PHX Minerals 拒绝收购要约后考虑出售

PHX Minerals 聘请银行家探讨合并或出售该公司的可能性,该公司管理着 Midcontinent 和 Haynesville Shale 地区的资产。过去两年,PHX 拒绝了多起未经请求的收购要约。


尽管PHX Minerals已经收到看似丰厚的报价,但仍聘请了银行家来探索战略替代方案,包括潜在的出售,以提高股东价值。

总部位于沃斯堡的 PHX Minerals 于 12 月 12 日表示,已聘请 RBC Capital Markets 担任财务顾问,协助审查过程。

消息公布后,PHX 股价收盘上涨逾 4%,至每股 4.03 美元,而 12 月 11 日该股收盘价为每股 3.85 美元。

PHX 的大部分资产位于 Midcontinent 的 SCOOP/STACK 区块和 Haynesville Shale 区块。截至第三季度末,PHX 拥有 88,637 英亩净租赁特许权使用费。

PXH 矿产权益的主要运营商包括Continental ResourcesAethon EnergyExpand Energy(原 Chesapeake Energy)、Gulfport EnergyTrinity Operating

PHX 的矿产、特许权使用费和权益产量大部分为天然气加权。预计 2024 年全年产量平均在 9.7 亿立方英尺当量/天至 10.3 亿立方英尺当量/天之间。(79% 至 82% 为天然气)。

在 PHX 拒绝了另一家专注于天然气的矿产和特许权使用费公司WhiteHawk Energy的多次主动收购要约后,该公司决定寻求战略替代方案。

WhiteHawk 的矿产和特许权使用费资产覆盖 Haynesville 和 Marcellus 页岩的 105 万英亩总面积。WhiteHawk 和 PHX 在 Haynesville 拥有多家相同的运营商。

在最新的竞标中,总部位于费城的 WhiteHawk公开提出以每股 4 美元的价格收购 PHX。该提议对 PHX 的估值约为 1.5 亿美元,比 PHX 30 天平均股价高出 17%。

一个月过去了,WhiteHawk 一直要求 PHX 做出回应。PHX 最终敦促其股东拒绝WhiteHawk 每股 4 美元的全现金收购报价,理由是该交易不符合投资者的最佳利益。

WhiteHawk于 2023 年 8 月首次公开竞标,要求 PHX 股东拥有该公司 61% 的股份,并获得每股 0.20 美元的一次性现金股息。

PHX 在致 WhiteHawk 的一封拒绝该提议的信中表示,初始报价“对于 PHX 及其股东而言价值严重不足”。

WhiteHawk 声称已经调整了其提案“以满足 PHX 不断变化的要求”,以使交易能够继续推进。

WhiteHawk 董事长兼首席执行官丹尼尔·赫兹 (Daniel Herz) 在 10 月 14 日的一份声明中表示,PHX 的股价表现落后于其他上市矿产同行、天然气加权生产商“以及自 2020 年以来的几乎所有其他指数”。


有关的

WhiteHawk Badgers 对 PHX 收购要约的回应


矿物和特许权使用费规模

投资者和行业专家认为,公开的矿产和特许权使用费名称需要扩大规模才能吸引更多投资者的兴趣

很少有矿产和特许权使用费公司的市值超过 100 亿美元。历史悠久的德克萨斯太平洋土地公司 (Texas Pacific Land Corp.)脱颖而出,市值超过 270 亿美元。

这条已有 150 年历史的横贯大陆铁路最终倒闭,成为德克萨斯州西部一家破产的土地信托公司。如今,德州太平洋土地公司 (TPL) 控制着二叠纪盆地核心地带的 90 万英亩土地。

TPL的股价同比增长了120%以上。

E&P Diamondback Energy的子公司Viper Energy Partners是另一只专注于二叠纪矿产和特许权使用费的股票。Viper 的市值约为 100 亿美元;该公司的股价在过去一年中增长了约 70%。

但矿产和特许权使用费行业大部分仍比较分散,由规模较小的参与者和少数上市公司组成。

规模较小的上市公司包括Sitio Royalties(市值约 33 亿美元)、Black Stone Minerals(约 33 亿美元)、Kimbell Royalty Partners(约 16 亿美元)、Dorchester Minerals(约 16 亿美元)和 PHX。

行业支持者认为,石油和天然气矿产及特许权使用费的投资论点是合理的。

与勘探与生产相比,它们是相对安全的投资。矿产和特许权使用费公司不会面临钻井和完井风险。矿产买家还可以一次性购买,永久拥有地下开采权。

但加拿大皇家银行全球能源副总裁蒂姆·佩里 (Tim Perry)在 2024 年世界石油商矿产与特许权使用费会议上表示,上市矿产公司仍需要更高的交易流动性来吸引更大、更成熟的投资者。


有关的

出售:奶奶的矿产

评论

添加新评论

此对话根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客户服务团队。

原文链接/HartEnergy

PHX Minerals Explores Sale After Rejecting Acquisition Bids

PHX Minerals hired bankers to explore a potential merger or sale of the firm, which manages assets across the Midcontinent and Haynesville Shale play. PHX has rejected multiple unsolicited acquisition bids in the past two years.


PHX Minerals has hired bankers to explore strategic alternatives, including a potential sale, to boost shareholder value despite already receiving seemingly lucrative offers.

Fort Worth-based PHX Minerals retained RBC Capital Markets as financial adviser to assist in the review process, the company said Dec. 12.

PHX shares closed up over 4% at $4.03 per share after the announcement, after closing at $3.85 per share on Dec. 11.

Most of PHX’s assets are in the Midcontinent’s SCOOP/STACK play and the Haynesville Shale. PHX had 88,637 net leased royalty acres at the end of the third quarter.

Key operators on PXH’s mineral interests include Continental Resources, Aethon Energy, Expand Energy (formerly Chesapeake Energy), Gulfport Energy and Trinity Operating.

The bulk of PHX’s mineral, royalty and working interest production is natural gas-weighted. Output is expected to average between 9.7 Bcfe/d and 10.3 Bcfe/d during full-year 2024. (79% to 82% gas).

The decision to pursue strategic alternatives comes after PHX rejected multiple unsolicited acquisition bids by WhiteHawk Energy, another gas-focused minerals and royalties company.

WhiteHawk’s mineral and royalty assets cover 1.05 million gross unit acres in the Haynesville and Marcellus shales. WhiteHawk and PHX’s interests share several of the same operators in the Haynesville.

In the latest bid, Philadephia-based WhiteHawk made a public offer to buy PHX for $4 per share. The proposal valued PHX at roughly $150 million and represented a 17% premium to PHX’s 30-day average share price.

A month passed; WhiteHawk badgered PHX for a response. PHX ultimately urged its shareholders to reject WhiteHawk’s $4 per share all-cash bid, arguing that the deal was not in the best interest of investors.

WhiteHawk’s first public bid in August 2023 called for PHX stockholders to own 61% of the pro forma company and to receive a one-time $0.20 per share cash dividend.

In a letter to WhiteHawk rejecting the proposal, PHX said the initial offer was “grossly inadequate in terms of the value offered to PHX and its stockholders.”

WhiteHawk contends that it has adjusted its proposals “to meet the ever-shifting requests from PHX” for a deal to go forward.

In an Oct. 14 statement, Daniel Herz, WhiteHawk’s Chairman and CEO, said PHX’s stock price performance has lagged compared to other public minerals peers, gas-weighted producers “and just about every other index since 2020.”


RELATED

WhiteHawk Badgers Response from PHX on Acquisition Offer


Mineral and royalty scale

Investors and industry experts argue that public minerals and royalties names need greater scale to attract greater investor interest.

Few minerals and royalties players have market values greater than $10 billion. The historic Texas Pacific Land Corp. stands out with a market capitalization of more than $27 billion.

The failed, 150-year-old transcontinental railroad eventually turned into a liquidating land trust in West Texas. Today, Texas Pacific Land (TPL) controls 900,000 acres in the core of the Permian Basin.

TPL’s stock price has grown by over 120% year-over-year.

Viper Energy Partners, a subsidiary of E&P Diamondback Energy, is another Permian-focused minerals and royalties stock. Viper’s market value is around $10 billion; The company’s stock price has grown around 70% over the past year.

But most of the minerals and royalties industry is still fragmented and made up of smaller players, with a small number of public companies.

Smaller publics include Sitio Royalties (market cap ~$3.3 billion), Black Stone Minerals (~$3.3 billion), Kimbell Royalty Partners (~$1.6 billion), Dorchester Minerals (~$1.6 billion) and PHX.

Industry proponents argue that the investment thesis for oil and gas minerals and royalties is sound.

They’re relatively safe investments, compared to E&Ps. Minerals and royalties companies aren’t exposed to drilling and completion risks. Minerals buyers also make a one-time purchase to own the subsurface rights in perpetuity.

But public minerals companies still need a higher trading liquidity to attract larger, sophisticated investors, Tim Perry, RBC vice chairman of global energy, said at the 2024 World Oilman’s Mineral & Royalty Conference.


RELATED

For Sale: Grandma’s Minerals

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.