Prairie 的 DJ Bayswater 需要增加近 70% 的油当量才能达到预期目标

Prairie Operating 投资者电话会议上,分析师表示,专注于丹佛-朱尔斯堡盆地的勘探与生产部门的产量数据毫无意义。Prairie 表示,其中一个数据已经过时。


以丹佛-朱尔斯堡 (DJ) 盆地为中心的Prairie Operating需要在下半年将产量提高 69%,才能达到其 2025 年预计的最低平均产量 24,000 桶油当量/天。

董事长兼首席执行官 Ed Kovalik 表示,产量增加的原因是第一季度平均产量为 3,289 桶油当量/天;该公司从Bayswater Exploration & Production收购 DJ Basin 时,获得的产量较少。

最终交易金额为 4.83 亿美元现金、1500 万美元托管资金和 370 万股股票,当时每股价值约为 4.21 美元。

最初的交易金额为 6.03 亿美元,包括未公开的现金金额和 520 万股股票,当时每股价值 8.64 美元。

科瓦利克在 8 月 12 日的投资者电话会议上表示,该交易基于贝斯沃特截至 12 月 1 日的 DJ 产量约为 26,000 桶油当量/天。

他补充说,该地产的油井产量下降率为每年 20%。

Prairie油田第二季度平均产量为21,052桶油当量/天,较第一季度增长540%。产量中约50%为石油,24%为液化天然气(NGL)。

科瓦利克表示:“我们实际上只是推迟了大约 60 天才开始增加产能。”

“但是,由于我们的钻井和完井施工取得了良好的效果,产量提升的进程非常顺利,所以我们没有理由相信我们无法实现这样的数字。”

“正确的数字”

但电话会议中的分析师表示,这些数字没有意义。

罗斯资本 (Roth Capital) 分析师 Leo Mariani 指出,Prairie 报告称,Bayswater 交易的净产量为 25,700 桶油当量/天。

“听起来这确实不是正确的数字。它比‘增加的’数字要低得多,”马里亚尼说。

“也许这是几个月前的某个旧数字,资产可能已经下降了几个月。”

科瓦利克表示,在协议生效日 12 月 1 日,公布的数字是正确的。

Prairie 在2 月 7 日的公告中称,该油田的储量为“约 26,000 桶油当量/天”。

马里亚尼回答说,“如果我现在这样算的话,看起来你们需要在 2025 年下半年平均每天生产 36,000 桶油当量才能达到你们的指导下限”,也就是 2025 年平均每天生产 24,000 桶油当量到 26,000 桶油当量之间。

新的指导值从 Prairie 在 2 月 7 日交易公告中预计的 29,000 桶/天降至 31,000 桶/天。

他说道:“考虑到第二季度的产量为 21,000 桶油当量/天,这将是一个巨大的增长。”

科瓦利克表示,Prairie 今年将有 35 口油井投入销售。上半年已有 9 口油井投入生产。

科瓦利克表示:“因此,你会看到第三季度和第四季度产量出现显著增长,产量退出率将显著高于我们所述的年平均产量。”

马里亚尼在电话会议后的投资报告中写道:“我们认为 Prairie 可能难以实现其 2025 年的生产目标——我们目前预测 2025 年的产量为 21,075 桶油当量/天,比公司预期的中值低 4,000 桶油当量/天。”

约翰逊赖斯公司 (Johnson Rice) 的分析师查尔斯米德 (Charles Meade) 也对此感到惊讶,他指出 Prairie 的第二季度产量低于贝斯沃特 (Bayswater) 矿的预期。

科瓦利克表示,该油田 20% 的产量递减率意味着,12 月 1 日的产量为 26,000 桶/天,此后减少了约 4,000 桶/天。

他补充说,交易的延迟导致今年迄今为止上线的油井数量减少,“但产量上升的轨迹是一样的。没有任何改变。”

该交易于2月7日宣布,原计划于当月晚些时候完成,但最终于3月26日完成。

指标

Bayswater 油田位于科罗拉多州韦尔德县,拥有净面积 29,000 英亩、超过 350 个运营地点和 7800 万桶油当量的探明储量。

包括该资产在内,Prairie 的总租赁面积为 65,000 净英亩。据该公司称,油井位置总计超过 600 个,已探明储量为 1.003 亿桶油当量,其中 70% 为液体油。

科瓦利克在8月12日的电话会议上表示:“这笔交易对我们公司来说是一个关键的里程碑。成功完成一笔市值不到2亿美元、价值超过6亿美元的交易,是对我们团队能力的有力证明。”

Prairie 拥有 10 亿美元的银行授信额度,其中 3.87 亿美元是作为完成 Bayswater 股票加现金交易的一部分提取的。此前,该授信额度的唯一参与者是花旗银行,但美国银行和西德克萨斯国家银行自第一季度起也加入了进来。

Prairie 的负债总额为 6 亿美元。

截至 8 月 12 日电话会议召开时,该公司的市值为 1.48 亿美元,股价为 3.38 美元。

Prairie 首席财务官 Greg Patton 表示,E&P 计划最终将产量扩大至 100,000 桶油当量/天。

评论

添加新评论

本次对话将根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客服团队。

原文链接/HartEnergy

Prairie’s D-J Bayswater Needs Nearly 70% More Boe/d to Hit Guidance

Analysts on Prairie Operating’s investor call said the Denver-Julesburg Basin-focused E&P’s production numbers didn’t make sense. Prairie said one of the numbers was an outdated figure.


Denver-Julesburg (D-J) Basin-focused Prairie Operating needs to increase its production by 69% in the second half to meet its 2025 minimum projected average of 24,000 boe/d.

The added growth is due to that first-quarter production average of 3,289 boe/d; it picked up fewer barrels from its D-J Basin acquisition from Bayswater Exploration & Production upon closing, said Ed Kovalik, chairman and CEO.

The deal at closing was for $483 million in cash, $15 million in escrow and 3.7 million shares, which were worth about $4.21 each at the time.

The original deal had been for $603 million, consisting of an undisclosed sum of cash and 5.2 million shares, which were worth $8.64 each at the time.

The deal had been based on Bayswater’s roughly 26,000 boe/d of D-J production as of Dec. 1, Kovalik said in an Aug. 12 investor call.

The property’s well decline rate is 20% a year, he added.

Prairie’s second-quarter production averaged 21,052 boe/d, a 540% increase from the first quarter. The output is about 50% oil and 24% NGL.

“What we really had is just an approximately 60-day delay to starting the ramp-up,” Kovalik said.

“But the ramp is very much well on its way with great results from our drilling and completion execution, so we have no reason to believe we're not going to accomplish these kinds of numbers.”

‘The right number’

But analysts on the call said the numbers didn’t make sense.

Leo Mariani, an analyst with Roth Capital, noted Prairie reported the Bayswater deal came with 25,700 net boe/d.

“Sounds like that really wasn't the right number. It was something significantly lower than …[what] was added,” Mariani said.

“Maybe that's some kind of old number from several months before and the asset would've been declining for several months.”

Kovalik said the announced figure was correct on the deal’s effective date of Dec. 1.

Prairie had reported in the Feb. 7 announcement that the property came with “approximately 26,000 boe/d.”

Mariani responded that, “if I'm doing the math right here, it looks like you guys need to average around 36,000 boe/d in the second half of 2025 to get to the lower end of your guidance,” which is a 2025 average of between 24,000 boe/d and 26,000 boe/d.

The new guidance is down from the 29,000 boe/d to 31,000 boe/d Prairie expected in its Feb. 7 deal announcement.

“Given that you were at 21,000 [boe/d] in the second quarter, that would be a heck of a ramp,” he said.

Kovalik said Prairie is putting 35 gross wells into sales this year. Nine were turned online in the first half.

“So you will see a pretty significant ramp through the [third quarter] and [fourth quarter] with a materially higher exit rate of production than we stated is our average annualized production,” Kovalik said.

Mariani wrote in an investment note after the call, "We think it may be difficult for Prairie to achieve its 2025 production guidance …. We are currently modeling 21,075 boe/d in 2025, which is 4,000 boe/d below the midpoint of the company's guidance.”

Charles Meade, an analyst with Johnson Rice, also expressed surprise, noting Prairie’s second-quarter output was less than what was expected from the Bayswater property.

Kovalik said the property’s 20% decline rate meant that the 26,000 boe/d on Dec. 1 became about 4,000 fewer boe/d since then.

He added that the delay in closing the deal resulted in bringing fewer wells online so far this year, “but the ramp trajectory is the same. Nothing's changed there.”

When announced Feb. 7, the deal was expected to close later that month. It closed on March 26 instead.

Metrics

The Bayswater property came with 29,000 net acres, more than 350 operated locations and 78 MMboe of proved reserves in Weld County, Colorado.

Including the property, Prairie’s total leasehold is 65,000 net acres. Well locations total more than 600 and proved reserves are 100.3 MMboe, 70% liquids, according to the company.

Kovalik said in the Aug. 12 call: “This deal was a pivotal milestone for our company. Successfully executing a transaction valued at over $600 million with a market cap under $200 million is a powerful validation of our team's ability.”

Prairie has a $1 billion bank credit facility with $387 million drawn as part of closing the Bayswater stock-and-cash deal. The sole participant of the credit had been Citibank, but Bank of America and West Texas National Bank joined since the first quarter.

Prairie’s liabilities total $600 million.

The company’s market cap was $148 million at the time of the Aug. 12 call, with shares trading at $3.38.

Greg Patton, Prairie’s CFO, said the E&P plans to eventually scale to 100,000 boe/d.

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.