石油价格


能源转型委员会的一份新报告称,碳捕获、利用和封存(CCUS)可能在某些行业的脱碳中发挥至关重要的作用,但石油和天然气公司在继续照常开采化石燃料的同时,无法利用碳清除技术  周四上映

碳捕获并不意味着石油公司可以继续照常营业 - 石油和天然气 360

资料来源:石油价格

该委员会由行业高管、银行家和学者组成,他们表示:“CUS 和裁员至关重要,但并不意味着一切照旧。”

该委员会表示,该报告“驳斥了 CCUS 和碳清除证明化石燃料生产照常进行的观点”,并表示到 2050 年必须大幅减少煤炭、石油和天然气的使用,其中现在开始。

根据该 报告,要将全球变暖限制在 1.5 摄氏度,需要 65% 的石油和天然气储量以及 90% 的煤炭储量尚未开发。

能源转型委员会表示,“因此,到 2030 年,化石燃料供应投资将下降 30-35%,到 2040 年将下降 45-65%,而没有必要勘探新领域。”

ETC 表示,“依赖大幅增加碳捕获或清除的使用并不明智,首要任务必须是降低化石燃料需求。”

ETC 表示,对于大多数煤炭应用,CCUS 比其他替代方案更昂贵,对于大多数天然气用途来说,CCUS 要么不切实际,要么不经济,而对于当今石油的大多数用途,CCUS“可能完全不切实际”。

能源转型委员会主任伊塔·凯特尔伯勒 (Ita Kettleborough) 表示,“CUS 和碳清除不能用来证明一切照旧的化石燃料生产是合理的。”

“需要一些CCUS和清除来实现净零排放并将全球变暖限制在1.5°C”与零碳电力、清洁氢和可持续低碳生物资源的使用一起发挥重要但有限的补充作用。必须部署它们,而不是取代快速减少化石燃料的使用。”

尽管减少石油和天然气使用、投资和生产的呼声日益高涨,但该行业表示,未来几十年将需要所有能源,世界将需要更多投资和新的石油和天然气开发,以确保市场稳定并避免能源和经济混乱。


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) could play a vital role in the decarbonization of some industries but carbon removals cannot be used by oil and gas firms while they continue to pump fossil fuels as usual, a new report by the Energy Transitions Commission showed on Thursday.

Carbon capture doesn’t mean oil firms can continue business as usual- oil and gas 360

Source: Oil Price

“CCUS and removals are vital but do not mean business as usual,” said the commission which includes industry executives, bankers, and academics.

The report “dispels the notion that CCUS and carbon removals justify business as usual for fossil fuel production,” according to the commission, which said that the use of coal, oil, and natural gas must be reduced dramatically by 2050, with reductions starting now.

Per the report, limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius would need 65% of oil and gas reserves and 90% of coal reserves to remain untapped.

“Consequently, investments in fossil fuel supply should decline by 30-35% by 2030 and 45-65% by 2040, with exploration of new fields deemed unnecessary,” the Energy Transitions Commission said.

According to ETC, “it is not prudent to rely on significantly higher use of carbon capture or removals—the priority must be to bring down fossil fuel demand.”

For most coal applications, CCUS would be more expensive than an alternative, CCUS would either be impractical or uneconomic for most gas use, and for most uses of oil today, CCUS “would be completely impractical,” ETC said.

“CCUS and carbon removals cannot be used to justify business-as-usual fossil fuel production,” said Ita Kettleborough, Director, Energy Transitions Commission.

“Some CCUS and removals are required to achieve net-zero emissions and limit global warming to 1.5°C – playing a vital, but limited, complementary role alongside zero-carbon electricity, clean hydrogen and the use of sustainable low-carbon bioresources. They must be deployed as well as, not instead of, rapid reduction in fossil fuels use.”

While calls for reduction of oil and gas use, investments, and production have intensified, the industry says that all energy sources will be needed for decades to come and the world will need more investments and new oil and gas developments to ensure market stability and avoid energy and economic chaos.