场地/项目开发

二氧化碳、天然气和氢气储存

过去一年,关于二氧化碳、天然气和氢气储存的出版物越来越关注储存方案的设计、评估和优化。这些努力涵盖了广泛的挑战和创新,包括将储存库从枯竭的气田和盐水层扩展到层状碳酸盐岩地层和重油储层。

JPT_2026-03_COFocus.jpg

过去一年,关于二氧化碳、天然气和氢气储存的出版物日益关注储存方案的设计、评估和优化。这些努力涵盖了广泛的挑战和创新,包括将储存库从枯竭的气田和盐水层扩展到层状碳酸盐岩地层和重油储层。关键优先事项包括提高注入能力和输送能力、提升储存容量和回收效率,以及保障长期密封安全。

优化储存方案不仅限于独立的二氧化碳储存作业。将二氧化碳储存作业与现有油田作业(例如提高油气采收率、废水处理和其他注入活动)相结合可以降低成本。例如,在现有的废水处理井中同时注入二氧化碳/盐水或水气交替注入方案,可以利用北美广泛的废水注入基础设施来降低单位成本。

与此同时,多孔介质储氢技术正受到广泛关注,尤其是在研究领域。研究工作主要集中在通过耦合数值模拟、实验室试验和人工智能等方法,加深对氢气动态流动行为、泄漏机制、微生物活性以及储氢设施在注取过程中动态响应的理解,从而提高储氢性能。此外,为了加快早期部署,研究人员还在探索将氢气与天然气混合后应用于现有地下储气设施。

显然,二氧化碳、天然气和氢气的地下储存具有共同的核心技术主题:开发优化、安全保障和卓越运营。随着相关技术在三种不同气体储存领域的普及,以及储存与其他现场作业的更紧密结合,二氧化碳和氢气储存的商业化进程有望加速,从而强化地下储存在新兴低碳能源系统中的作用。

本期(2026年3月)论文摘要

SPE 224197 SCCO₂ /盐水注入或WAG耦合与盐水处置井用于碳封存, 作者:Stella I. Eyitayo,SPE,以及Marshall C. Watson,SPE,德克萨斯理工大学

SPE 225606 研究探讨了氢气/天然气混合物在地下气体储存库中的储存, 作者为德克萨斯农工大学的黄天佳(SPE)、乔治·J·莫里迪斯(SPE)和托马斯·A·布拉辛格姆(SPE)。

SPE 225484 英国二氧化碳运输、储存项目达成最终投资决策, 为 Hans Sizoo(SPE)、Ben Kek 和 Alex Tait(BP)等提供了经验教训。

推荐延伸阅读

SPE 228347 美国地下氢气储存的系统性综述:技术、经济和未来展望, 作者:路易斯安那大学拉斐特分校的 Bilal Ibrahim 等人。

SPE 224206 AD Ameyaw、新墨西哥矿业与技术学院等对蓝氢生产中碳捕获与封存的综合技术经济和生命周期评估。

SPE 228011 SPE CO 2存储工作组:从管理跨行业竞争性技术合作中汲取的经验教训,作者:Harpreet Singh,独立顾问等。

邱凯斌( SPE)是SLB公司的地质力学顾问。他拥有超过20年的行业经验,曾参与马来西亚、伊朗、埃及、利比亚、印度、印度尼西亚、日本、韩国和中国的众多咨询项目。邱凯斌拥有清华大学水利水电工程学士学位和岩土工程硕士学位。近年来,他致力于将储层地质力学应用于高压高温油藏、深水油藏、致密油藏、致密气藏、页岩气藏和甲烷水合物的勘探开发。除地质力学外,邱凯斌还擅长钻井工程、非常规油气资源的地震勘探与增产一体化解决方案、碳捕获与封存以及地热能开发。他已发表40余篇技术论文。邱凯斌是同行评审期刊《SPE Journal》的执行主编,同时也是《JPT》期刊的编委会成员。

原文链接/JPT
Field/project development

CO2, Natural Gas, and Hydrogen Storage

In the past year, publications on CO2, natural gas, and hydrogen storage have increasingly focused on the design, evaluation, and optimization of storage plans. These efforts encompass a broad spectrum of challenges and innovations, including the expansion of storage reservoirs from depleted gas fields and saline aquifers to stratified carbonate formations and heavy-oil reservoirs.

JPT_2026-03_COFocus.jpg

In the past year, publications on CO2, natural gas, and hydrogen storage have increasingly focused on the design, evaluation, and optimization of storage plans. These efforts encompass a broad spectrum of challenges and innovations, including the expansion of storage reservoirs from depleted gas fields and saline aquifers to stratified carbonate formations and heavy-oil reservoirs. Key priorities include enhancing injectivity and deliverability, boosting storage capacity and recovery efficiency, and safeguarding long-term containment.

Optimizing storage plans extends beyond standalone CO2 storage operations. Integrating CO2 storage operations with existing field operations—such as enhanced oil and gas recovery, wastewater disposal, and other injection activities—could lower costs. For example, simultaneous CO2/brine injection or water-alternating-gas schemes in existing wastewater-disposal wells could reduce unit costs by leveraging the extensive wastewater-injection infrastructure in North America.

Concurrently, hydrogen storage in porous media is gaining intense interest, particularly within the research community. The research efforts are centered on improving storage performance by deepening understanding of the dynamic flow behavior, leakage mechanisms, and microbial activities of hydrogen and the dynamic response of the storage complex during injection and withdrawal using coupled numerical simulations, laboratory tests, and artificial intelligence. To accelerate early deployment, blending hydrogen with natural gas in existing underground gas storage facilities is also investigated.

It is clear that subsurface storage of CO2, natural gas, and hydrogen shares core technical themes: development optimization, containment assurance, and operational excellence. As technologies diffuse across the storage of the three different gases—and as storage is more tightly integrated with other field operations—the commercialization of CO2 and hydrogen storage is likely to accelerate, strengthening the role of subsurface storage in the emerging low-carbon energy system.

Summarized Papers in This March 2026 Issue

SPE 224197 SCCO2/Brine Injection or WAG Couple With Saltwater-Disposal Wells for Carbon Sequestration by Stella I. Eyitayo, SPE, and Marshall C. Watson, SPE, Texas Tech University

SPE 225606 Study Explores Storage of Hydrogen/Natural Gas Mixtures in Underground Gas Repositories by Tianjia Huang, SPE, George J. Moridis, SPE, and Thomas A. Blasingame, SPE, Texas A&M University

SPE 225484 UK CO2 Transportation, Storage Project Reaching Final Investment Decision Provides Lessons by Hans Sizoo, SPE, Ben Kek, and Alex Tait, BP, et al.

Recommended Additional Reading

SPE 228347 A Systematic Review of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the United States: Technical, Economic, and Future Insights by Bilal Ibrahim, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, et al.

SPE 224206 Technoeconomic and Life-Cycle Assessments of Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage in Blue Hydrogen Production by A.D. Ameyaw, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, et al.

SPE 228011 SPE CO2 Storage Work Group: Lessons From Managing Competitive Cross‑Industry Technical Collaboration by Harpreet Singh, Independent Consultant, et al.

Kaibin Qiu, SPE, is a geomechanics adviser at SLB. He has more than 20 years of experience in the industry and has worked on many consulting projects in Malaysia, Iran, Egypt, Libya, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, and China. Qiu holds a BS degree in hydraulic and hydropower engineering and an MS degree in geotechnical engineering, both from Tsinghua University in China. In recent years, he has been involved in applying reservoir geomechanics for the exploration and development of high-pressure/high-temperature reservoirs, deep water, tight oil, tight gas, shale gas, and methane hydrate. Beyond geomechanics, Qiu also specializes in drilling engineering, integrated seismic to stimulation solutions for unconventionals, carbon capture and storage, and geothermal. He has authored more than 40 technical papers. Qiu is an Executive Editor for the peer-reviewed SPE Journal. He is also a member of the JPT Editorial Review Board.