油藏模拟

当谈到堵塞泄漏时,一些结垢可能会很好

在甲烷泄漏和二氧化碳储存日益受到关注的行业中,寻找密封泄漏的新方法是一项宝贵的技能。

岩石.jpg
方解石晶体,就像在地下生长的晶体一样,可以堵塞微观泄漏路径。
资料来源:BioSqueeze

专注于钻探和压裂岩石的工程师现在正在寻找增加岩石以阻止泄漏的方法。

不乏选择,而且没有一个对水泥挤压的未来构成威胁。

不过,最近的两篇论文让我们得以一睹越来越多的新选择,这些新选择的灵感来自于从堵塞难以捉摸的甲烷泄漏到长期碳储存等难题。

一篇论文讨论了修复微米级裂缝,通过将细菌和化学物质的混合物注入这些空间,在这些空间中形成碳酸钙密封,从而使气体通过环空泄漏。

另一种方法旨在通过建造长的地下隔离墙和堵塞断层等方法来填充大的开口。这个想法是抽出在泄漏点相遇的两股化学物质流,并建立一个不渗透的重晶石屏障。

在 3 月份的 SPE 储层模拟会议上关于建造重晶石屏障的演讲结束后,听众中的一位工程师在提出问题时赞扬了该论文的作者、塔尔萨大学副教授拉米·尤尼斯 (Rami Younis) 尝试了一些“疯狂的想法。”

这将是“疯狂的”,因为要应对输送化学品流来建造地下屏障的艰巨挑战,以及如何说服那些以与水垢为生的工程师保持水井流动以将水垢引入水库。

尤尼斯的简短回答是,重晶石可以利用现成的成分形成持久的屏障,这些成分可以运送到偏远地区。论文中的表格强调了其他可用选项如何在其中一项或两项方面失败。有些不坚固且不持久,例如凝胶和纳米泡沫。其他输送则比较棘手,例如泵送水泥或方解石。

此外,随着时间的推移,水泥会变脆并破裂,而方解石会受到强酸的侵蚀,该论文称。

第二种替代方案由一家名为 BioSqueeze 的公司发明,其主要论点是获取。富含细菌和化学物质的水可以进入小至微米的地方,而大多数替代品需要大 100 倍以上的开口。该公司表示,结果比原来强七倍。

BioSqueeze 联合创始人兼研发副总裁兰迪·希伯特 (Randy Hiebert) 表示,“我们使用天然土壤细菌,而不是病原体”,形成类似于石灰石的岩石。

不利的一面是,充当催化剂的细菌无法在 170°F 以上的温度下生存。

这两项创新都受到了质疑。

虽然该技术是在美国能源部的资助下开发的,并且该公司已经进行了 4 年的商业工作,但希伯特仍然必须让石油工程师相信细菌可以快速结晶该公司专有的化学品混合物以堵塞泄漏。

但一些棘手的问题迫使客户尝试新的东西。希伯特回忆起一家未透露姓名的大型石油公司的一项成功工作,该公司在失败的解决方案上花费了数百万美元。该公司最终给 BioSqueeze 打电话,该公司在潜在解决方案供应商名单上排名第 17位。

尤尼斯一直试图从实验室工作和计算机模拟中收集足够的证据,以说服联邦官员,他值得从分配给碳捕获和储存研究的资金中获得研究资助。

这些只是国际上致力于此类新颖堵塞想法的研究和初创公司的两个例子。该行业得到了政府计划的大力支持,这些计划旨在限制甲烷排放(全球变暖的主要原因)以及碳捕获和储存,这需要建立基本上永久持续的地下储存。

一些人正在寻找添加到油田水泥中的添加剂,这些添加剂可以与破裂进入的盐水发生反应。流体引起结晶,填充间隙。从壳牌到麻省理工学院 (MIT) 的一组考古学家,都在寻找实现这一目标的方法。

根据《美国科学促进会科学进展》上发表的一项研究,麻省理工学院的研究人员使用最新的化学分析设备剖析了罗马考古遗址收集的水泥的化学成分,试图弄清楚 2000 年前建造的混凝土结构和道路是如何仍然屹立不倒的

当他们对这种材料进行微观分析时,他们对被称为石灰碎屑的微小白色块感到困惑。它们没有任何明显的目的,研究人员无法接受细心的罗马水泥制造商会用这些杂质来制造水泥。他们的化学分析支持了这样一种理论,即这些活性钙与渗漏的水接触并形成碳酸钙,从而使水泥能够自行愈合。

为了测试他们的理论,他们使用确保最终产品中含有石灰碎屑的配方制造了一批水泥。测试时,结果反映了罗马混凝土中发现的方解石填充裂缝。

人们对超长寿水泥越来越感兴趣的一个迹象是科学论文末尾的注释,描述了麻省理工学院的专利,涵盖了这一发现的潜在用途。

罗马水泥_sciadv.add1602-f6.jpg
所提出的古罗马迫击炮自我修复机制的示意图。
资料来源:L. Seymour 等人,美国 科学促进会科学进展https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add1602

八加仑处理

BioSqeeze 的论文描述了俄亥俄州的一项工作,该工作被要求阻止持续的煤气泄漏。州监管机构不会证明该井已正确退役,除非他们堵塞了通过环空小裂缝向上流动的气体。

井主之所以雇用该公司,是因为它提供了一种可以注入地表水泥屏障的处理方法。其他方法需要钻出塞子。

与大多数油田作业的规模相比,“矿化”注入量听起来很小。

在俄亥俄州井场的第一天,他们在 13 分钟内注入了 8 加仑该公司专有的混合流体;每分钟的注射速度明显减慢。

当天晚些时候,我们花了 16 分钟注入那么多液体,随后又花了 22 分钟注入 7 加仑,这表明正在生长的岩石正在填充开口。

在接下来的 36 小时内,随着注入液体量的下降,注入时间增加。第 2 天,经过近 2 小时的泵送后,他们仅能注射 4.6 加仑。

他们停止了,因为注射速率已从 0.56 加仑/分钟的峰值降至 0.01 加仑/分钟。此外,泵送后的压力下降也有所缩小,从早期的 78% 降至最终的 14%。

最重要的是,据该报称,俄亥俄井经过处理后,环空压力降至零,监管机构承认该井已被正确堵塞并废弃。

决赛桌.png
表 1—报道的各种地球工程应用中的密封剂和输送方法。
来源:SPE 212221

击中目标

尤尼斯在演讲中表示,挑战在于证明多个注入井可以提供输送成分所需的化学流,以确保“在泄漏点形成流体动力密封”。

到目前为止,工作主要是实验室测试和计算机模拟。模拟使用的注入井组的模式与注水所用的模式相呼应。

与注水一样,所使用的液体价格低廉且来源丰富。但通过注水提高石油产量的长期经验表明,很难以可预测的方式将流体流输送到地下目标。

这项工作从实验室测试开始。塔尔萨大学石油工程副教授 Jun Lu 将两股成分通过不同的管道注入砂岩岩心。

该论文称,需要单独的注入点来“避免管道内发生的快速水垢沉积”。

尤尼斯表示,在他们注入了 200 个孔隙体积的盐水成分(硫酸盐和硫酸根离子)后,“岩心的射线扫描显示,在两半之间已经形成了一层薄壁的重晶石垢。”

该论文还报告了“水文-机械-化学耦合”输运模型的两次模拟结果。

在其中一项研究中,他们制作了一个又长又薄的重晶石帘,可用于堵塞天然气储存场所的泄漏。在第二次中,他们针对代表断层的较小区域注入了大量液体。

在这两种情况下,测试都以模拟空间内的压力上升而结束,这表明它们已经成功,就像轮胎修补洞后保持空气一样。

根据这些结果,尤尼斯希望赢得将这一想法推向现场测试所需的拨款。

供进一步阅读

SPE 213099 生物矿化:表面注入消除 Bradenhead 压力作者:BioSqueeze 的 Randy Hiebert 和 John Griffin。

SPE 212221 裂缝中选择性无机沉淀对弹性和安全地下储存场地进行地球工程的数值研究,作者:Shijun Fan、Rami M. Younis 和 Jun Lu,塔尔萨大学。

热混合:对古罗马混凝土耐久性的机械见解, 作者:LM Seymour 和 J. Maragh,麻省理工学院;和 P. Sabatini,DMAT SRL 等人美国科学促进会,《科学进步》, 2023 年 1 月。  

原文链接/jpt
Reservoir simulation

When It Comes To Plugging Leaks, Some Scaling Could Be Good

In an industry where methane leaks and carbon dioxide storage are increasingly important concerns, finding new ways to seal leaks is a valuable skill.

rocks.jpg
A calcite crystal like the ones grown in the ground to plug microscopic leak paths.
Source: BioSqueeze

Engineers that have focused on drilling and fracturing rock are now looking at ways to grow it to stop leaks.

There’s no shortage of options, and none of them threaten the future of the cement squeezes.

Two recent papers, though, offer a glimpse at the growing array of new options inspired by difficult problems ranging from plugging elusive methane leaks to long-term carbon storage.

One paper discusses healing micron-scale cracks that allow gas leaks through the annulus by injecting a mix of bacteria and chemicals into those spaces, where they create a calcium carbonate seal.

The other approach is aimed at filling large openings with methods ranging from building long, underground barrier walls to plugging faults. The idea is to pump down two streams of chemicals that meet at the leak site and build an impermeable barite barrier.

After the presentation at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference in March on building barite barriers, an engineer in the audience began his question by praising the paper’s author, Rami Younis, an associate professor at the University of Tulsa, for trying out some “crazy ideas.”

That would be “crazy” as in taking on the daunting challenges of delivering streams of chemicals to build an underground barrier, and how to convince engineers who fight scale for a living to keep wells flowing to introduce scale into the reservoir.

Younis’ short answer was barite can create a lasting barrier using readily available ingredients that can be delivered into remote spots. A table in the paper highlighted how other available options fail on one or both of those counts. Some are not strong and long-lasting, such as gels and nanofoams. Others are tricky to deliver, such as pumping cement or calcite.

Also, over time, cement can get brittle and break up while calcite can be attacked by strong acid, the paper said.

The leading argument for the second alternative, invented by a company called BioSqueeze, is access. The bacteria- and chemical-rich water can go in places as small as a micron, while most of the alternatives require openings more than 100 times larger. The company said the result is seven times stronger than the original.

“We use natural soil bacteria, which are not pathogens” which form rock that is similar to limestone, said Randy Hiebert, co-founder and vice president for research and development for BioSqueeze.

On the downside, the bacteria that act as a catalyst cannot survive temperatures above 170°F.

Both innovations have been greeted with skepticism.

While the technology was developed with funding from the US Department of Energy and the company has been doing commercial work for 4 years, Hiebert still must convince petroleum engineers that bacteria can quickly crystalize the company’s proprietary mix of chemicals to plug leaks.

But some nagging problems force customers to try something new. Hiebert recalled a successful job for an unnamed large oil company which had spent millions on failed solutions. The company finally called BioSqueeze, which was 17th on the list of potential providers of solutions.

Younis has been trying to gather enough evidence from lab work and computer simulations to convince federal officials that he is worthy of a research grant from the funding allocated for carbon capture and storage research.

Those are just two examples of research and startups internationally working on such novel plugging ideas. The sector has gotten a jolt of support from government programs to limit methane emissions, a major cause of global warming, and carbon capture and storage, which requires creating underground storage that essentially lasts forever.

Some are looking for additives to put into oilfield cement that react to brine coming in through a break. The fluid causes crystallization that fills the gap. Those looking for ways to do this range from Shell to a group of archeologists at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).

MIT researchers used the latest chemical analysis devices to dissect the chemical makeup of cement gathered at a Roman archeological site, trying to figure out how concrete structures and roads built 2,000 years ago are still standing, according to a study published in AAAS Science Advances.

When they did a microscopic analysis of the material, they were puzzled by tiny white chunks, called lime clasts. They didn’t serve any obvious purpose, and the researchers couldn’t accept that careful Roman cement makers would have made cement with those impurities. Their chemical analysis supported a theory that those bits of reactive calcium came in contact with water leaking in and formed calcium carbonate which allowed the cement to heal itself.

To test their theory, they made a batch of cement using a recipe that ensured lime clasts would be in the final product. When tested, the result mirrored the calcite-filled cracks found in Roman concrete.

One sign of the growing interest in ultralong-lived cement was in a note at the end of the scientific paper describing the MIT patents covering potential uses for this discovery.

Roman Cement_sciadv.add1602-f6.jpg
Schematic of the proposed mechanism for self-healing within ancient Roman mortars.
Source: L. Seymour et al., AAAS Science Advances https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.add1602

Eight-Gallon Treatment

The BioSqeeze paper described a job in Ohio, where it was called in to stop a persistent gas leak. State regulators were not going to certify the well had been properly decommissioned until they plugged the gas flowing up through small cracks in the annulus.

The well owner hired the company because it offered a treatment that could be injected into the cement barrier at the surface. Other methods would require drilling out the plugs.

Compared to the scale of most oilfield jobs, the volumes injected for the “biomineralization” sound tiny.

On day one at the Ohio wellsite, they injected 8 gallons of the company’s proprietary fluid mix over 13 minutes; the injection rate per minute slowed significantly.

Later that day, it took 16 minutes to inject that much fluid and later, 22 minutes to inject 7 gallons, suggesting the growing rock was filling the openings.

Over the next 36 hours, the injection times rose as the injected fluid volumes dropped. On day 2, they were able to inject only 4.6 gallons after nearly 2 hours of pumping.

They stopped because the injection rate had fallen from a peak of 0.56 gal/min to 0.01 gal/min. Also, the pressure falloff after pumping had shrunk, from 78% early on to 14% at the end.

Most importantly, after the Ohio well was treated, the annulus pressure dropped to zero, and regulators accepted that it had been properly plugged and abandoned, according to the paper.

finaltable.png
Table 1—Reported sealants and delivery methods in various geoengineering applications.
Source: SPE 212221

Hitting a Target

The challenge is proving that multiple injection wells can deliver the chemical streams needed to deliver the ingredients to ensure “a hydrodynamic seal forms in the leaky spot,” Younis said during his presentation.

So far, the work has been mostly lab testing and computer simulations. The simulations used groups of injection wells in patterns that echo the patterns used for water injection.

Like water injection, the fluids used are inexpensive and plentiful. But long experience with water injection for greater oil production shows it is difficult to predictably deliver streams of fluids to a subsurface target.

The effort began with lab tests. The two streams of ingredients were injected through separate tubes into a sandstone core by Jun Lu, an associate professor of petroleum engineering at The University of Tulsa.

Separate injection points were required to “avoid the rapid scale deposition that would otherwise occur within tubing,” the paper said.

After they injected 200 pore volumes of the brine components—barium and sulfate ions—Younis said, “X-ray scans of the cores showed a thin wall of barite scale had developed between the two halves.”

The paper also reported the results of two simulations in a “coupled hydrological-mechanical-chemical” transport model.

In one they created a long, thin barite curtain, which could be used to plug a leak in a gas storage site. In the second they injected a large volume targeting a smaller area that represented a fault.

In both instances the test ended with rising pressure inside the simulated space, indicating they had succeeded, like a tire holding air after patching a hole.

Based on those results, Younis is hoping to win the grant money needed to move this idea toward field testing.

FOR FURTHER READING

SPE 213099 Biomineralization: Surface Injection Eliminates Bradenhead Pressure by Randy Hiebert and John Griffin, BioSqueeze.

SPE 212221 A Numerical Study of Selective Inorganic Precipitation in Fractures To Geoengineer Resilient and Secure Underground Storage Sites by Shijun Fan, Rami M. Younis, and Jun Lu, University of Tulsa.

Hot Mixing: Mechanistic Insights Into the Durability of Ancient Roman Concrete by L.M. Seymour and J. Maragh, MIT; and P. Sabatini, DMAT SRL, et al. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Science Advances, January 2023.