹在 11 月 1 日波士顿学院首席执行官俱乐部午餐会上发表讲话后说道。

 


原文链接/oilandgas360

Yahoo Finance


Chevron’s deal to buy Hess HES.N will unlock $15 billion worth of tax benefits that had once been relegated to the accounting dustbin, as the combined company takes advantage of Hess’s past losses to cut future payments, according to the company and tax experts.

Chevron takeover of Hess resurrects multi-billion dollar tax shield- oil and gas 360

Source: Reuters

The tax shield is a little-known advantage to Chevron’s mega-takeover of Hess struck last month. The tax benefits are expected to provide the No. 2 U.S. oil and gas producer hundreds of millions of dollars in extra annual cash flow over the next several years.

“The tax benefits were definitely factored into how Chevron valued Hess,” said Donald Williamson, an accounting professor at American University’s Kogod School of Business. “The Hess losses will allow Chevron to lower its tax rate significantly for several years.”

The 1918 Revenue Act first allowed corporations to carry their losses forward as tax benefits to smooth out large fluctuations in income over time. But the losses only come in handy if a company is eventually able to make enough money to have big tax bills.

Before the companies agreed to the $53 billion all-stock deal, Hess was sitting on more than $15 billion in net operating losses from previous years and unable to take advantage of them due to low profits and heavy losses, according to explanations Hess has provided in its financial statements.

The independent oil and gas driller had been stung badly by a crash in oil prices in 2016 and had never fully recovered.

Chevron Chief Financial Officer Pierre Breber told analysts in a conference call shortly after the Oct. 23 deal that Chevron would benefit from Hess’s past losses.

“When you combine the companies, we have the greater U.S. income, and we can use those net operating losses,” he said.

The company declined to provide any details about the size of the benefit.

Williamson explained that a 1986 tax code reform limits how much net operating loss a company can apply each year to its tax bill – a provision meant to discourage corporate takeovers just for the sake of trafficking in net operating losses.

That limit is calculated by multiplying the value of the takeover by the Applicable Federal Rate (AFR) published each month by the Internal Revenue Service.

In Chevron’s case, the net operating loss limit applied against U.S. income taxes could be as high $1.93 billion a year, Williamson said.

The bottom line effect, when that loss limit is multiplied by the U.S. federal tax rate of 21%, is extra cash flow that could top $400 million a year.

TAXPAYER ANGST

Taxpayer advocates, already frustrated by low corporate tax rates, criticized the perk.

“The tax benefits going to Chevron and other U.S. corporations from net operating losses are absolutely undermining our federal budget,” said Jean Ross, an analyst at the Center for American Progress. “There’s a strong and appropriate case to increase the corporate income tax rate.”

Last year, corporate tax revenue totaled a record $425 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

Over the past decade, Chevron’s current U.S. federal tax expense has averaged $40 million a year.Last year, the company’s current federal tax expense was $1.72 billion, or 8.2% of $21 billion in U.S. income, according to company financial statements.

Top U.S. oil company Exxon Mobil XOM.N paid an even smaller percentage in 2022 on U.S.-based income. Its current federal tax expense last year was $696 million, or 2.5% of U.S. income of $28.3 billion, according to Exxon financial statements.

Exxon also will be able to cut its future tax bill somewhat with its $60 billion takeoverdeal last month of Pioneer Resources PXD.N.

At the end of last year, Pioneer net operating losses that could be used to offset future U.S. federal taxes was pegged at $1.1 billion.

Exxon CEO Darren Woods, however, told Reuters the tax benefit was not a factor in the company’s decision to buy Pioneer.

“It’s too small,” Woods said after speaking at the Boston College Chief Executives Club luncheon on Nov. 1.