债务法案的通过为 MVP 扫清了道路,更快地获得基础设施许可

由于债务上限立法经受住了参议员的抵制,MVP 天然气管道和更快的许可程序获胜。

美国参议院于 6 月 2 日通过的债务上限法案将为山谷管道扫清道路,并加快石油和天然气基础设施项目的审批流程。来源:Shutterstock.com

编者注:本文已根据 Equitrans 和 EQT 的评论进行了更新。


最终,国会采取了一项非同寻常的行动,迫切希望避免全球经济灾难性的崩溃,从而拯救山谷管道(MVP)。

但被救了。

6 月 1 日晚,参议院以 63 比 36 的投票结果通过了债务上限立法,其中包括为建立 MVP 扫清道路的条款,以及修订《国家环境政策法》(NEPA) 以简化基础设施许可流程的条款。预计乔·拜登总统将于今天晚些时候将其签署为法律,然后在椭圆形办公室向全国发表讲话。

“参议院的投票意义重大,不仅因为它保证了该计划的通过,其中包括 NEPA 改革和批准山谷管道,而且因为国会两院都获得了两党投票支持改革基石政府事务部负责人杰克·贝尔彻 (Jack Belcher) 告诉哈特能源公司 (Hart Energy)。

这段经历并不容易。参议员蒂姆·凯恩(弗吉尼亚州民主党人)最终投了赞成票,但在此之前提交了一份失败的修正案,删除了与管道相关的内容。强左翼参议员伯尼·桑德斯(佛蒙特州民主党)和伊丽莎白·沃伦(马萨诸塞州民主党人)与极右翼参议员特德·克鲁兹(德克萨斯州共和党)和兰德·保罗(肯塔基州共和党)反对,形成了一个不同寻常的联盟。

在参议院占多数的民主党以 44 比 4 的投票结果支持了该法案,众议院三名独立议员中的两名也投了赞成票。在参加投票的共和党人中,48 人中有 31 人反抗少数党领袖米奇·麦康奈尔(肯塔基州共和党人)并投了反对票。参议员比尔·哈格蒂(田纳西州共和党人)没有投票。

NEPA 改革

事实证明,拜登和众议院议长凯文·麦卡锡(加利福尼亚州共和党人)本周早些时候达成的妥协不仅对 MVP 意义重大,而且对未来的其他能源基础设施项目也意义重大。

“多年来,NEPA(国家环境政策法案)改革一直没有被讨论,环保倡导者反对任何触及它的尝试,”贝尔彻说。最初于 1969 年通过,最后一次大幅修改是在 20 世纪 80 年代初。”

他说,这些改革并非无关紧要,它们通过多种方式简化了许可流程:

  • 编纂“合理可预见的标准”;
  • 消除在确定牵头联邦机构方面的延误和混乱;
  • 将环境影响归入一份文件;
  • 为环境影响报告和环境评估创建“热点时钟”;
  • 使分类排除更容易实施。

他说,这些变化将使联邦许可变得更容易、更快捷,并且在某些方面也减少了争议。

贝尔彻补充道:“这也很重要,因为它为今年晚些时候可能在国会获得通过的可能的改革方案带来了更多改变的动力。”

艰巨的努力

他说,该法案中的条款将 MVP 这个多年来面临严重风险的项目置于最终完成的轨道上,产生了深远的影响。

他说:“该语言实际上确保了它将通过立即批准许可证并从第四巡回法院进入华盛顿特区巡回法院对其提出质疑的能力来建造,这不太可能允许任何更多的延误。” 

Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC 合资企业的主要合作伙伴 Equitrans Midstream 在等待总统签署该法案时发表声明:“我们感谢白宫的全力支持,以及民主党和民主党的强有力领导。”共和党立法者承认 MVP 是一个重要的能源基础设施项目。” 

阿巴拉契亚地区的主要生产商 EQT Corp. 也对该协议表示欢迎。

首席执行官托比·赖斯(Toby Rice)在其LinkedIn账户上表示:“MVP的完成对于解决美国东南部地区日益难以负担和电力不足的问题至关重要,同时也符合可行的气候目标。” “将其纳入该法案表明,允许改革不是政治讨价还价的筹码,而是两党政府为了所有美国人的利益而认识到的必要性。”

尽管如此,为 MVP 的完成扫清道路所需的艰巨努力的挫败感仍然存在于石油和天然气行业。

“该法案的通过确实说明了我们在批准能源项目方面所处的状况,”贝尔彻说。“实际上,我们生活在一个需要国会和白宫采取行动才能批准和建设州际管道并进行墨西哥湾租赁销售的时代。”

美国勘探与生产委员会首席执行官安妮·布拉德伯里 (Anne Bradbury) 在该组织 6 月 2 日发布的一份声明中呼应了这些观点。 

“不应采取国会法案来批准在美国修建管道,”布拉德伯里说。“鼓励国会继续努力实现我们的许可制度现代化,并解决更多损害美国建设能力的根本问题。”

原文链接/hartenergy

Passage of Debt Bill Clears Way for MVP, Swifter Permitting for Infrastructure

The MVP natural gas pipeline and a swifter permitting process win as debt ceiling legislation weathers resistance from senators.

The debt ceiling bill, which passed in the U.S. Senate on June 2, will clear the way for the Mountain Valley Pipeline and allow a swifter permitting process for oil and gas infrastructure projects. (Source: Shutterstock.com)

Editor’s note: This article has been updated with comments from Equitrans and EQT.


In the end, it took nothing less than an extraordinary act of a Congress desperate to avert a catastrophic unraveling of the global economy to rescue the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP).

But rescued it is.

In the late evening of June 1, the Senate voted 63-36 to pass debt ceiling legislation that included provisions to clear the way to build MVP, as well as amend the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to streamline the permitting process for infrastructure. President Joe Biden is expected to sign it into law later today before he addresses the nation from the Oval Office.

“The vote in the Senate is significant, not only because it guarantees passage of the package, which includes NEPA reforms and approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, but because you have had a bipartisan vote in both houses of Congress in support of the reforms and MVP,” Jack Belcher, principal at Cornerstone Government Affairs, told Hart Energy.

Passage did not come easy. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) ultimately voted yes, but not before submitting a failed amendment to delete aspects relating to the pipeline. Hard left Sens. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) joined in an unusual alliance with hard right Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) in opposition.

Democrats, who hold a majority in the Senate, voted 44-4 in favor of the bill, as did two of the chamber’s three independents. Among Republicans voting, 31 of 48 defied Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and voted against. Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) did not vote.

NEPA reforms

The compromise struck earlier this week by Biden and House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) turned out to be significant not just for MVP, but for other energy infrastructure projects in the future.

“For years, NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) reform has been off the table, with environmental advocates opposing any attempt to touch it,” Belcher said. Originally passed in 1969, the last time it was significantly altered was in the early 1980s.”

The reforms are not inconsequential, he said, and they streamline the permitting process in a number of ways:

  • Codifying the “reasonably foreseeable standard”;
  • Eliminating delays and confusion over determining the lead federal agency;
  • Relegating environmental impacts to a single document;
  • Creating a “shot clock” for environmental impact statements and environmental assessments; and
  • Making categorical exclusions easier to put in place.

These changes that will make federal permitting easier, quicker and, in some ways, less contentious, he said.

“It is also important because it creates momentum for more changes in a possible reform package that might move through Congress later in the year,” Belcher added.

Herculean effort

Provisions in the bill that set MVP, a project at serious risk for years, on a trajectory to ultimate completion have a profound impact, he said

“The language virtually ensures that it will be built by immediately approving the permit and taking the ability to challenge it out of the 4th Circuit and into the D.C. Circuit, which will not likely allow any more delays,” he said. 

Equitrans Midstream, lead partner in the Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC joint venture, issued a statement while waiting for the president to sign the bill: “We are grateful for the full support of the White House, as well as the strong leadership of Democratic and Republican legislators for recognizing the MVP as a critical energy infrastructure project.” 

And a key producer in the Appalachian region, EQT Corp., also hailed the agreement.

“The completion of MVP is critical to addressing increasingly unaffordable and insufficient electricity in the Southeastern United States, in alignment with feasible climate goals,” CEO Toby Rice said on his LinkedIn account. “Its inclusion in this bill shows that permitting reform is not a political bargaining chip but, instead, a necessity recognized by a bipartisan government acting for the good of all Americans.”

Still, frustration over the Herculean effort required to clear the way for MVP’s completion lingers in the oil and gas industry.

“Its passage does say something about the state we are in when it comes to approving energy projects,” Belcher said. “We actually live in a time when it takes an act of Congress and the White House to permit and build an interstate pipeline and also to hold a Gulf of Mexico lease sale.”

Anne Bradbury, CEO of the American Exploration and Production Council, echoed those sentiments in a statement released by the group June 2. 

“It should not take an act of Congress to approve a pipeline in America,” Bradbury said. “We encourage Congress to continue to work toward modernizing our permitting system and addressing more of the underlying issues that have been hurting America’s ability to build.”