IADC、监管和立法新闻安全和 ESG

API、美国能源集团联合反对拟议的甲烷费规则

美国石油协会 (API) 与代表美国石油和天然气行业各个领域的其他 19 个协会一起呼吁美国环境保护署 (EPA) 修改其提议的美国能源甲烷费。

在向该机构提交的关于“废物排放费”拟议规则制定的评论中,这些协会认为,美国环保局拟议的规则造成了一个不连贯的监管制度,未能满足《通货膨胀减少法案》概述的法定要求,并阻碍了减排业界的努力。

“对美国能源征税是一个严重的失误,可能会危及我们国家的能源优势并削弱我们的能源安全,”API 政策、经济和监管事务高级副总裁达斯汀·迈耶 (Dustin Meyer) 表示。石油和天然气公司正在整个运营过程中进行创新,以减少甲烷排放,同时满足不断增长的能源需求。然而,这一提议创造了一个不连贯、混乱的监管制度,只会抑制技术进步并阻碍能源发展。我们将与整个行业的合作伙伴一起考虑所有选择,以确保为美国能源的持续发展建立明智的监管框架。”

在评论信中,这些协会对拟议规则与正在进行的其他甲烷法规的联系表示担忧,突显了拜登政府对甲烷法规的不协调态度。这些协会敦促政府将这一拟议规则与其他法规相协调,包括 W 子部分和 EPA 的最终甲烷规则。此外,他们还呼吁在净额结算要求上更加灵活,以激励更多的减排,按照国会的意图澄清该规则的豁免,以及常识性合规性和报告时间表。

该行业正在采取行动减少甲烷排放,同时继续生产负担得起的、可靠的能源。从 2011 年到 2021 年,所有七个主要产区的平均甲烷排放强度下降了近 66%。环境伙伴关系等行业主导的倡议正在帮助加快进展,该伙伴关系的成员占美国陆上天然气和石油产量的近 70%通过推动合作和分享最佳实践来减少甲烷排放。

原文链接/drillingcontractor
IADC, Regulation, and LegislationNewsSafety and ESG

API, US energy groups unite against proposed methane fee rule

The American Petroleum Institute (API) joined 19 other associations representing all segments of the US oil and natural gas industry in calling on the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to revise its proposed methane fee on American energy.

In comments submitted to the agency on the “waste emissions charge” proposed rulemaking, the associations argued that the EPA’s proposed rule creates an incoherent regulatory regime, fails to meet the statutory requirements outlined by the Inflation Reduction Act and disincentivizes emissions reduction efforts by the industry.

“This tax on American energy is a serious misstep that could jeopardize our nation’s energy advantage and weaken our energy security,” said API Senior VP of Policy, Economics and Regulatory Affairs Dustin Meyer. “US oil and natural gas is innovating throughout its operations to reduce methane emissions while meeting growing energy demand. Yet this proposal creates an incoherent, confusing regulatory regime that will only stifle technology advancements and hamper energy development. With partners across the industry, we will consider all options to ensure a smart regulatory framework for continued American energy development.”

In the comment letter, the associations raised concerns about the proposed rule’s nexus to other methane regulations underway, highlighting the Biden administration’s disharmonized approach to methane regulations. The associations urged the administration to coordinate this proposed rule with other regulations, including Subpart W and the EPA’s final Methane Rule. Additionally, they called for more flexibility on netting requirements to incentivize greater emissions reductions, clarification of the rule’s exemptions as intended by Congress and commonsense compliance and reporting timelines.

The industry is taking action to reduce methane emissions while continuing to produce affordable, reliable energy. Average methane emissions intensity declined by nearly 66% across all seven major producing regions from 2011 to 2021. Industry-led initiatives like The Environmental Partnership, whose members make up nearly 70% of US onshore natural gas and oil production, are helping to accelerate progress on methane emissions reductions by driving collaboration and sharing best practices.