NAPE:在勘探与生产熟悉的盆地,锂热提供的黄金很少

人们对锂资源的需求随之而来,因为这种利润丰厚的元素预计将在全球降低排放的努力中发挥作用,但在许多领域,经济面临着挑战。

锂热潮正在兴起,在美国,斯马科弗地层正在成为头条新闻。

Grounded Energy 地质学家 Galen Huling 表示,虽然勘探与生产公司熟悉的许多其他盆地都含有对电池技术至关重要的元素,有助于降低排放,但 Smackover 的炒作是合理的。从阿肯色州 Smackover 来看,盐水浓度平均为百万分之 150 (ppm) 至 400 ppm。

Standard Lithium正在致力于将商业规模的直接锂提取项目上线,其钻探的油井甚至达到了 600 ppm。

“如果您将其与美国其他盐水进行比较,您会发现索尔顿海的平均浓度在 200 左右。“克莱顿谷的数量多达 300 个。因此,这些数量超过了该国许多其他地区,”Huling 在 2 月 7 日的 NAPE 能源商业会议上说道。

Huling 探索了一系列假设的经济学,以强调锂提取的潜在货币价值。一个标准的 640 英亩的区域,平均净储层厚度为 100 英尺,孔隙度为 11%,锂浓度为 250 mg/L,每个区域可转化为 2.9 亿美元。他说,这是假设回收率达到 100%,碳酸锂价格为每吨 25,000 美元。

“这没什么可耸耸肩的,”胡林说。此外,Smackover 位于一个工业友好地区,拥有强大的石油和天然气资源和基础设施,使得该元件能够转移到国内和全球市场。

Smackover 位于从德克萨斯州到佛罗里达州的美国墨西哥湾沿岸,吸引了石油巨头埃克森美孚公司、锂巨头 Albemarle 和铁矿石公司 Pantera Minerals 的兴趣。这些公司的目标是增加美国的锂供应,锂是电动汽车动力电池的关键成分,并提供能量存储以加强电网。


有关的

Element3 从二叠纪双鹰废水中提取锂

Lyten 将天然气转化为锂硫电池的中试工厂

锂替代品:Natron Energy 扩大钠离子电池规模

埃克森美孚计划于 2027 年开始锂生产

锂热潮:石油和天然气公司变成探矿者


到处

虽然斯马科弗吸引了许多公司,但胡林指出,锂矿床遍布美国各地,包括阿巴拉契亚、索尔顿海、粉河盆地、威利斯顿盆地和内华达州。在地质历史的某个时刻,这些地区发生了地质沉降,暴露了来自火山或火成岩的锂基岩。然而,锂的浓缩需要时间(数百万年)。

他说,将其从地下从盐水中提取出来需要一些地热激活和一个封闭的盆地系统来积聚和浓缩水,等等。

GeoBrines International 创始人兼首席执行官汤姆·史密斯 (Tom Smith) 表示,在犹他州,Paradox 盆地一直被称为矿产盆地。矿工在那里勘探铀、钾、锂以及石油。

“这里的盐水通常具有较高的 TDS;总溶解固体非常高。“盐水中溶解了大量矿物质。“这是一个去哪里寻找的线索,”史密斯说。

但这是下一个 Smackover 吗?

“所以,明确地说,不,”史密斯说。

他说,总部位于澳大利亚的安森资源公司可能是在悖论中锂提取工作中走得最远的。该公司拥有 1,000 多个砂金矿权,在犹他州格林河附近设有一个加工场地,并且作为碳酸锂项目的一部分正在进行预可行性研究。然而,该公司每天需要 30 万桶淡水。

“但这就是科罗拉多河流域,”史密斯说。水资源稀缺。“这里每天不可能生产 30,000 桶石油,”史密斯说。

另外,在运输液体时,这些数字并不能相加。他说,成本从 3 美元/桶到 5 美元/桶不等。史密斯解释说,在该地区打井时,必须除去盐,因为盐水不稳定。

实际上,您必须将淡水拖到井中以保持盐的溶解和移动。否则,你的管道会扩大或盐分增加,这只是一场噩梦,”史密斯说。“因此,至少可以说,这里存在很大的财务风险。”稳定的盐水更容易处理。

具有挑战性的经济学

为了说明具有挑战性的经济问题,史密斯举了一个位于 Paradox 盆地的商业规模直接锂提取 (DLE) 项目的例子。

每天处理约 2,800 桶含有混合锂污染物的源盐水材料,每天会产生约 268 磅锂(200 ppm 锂)。

这批货物每年将产生约 570 万美元的销售收入。这是基于每吨 30,000 美元的碳酸锂当量基础上的。

“加工成本约为其中的三分之一,每吨约 10,000 美元。因此,您的税前利润约为 380 万美元。但实际上,你要花费 2500 万美元才能做到这一点——钻井并获得设施。您的回报超过六年。这是 2 倍的投资回报率。

“这并不能真正让船漂浮起来。”

Blackbuck Resources是一家专注于二叠纪盆地水务中游公司,已涉足锂业。Blackbuck 首席执行官 Justin Love 分享了一个关于锂开发的警示故事。虽然二叠纪盆地被认为是石油生产地,但它可能不是从采出水中提取锂的最佳地点。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,该公司开始在其处理的水中寻找价值,尤其是锂。

“我不认为二叠纪盆地的采出水将成为一种可行的资源,”洛在回顾该公司的经验时说道。他说,挑战包括每天需要获取数十万桶水。考虑到水来自不同的长凳,水质也是一个问题。

“这可能是骨泉产出的水。可能是沃尔夫坎普。它可能真的来自任何地方,对吧,这取决于你的管道网络在哪里,”洛夫说。“如果卡车司机把它扔掉,那就禁止了。” “您会发现水质有很大的变化。我认为在二叠纪,平均而言,约为 20 ppm,这不是很有竞争力。然后,就存在技术挑战。”

洛夫说,从水中去除碳氢化合物不仅困难,而且价格昂贵。

“即使是索尔顿海这样的地热项目也遇到了很多麻烦。这是非常热的原始汤。它可以减压。“他们在规模方面存在很多问题,”洛夫说。

相反,布莱克巴克在任何可行的石油和天然气窗口之外寻找北美的纯盐水。

“到本月底,我们有望控制和种植约 30,000 英亩的土地。所以,我们对此感到非常兴奋,”乐福说。

锂和法律

除了经济和技术方面的考虑之外,Daily & Woods 的律师 Tom Daily 还指出了矿物定义的合法性,以及盐水中不同元素的单独所有权可能带来的挑战。

“德克萨斯州对于谁或什么拥有盐水感到非常困惑,”戴利说。

他说,与石油一起生产的盐水可能属于矿主和石油运营商。“但如果有人出去钻一口盐水井,他们可能正在与地表所有者打交道,”他说。

将盐水称为矿物(将锂称为矿物)可能对所有权具有不同的法律含义。“这可能会把我们带到我们不想去的地方。因此,我们需要非常小心什么是矿物质。”

获得生产盐水和提取锂的权利需要获得盐水租赁,这与石油和天然气租赁不同。它还需要仔细起草特许权使用费条款。Daily 表示,锂资源开发商还应牢记重新注入废盐水时所需的许可,以避免地下侵入。

强制共享是应对不愿参与的租赁业主的一种解决方案。戴利说,组建装置是“避免这种侵入责任的唯一方法,同时仍然能够与实际上的巨大洪水一起注入和生产”。“并且在单位内,您获得强制联合的权利。”

阿肯色州目前正在为拒绝签署租约的租户支付特许权使用费。

“这将是一场非常激烈的讨论,”戴利说,“因为正如你可以想象的那样,特许权使用费所有者认为他们应该获得电池级碳酸锂销售价值的 12.5%反对基于盐水价值的东西。”

原文链接/hartenergy

NAPE: In Basins Familiar to E&Ps, Lithium Rush Offers Little Gold

A quest for sources of lithium comes as the lucrative element is expected to play a part in global efforts to lower emissions, but in many areas the economics are challenging.

The lithium rush is on, and in the U.S. the Smackover Formation is making headlines.

While many other basins familiar to E&Ps hold the element critical for battery technology that could help lower emissions, the Smackover hype is justified, according to Galen Huling, geologist for Grounded Energy. Looking at the Arkansas Smackover, brine concentrations average from 150 parts per million (ppm) to 400 ppm.

Wells drilled by Standard Lithium, which is working to bring commercial-scale direct lithium extraction projects online, have even reached 600 ppm.

“If you’re comparing that to other brines in the U.S, you’ve got the Salton Sea averaging in the low 200s. Clayton Valley is up to 300. So, these are exceeding a lot of the other regions of the country,” Huling said at the Feb. 7 NAPE Energy Business Conference.

Huling explored a range of hypothetical economics to highlight the potential monetary value of lithium extraction. A standard 640-acre section with an average net reservoir thickness of 100 ft, 11% porosity and a lithium concentration of 250 mg/L could translate to $290 million per section. That’s assuming 100% recovery and a lithium carbonate price of $25,000 per tonne, he said.

“That’s nothing to shrug at,” Huling said. Plus, the Smackover’s location in an industry-friendly region with a strong oil and gas presence and infrastructure in place, enables the element to be moved to domestic and global markets.

The Smackover, which along the U.S. Gulf Coast from Texas to Florida, has attracted interest from oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp., lithium powerhouse Albemarle and iron ore company Pantera Minerals. The companies are among those aiming to boost U.S. supplies of lithium, a key ingredient of batteries used to power electric vehicles and to provide energy storage to strengthen electric grids.


RELATED

Element3 Extracts Lithium from Permian’s Double Eagle Wastewater

Lyten’s Pilot Plant to Transform Natgas to Lithium-sulfur Batteries

Lithium Alternative: Natron Energy Scaling Up Sodium-ion Batteries

Exxon Mobil Aims to Start Lithium Production by 2027

The Great Lithium Rush: Oil and Gas Companies Turn Prospectors


Everywhere

While the Smackover has attracted many companies, Huling noted that lithium deposits are located across the U.S.—including Appalachia, Salton Sea, Powder River Basin, Williston Basin and Nevada. At some point during their geologic history, the areas have had geologic subsidence that has exposed basement rock with lithium being sourced from volcanic, or igneous rocks. However, it takes time—millions of years—for lithium to concentrate.

Getting it out of the ground from brine requires some geothermal activation and a closed basin system for water to accumulate and concentrate, among other requirements, he said.

In Utah, the Paradox Basin has always been known as a minerals basin, said Tom Smith, founder and CEO of GeoBrines International. There, miners explore for uranium, potash and lithium, as well as oil.

“The brine fluids out here typically have high TDS; total dissolved solids are very high. … You’ve got a lot of mineral load dissolved in that brine. That’s a clue where to look,” Smith said.

But is it the next Smackover?

“No, flat out, no,” Smith said.

Australia-based Anson Resources is perhaps the furthest along in lithium extraction efforts in the Paradox, he said. The company has more than 1,000 placer claims, a processing site near Green River, Utah, and a pre-feasibility study underway as part of a lithium carbonate project. However, the company requires 300,000 bbl/d of freshwater.

“But this is the Colorado River Basin,” Smith said. Water resources are scarce. "You’re not going to get 30,000 barrels a day out here,” Smith said.

Plus, the numbers don’t add up when it comes to hauling fluids. Costs run from $3/bbl to $5/bbl, he said. When drilling a well in the region, salt has to be removed because the brines aren’t stable, Smith explained.

“You actually have to haul fresh water to the well to keep that salt dissolved and moving. Otherwise, your tubing gets scaled up or salted up, and it’s just a nightmare,” Smith said. “So, there’s a lot of financial risk here, to say the least.” Stable brines are easier to process.

Challenging economics

To illustrate the challenging economics, Smith gave an example of a commercial-scale direct lithium extraction (DLE) project in the Paradox Basin.

Processing about 2,800 bbl/d of source brine material with mixed lithium contaminants produces about 268 lbs of lithium per day (200 ppm lithium).

That haul would generate an annual revenue from sales of about $5.7 million. That’s based on a lithium carbonate equivalent basis of $30,000 per metric tonne.

“The cost of processing is about a third of that, [about] $10,000 per metric ton. So, your profit before tax is about $3.8 million. But really you spend $25 million to do this—to drill the well and get the facilities. Your payoff is greater than six years. It’s a 2X ROI.

“This doesn’t really float the boat.”

Blackbuck Resources, a Permian Basin-focused water midstream company, has jumped into lithium. Blackbuck CEO Justin Love shared a cautionary tale on lithium development. While the Permian is considered the place to be for oil production, it may not be the best for lithium from produced water. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the company started looking for value—particularly lithium—in the water it treats.

“I don’t think produced water in the Permian Basin is going to be a viable resource,” Lowe said, reflecting on the company’s learnings. Challenges include the need to have access to hundreds of thousands of barrels per day of water, he said. Water quality is also an issue, considering the water is coming from various benches.

“It might be Bone Spring produced water. It might be Wolfcamp. It could be really from anywhere, right, depending on where your pipeline network is,” Love said. “God forbid if a truck driver drops it off. … You’re seeing very large variability in your water quality. I think in the Permian, on average, it’s somewhere around 20 ppm, which is not very competitive. And then, there’s a technical challenge.”

It is not only difficult to remove hydrocarbons from the water, it is also expensive, Love said.

“Even the geothermal projects like in the Salton Sea are having a ton of trouble. It’s primordial soup coming up very hot. It depressurizes. They’re having a lot of issues with scale,” Love said.

Blackbuck, instead, sought a North American pure-play brine outside any viable oil and gas window.

“We’re on track by the end of this month to have somewhere around 30,000 acres under control and growing. So, we’re really excited about it,” Love said.

Lithium and the law

Besides economic and technical considerations, attorney Tom Daily of Daily & Woods pointed out the legalities around the definition of mineral and how challenges may arise from separate ownership of different elements within brine.

“Texas is pretty confused about who or what owns brine,” Daily said.

Brine produced along with oil may belong to the mineral owner and the oil operator, he said. “But if someone just goes out and drills a brine well, they may be dealing with the surface owner,” he said.

Referring to brine as a mineral—versus lithium as a mineral—may have different legal implications for ownership. “And that can lead us to places we don’t want to go. So, we need to be real careful about what is a mineral.”

Obtaining rights to produce brine and extract lithium requires getting a brine lease, which differs from an oil and gas lease. It also requires carefully drafted royalty provisions. Developers of lithium resources should also keep in mind the permissions required when reinjecting spent brine to avoid underground trespass, Daily said.

Forced pooling is a solution to dealing with a lease owner who doesn’t want to participate. Forming units is “the only way to avoid this trespass liability while still being able to inject and produce in concert with what is actually a giant water flood,” Daily said. “And within the units you acquire the right to force pool.”

Arkansas is currently sorting out royalty payments for lease owners who have refused to sign a lease.

“It’s going to be a very heated discussion,” Daily said, “because you have, as you can imagine, royalty owners who think they ought to get 12.5% of the sale value of battery-grade lithium carbonate as opposed to something based on the value of brine.”