化学 EOR 方法获得动力

更好的化学配方和更低的成本、实验室分析的进步和更高的油价使得化学 EOR 更加经济可行。

作者:Velda Addison,Hart Energy

过去,考虑到化学品成本高、对特定化学品在油藏中的行为了解不足、采收率未知以及项目失败,化学 EOR 并不是提高老化油田采收率的首选方法。

但根据化学公司发布的一份报告,由于化学配方的改进和成本的降低、实验室分析的进步、油价上涨使化学 EOR 更加经济可行,以及其将采收率提高至 70% 的潜力,该方法正在获得发展势头。 Lux Research 跟踪了 135 个项目,以寻找化学 EOR 市场的趋势。

目前,化学 EOR 仍仅占全球 EOR 产量的 1/10,但适用于许多与其他形式 EOR 不兼容的领域Lux Research分析师兼该报告的主要作者Daniel Choi 在一份准备好的声明中表示。“此外,市场的变化和化学 EOR 工艺的改进使得曾经被认为不经济的项目现在变得可行。” 该报告发布之际,全球新发现数量下降,石油和天然气公司正在寻找方法延长成熟油田的寿命,同时提高其他油田的采收率。报告指出,生产商更换一桶石油的成本已从1998年的每桶6美元上升到2012年的每桶28美元。 但每种化学EOR方法都有其缺点和优点,每种化学品或化学品组合都会被利用为了各种目标。报告指出,瓜尔胶和水解聚丙烯酰胺等聚合物可以增加注水的粘度,降低注水的流动性和指进,并提高波及效率。聚合物是最常用、最成熟且最便宜的化学EOR方法;然而,它们的采收率最低,约为原始石油地质储量 (OOIP) 的 5%。 研究人员称表面活性剂聚合物驱是一种有吸引力的选择,其采收率提高了约 OOIP 的 20%。表面活性剂可以降低油和水之间的张力,从而释放出原本会被困住的油。某些类型的表面活性剂还具有更高的温度和盐耐受性。然而,表面活性剂比聚合物驱更昂贵,研究人员表示,水库会吸附表面活性剂,这会使使用此类化学品的驱油变得复杂。







碱性化学物质与油中的酸性部分发生反应,原位产生表面活性剂;报告继续说,表面活性剂可以降低石油和岩石之间的界面张力。按重量计算,这些化学品的成本约为表面活性剂的 5% 至 50%。“虽然比表面活性剂便宜,但[碱性表面活性剂聚合物]驱油仅适用于含有高浓度酸性部分的油藏,能够在井下产生足够的表面活性剂来克服捕获石油的毛细管力。软化注入水对于最大限度地减少离子交换和不损坏储层也至关重要。”

研究人员根据成本、采收率、成熟度、耐久性和动量等五个参数评估了每种方法,得出的结论是,不存在最好的化学方法。 EOR 方法。SP

[碱性表面活性剂聚合物] 驱油是领先者,但不是灵丹妙药。每个油藏都是独一无二的,在项目准备好全面实施之前需要多年的实验室分析和现场试验,”Lux 说。因此,可行性是所采用方法的关键决定因素,并且不存在“最好的”化学EOR方法。尽管如此,三元复合驱由于其高采收率(占 OOIP 的 25%)和相对较低的成本而势头强劲。

尽管与其他 EOR 方法相比,化学 EOR 的总体使用率较低,但世界上的一些地区正在带头努力包括试点项目和全领域项目。报告称,在这两种情况下,北美(特别是美国和加拿大)主导了化学 EOR 市场,其次是亚洲,中国是世界上最大的聚合物以及大庆和胜利油田第二大聚合物驱的所在地。 。

报告称,自 1985 年以来,北美和亚洲占实地试点的 76%,占全面实地项目的 96%。

但其他地区已经测试了这种方法。其中包括中东,阿曼石油开发公司的 Marmul 油田于 2010 年进行了全油田聚合物驱。希望将石油采收率从最初估计的约 10% 至 20% 提高到 20% 或更低。据该公司网站称,30 多岁。但该项目被搁置,因为阿曼的发现开采成本较低。

“然而,当今的经济状况使得各种 EOR 技术增加的单位成本变得更加可行,”PDO 在其网站上表示。“Marmul 项目最重要的方面是它帮助 PDO 引入了一种新的、更智能的方式来管理其油田。成功提高采收率策略的关键是保持油田准确数据的良好流动,因此每口井都能够容纳测量和测井设备来监测进入生产井的流量,并不断检查质量所使用的聚合物。PDO 希望在其所有油田实施这种更有针对性的油藏管理策略,而不仅仅是那些指定用于未来 EOR 项目的油田。”

报告指出了几个值得继续关注的主要化学 EOR 项目。其中包括道达尔 (Total) 在安哥拉近海 Dalia 油田的深水聚合物稠化注水 EOR 项目,以及马来西亚国家石油公司 (Petronas) 定于 2016 年在马来西亚近海 Angsi 油田的全油田 ASP 项目。

请联系作者 Velda Addison,邮箱为vaddison@hartenergy.com

原文链接/hartenergy

Chemical EOR Methods Gain Momentum

Better chemical formulations and lower cost, advances in laboratory analysis and higher oil prices are making chemical EOR more economically viable.

By Velda Addison, Hart Energy

In the past chemical EOR was not the method of choice to boost recovery rates for aging oil fields, considering the high cost of chemicals, insufficient knowledge of a given chemical’s behavior in reservoirs, unknown recovery factors and failed projects.

But the method is gaining momentum thanks to improved chemical formulations and lower costs, advances in laboratory analysis, higher oil prices that make chemical EOR more economically viable and its potential to boost recovery rates to as high as 70%, according to a report released by Lux Research, which tracked 135 projects in search of trends in the chemical EOR market.

“Chemical EOR still only accounts for [1/10] of global production from EOR today but is applicable in many fields that are incompatible with other forms of EOR,” Daniel Choi, Lux Research analyst and the report’s lead author, said in a prepared statement. “Besides, changes in the market and improvements to the chemical EOR process have allowed projects once considered uneconomical to now be viable.”

The report’s release comes as the number of new discoveries worldwide falls and oil and gas companies look for ways to expand the life spans of mature fields, while also increasing recovery rates at other fields. The report pointed out that the cost for producers to replace a barrel has risen from $6 per barrel in 1998 to $28 per barrel in 2012.

But each chemical EOR method has its drawbacks and advantages, with each chemical, or combination of chemicals, being tapped for various objectives. Polymers such as guar gum and hydrolyzed polyacrylamide, for example, increase the viscosity of waterfloods, reduce the flood’s mobility and fingering, and increase sweep efficiency, the report noted. Polymers are the most utilized, most mature and least expensive chemical EOR method; however, they have the lowest recovery factor—about 5% of original oil in place (OOIP).

Researchers called surfactant polymer floods an attractive option, with an improved recovery factor of about 20% of OOIP. Surfactants reduce tension between oil and water, enabling the release of oil that would otherwise be trapped. Certain types of surfactants also have higher temperature and salt tolerances. However, surfactants are more expensive than polymer floods, and researchers said that reservoirs adsorb surfactants, which can complicate floods using this type of chemical.

Alkaline chemicals react with acidic moieties in oil to produce surfactants in situ; the surfactants then reduce the interfacial tension between oil and rock, the report continued. By weight, these chemicals’ costs are between 5% and 50% of surfactants. “While less expensive than surfactants, [alkaline surfactant polymer] floods are only applicable to reservoirs containing oil with high concentration of acidic moieties [that are] able to produce enough surfactants downhole to overcome the capillary forces trapping the oil. Softening the injection water is also critical to minimize ion exchange and not damage the reservoir.”

Researchers—who evaluated each method on five parameters that included cost, recovery factor, maturity, durability and momentum—concluded that there is no best chemical EOR method.

“ASP [alkaline surfactant polymer] floods are the frontrunner but [are] no magic bullet. Each reservoir is unique, requiring years of laboratory analysis and field pilots before a project is ready for full-field implementation,” Lux said. “Consequently, feasibility is a key determinant of the method employed, and there is no ‘best’ chemical EOR method. Still, ASP floods are gaining momentum due to their high recovery—~25% of OOIP—and relatively low cost.”

Despite the overall low use of chemical EOR compared to other EOR methods, some parts of the world are leading the effort in terms of both pilot projects and full-field projects. In both instances, North America—specifically the U.S. and Canada—dominates the chemical EOR market, followed by Asia where China is home to the world’s largest polymer and second largest polymer floods in the Daqing and Shengli fields, the report said.

North America and Asia account for 76% of field pilots and 96% of full field projects since 1985, according to the report.

But other regions have tested the method. These include the Middle East, where Petroleum Development Oman’s Marmul Field underwent a full-field polymer flood in 2010. Hopes were to raise the total percentage of oil recovered from initial estimates of about 10% to 20% to the high 20s or low 30s, according to the company’s website. But the project was shelved because discoveries in Oman had cheaper extraction costs.

“However, today’s economic conditions make the increased unit cost of the various EOR techniques more feasible,” PDO said on its website. “The most significant aspect of the Marmul project is the way it has helped to usher in a new, smarter way for PDO to manage its oil fields. The key to a successful enhanced oil recovery strategy is maintaining a good flow of accurate data on the oil field, so each well will be able to accommodate measuring and logging equipment to monitor the flow into the production wells, as well as constantly checking the quality of the polymers being used. This more focused reservoir management strategy is something that PDO hopes to implement across all its fields, not just those earmarked for future EOR projects.”

The report pointed out several major chemical EOR projects to continue watching. These include Total’s polymer-viscosified waterflooding EOR project in the Dalia Field offshore Angola in deepwater and Petronas’ full-field ASP project in Angsi Field offshore Malaysia set for 2016.

Contact the author, Velda Addison, at vaddison@hartenergy.com.