石油价格


自拜登总统上任第一天起,美国石油和天然气行业就一直批评他的能源政策,称这些政策对化石燃料采取惩罚性和限制性措施,损害了美国的能源和国家安全。

然而,拜登总统任期内,美国石油和天然气 产量却创下历史新高。但业内人士表示,尽管拜登有政策,但这一成就的实现并非归功于这些政策。

就共和党候选人、前总统唐纳德·特朗普而言,他已承诺恢复“钻探、婴儿钻探”政策,以支持释放更多美国石油和天然气产量。

该行业认为自己是拜登气候法律和规定的目标,猛烈抨击了所谓的“不完善”的能源政策,并经常对现任政府及其许多能源法案和提案表示失望。包括历史上最少的拟议租赁销售、甲烷排放税以及暂停液化天然气出口项目审批。

“在下一届政府做出决定之前,我们在做出某些商业决策时会处于不断变化的状态,”一家美国勘探和生产公司的高管在  对最新的达拉斯联储能源调查发表评论时表示。

另一条评论写道,“我无法回忆起一个充满令人不安的世界冲突和我们必须在美国总统选举中做出的选择的更加不确定的时期。”

美国石油和天然气行业 支持特朗普 当选总统。根据 OpenSecrets收集的数据,该公司已向唐纳德·特朗普的竞选活动捐赠了 750 万美元,这显然比拜登总统更利于他,后者从能源领域外部团体那里收到了略高于 100 万美元的资金。

然而,特朗普的两项主要竞选承诺——废除通胀削减法案(IRA)和征收贸易关税,特别是对中国产品征收60%的关税——可能不会有利于石油和天然气行业。

尽管该行业批评 IRA 的排放费,但仍将从 IRA 的资金中受益,以启动和运行碳捕获和氢项目。

去年,美国最大的石油生产商之一西方石油公司获得了 拜登政府的两项拨款之一 ,用于在德克萨斯州建造世界上第一座直接空气捕获工厂,该工厂将直接从大气中提取二氧化碳。

美国政府还决定通过两党基础设施​​法提供 70 亿美元的资金来支持氢中心。由于计划选择 通过碳捕获和储存(CCS)从天然气中生产氢气的地点,这引起了很多争议 。

特朗普 承诺要摧毁 爱尔兰共和军。然而,这首先需要共和党控制的国会,包括众议院和参议院。分析师称,即便如此,也可能很难缩减或取消激励措施,因为它们主要有利于共和党州的项目和就业机会。

美国石油巨头的高管纷纷表示支持爱尔兰共和军。其中之一就是埃克森美孚首席执行官达伦·伍兹。

“我非常支持 IRA “我非常支持 IRA “因为根据立法,IRA 关注的是碳强度,理论上与技术无关,”伍兹上个月在休斯敦举行的 CERAWeek 上说道。由 华盛顿邮报报道。

“他们并不想选择某种特定的技术。”

美国石油协会(API)尽管对拜登的许多能源政策提出了批评,但也支持爱尔兰共和军对有利于该行业的绿色技术的激励措施。

API 总裁兼首席执行官迈克·萨默斯 (Mike Sommers) 在会上表示:“我怀疑,当有人试图废除爱尔兰共和军 (IRA) 时,最终会看起来更像是手术刀式的方法,而不是屠刀。”据《华盛顿邮报》报道,休斯敦会议。

“我们会倡导我们支持的条款。”

美国石油和天然气行业也担心与中国的贸易战升级,特朗普提出  对中国商品进口征收60%或更高的关税。如果不劝阻特朗普的这一想法,由于钢管和铝管的预期增加以及贸易路线颠覆带来的通胀压力,能源项目的成本必将上升。

 

作者:Oilprice.com 的 Tsvetana Paraskova


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


Since day one of President Joe Biden’s term in office, the U.S. oil and gas industry has been criticizing his energy policies, saying that these undermine America’s energy and national security with punitive and restrictive measures against fossil fuels.

Yet, during President Biden’s tenure, American oil and gas production has hit record highs. But this achievement has come despite Biden’s policies, not thanks to them, the industry says.

For his part, the presumptive Republican nominee and former president Donald Trump has pledged to return to the “drill, baby, drill” policies supportive of unleashing more U.S. oil and gas production.

The industry, which feels it has been the target of Biden’s climate laws and provisions, has slammed what it has described as ‘inept’ energy policies and has often expressed frustration with the current Administration and its many energy bills and proposals, including the fewest proposed lease sales in history, a methane emissions tax, and a pause on LNG export project approvals.

“Until the next administration is decided, we’re in a state of flux when it comes to making certain business decisions,” an executive at an U.S. exploration and production firm said in comments to the latest Dallas Fed Energy Survey.

Another comment read, “I can’t recall a more uncertain time with disturbing world conflicts and the choice we have to make in the U.S. presidential election.”

The U.S. oil and gas industry favors Trump for president. It has donated $7.5 million to Donald Trump’s campaign, clearly favoring him over President Biden, who has received just over $1 million from outside groups in the energy sector, according to data collected by OpenSecrets.

However, two of Trump’s leading campaign pledges—scrap the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and slap trade tariffs, especially a 60% tariff on Chinese products – may not benefit the oil and gas industry.

The sector, despite criticizing the IRA for its emissions fees, is set to benefit from the IRA funding to get carbon capture and hydrogen projects up and running.

Last year, one of the biggest U.S. oil producers, Occidental, won one of two grants by the Biden Administration to build the world’s first direct air capture plant in Texas that would extract carbon dioxide directly from the atmosphere.

The U.S. Administration has also decided to support hydrogen hubs with $7 billion in funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. This has stirred a lot of controversy due to the selection of sites planned to produce hydrogen from natural gas with carbon capture and storage (CCS).

Trump has pledged to gut the IRA. However, this would first need a Republican-controlled Congress with both House and Senate. And even then, it could be difficult to scale back or scrap the incentives, as they mostly benefit projects and jobs in Republican states, analysts say.

Executives at the U.S. oil majors have expressed support for the IRA. One of these is none other than ExxonMobil’s chief executive Darren Woods.

“I was very supportive of the IRA — I am very supportive of the IRA — because as legislated the IRA focuses on carbon intensity and in theory is technology-agnostic,” Woods said at the CERAWeek in Houston last month, as carried by the Washington Post.

“They’re not trying to pick a particular technology.”

The American Petroleum Institute (API), despite all its criticism against many of Biden energy policies, also supports the IRA incentives for green technologies that benefit the industry.

“I suspect that when there is an attempt to repeal the IRA — and there will be — it will end up looking more like a scalpel-like approach rather than a butcher knife,” API president and CEO Mike Sommers said at the Houston conference, the Washington Post reports.

“And we’ll advocate for the provisions that we support.”

The U.S. oil and gas industry is also apprehensive about an escalation of the trade war with China, with Trump’s idea to slap a 60% tariff or higher on imports of Chinese goods. If Trump is not dissuaded from this idea, the cost of energy projects is set to rise due to expected increases in steel and aluminum pipes and inflationary pressure from upended trade routes.

 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com