俄亥俄石油公司和阿巴拉契亚天然气公司整合时机已经成熟

由于买家“渴望”顶级天然气资产,阿巴拉契亚可能成为未来几年的交易热点。运营商、分析师和投资者也在密切关注俄亥俄州尤蒂卡石油航道地下的产出。

专家表示,买家“渴望”顶级天然气资产。由于亨利港天然气价格接近历史低点,许多业主还不愿意出售。

但投资银行Houlihan Lokey石油和天然气集团董事总经理丹尼尔·克劳利(Daniel Crowley)表示,随着美国新的液化天然气出口上线、天然气需求增长以及大宗商品价格前景改善,以天然气为重点的并购活动即将爆发。

“曲线上有很好的升水。我们有一个饥饿的买家世界,”克劳利在哈特能源公司的 DUG GAS+ 会议暨博览会上说道。 “我们确实为 A&D 活动的大幅增加做好了准备。”

2023 年,上游行业的并购活动大幅增加,其中包括美国超级巨头埃克森美孚公司雪佛龙公司的数十亿美元收购。

交易活动已持续到 2024 年,主要集中在西德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州的二叠纪盆地。

最近的绝大多数上游交易都集中在石油生产资产和面积上。

总体而言,过去一年石油价格比天然气价格更加稳定。价格稳定有助于推动石油资产交易量的增加。

天然气价格波动性更大:今年亨利中心价格平均约为 2.36 美元/千立方英尺,较 2023 年下降 10%,较 2022 年下降 64%。

2022 年,亨利中心的平均价格为 6.67 美元/千立方英尺,当时能源市场因俄罗斯入侵乌克兰和全球经济从 COVID-19 衰退中重新复苏而紧张。

天然气价格不稳定导致买家愿意为天然气资产支付的价格与卖家愿意接受的条款之间脱节。

但随着未来天然气需求、液化天然气出口增长和价格上涨的明朗化,天然气交易已经开始跨越终点线。

最大的例子是切萨皮克能源公司(Chesapeake Energy) 与西南能源公司 (Southwestern Energy)价值 115 亿美元的合并。

切萨皮克和西南航空在阿巴拉契亚和路易斯安那州海恩斯维尔页岩都有足迹。此次合并预计将创建美国最大的纯天然气生产商。

在海恩斯维尔,Rockcliff Energy II以 27 亿美元的价格出售给东京燃气公司 (Tokyo Gas Co.)及其合作伙伴 Castleton Commodities 。该交易使东京天然气及其美国上游子公司TG Natural Resources在东德克萨斯州拥有更深入的足迹。

海恩斯维尔 (Haynesville) 周围还有不少其他天然气地产,其中包括雪佛龙 (Chevron)特鲁瑞安 (Tellurian)的著名套装

但克劳利告诉哈特能源公司,阿巴拉契亚地区因其低成本、丰富的天然气供应和独特的基础设施挑战,也可能成为未来两年以天然气为主的并购热点。

“在我与阿巴拉契亚的一些生产商的对话中,人们非常仔细地关注期货溢价,并在适当的时间排队进入市场,”克劳利说。


有关的

Aethon 削减钻机但希望获得更多西海恩斯维尔种植面积


成长于加斯兰

宾夕法尼亚州、西弗吉尼亚州和俄亥俄州拥有富含天然气和液体的有趣航道,吸引了生产商的投资。

自从水平钻井和水力压裂技术出现以来,阿巴拉契亚运营商主要瞄准了含气的马塞勒斯页岩区。

但该地区长期以来因原油潜力而闻名:1859 年 8 月,德雷克在宾夕法尼亚州泰特斯维尔附近发现了油井,开启了一场富矿,实际上催生了美国石油工业。

在俄亥俄州边境,泰特斯维尔和油溪以西不远的地方,运营商正在将一些新的水平油井喷涌而出。

但天然气仍然是阿巴拉契亚地区的王者,该盆地是美国一些最大的天然气生产商的所在地。

殷拓集团和西南航空这两家美国最大、生产力最高的天然气运营商都拥有遍布宾夕法尼亚州、西弗吉尼亚州和俄亥俄州的租赁权。

大型上市公司切萨皮克 (Chesapeake) 和科特拉能源 (Coterra Energy)在宾夕法尼亚州东北部都有大量业务。

Range ResourcesAntero ResourcesCNX ResourcesGulfport Energy等几家中小型生产商正在阿巴拉契亚开展业务。

去年,投资者一直热衷于其中几个公司,但他们对格尔夫波特尤其热衷,该公司的股价在过去 12 个月内飙升了 100% 以上

Enerplus最近同意以近 40 亿美元的价格出售Chord Energy,以创建一家规模更大的威利斯顿盆地公司,该公司还在宾夕法尼亚州东北部拥有一个传统的非经营性职位。

阿巴拉契亚 SMID 帽
中小型勘探与生产公司 Range Resources、Antero Resources、Enerplus、CNX Resources 和 Gulfport Energy 均属于阿巴拉契亚顶级生产商。注:显示的井于 2022 年 1 月 1 日后开始生产。(来源:Rextag 数据)

阿巴拉契亚地区也分布着一些有趣的私人勘探与生产公司,并拥有大片土地:Ascent ResourcesEncino EnergyPennEnergy ResourcesSeneca Resources(National Fuel Gas Co. 的勘探与生产部门)。

州数据显示,Ascent 和 Encino 的 EAP Ohio 是在俄亥俄州 Utica 石油窗口运营的两家顶级公司,另外还有勘探先锋EOG Resources 。

阿巴拉契亚列兵
大型私人阿巴拉契亚生产商包括 Ascent Resources、Encino Energy (EAP Ohio)、PennEnergy Resources 和 Seneca Resources。注:显示的井于 2022 年 1 月 1 日后开始生产。(来源:Rextag 数据)

在整个阿巴拉契亚盆地,克劳利已经确定了大约两打公司,这些公司可能是合理的卖家,或者在未来两年左右的时间内出售非核心阿巴拉契亚资产包。他说,私募股权支持的勘探与生产公司可能占该名单的一半左右。

克劳利表示,按照私募股权标准,阿巴拉契亚勘探与生产的多项投资相对成熟,一些赞助商目前已持有阿巴拉契亚投资 10 年到 12 年。私募股权公司可能会寻求将其投资货币化。

第二类潜在交易可能源于勘探与生产公司进行其他大型交易的非核心资产剥离。

殷拓目前正在营销宾夕法尼亚州马塞勒斯页岩的大型非经营头寸,据报道价值约 30 亿美元。切萨皮克经营这些资产。

随着 Enerplus 与 Chord 合并并优先投资北达科他州巴肯页岩,有关 Enerplus 在宾夕法尼亚州东北部遗留的非作业权益将何去何从的问题仍然存在。

一旦切萨皮克和西南航空之间的合并完成,可能会有其他非核心阿巴拉契亚地产从他们的合并投资组合中消失。

第三类潜在的阿巴拉契亚交易可能会集中在引起大量投资者热议的中小型股公众身上。

其中一些公司的表现明显优于较大的天然气加权同行,包括 Gulfport(股价同比上涨约 101%)、CNX Resources(同比上涨约 47%)、Range Resources(同比上涨约 30%)和 Antero(同比增长约 20%)。

“阿巴拉契亚地区的一些规模较小的公共运营商是合乎逻辑的候选者,可以被剔除或合并到其他运营商中,”克劳利说。

“如果我们看到切萨皮克-西南航空在未来一两年内至少发生一笔增量交易,我一点也不会感到惊讶,”他说。

在阿巴拉契亚地区运营的少数小型私人、家族办公室拥有的石油和天然气公司可能会在未来几年内形成第四个潜在的并购领域。


有关的

分析师:投资者为何抢购格尔夫波特能源股票?


中游问题

在阿巴拉契亚执行并购交易最独特的挑战之一是中游部分。

克劳利说,回顾近年来阿巴拉契亚地区签署的一些最大的并购交易,大多数都涉及中游产能的某些组成部分。

切萨皮克对 Chief E&D Holdings 的收购使合并后的公司能够通过共享中游资产来提高天然气产量。

殷拓集团于 2021 年收购阿尔塔资源开发公司,其中包括整合的中游资产。同样,该公司的 Tug Hill 交易在联邦贸易委员会长期拖延后于去年完成,其中包括 XcL 中游资产。

最近,殷拓集团 (EQT) 斥资 55 亿美元的股票收购了 Equitrans Midstream,该公司是备受争议且政治化的 Mountain Valley Pipeline 项目背后的开发商。

在并购交易中整合中游并不像其他盆地那样是一个大问题。西方石油公司等一些运营商正在寻求剥离中游权益以偿还其他债务。

但中游准入是阿巴拉契亚交易中的一个关键考虑因素。

“帕巴拉契亚的生产基本上处于其外卖能力的边缘,因此每个人都在争夺承购权,”克劳利说。 “控制中流对于在这方面保护自己很重要。”


有关的

EQT 旨在“灵活整合”Equitrans 的交易面临严峻挑战


油性俄亥俄行动

天然气价格如此之低,以至于包括 EQT、Chesapeake、Aethon Energy 在内的生产商正在削减美国各地天然气地区的钻机并减少钻探或完井活动

一些机会主义的阿巴拉契亚勘探和生产公司正在将资本支出从富含气体的马塞勒斯转移到尤蒂卡页岩和波因特普莱森特地层中富含石油和液体的航道。

俄亥俄州尤蒂卡石油窗口
根据 Rextag 数据,俄亥俄州原油水平井于 2020 年 1 月 1 日后开始首次生产。(来源:Rextag 数据)

运营商、分析师和投资者对在俄亥俄州尤蒂卡石油窗口划定和测试的原油井感到热衷。

迄今为止,EOG、EAP Ohio 和 Ascent 已在俄亥俄州尤蒂卡钻探了一些产量最高的油井。但根据俄亥俄州自然资源部 (ODNR) 三月份发布的数据,其他勘探与生产公司正在参与俄亥俄州的石油开采活动。

该公司在第一季度财报中表示,俄亥俄州贝尔蒙特县亨德肖特油田的两口井于去年上线,该公司的石油产量“强劲”。

根据 ODNR 数据,2023 年第四季度,Hendershot 5 和 6 的平均产量为 782 桶/天,这是该码头第一个完整生产季度。

初步结果在格尔夫波特现有面积(大约两年的可钻库存)中描绘了 50 至 60 个液体密集钻井地点。

古尔波特尤蒂卡油井
俄亥俄州贝尔蒙特县的格尔夫波特两口井亨德肖特油田的石油产量“强劲”。(来源:GPOR 23 年第 4 季度投资者介绍)

虽然西南航空 (SWN) 更多地关注天然气生产,但该公司已悄然钻探了可观石油产量的油井。

SWN Production Ohio LLC 报告根西县三口油井的产量已于 11 月中旬开始销售:

  • 根据 ODNR 数据,Posey A 1H 在 45 天内生产了 57,400 桶,即 1,275 桶/天;
  • Posey A 3H 在 45 天内产量为 50,732 桶,即 1,127 桶/天;和
  • Posey B 5H 在 45 天内产量为 37,517 桶,即 834 桶/天。

Infinity Natural Resources (INR) 是另一家私人勘探与生产公司,该公司最初专注于宾夕法尼亚州西南部的干气生产,随后又收购了俄亥俄州的油田。

ODNR 数据显示,INR 在俄亥俄州尤蒂卡钻探了一些最大的油井,其初始产量可与 EOG、Ascent 和 Encino 钻探的油井相媲美。

今年 2 月,俄亥俄州石油和天然气土地管理委员会授予 Infinity 租赁根西县盐叉州立公园两块土地和钻探的投标。

“Infinity 做得很好,从最初以干燥天然气为主的业务转型为一家公司,我猜,其当前收入和价值的大部分来自石油生产,”克劳利说。 。


有关的

俄亥俄州古欣:EOG 与 Ascent、Encino 一起开发顶级油井

原文链接/hartenergy

Ohio Oil, Appalachia Gas Plays Ripe for Consolidation

With buyers “starved” for top-tier natural gas assets, Appalachia could become a dealmaking hotspot in the coming years. Operators, analysts and investors are also closely watching what comes out of the ground in the Ohio Utica oil fairway.

Buyers are “starved” for top-tier natural gas assets, experts say. With Henry Hub gas prices near record lows, many owners haven’t been willing to sell.

But natural gas-focused M&A activity is poised to ignite as new U.S. LNG exports come online, gas demand grows and the outlook for commodity prices improves, said Daniel Crowley, a managing director for investment bank Houlihan Lokey’s oil and gas group.

“We have a nice contango in the curve. We have a starved buyer universe,” Crowley said during Hart Energy’s DUG GAS+ Conference and Expo. “We’re really setting ourselves up for a significant increase in A&D activity.”

The upstream sector saw a massive spike in M&A activity in 2023, including multibillion-dollar acquisitions by both U.S. supermajors Exxon Mobil Corp. and Chevron Corp.

Dealmaking has spilled over into 2024, centered on the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico.

The vast majority of recent upstream deals have centered around oil-producing assets and acreage.

Oil prices, generally speaking, have been more stable than natural gas prices over the past year. Price stability has helped fuel a greater volume of transactions for oily assets.

Natural gas prices have been much more volatile: Henry Hub prices should average around $2.36/Mcf this year, a 10% decline from 2023 and a 64% decline from 2022 levels.

Henry Hub prices averaged $6.67/Mcf in 2022, when energy markets were stretched thin between Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the global economy reemerging from the COVID-19 recession.

Gas-price instability caused a disconnect between what buyers were willing to pay for gassy assets and terms sellers were willing to accept.

But with greater clarity on future gas demand, LNG export growth and increasing prices, gas deals have started to cross the finish line.

The biggest example is Chesapeake Energy’s combination with Southwestern Energy in a $11.5 billion merger.

Both Chesapeake and Southwestern have footprints in Appalachia and in the Louisiana Haynesville Shale. The merger is expected to create the nation’s largest pure-play gas producer.

In the Haynesville, Rockcliff Energy II sold to Tokyo Gas Co. and partner Castleton Commodities in a $2.7 billion deal. The deal gives Tokyo Gas and its U.S. upstream subsidiary, TG Natural Resources, a deeper footprint in East Texas.

There are quite a few other gassy properties being shopped around the Haynesville, including notable packages from Chevron and Tellurian.

But Appalachia, with its low-cost and bountiful gas supplies and unique infrastructure challenges, could also be a hotspot for gas-weighted M&A in the next two years, Crowley told Hart Energy.

“In the conversations I have with some producers in Appalachia, people are very carefully watching that contango and sort of queueing up to come to the market at the right time,” Crowley said.


RELATED

Aethon Cuts Rigs but Wants More Western Haynesville Acreage


Growing in Gasland

Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio boast an interesting mix of gas- and liquids-rich fairways attracting investment from producers.

Since the advent of horizontal drilling and fracking techniques, Appalachia operators have largely targeted the gassy Marcellus Shale play.

But the area has long been known for crude oil potential: Drake’s Well striking oil near Titusville, Pennsylvania, in August 1859, kicked off a bonanza that effectively birthed the U.S. oil industry.

Across the border in Ohio, not far west of Titusville and Oil Creek, operators are bringing online some gushing new horizontal oil wells.

But gas is still king in Appalachia, and the basin is home to some of the nation’s largest natural gas producers.

Both EQT Corp. and Southwestern, two of the nation’s largest and most productive gas operators, own leasehold spread across Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Ohio.

Large-cap publics Chesapeake and Coterra Energy both have large footprints in northeast Pennsylvania.

Several small- and mid-sized producers, including Range Resources, Antero Resources, CNX Resources and Gulfport Energy, are playing in Appalachia.

Investors have been hot on several of these names in the past year—but they’ve been particularly hot on Gulfport, which has seen its stock price spike over 100% in the past 12 months.

Enerplus, which recently agreed to a nearly $4 billion sale to Chord Energy to create a larger Williston Basin player, also owns a legacy non-operated position in northeast Pennsylvania.

Appalachia SMID caps
Small- and mid-cap E&Ps Range Resources, Antero Resources, Enerplus, CNX Resources and Gulfport Energy are among Appalachia’s top producers. Note: Displayed wells began production after Jan. 1, 2022. (Source: Rextag data)

Several interesting private E&Ps inhabit Appalachia as well, and hold blocky acreage positions: Ascent Resources, Encino Energy, PennEnergy Resources and Seneca Resources, the E&P segment of National Fuel Gas Co.

Ascent and Encino’s EAP Ohio are two of the top players operating in the Ohio Utica oil window, along with the exploring pioneer EOG Resources, state data show.

Appalachia privates
Large private Appalachia producers include Ascent Resources, Encino Energy (EAP Ohio), PennEnergy Resources and Seneca Resources. Note: Displayed wells began production after Jan. 1, 2022. (Source: Rextag data)

Across the entire Appalachia Basin, Crowley has identified roughly two dozen companies that could be logical sellers, or sell off non-core Appalachia asset packages, over the next two or so years. Private equity-backed E&Ps probably make up about half of that list, he said.

By private equity standards, several of the investments in Appalachia E&Ps are relatively mature—some sponsors have held onto their Appalachia investments for 10 years to 12 years at this point, Crowley said. PE firms may look to monetize their investments.

The second bucket of potential dealmaking could stem from non-core divestitures by E&Ps doing other large deals.

EQT is currently marketing a large non-operated position in the Pennsylvania Marcellus Shale, reportedly valued at about $3 billion. Chesapeake operates the assets.

As Enerplus combines with Chord and prioritizes investment in the North Dakota Bakken shale, questions remain about what will become of Enerplus’ legacy non-op interests in northeast Pennsylvania.

And once the merger between Chesapeake and Southwestern closes, there could be other non-core Appalachia properties that fall out of their combined portfolio.

The third category of potential Appalachia dealmaking could focus on the small- to mid-cap publics generating a healthy amount of investor buzz.

Several of these names have significantly outperformed their larger gas-weighted peers, including Gulfport (stock price up ~101% year over year), CNX Resources (up ~47% yoy), Range Resources (up ~30% yoy) and Antero (up ~20% yoy).

“Some of the smaller public operators in Appalachia are logical candidates to be taken out or merged into somebody else,” Crowley said.

“I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if we see at least one of those transactions incremental to Chesapeake-Southwestern happening in the next year or two,” he said.

A smattering of smaller private, family office-owned oil and gas companies that operate in Appalachia that could set up a fourth bucket of potential M&A in the coming years.


RELATED

Analysts: Why Are Investors Snapping Up Gulfport Energy Stock?


Midstream matters

One of the most unique challenges to executing M&A transactions in Appalachia is the midstream component.

Looking back at some of the biggest M&A deals inked across Appalachia in recent years, most included some component of midstream capacity, Crowley said.

Chesapeake’s acquisition of Chief E&D Holdings enabled the combined firm to boost gas production by sharing midstream assets.

EQT’s acquisition of Alta Resources Development in 2021 included integrated midstream assets. Similarly, the company’s Tug Hill deal, which closed last year after a long delay by the Federal Trade Commission, included XcL Midstream assets.

Most recently, EQT is paying $5.5 billion in stock to acquire Equitrans Midstream, the developer behind the controversial and politicized Mountain Valley Pipeline project.

Integrating midstream in M&A transactions isn’t as big of a hang-up in other basins. Some operators, such as Occidental Petroleum, are looking to divest midstream interests to pay down other debts.

But midstream access is a key consideration in Appalachia dealmaking.

“Appalachia is basically producing right on the brink of its takeaway capacity, so everybody’s competing for offtake,” Crowley said. “Having control of your midstream is important to protect yourself in that regard.”


RELATED

EQT Deal to ‘Vertically Integrate’ Equitrans Faces Steep Challenges


Oily Ohio Action

Natural gas prices are so low that producers including EQT, Chesapeake, Aethon Energy and others are shedding rigs and reducing drilling or completions activity in gassy areas around the U.S.

Some opportunistic Appalachia E&Ps are shifting capital spending away from the gassy Marcellus toward oil- and liquids-rich fairways in the Utica shale and Point Pleasant formations.

Ohio Utica Oil Window
Ohio crude oil horizontal wells that began first production after Jan. 1, 2020, according to Rextag data. (Source: Rextag data)

Operators, analysts and investors are hot on crude oil wells being delineated and tested in the Ohio Utica oil window.

EOG, EAP Ohio and Ascent have drilled some of the most productive oil wells in the Ohio Utica so far. But other E&Ps are getting in on the oily Ohio action, according to data published by Ohio’s Department of Natural Resources (ODNR) in March.

Gulfport reported “strong” oil production from a two-well Hendershot pad in Belmont County, Ohio, which came online last year, the company said in first-quarter earnings.

Hendershot 5 and 6 produced an average of 782 bbl/d during the fourth quarter of 2023, the pad’s first full quarter in production, per ODNR figures.

The initial results delineate between 50 and 60 liquids-heavy drilling locations across Gulfport’s existing acreage—about two years of drillable inventory.

Gulport Utica Oil Wells
Gulfport saw “strong” oil output from a two-well Hendershot pad in Belmont County, Ohio. (Source: GPOR 4Q23 investor presentation)

While Southwestern(SWN) is focused much more on gas production, the company has quietly drilled wells with considerable oil production.

SWN Production Ohio LLC reported production from three Guernsey County wells that went to sales in mid-November:

  • Posey A 1H produced 57,400 bbl, or 1,275 bbl/d, over 45 days, per ODNR data;
  • Posey A 3H produced 50,732 bbl, or 1,127 bbl/d, over 45 days; and
  • Posey B 5H produced 37,517 bbl, or 834 bbl/d, over 45 days.

Infinity Natural Resources (INR) is another private E&P that’s been buying up oily acreage in Ohio after initially focusing on dry gas production in southwest Pennsylvania.

INR has drilled some of the most prodigious oil wells in the Ohio Utica, with initial production rates rivaling wells drilled by EOG, Ascent and Encino, ODNR data show.

In February, the Ohio Oil and Gas Land Management Commission awarded a bid to Infinity to lease two parcels of land and drill in Salt Fork State Park in Guernsey County.

“[Infinity has] done a nice job of transforming themselves from what was originally this dry gas-focused business into a company that, I’m guessing, generates a significant majority of its current revenue and value from oil production,” Crowley said.


RELATED

Gushing, Ohio: EOG Joins Ascent, Encino in Top Oil Wells