英力士集团总裁拉特克利夫支持英国削减碳税,并呼吁增加钻探活动

2026年4月2日

(WO)——英力士董事长吉姆·拉特克利夫支持取消英国碳税的提议,并警告说,目前的政策有可能损害国内工业和能源安全,同时阻碍石油和天然气开发。

此前,英国保守党承诺,如果重新执政,将取消与碳相关的税收。拉特克利夫表示,此举将有助于恢复英国工业的竞争力。

拉特克利夫此前曾警告说,欧洲的碳成本并未平等地应用于进口产品,这增加了生产转移到海外和全球排放量增加的风险。

“我非常欢迎今天凯米·巴德诺克的宣布”。

“能源是当今所有国家都至关重要的要素,原因有很多。在我看来,以下三点最为重要。”

“首先,能源独立。一个国家必须能够保障电力供应、维持医院运转并保护人民,尤其是在冲突时期。”

其次,能源竞争力。价格合理的能源是经济增长和工业实力的最大驱动力之一。

第三,绿色能源。我们必须以切实可行且可持续的方式逐步降低碳足迹。

“至关重要的是,这必须按这个顺序进行。”

“所有这些都指向一个显而易见的结论:我们应该开发国内的石油和天然气储量,不仅是北海,还有我们丰富的页岩油气储量。不这样做,反而从国外大量进口能源,是经济和战略上的疯狂之举。”

这些言论凸显了工业界领导人日益担忧的问题,即高昂的能源成本和监管负担可能会加速欧洲的去工业化进程。

对于上游运营商而言,这些评论强化了加强开发国内油气资源的呼吁,尤其是在北海和英国潜在的页岩油气产区,因为政策制定者正在权衡气候目标和能源安全之间的平衡。

原文链接/WorldOil

INEOS’ Ratcliffe backs UK carbon tax cuts, calls for more drilling

April 02, 2026

(WO) — INEOS Chairman Jim Ratcliffe has backed a proposal to scrap UK carbon levies, warning that current policies risk undermining domestic industry and energy security while discouraging oil and gas development.

The comments follow a pledge by the UK Conservative Party to remove carbon-related taxes if it returns to power, a move Ratcliffe said would help restore competitiveness for British industry.

Ratcliffe has previously cautioned that carbon costs in Europe are not applied equally to imports, raising the risk of production shifting overseas and increasing global emissions.

“I thoroughly welcome today’s announcement by Kemi Badenoch.

“Energy is a critical ingredient for all countries today for a number of reasons. In my view these are the three most important.

“First, energy independence. A country MUST be able to keep the lights on, run hospitals and protect its people especially in times of conflict.

“Second, energy competitiveness. Affordable energy is one of the single biggest drivers of economic growth and industrial strength.

“Third, green energy. We must progressively lower our carbon footprint in a way that is practical and sustainable.

“Critically, this must happen in this order.

“All of this points to one obvious conclusion: we should be exploiting our domestic reserves of oil and gas not only the North Sea but also our plentiful reserves of shale oil and gas. Not doing so, while importing vast quantities of energy from abroad, is economic and strategic madness."

The remarks highlight growing concern among industrial leaders that high energy costs and regulatory burdens could accelerate deindustrialization in Europe.

For upstream operators, the comments reinforce calls for increased development of domestic oil and gas resources, particularly in the North Sea and potential UK shale plays, as policymakers weigh the balance between climate targets and energy security.