不是页岩气繁荣一代的并购策略

Pioneer Natural Resources 和 Range Resources 探索合并的传言反映了能源并购的现状。 

德勤副董事长兼美国能源和化学品行业领导人艾米·克罗尼斯表示,“并购活动的旧驱动力,例如投资和收购以实现增长以及增加市场份额,似乎已被新驱动力所取代。” 

两个不幸的公司实体——一个在二叠纪盆地,另一个在阿巴拉契亚地区——拥有宝贵的资产;唉,他们的土地并不连续。

我们不知道彭博社的报道中是否有任何内容表明先锋自然资源公司正在探索与 Range 资源公司合并。我们确实知道,市场对 Range 的支持者们尖叫着,“就这样吧!”而 Pioneer 的支持者则采取了更多“等等,什么?”的态度。

我们知道,Pioneer 强调其“不考虑重大业务合并或其他收购交易”,这导致其震荡的股价迅速回升,而 Range 的股价在这一消息后上涨了 12% ”迅速泄气。

Range首席执行官杰夫·文图拉(Jeff Ventura)告诉分析师,他的公司处于有利地位,不需要进行任何形式的合并或收购。随后,高管们回避了有关是否确实进行过讨论的问题。

但这项交易的消息并未反映出来的不仅仅是八卦。该报告在某种程度上代表了能源并购的现状。

Pioneer 是二叠纪盆地一家以石油为主的卓越勘探与生产公司。德勤在其《2023 年石油和天然气并购展望》中报告称,2022 年二叠纪盆地占页岩油并购交易价值的 28%。

Range 是马塞勒斯页岩区领先的天然气和液化天然气生产商。去年,随着供应链控制的重要性日益增强,全球 82% 的中游交易涉及天然气基础设施。

并购新动能

2022 年,油价飙升本身可能就足以引发一笔交易或 30 笔交易,即使是在地理位置不同的盆地。但我们现在生活在一个与原油价格驱动并购交易不同的世界。

德勤副董事长兼美国能源和化工行业领导人艾米·克罗尼斯 (Amy Chronis) 在报告中表示,“并购活动的旧驱动力,例如投资和收购以实现增长以及增加市场份额,似乎已被新驱动力所取代。” Outlook 的执行摘要。

首要驱动因素是能源安全,在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰以及随后对欧洲的天然气出口大幅减少之后,能源安全成为并购的一个重要因素。随着去年美国出口的增加以及欧洲和亚洲天然气价格的飙升,液化天然气资产的重要性尤其增加。

第二个驱动因素是卓越运营,其中整合是提高效率和加强技术使用以提高生产力的工具。二叠纪盆地的并购揭示了资本纪律的力量。随着“钻地、宝贝、钻地”被“山地、宝贝、寒冷”所取代,公司开始强调面积整合和战略扩张。

2022 年,二叠纪盆地每英亩交易估值有所下降。这并不奇怪——大部分最好的土地在前几年都被吞没了。但去年,每桶油当量的价格达到了 2014 年以来的最高水平。 在此期间,最富裕盆地的并购活动下降,突显了油价的失势。

Pioneer-Range 的交易将让人回想起页岩革命的成长时代。iPhone 14时代,投资者更看重自由现金流。

但自由现金流是干净的现金流。第三个驱动因素展示了能源转型如何给当今几乎所有石油和天然气活动投下漫长而干净的阴影。2022年,清洁能源约占石油和天然气并购价值的15%,其中约80%涉及生物燃料以及太阳能和风能联合资产。

第四个驱动因素说明了石油和天然气公司进军清洁能源领域。德勤援引 Refinitiv Eikon 的数据表示,目前石油和天然气公司约有三分之一的合资企业属于清洁能源领域。数量最多的是氢和相关燃料(氨、氮、可持续航空燃料),其来源、燃料和碳捕获计划的组合呈日益增长的趋势。

最后,过去五年中超过 70% 的交易涉及一家公司收购另一家具有更好 ESG 概况的公司——在能源转型意义上进行升级。对于购买 ESG 友好型资产的大型独立企业和超级巨头来说尤其如此。ESG 在中小型公司的交易中发挥的作用较小。

对于未来一年,德勤预计会出现更多相同的情况:继续谨慎整合并加速转向清洁能源。资本纪律鼓励涉及连续土地的交易,因此不要将目光转向其他盆地。

并购活动面临的威胁包括宏观经济和资本市场环境,以及随之而来的经济衰退或放缓的风险。从地缘政治角度来看,欧盟对俄罗斯石油禁运和全球对俄罗斯的制裁总体上增加了不确定性,也增加了交易的不确定性。

能源转型加速导致碳氢化合物需求前景疲软,没有什么比生存威胁更能破坏整合的情绪了。

原文链接/hartenergy

Not Your Shale Boomer’s M&A Strategy

Rumors of Pioneer Natural Resources and Range Resources exploring a merger is reflective of the state of energy M&A. 

“The old drivers of M&A activity, such as investing and acquiring for growth and increasing market share, seem to have been replaced by new drivers,” Amy Chronis, Deloitte’s vice chair and U.S. energy and chemicals leader, said. 

A pair of star-crossed corporate entities—one in the Permian, the other in Appalachia—endowed with valuable assets; alas, their acreages are not contiguous.

We don’t know if there was anything to the Bloomberg report that Pioneer Natural Resources explored a merger with Range Resources. We do know the market’s cheerleaders for Range screamed, “Go for it!” while Pioneer’s backers took more of a “wait, what?” approach.

And we know Pioneer’s emphatic statement that it was “not contemplating a significant business combination or other acquisition transaction” resulted in a quick recovery for its jolted stock price, while Range’s shares—which jumped 12% on the news—swiftly deflated.

For its part, Range CEO Jeff Ventura told analysts his company was in a great position and didn’t need to pursue any kind of merger or acquisition. Executives then dodged questions about whether discussions had actually taken place.

But news of this deal-that-wasn’t reflected more than just gossip run amok. The report was a representation, of sorts, of the state of energy M&A.

Pioneer is a preeminent oil-focused E&P in the Permian Basin. The Permian accounted for 28% of shale M&A deal value in 2022, Deloitte reported in its “Oil and Gas M&A Outlook 2023.”

Range is a leading natural gas and NGL producer in the Marcellus Shale. Last year, 82% of global midstream deals involved natural gas infrastructure as control of the supply chain increased in importance.

New drivers of M&A

The soaring price of oil in 2022 might have been enough on its own to trigger a transaction or 30, even in geographically disparate basins. But we live in a different world than when M&A deals were driven by the price of crude.

“The old drivers of M&A activity, such as investing and acquiring for growth and increasing market share, seem to have been replaced by new drivers,” Amy Chronis, Deloitte’s vice chair and U.S. energy and chemicals leader, said in the outlook’s executive summary.

Topping the list of drivers is energy security, which emerged as a huge factor in M&A in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and subsequent drastic reduction of natural gas exports to Europe. LNG assets, in particular, have grown in importance as U.S. exports rose and gas prices skyrocketed in Europe and Asia last year.

Driver No. 2 is operational excellence, in which consolidation is a tool to increase efficiency and enhanced use of technology to increase productivity. M&A in the Permian has revealed the power of capital discipline. As “drill, baby, drill” gave way to “chill, baby, chill,” companies have emphasized acreage consolidation and strategic expansions.

In 2022, Permian deal valuations fell on a per-acre basis. It’s not that surprising—most of the best acreage was gobbled up in previous years. But last year, the price per boe reached its highest level since 2014. That M&A declined in the richest basin during that time underscores how oil price has been dethroned.

A Pioneer-Range deal would have harkened back to the grow-grow days of the shale revolution. In the iPhone 14 era, investors are more interested in free cash flow.

But free cash flow as clean cash flow. Driver No. 3 shows how the energy transition casts its long, clean shadow over virtually all oil and gas activity these days. Clean energy accounted for about 15% of oil and gas M&A value in 2022, about 80% of which involved biofuels, and combined solar and wind assets.

Driver No. 4 illustrates oil and gas companies’ incursion into clean energy. About one-third of joint ventures by oil and gas companies are now in the clean energy space, Deloitte said, citing data from Refinitiv Eikon. The highest numbers are in hydrogen and related fuels (ammonia, nitrogen, sustainable aviation fuel), trending toward a growing mix of sources, fuels and carbon-capture programs.

Finally, more than 70% of deals during the past five years involve a company buying another with a better ESG profile—marrying up in the energy transition sense. This is particularly the case with larger independents and supermajors buying ESG-friendly assets. ESG plays less of a role in transactions made by smaller and mid-sized companies.

For the year ahead, Deloitte expects more of the same: a continuation of cautious consolidation and an accelerated pivot toward clean energy. Capital discipline encourages deals involving contiguous acreage, so no wandering eyes in the direction of other basins.

Threats to M&A activity include the macroeconomic and capital market environments, carrying with them the risks of a recession or slowdown. Geopolitically, the EU’s embargo on Russian oil and global sanctions on Russia increase uncertainty generally, as well as in deal making.

And a weaker demand outlook for hydrocarbons driven by acceleration of the energy transition—well, nothing ruins the mood for consolidation like an existential threat.