Infinity 短期内瞄准尤蒂卡“更高级别”的并购

无限自然资源公司首席执行官扎克·阿诺德 (Zack Arnold) 在 SUPER DUG 上表示,随着阿巴拉契亚盆地大规模交易的形成,无限自然资源公司正将注意力集中在俄亥俄州尤蒂卡页岩的“低级别”并购上。


新上市的 Infinity Natural Resources表示,至少目前,它正将注意力集中在俄亥俄州尤蒂卡页岩的“低级别”并购上。

有关尤蒂卡油田运营商控制权即将发生变化的传言甚嚣尘上,Ascent Resources在今年3月就曾告知投资者,该公司正在考虑IPO 。近几个月来,包括格尔夫波特能源公司 (Gulfport Energy)EOG ResourcesExpand Energy在内的多家上市公司也成为并购热议的焦点。


有关的

Infinity尤蒂卡石油产量随着并购和扩张的进行而上升


在等待阿巴拉契亚大规模并购成形的同时,首席执行官扎克·阿诺德表示,公司正在寻求扩大规模。

此外,Infinity 继续通过准备钻探的项目来抵御大宗商品价格波动,以便实时决定 Infinity 计划在何处部署其资本。

在2025 年 SUPER DUG 会议和博览会上的独家采访中,阿诺德与哈特能源公司的尼萨·达邦 (Nissa Darbonne) 分享了该公司在尤蒂卡的战略方针


有关的

阿巴拉契亚的无限平衡法案:俄亥俄石油还是马塞勒斯天然气


哈特能源公司执行特约编辑妮莎·达邦尼 (Nissa Darbonne):您好,感谢您加入我们。我是哈特能源公司执行特约编辑妮莎·达邦尼 (Nissa Darbonne)。我们将与扎克·阿诺德 (Zack Arnold) 一起参加 SUPER DUG 2025 活动。扎克是新上市的Infinity Natural Resources公司的创始人兼总裁兼首席执行官,该公司专注于俄亥俄州尤蒂卡的油田。扎克,非常感谢您加入我们。

ZA:谢谢您的邀请。

ND:刚才我们在台上进行了一次非常愉快的交流,我们首先谈到了尤蒂卡石油业务的潜在并购方向。一些公司可能通过并购或IPO退出,其中包括Ascent,而Gulfport可能不一定会退出,但会以某种方式参与到某种并购中。Encino在,你们也在。然后是EOG。此外,由于与西南石油的合并,切萨皮克(现名为Expand)实际上已经重返尤蒂卡。这一切都是在过去几个月里突然发生的。您认为接下来会发生什么?未来会如何发展?

ZA:是的,我们非常期待事态发展。我们认为大型并购很有意思,正如您提到的几家公司,他们考虑合并的方式也很有意义。我们认为在较低层面也有很多并购可以进行,而这正是我们短期内将重点关注的领域,即寻找可以收购的不同资产,以帮助我们扩大规模,同时我们也在观察更大规模的并购最终如何发展,因为阿巴拉契亚地区的并购总是充满挑战。我认为俄亥俄州有其自身独特的因素,阻碍了看似合乎逻辑的组合。但我们真的非常兴奋。我们认为今年将是一些不同的运营商探索未来发展方向的好年头。

ND:此外,Infinity 在宾夕法尼亚州也拥有 Marcellus 天然气资产,所以你们同时拥有这两种商品。你们可以灵活地分配资本支出,在两种商品之间进行切换。请谈谈这种灵活性的好处。目前油价略有下跌,而天然气价格表现良好,你们是否正在灵活调整资本支出?

ZA:是的,从历史上看,我们公司在资产开发方式多元化——既开发石油资产,也开发天然气资产——方面表现最佳。因此,我们一直非常重视这种平衡。我们拥有极大的灵活性。我们的土地和运营团队在两个开发窗口期都持续拥有准备就绪的钻探项目,以便我们能够实时决策如何部署资本。当我们部署这些资本时,无论是在石油开发窗口期还是天然气开发窗口期,其资本配置都非常相似。我们使用的套管是相同的,钻井平台是相同的,压裂团队也是相同的。某些压裂设计可能会有所不同,但基本上我们可以将一个项目替换为另一个项目,而不会真正经历任何延迟或资本结构的任何变化。

因此,我们今年一直在研究如何推进几个天然气项目。我们正在完成一个项目,预计它会在今年晚些时候或明年年初投入使用。我们还在建造一个平台,预计会在2026年建成。我们之所以提前推进这些项目,是因为即使我们的石油收益仍然非常稳健,我们对此感到满意,我们仍会继续推进石油项目。目前,天然气的收益实在太诱人了,不容忽视。因此,我们正在努力推进并实施其中一些项目。

ND:你们在俄亥俄州仍然拥有大量的直水平井库存,但是俄亥俄州是否有可能需要部署掉头水平井,用于可能被搁置的土地,甚至是被其他运营商单元化而搁置的土地?

ZA:是的,这个问题问得很好。我认为尤蒂卡地区非常适合我们选择钻掉头井。目前,我们正在开发常规钻井技术。我们将首先钻探这些井。但就我们目前的情况来看,我们有一些由传统运营商组建的钻井单元,由于其他运营商的活动,它们在钻探过程中可能会受到一些限制。因此,我认为在现有的钻井单元内部钻掉头井是比较自然的选择。而且我认为尤蒂卡地区的地质条件非常平静,易于钻探。我认为这些单元非常适合开采和回收储量,而目前在现有单元内部钻探4000英尺的水平段并不经济。

ND:很高兴你指出尤蒂卡地层非常平静。它的沉积物相当均匀,几乎没有什么意外。

ZA:是的,对我们来说开发起来非常容易,可以钻探19000英尺、2000英尺、21000英尺、22000英尺的水平段,并将它们平行钻进。而且我们不会遇到扭矩和阻力问题,也不会遇到地质导向问题,这些问题会给我们带来技术限制。通常情况下,我们想要钻多远,取决于陆地面积。

ND:太棒了。谢谢你,Zack。

ZA: 是的,感谢您的邀请。

ND:感谢您的收看。敬请关注,获取更多切实可行的能源情报。

评论

添加新评论

本次对话将根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客服团队。

富文本编辑器,评论字段
原文链接/HartEnergy

Infinity Eyeing ‘Lower Level’ Utica M&A in the Short Term

Infinity Natural Resources is focusing its attention on “lower level” M&A in Ohio’s Utica Shale as large-scale deals take shape in the Appalachian Basin, CEO Zack Arnold said at SUPER DUG.


Newly public Infinity Natural Resources says it is focusing its attention on “lower level” M&A in Ohio’s Utica Shale, at least for now.

Rumors have been swirling of an upcoming change of control for Utica operators, including Ascent Resources telling investors in March that it is considering an IPO. A number of publics, including Gulfport Energy, EOG Resources and Expand Energy, have been the subject of M&A chatter in recent months.


RELATED

Infinity’s Utica Oil Output Rising as Play M&A, Expansion Underway


While waiting for large-scale M&A to take shape in Appalachia, CEO Zack Arnold said the company is looking to gain some scale.

And, Infinity continues to hold out on commodity price swings with drill-ready projects to allow for real-time decisions on where Infinity plans to deploy its capital.

Arnold shares his company’s strategic approach in the Utica with Hart Energy’s Nissa Darbonne in this exclusive interview at the 2025 SUPER DUG Conference and Expo.


RELATED

Infinity’s Balancing Act in Appalachia: Ohio Oil or Marcellus Gas


Nissa Darbonne, executive editor-at-large, Hart Energy: Hi, thank you for joining us. I'm Nissa Darbonne, executive editor-at-large for Hart Energy. We're visiting at SUPER DUG 2025 with Zack Arnold. Zack is a founder and he's president and CEO of newly-public Infinity Natural Resources, which focuses on the Ohio Utica oil play. Zack, thank you so much for joining us here.

ZA: Thanks for having me.

ND: We had a really good visit on stage just now, and we opened with the direction of potential M&A in the Utica oil play. Company names that have been floating out there to maybe exit an M&A or IPO include Ascent, and maybe Gulfport wouldn't necessarily be exiting, but somehow be involved in some sort of pile up. Encino is there, y'all are there. And then EOG is out there. Also too, by virtue of the Southwestern merger, Chesapeake, now Expand, is actually back in the Utica. This has all just kind of come about quite suddenly in the past few months. What do you see happening and where may it go?

ZA: Yeah, we're very excited to watch how things unfold. For us we think large M&A is interesting, and you mentioned several companies, that it makes sense for them to think about ways to come together. We think there's also a lot of M&A to be done at a lower level, and that's where we're going to start focusing in the short term, is looking for different assets that we can acquire to help us gain some scale while we're watching the larger scale M&A take whatever shape that it does, because Appalachia M&A is always challenging. I think Ohio has had its own unique sets of things that prevent what seemed like logical combinations of coming together. But we're really excited. We think this is going to be a good year for a few different operators to figure out what the future holds for them.

ND: And also too, Infinity also has Marcellus gas properties over in Pennsylvania, so you have both commodities. You could be flexible in your capex allocation, redirecting from one to another. Tell us about the benefits of this flexibility and are you flexing right now because oil's a little down and gas is doing very well?

ZA: Yeah, historically, our company has been its best when we are diverse in how we develop the assets, developing oil assets, and also developing gas assets. So we've always appreciated that balance. We have a tremendous amount of flexibility. Our land and operations teams are continuing to have drill ready projects in both windows so that we can make very real time decisions as to where we want to deploy our capital. And when we deploy that capital, the capital looks very similar in both the oil window and the gas window. The casing that we run is the same. The drilling rig we use is the same. The frac crew that we run is the same. There might be some variations in some of the frac design, but largely we can swap one project out for another and not really experience any delay or any change in our capital structure.

And so as a result of that, we have looked at ways this year where we can pull forward a couple of gas projects. We're completing a project now that we expect it to develop later this year or early next year. And we're building a pad now that we thought we would do in 2026. So we're pulling these projects forward because even though our oil returns are still really solid and we are happy with those, we're going to continue to do oil projects. The gas returns are too good to ignore right now. So we’re trying to pull some of those projects forward and execute them.

ND: And you still have incredible amounts of inventory in Ohio for straight laterals, but is there potential in Ohio for needing, having to deploy U-turn laterals for where there may be stranded acreage, maybe even acreage stranded by other operators’ unitizations?

ZA: Yeah, so that's a great question. And I think the Utica lends itself well for U-turn wells when we choose to do those. And for us right now, we're developing the conventional geometry. We're going to drill those wells first. But the nature of the position we've put together, we have some units that were formed from legacy operators that might have some limitations in what you can do around them because of other operators’ activities. So I do think there will be some natural opportunities to look at U-turns inside of the units that exist. And I think the way geologically, the Utica is a very calm, easy to drill formation. I think it's well set up for those units to be exploited and recover those reserves that right now it's not economic to drill 4,000-foot laterals inside of that existing unit.

ND: And I'm glad that you pointed out that the Utica is a very quiet formation. It's deposition is fairly uniform and there's pretty much no surprises there.

ZA: Yeah, it's been very easy to develop for us and allows us to drill 19-, 20-, 21-, 22,000-foot laterals and do them parallel to each other. And we don't have torque and drag problems or geosteering problems that they provide technical limits. Usually it's a land limit as to how far we want to drill.

ND: Super. Thank you, Zack.

ZA: Yeah, thanks for having us.

ND: And thank you for joining us. Stay tuned here for more actionable energy intelligence.

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.

Rich Text Editor, Comment field