刺激未来

压裂现场实验室正在取得积极的成果。

在水力压裂试验场 2 的电缆作业过程中,润滑器连接到油井。(摄影:Mike Lillejord,GTI 提供)

[编者注:这个故事最初出现在 2020 年 1 月版的 E&P中在这里订阅杂志 。]  

自 20 世纪 40 年代首次实验使用以来,水力压裂作为一种刺激石油和天然气储层的手段已经取得了长足的进步,这在很大程度上要归功于美国能源部 (DOE) 领导的革命性技术进步,这些技术进步帮助迎来了现代石油和天然气储层的开发。页岩气繁荣。

来自页岩地层的天然气占美国天然气产量的大部分,从 2007 年(美国能源信息管理局 (EIA) 保存页岩特定记录的第一年)的 1.3 Tcf 上升到 2017 年的 18.6 Tcf到 2050 年,页岩地层和致密油区的产量预计将增至约 33.3 Tcf,占全国天然气产量的 75% 以上。

由于国内页岩气资源丰富,采用水力压裂技术生产,美国2018年天然气产量位居世界第一,增长创历史新高,创下了新的年度产量基准。

美国能源部国家能源技术实验室 (NETL) 是美国唯一专门研究化石燃料的联邦研究实验室,在水力压裂方面拥有丰富的创新历史。20 世纪 70 年代,对美国天然气资源日益减少的担忧促使联邦政府资助的研究重点关注非常规天然气储层,例如以前开发起来不经济的页岩、致密砂岩和煤层。

作为东部页岩气研究计划的一部分,NETL 帮助推进了大体积水力压裂技术。1975 年,美国能源部的一家行业合资企业在阿巴拉契亚盆地钻探了第一口定向井以开采页岩气,不久之后,完成了第一口水平页岩井,该井使用了七个单独的水力压裂层段。美国能源部整合了 35 个研究井的基本岩心和地质数据,首次公开发布了西弗吉尼亚州、俄亥俄州和肯塔基州页岩气技术可采天然气的估计数据。

如今,NETL 正在通过协作调查提高资源回收效率的方法来继承这一遗产。二叠纪、阿巴拉契亚、威利斯顿和伊格尔福特盆地内的现场实验室正在揭示与非常规油藏相关的地下问题,并提供有意义的见解,以帮助满足子孙后代的能源需求。


马塞勒斯页岩能源与环境实验室

马塞勒斯页岩能源与环境实验室 (MSEEL) 成立于 2014 年,是美国能源部首批现场实验室之一。这个耗资 2500 万美元的项目旨在开发和验证新知识和技术,以提高回收效率并最大限度地减少非常规资源开发对环境的影响。

NETL 代表化石能源办公室管理该项目并提供技术监督。MSEEL 横跨西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦郊外的两个东北自然能源 (NNE) 生产基地,由附近的西弗吉尼亚大学 (WVU) 运营,并涉及其他大学和国家实验室组成的联盟。

摩根敦工业园 (MIP) 的初始地点有两口井,提供了记录良好的生产基线和环境特征数据。钻了一口专用科学观测井来收集详细的地下数据,包括测井数据。操作员收集了 111 英尺 4 英寸的垃圾。整个圆形核心,被认为是从整个马塞勒斯地层中提取的第一个核心。

此外,还采集了 147 个侧壁岩心样本,研究人员用这些样本进行地球化学、微生物和地质力学研究。该观测井还配备了井下地震阵列,以监测 NNE 于 2015 年 6 月下旬开始钻探的两口新生产井(称为 MIP 3H 和 5H)的增产事件。MIP 3H 横向井进行了记录,并配备了永久性光纤仪器传感器。 

NNE 最近建立了第二个 MSEEL 地点,称为 Boggess 地点,拥有六口水平生产井,全部使用最新的随钻测井工具进行记录,其中一口配备了永久性光纤布线和传感器,可在生产过程中提供近乎实时的信息。压裂和生产。

最初的项目计划要求收集样本和数据以及先进技术的测试和演示。但该项目的分阶段方法和对多个 Marcellus 井的使用,通过识别和整合专注于提高采收率的创新工具和技术,提供了扩大项目范围的灵活性。

过去五年从 MSEEL 中吸取的经验教训使 MIP 井场的储量增加了 20%,并有助于 NNE 将最佳实践纳入其其他作业中。阿巴拉契亚盆地的其他运营商正在采用最先进的技术和技术,这些技术和技术已作为该项目的一部分得到演示和确认。例如,使用100目砂支撑剂和合成钻井泥浆已成为整个盆地的普遍做法。 

MSEEL 的博格斯网站
MSEEL 的博格斯工厂建于 2018 年,拥有六口水平生产井,其中一口配备了永久性光纤布线和传感器,可在水力压裂和生产过程中提供近乎实时的信息。(来源:NETL)

完井设计
MSEEL 团队开发了一种完井工程设计方法,通过增加沿侧向生产的射孔簇的百分比来提高效率。该方法基于岩心取样、光纤传感和随钻测井数据,最大限度地减少了横向非均质性对裂缝刺激的影响。这些测量用于预测破裂压力,然后用于在具有相似机械性能的岩石中放置阶段和射孔簇,从而提高在给定处理阶段内刺激所有簇的可能性。

穿孔对生产率的影响
MSEEL 现场的研究表明,每个阶段所需的穿孔比以前使用的要少。通过使用更少和更小的孔,NNE 能够提高注入速率,从而通过更有效地将砂子输送到诱导裂缝中来促进更有效的压裂。除此之外,NNE 了解到,升级套管柱和压裂堆栈以更有效地承受更高的压力,可以确保每个射孔簇都得到有效的增产。

车辆影响
NNE 了解到,与标准卡车和拖车系统相比,使用经济高效的箱式沙子输送系统可以控制二氧化硅暴露。这是整个盆地广泛使用的另一种技术。研究人员还了解到,天然气混合钻机并没有像以前认为的那样减少排放,也没有显着节省成本。

钻井泥浆
MSEEL 证实,合成钻井泥浆产生的钻屑比传统钻屑的处理更加环保,并且改善了钻井性能。这种类型的泥浆是 NNE 和盆地其他作业者常用的。 

采收效率
光纤和生产测井证明,与较大的砂支撑剂相比,增加 100 目砂浓度不会降低储层性能。它改善了裂缝刺激并降低了成本,因为每个集装箱体积可以运输更多的沙子。NNE 使用更高比例的 100 目砂作为其标准压裂设计的一部分。

压裂和效率
WVU 开发了一个名为 FIBPRO 的软件系统,用于分析 MIP 3H 井水力压裂期间收集的光纤分布式声学传感、分布式温度传感和微震数据。使用 FIBPRO 进行的分析表明,阶段之间变形和横流的分布表明阶段和簇之间的完井效率存在差异。这些差异影响了生产效率,并导致更好地了解完井时的地质/地质力学控制,并最终影响了油井生产。

裂缝几何形状
西弗吉尼亚大学开发了一种集成地质力学和离散天然裂缝模型来研究水力裂缝几何形状的复杂性。通过光纤数据和生产测井测量的历史匹配和生产响应证实了油藏模拟和工程水力压裂的重要性。进行了井距敏感性研究,以确定最大化采收率的支管之间的最佳距离以及每段的井数。

使用测量的注入数据进行数值建模,以模拟 MIP 3H 井的增产阶段 1 至 3。测量数据与模型估计的泥浆体积、泥浆速率和支撑剂质量的比较表明,与增产效率有很强的相关性。这种建模将在其他阶段继续进行,结合微震和生产旋转器测试数据,以更好地模拟裂缝几何形状。

地球化学
在以马塞勒斯页岩为代表的深层生物圈中已经发现了新的微生物。地下微生物群落通过生物矿化(结垢)、酸形成(腐蚀)、生物膜形成(生物污垢)和金属流动性等过程影响能源生产、储层特性和井眼完整性。了解这些生物对于减少井下损坏和结垢以及地面设施中镭的沉淀非常重要。为了更好地分析马塞勒斯页岩的生物地球化学特征并研究对微生物分布、多样性和功能的地质控制,研究人员开发了新方法,以最大限度地提高脂质生物标志物的回收率和重现性,这些努力增强了研究人员对地下生物地球化学及其影响的理解。长期生产。NETL 的研究人员研究了水/岩石相互作用以及重晶石沉淀对生产效率的影响。

水的影响
近一年对回流水和采出水的连续监测表明,总溶解固体趋于稳定,离子成分几乎没有变化。钻屑中的放射性核素始终低于西弗吉尼亚州环境保护部垃圾填埋场处置水平,并远低于美国交通部分类为低放射性废物的水平。MSEEL 钻屑分析结果帮助西弗吉尼亚州立法者根据美国 EPA 的毒性特征浸出程序制定了新的全州废物处理标准,MSEEL 钻屑中的有机或无机成分均未超出该标准。

排放
在 MIP 现场油井开发的所有阶段均进行直读气溶胶采样(垫准备除外)。采样地点包括钻台、1 公里和 2 公里距离。EPA 规定的 PM2.5(直径小于 2.5 微米的颗粒,能够到达人体肺部空域)排放在井场最高排放时段(水力压裂)期间,从顺风 1 公里处的背景中无法检测到。钻井和完井作业期间的监测表明,很大一部分空气排放来自卡车交通和其他移动源,而不是来自垫场作业的排放。使用固定和移动系统在 MIP 现场进行的排放审计表明,现场甲烷排放的主要来源是采出水箱。

后续步骤
MSEEL 两个站点的持续工作建立在该项目早期工作的启示和成就的基础上,重点是经济学。

MSEEL 的初步努力采用了 NETL 研究人员多年前开创的先进水力压裂增产技术。目前的研发旨在以经济有效的方式提高该地区水平钻井和水力压裂的天然气采收率。最新现场测试的一个关键目标是展示可应用于 Marcellus 页岩区其他区域的最佳完井策略,以提高整体资源回收效率。 

例如,WVU 在最初的 MSEEL 站点进行的从纳米孔到储层规模的建模,增进了对压裂响应和受影响的岩石体积的理解,以及处理和处理单井大型数据集的方法和能力。它还有助于优化支管之间的间距、舞台长度和集群设计。MSEEL 的先进技术使 NNE 能够设计更好的油井。此外,自 MSEEL 开始以来,已经开发了多种技术,与高级建模相结合,可以更经济地获取相同类型的信息。这是 MSEEL 项目下一阶段的重点。 

NETL 及其项目合作伙伴还正在构建更好的模型,以提供更深入的见解。NETL 研究人员团队正在进行计算机断层扫描成像并记录 139 英尺(4 英寸)的深度。从 Boggess 现场的 17H 先导井取回的整个圆形岩心和 50 个侧壁岩心。这些数据将用于开发马塞勒斯页岩的高分辨率地质力学模型,该模型可以提高整个马塞勒斯页岩地区的生产效率和环境绩效。

MSEEL 位于西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦附近的博格斯工厂的工作重点是从先前的研究中学习并整合最新的创新,以提高资源回收率和项目经济性,同时减少对环境的影响。 (来源:NETL)
MSEEL 位于西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦附近的博格斯工厂的工作重点是从先前的研究中学习并整合最新的创新,以提高资源回收率和项目经济性,同时减少对环境的影响。(来源:NETL)

MSEEL 项目展示了由西弗吉尼亚大学领导的政府与私营部门伙伴关系的典范。该项目表明,可以安全高效地进行运营,并且不会对环境造成长期影响。由于NNE技术和工艺的成功示范,这些做法已被流域其他运营商采用。


水力压裂试验场1、2

2014 年,NETL 与伊利诺伊州德斯普兰斯的天然气技术研究所 (GTI) 合作,启动了一项全面的诊断和测试计划,重点是减少和最大限度地减少对环境的影响、展示安全可靠的操作以及提高液压系统的效率。压裂。研究合作重点是位于西德克萨斯州和新墨西哥州二叠纪盆地的两个水力压裂试验场(HFTS 1 和 HFTS 2),两个试验场相距约 140 英里。该程序模拟了 DOE/NETL 和天然气研究所(这两个实体合并形成 GTI)在 20 世纪 90 年代在直井中进行的现场实验。

技术已经发展到有利于具有多个水力压裂阶段的更长的水平页岩井,带来了一系列新的挑战和悬而未决的问题。例如,水平井多级压裂增产过程中的最佳压裂级数是未知的。水平井多级压裂会增加成本,但压裂级数的增加并不总是与产量的增加相关。

对所有阶段应用统一的压裂增产设计并不能考虑沿井眼的地质变化,并且效率也没有最大化。压裂工艺设计和执行的改进将减少要钻探的加密井数量、使用的工作液量以及未来油气回收活动的能源需求。

压裂工艺的优化需要了解沿井筒给定位置的压裂参数与地质特性之间的因果关系。设计和实施最佳水力压裂策略需要全面了解页岩地质力学和沉积特征的可量化影响。HFTS 1 和 2 的研究人员正在使用先进技术进行设计和实施的结论性测试,以表征、评估和提高各个水力压裂阶段的有效性。

Laredo Petroleum 为价值 3200 万美元的 HFTS 1 项目提供了位于德克萨斯州里根县的油田。该场地在二叠纪-米德兰盆地的 Wolfcamp 地层中拥有 11 口水平井。在水力压裂作业之前和之后,GTI 的研究人员进行了地震勘测,以生成地下地质图像,收集水和空气样本,并进行微震监测,以检测因压裂而发生的非常小规模的地震事件。

此外,研究人员还使用示踪剂来研究支撑剂的分布。虽然 HFTS 1 的所有计划第一阶段现场工作均已完成,但数据分析和整合仍在进行中。此外,还将继续收集测试井的压力、温度和生产数据以供将来分析。通过该项目收集的信息是迄今为止对于非常规石油和天然气生产最有意义的数据集,为理解诱发裂缝、验证和开发模型以及评估预测分析如何改进流程提供了必要的信息。

耗资 2700 万美元的 HFTS 2 项目于 2018 年启动。阿纳达科石油公司和壳牌勘探与生产公司同意在德克萨斯州洛文县二叠纪-特拉华盆地内建设一个新油田,该油田具有不同的深度、压力和渗透率比 HFTS 1。

截至 2019 年中期,八井平台上的所有井均已钻探,其中两口井安装了光纤传感器。另外还钻了一个垂直导向井,取芯并安装了永久性光纤电缆和压力表。压裂作业正在进行中,相关分析正在进行中。

HFTS 1 的目标是了解和定义页岩地质与裂缝动力学的关系,而 HFTS 2 的重点是优化水力压裂和井距。

NETL 资助的 HFTS 1 和 HFTS 2 位于德克萨斯州西部和新墨西哥州的二叠纪盆地,相距约 140 英里。 (来源:NETL)
NETL 资助的 HFTS 1 和 HFTS 2 位于德克萨斯州西部和新墨西哥州的二叠纪盆地,相距约 140 英里。(来源:NETL)

压裂作业的影响
HFTS 1 的 11 口井完成了 400 多个压裂阶段。岩心描述由多个团队完成,结果已纳入最终的岩心描述报告。发现了两套主要的充满方解石胶结物的自然张开式裂缝,大致走向东北至东南和西北偏西至东南偏东。已发现 11 个断层,全部位于上 Wolfcamp 地层内。在岩心中发现了 700 多条裂缝(天然裂缝和诱发裂缝)。

裂缝洞察
结果表明,裂缝的数量和复杂性远远超出了当前模拟器/模型的预测范围。刺激会产生多个远场裂缝(100 英尺外),这些裂缝分布不均匀,存在裂缝簇和空隙。可变速率压裂可提高射孔效率,从而在不增加额外成本的情况下提高产量。 

空气和水的影响
在水力压裂作业之前、期间和之后收集空气和水样本。空气质量数据和分析表明,在测试现场的压裂和生产作业期间,受管制的空气质量化合物几乎没有增加,尽管使用开放系统时回流期间的排放量可能会增加。此外,没有证据表明天然气或采出水迁移到地下水含水层。迄今为止的研究表明,水力裂缝不会延伸到淡水区。

支撑剂影响
在岩心中测得的垂直支撑剂分布仅是测得的微震几何形状的一小部分 (5%)。发现了多个支撑剂包。其他的可能在取芯过程中被冲掉,表明支撑剂放置效率低下。支撑裂缝尺寸与水力压裂尺寸有很大不同。

地质特征
成功钻穿了两口水平井之间的增产岩石体积的斜岩心井,回收了跨越 Wolfcamp 地层上部和中部的 595 英尺岩心。这是第一个作为公共资助研究项目一部分的此类核心。分析表明,上沃尔夫坎普地层和中沃尔夫坎普地层差异很大。上沃尔夫坎普的水力裂缝和天然裂缝多了很多倍,导致裂缝半长和间距影响截然不同。

压裂与生产

可变速率压裂可提高射孔效率,从而在不增加额外成本的情况下提高产量。

上 Wolfcamp 地层岩心的水力压裂中显示了支撑剂充填层。 (来源:NETL)
上 Wolfcamp 地层岩心的水力压裂中显示了支撑剂充填层。(来源:NETL)
HFTS 1 的岩心样本显示出天然裂缝与水力压裂产生的裂缝之间的独特区别。 (来源:NETL)
HFTS 1 的岩心样本显示出天然裂缝与水力压裂产生的裂缝之间的独特区别。(来源:NETL)

后续步骤
HFTS 项目正在获取基本的水力压裂见解,这些见解将影响不同页岩地层的勘探和开发多年。研究人员正在继续分析和整合各种数据集,以加深对压裂过程的了解。

随着 HFTS 2 的主要研究工作的进展,HFTS 1 已进入第二阶段,该阶段的重点是 EOR 方法。EOR 现场试点涉及一组新井,位于现有第一阶段实验井西北约 1 英里处,更新的完井设计反映了第一阶段的经验教训。该现场包括一个中央注入器/生产器,用于测试循环气体注入、补偿通过配备井下压力和温度计的水平井和垂直井,用于监测储层注入过程中的气体运动。

这两个 HFTS 项目都对行业产生了直接影响,因为每项工作都涉及由十几家石油和天然气公司和运营商(其中六家参与这两个项目)组成的联合行业合作伙伴关系 (JIP),提供技术支持和分摊成本。JIP 将加速采用正在开发的技术创新和最佳实践。


巴肯/伊格尔福特实验室

随着水力压裂方法的不断发展并允许提高压裂体积,IP 后很大一部分可采石油仍留在地下。NETL 与北达科他州大学能源与环境研究中心 (UND-EERC) 合作,
在北达科他州西部威利斯顿盆地巴肯页岩区的 Stomping Horse 综合体启动了一个以 EOR 为重点的现场实验室项目。合作始于 2017 年 9 月。

初步实验室研究表明,乙烷以及甲烷和乙烷的混合物可用于调动巴肯油藏中的石油,并成为第三次 EOR 作业的可行注入液。EERC 通过巴肯生产优化计划,与 Liberty Resources 和北达科他州工业委员会合作,设计并进行了使用富天然气的 EOR 试点测试。该项目以及 2018 年启动的新 Eagle Ford 页岩实验室的主要目标是更好地描述现有裂缝网络、刺激储层体积和流体流动动力学,以提高 EOR 机会。

Stomping Horse 综合体 Leon-Gohrick 钻距单元内所有井的基线储层特征数据收集均已完成。测量的参数包括对生产的石油、水和天然气的分析以及允许注入井和补偿井的井底压力和温度。

压力
最小混相压力 (MMP) 研究已进行,以确定来自 Stomping Horse 复合体的石油中富气组分和不同富气混合物的 MMP。甲烷、乙烷、丙烷和不同相关混合物的MMP数据表明,“更丰富”的气体混合物将导致较低的MMP值(例如,甲烷MMP>乙烷MMP>丙烷MMP)。

注入气体类型
对巴肯页岩和非页岩样品中丰富气体成分的岩石提取研究表明,在从巴肯岩石中调动碳氢化合物时,甲烷的效果最差,丙烷最有效,乙烷的效果中等。岩石提取研究还表明,丙烷在所有压力下均有效。乙烷在较高压力下有效,而甲烷在任何压力下效果最差。

模型研究
针对富气 EOR 作业对 Stomping Horse 综合设施地面基础设施潜在影响的模型研究预测,该过程不会对地面设施运营产生不利影响。选定注入/生产场景的油藏模型预测增量石油采收率可能超过 25%。

注入测试
2018 年夏季,在 Stomping Horse 综合设施的两口井中进行了小规模注入测试。在 3 次测试中总共注入了 24.6 MMscf 的富气。达到的最大注射速率为 1.14 MMscf/d。在钻距单元的六口井(包括注入井和紧邻的偏置井)注入测试之前、期间和之后收集井下压力和温度数据。从小规模注入测试中获得的数据用于完善后续更大规模先导测试的设计。

快速流动路径
在大规模先导测试期间,将示踪剂引入注入井。在 Stomping Horse 综合设施中对多口井进行了多次采样,作为识别注入井和各个偏置井之间快速流动路径的一种手段。大规模测试的最大注入速率为2 MMscf/d。一般来说,每个周期注入都会进行,直到达到三个标准之一:总注入量为 60 MMscf、注入时间为 30 天或在补偿井处有明显突破的证据。

下一步
由于在地理位置相对偏僻的地区扩大天然气收集基础设施带来的经济挑战,管理巴肯丰富的天然气产量是北达科他州政府和行业利益相关者的首要任务。NETL 与 UND-EERC 的合作旨在证明在巴肯油田使用富气进行 EOR 的可行性,这将减少火炬燃烧并提高石油采收率。

预注入测试和相关监测活动正在进行中,并且使用流通测试方法的页岩渗透性和页岩吸附研究也在继续。丰富的气体暴露对巴肯页岩和非页岩致密岩石的性质(包括粘土和矿物学、润湿性和相对渗透率)的影响正在使用各种实验室技术(例如核磁共振和场发射扫描电子显微镜)进行检查。巴肯岩石中不同富气组分优先吸附的潜力也正在通过储层压力和温度条件下的流通实验进行检验。

同样,新兴的 Eagle Ford 页岩实验室致力于提高 INPEX Eagle Ford LLC 在德克萨斯州拉萨尔县页岩矿区的水力压裂水平井的油气回收效率。该项目由德克萨斯农工大学、劳伦斯伯克利国家实验室和斯坦福大学合作。资金由 NETL 提供,INPEX Eagle Ford LLC 提供配套资金,其他运营商和服务公司通过 JIP 协议提供捐款。

Eagle Ford 页岩地层的现场研究于 2018 年 4 月开始,目前仍在进行中。利用新开发的综合监测解决方案,该团队将提供前所未有的全面高质量现场数据,以提高对水力压裂过程、重复压裂和后续吞吐注气的科学知识。这些知识将有助于通过减少新井数量、减少材料和能源消耗来优化生产。


关键要点和未来的步骤

NETL 现场实验室进行的研究通过对钻井和增产过程的环境影响提供了公正的看法,帮助重新定义了公众对非常规石油和天然气勘探的看法,研究表明这种影响相对良性。与此同时,NETL 正在寻找水力压裂技术的新可能性,这些技术有望优化运营并提高资源回收率,使其超越当前水平。

例如,自 MSEEL 开始以来,已经开发了多种技术,当与高级建模相结合时,可以允许以更具成本效益的方式获取相同类型的信息。如果该项目目前的努力证明这些创新有效并改善了生产结果,那么该项目将在马塞勒斯页岩地区以及可能在全国其他页岩气区实现更高效、更有效的资源回收——特别是与来自HFTS 1 和 2。

HFTS 1 的第二阶段工作补充了巴肯实验室正在进行的 EOR 现场研究。每个项目最终都旨在通过提供与增产和生产相关的新科学知识以及通过重复压裂和 EOR 提高采收率来提高页岩油生产的效率。

NETL 及其合作伙伴的研究为裂缝增产和 EOR 过程提供了新的见解,这将有助于开发新的方法和工具,以最大限度地提高裂缝页岩的石油产量。虽然一些研究成果将适用于特定地层,但许多现实和实用的知识将适用于其他非常规油气藏和地下应用,例如致密气砂储层,甚至用于 CO 2封存的盐水地层。

美国能源部正在使用从这些示范项目和 2019 财年授予的新现场实验室项目中收集的数据来支持人工智能和机器学习。这项工作的结果将产生有关页岩裂缝和基质特性的基础知识。此外,还将开发用于评估水力压裂性能的分析工具和针对水力压裂系统独特特征的方法,以提高生产效率并提高资源回收率。


阅读 E&P 一月份的其他封面故事:

关键的压裂成分朝不同的方向发展

支撑剂压碎强度比较

原文链接/hartenergy

Stimulating Future

Positive results are emerging from fracturing field laboratories.

A lubricator is connected to an oil well during wireline operations for the Hydraulic Fracturing Test Site 2. (Photo by Mike Lillejord, courtesy of GTI)

[Editor's note: This story originally appeared in the January 2020 edition of E&P. Subscribe to the magazine here.]  

Hydraulic fracturing has come a long way as a means of stimulating oil and natural gas reservoirs since its first experimental use in the 1940s, thanks in large part to revolutionary technological advances led by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) that helped usher in the modern shale gas boom.

Natural gas derived from shale formations accounts for the bulk of U.S. natural gas production, rising from 1.3 Tcf in 2007—the first year for shale-specific record-keeping by the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)—to 18.6 Tcf in 2017. Production from shale formations and tight oil plays is expected to rise to roughly 33.3 Tcf by 2050, accounting for more than 75% of the natural gas produced nationwide.

Because of plentiful domestic shale gas produced using hydraulic fracturing techniques, the U.S. led the world in natural gas production in 2018, notching record growth and setting a new annual production benchmark.

The DOE’s National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), the nation’s only federal research laboratory dedicated to fossil fuels, has a rich history of innovation when it comes to hydraulic fracturing. In the 1970s, fears that U.S. natural gas resources were dwindling prompted federally sponsored research focused on unconventional natural gas reservoirs, such as gas shales, tight sandstones and coal seams that were previously uneconomical to develop.

As part of the Eastern Gas Shales Research Program, the NETL helped to advance large-volume hydraulic fracturing technology. In 1975 a DOE industry joint venture drilled the first directional wells in the Appalachian Basin to tap shale gas and, shortly thereafter, completed the first horizontal shale well that used seven individual hydraulically fractured intervals. The DOE integrated basic core and geologic data from 35 research wells to prepare the first publicly available estimates of technically recoverable gas for gas shales in West Virginia, Ohio and Kentucky.

Today the NETL is building upon that legacy via collaborative investigation of ways to increase resource recovery efficiency. Field laboratories within the Permian, Appalachian, Williston and Eagle Ford basins are shedding light on subsurface questions associated with unconventional reservoirs and providing meaningful insights to help meet the energy needs of future generations.


Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Laboratory

Established in 2014, the Marcellus Shale Energy and Environmental Laboratory (MSEEL) was among the DOE’s first field laboratories. The $25 million project was created to develop and validate new knowledge and technology to improve recovery efficiency and minimize the environmental implications of unconventional resource development.

The NETL manages the project and provides technical oversight on behalf of the Office of Fossil Energy. The MSEEL, which spans two Northeast Natural Energy (NNE) production sites outside Morgantown, W.Va., is run by nearby West Virginia University (WVU) and involves a consortium of other universities and national laboratories.

The initial site at the Morgantown Industrial Park (MIP) featured two wells, which provided a well-documented baseline of production and environmental characterization data. A dedicated scientific observation well was drilled to collect detailed subsurface data, including log data. Operators collected 111 ft of 4-in. whole round core, believed to be the first core extracted through the entirety of the Marcellus Formation.

In addition, 147 sidewall core samples were taken, which researchers used to conduct geochemical, microbiological and geomechanical investigations. The observation well also was instrumented with a downhole seismic array to monitor stimulation events in two new production wells (identified as MIP 3H and 5H) that NNE began drilling in late June 2015. The MIP 3H lateral was logged and instrumented with permanent fiber-optic sensors. 

NNE recently established a second MSEEL location, known as the Boggess site, featuring six horizontal production wells—all logged with the latest LWD tools and including one fully instrumented with permanent fiber-optic wiring and sensors to provide near-real-time information during fracturing and production.

The initial project plan called for sample and data collection as well as testing and demonstration of advanced technologies. But the project’s phased approach and access to multiple Marcellus wells provided the flexibility to expand the project’s scope by identifying and incorporating innovative new tools and techniques focused on increasing recovery efficiency.

Lessons learned from the MSEEL within the past five years have increased reserves at the MIP well site by 20% and contributed to best practices that NNE incorporated into its other operations. Other operators in the Appalachian Basin are adopting state-of-the-art techniques and technologies that have been demonstrated and confirmed as part of this project. For example, the use of 100 mesh sand proppant and synthetic drilling mud has become a common practice throughout the basin. 

MSEEL's Boggess site
The MSEEL’s Boggess site, established in 2018, features six horizontal production wells, including one fully instrumented with permanent fiber-optic wiring and sensors to provide near-real-time information during hydraulic fracturing and production. (Source: NETL)

Completion design
The MSEEL team developed an engineered design methodology for well completion that enhances effectiveness by increasing the percentage of perforation clusters along the lateral contributing to production. The methodology—based on core sampling, fiber-optic sensing and LWD data—minimizes the effect of lateral heterogeneity on fracture stimulation. These measurements are used to predict breakdown pressure, which was then used to place stages and perforation clusters in rock with similar mechanical properties, thereby improving the probability of stimulating all clusters within a given treatment stage.

Perforation impacts on productivity
Research at the MSEEL site indicated that fewer perforations are needed per stage than had been previously used. By using fewer and smaller holes, NNE was able to increase the rate of injection, which facilitated more efficient fracturing by delivering sand more effectively into the induced cracks. Coupled with this, NNE learned that upgrading the casing string and frac stack to withstand higher pressures more effectively ensured that every perforation cluster was stimulated effectively.

Vehicle impacts
NNE learned that silica exposure can be controlled by using a cost-effective box-type sand delivery system versus a standard truck-and-trailer system. This is another technique widely used throughout the basin. Researchers also learned that a natural gas hybrid rig does not reduce emissions as much as previously believed, nor does it provide significant cost savings.

Drilling mud
The MSEEL provided confirmation that synthetic drilling mud produces cuttings that are more environmentally friendly to dispose of than traditional cuttings and improved drilling performance. This type of mud is commonly used by NNE and other operators in the basin. 

Recovery efficiency
Fiber optics and production logging proved that increased 100 mesh sand concentrations do not degrade reservoir performance when compared to larger sand proppant. It improves both fracture stimulation and decreases costs as more sand can be shipped per container volume. NNE uses a much higher percentage of 100 mesh sand as part of its standard frac design.

Fracturing and efficiency
WVU developed a software system called FIBPRO to analyze fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensing, distributed temperature sensing and microseismic data collected during hydraulic fracturing of the MIP 3H well. Analyses using FIBPRO showed that the distribution of deformation and crossflow between stages demonstrated differences in completion efficiency among stages and clusters. These differences affected production efficiency and resulted in a better understanding of the geological/geomechanical controls on completion and, ultimately, on well production.

Fracture geometry
WVU developed an integrated geomechanical and discrete natural fracture model to investigate the complexity of hydraulic fracture geometry. History matching and production response, as measured by fiber-optic data and production logging, confirmed the reservoir simulation and importance of engineered hydraulic fractures. Well spacing sensitivity research was done to identify the optimal distance between laterals to maximize recovery and the number of wells per section.

Numerical modeling was conducted to simulate stimulation Stages 1 through 3 of the MIP 3H well, using measured injection data. Comparison of measured data and slurry volumes, slurry rates and proppant mass estimated by the model showed strong correlation with stimulation efficiency. This modeling will continue for other stages, incorporating microseismic and production spinner test data, to better model fracture geometries.

Geochemistry
New microorganisms have been recognized in the deep biosphere represented by the Marcellus Shale. Subsurface microbial communities affect energy production, reservoir properties and wellbore integrity through processes such as biomineralization (scaling), acid formation (corrosion), biofilm formation (biofouling) and metal mobility. Understanding these organisms is important to reduce downhole well damage and scaling as well as precipitation of radium in surface facilities. To better analyze the biogeochemical characteristics of Marcellus Shale and investigate geological controls on microbial distribution, diversity and function, researchers developed new methods to maximize recovery and reproducibility of lipid biomarkers—efforts that are enhancing researchers’ understanding of subsurface biogeochemistry and the effect on long-term production. Researchers at the NETL have investigated water/rock interactions and the effects of barite precipitation on production efficiency.

Water impacts
Continuous monitoring of flowback and produced waters for nearly a year showed that total dissolved solids leveled off, with little change in ionic composition. Radionuclides in the drill cuttings were consistently below West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection levels for landfill disposal and well below U.S. Department of Transportation levels for classification as low-level radioactive waste. Findings from the analysis of the MSEEL drill cuttings aided West Virginia legislators in establishing new statewide waste disposal criteria based on the U.S. EPA’s toxicity characteristic leaching procedure, which has not been exceeded for either organic or inorganic constituents in the MSEEL drill cuttings.

Emissions
Direct-reading aerosol sampling was conducted throughout all stages of well development at the MIP site except pad preparation. Sampling locations included the drill pad, 1-km and 2-km distances. EPA-regulated PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter, capable of reaching human lung airspaces) emissions were not detectable from background at 1-km downwind during the highest emissions periods (hydraulic fracturing) on the well pad. Monitoring during drilling and completion operations indicated that a significant portion of air emissions was from truck traffic and other mobile sources, not from emissions due to pad operations. Emissions audits conducted at the MIP site using stationary and mobile systems indicated that the primary contributor to methane emissions on site was a produced water tank.

Next steps
Continued work at the MSEEL’s two sites builds upon the revelations and achievements of the project’s earlier work, with a focus on economics.

The initial efforts at the MSEEL advanced hydraulic fracturing stimulation techniques that the NETL researchers pioneered years ago. The current R&D is geared toward cost-effectively improving gas recovery from horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing in the region. A key objective of the latest field test is to demonstrate optimal completion strategies that can be applied to other areas of the Marcellus Shale play to improve overall resource recovery efficiency. 

For example, modeling from nanopore to reservoir-scale by WVU at the original MSEEL site advanced the understanding of the frac response and affected rock volume and the approaches and capabilities to handle and process large datasets from a single well. It also helped optimize spacing between laterals, stage length and cluster design. Technologies advanced at the MSEEL enabled NNE to design better wells. In addition, several technologies have been developed since the MSEEL began that facilitate acquisition of the same type of information much more cost-effectively when coupled with advanced modeling. That is the critical focus of the MSEEL project’s next phase. 

The NETL and its project partners also are building better models that offer deeper insights. A team of NETL researchers is conducting computed tomography imaging and logging 139 ft of 4-in. whole round core and 50 sidewall cores retrieved from the Boggess site’s 17H pilot well. The data will be used to develop a high-resolution geomechanical model of the Marcellus that could yield the capability to improve production efficiency and environmental performance throughout the Marcellus Shale region.

Work at MSEEL’s Boggess site near Morgantown, W.Va., is focused on learning from prior research and integrating the latest innovations to improve resource recovery and project economics while reducing environmental impacts. (Source: NETL)
Work at MSEEL’s Boggess site near Morgantown, W.Va., is focused on learning from prior research and integrating the latest innovations to improve resource recovery and project economics while reducing environmental impacts. (Source: NETL)

The MSEEL project demonstrated a model government-private sector partnership, with WVU at the helm. The project has shown that safe and efficient operations can be conducted with no long-term environmental consequences. Because of NNE’s successful demonstration of technologies and techniques, these practices have been adopted by other operators in the basin.


Hydraulic Fracturing Test Sites 1 and 2

The NETL teamed up with the Gas Technology Institute (GTI), of Des Plaines, Ill., in 2014 to launch a comprehensive diagnostics and testing program focused on reducing  and minimizing environmental impacts, demonstrating safe and reliable operations, and improving the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing. The research collaboration is focused on two hydraulic fracturing test sites (HFTS 1 and HFTS 2) about 140 miles apart in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. The program emulates field experiments that the DOE/NETL and the Gas Research Institute—one of two entities that combined to form GTI—performed in vertical wells in the 1990s.

Technology has evolved to favor longer horizontal shale wells with multiple hydraulic fracturing stages, introducing a new set of challenges and unanswered questions. For instance, the optimal number of fracturing stages during multistage fracture stimulation in horizontal wells is unknown. Multistage fracturing in horizontal wells raises costs, yet the increase in fracturing stages does not always correlate to a rise in production.

Applying a uniform fracture stimulation design to all stages does not account for geological variations along the wellbore, and efficiency is not maximized. Improvements in the design and execution of fracturing processes will reduce the number of infill wells to be drilled, the amount of working fluid used and energy demand for future oil and gas recovery activity.

Optimization of the fracturing process requires an understanding of the cause-and-effect relationship between fracturing parameters and geological properties at a given location along the wellbore. A comprehensive understanding of the quantifiable impacts of a shale’s geomechanical and depositional features is required to design and implement an optimal hydraulic fracturing strategy. Researchers at HFTS 1 and 2 are conducting conclusive tests designed and implemented using advanced technologies to characterize, evaluate and improve the effectiveness of individual hydraulic fracture stages.

Laredo Petroleum provided a field site in Reagan County, Texas, for the $32 million HFTS 1 project. The site features 11 horizontal wells in the Wolfcamp Formation of the Permian-Midland Basin. Prior to and after hydraulic fracturing operations, researchers with GTI conducted seismic surveys to produce images of the subsurface geology, collected water and air samples and undertook microseismic monitoring to detect very small-scale seismic events that occurred as a result of fracturing.

In addition, researchers used tracers to study the distribution of proppant. While all planned Phase 1 fieldwork for HFTS 1 has been completed, data analysis and integration are ongoing. Additionally, pressure, temperature and production data from the test wells continue to be collected for future analyses. The information gathered through the project is the most meaningful dataset to date for unconventional oil and gas production, providing information essential to understanding induced fractures, validating and developing models, and assessing how predictive analytics can improve the process.

The $27 million HFTS 2 project was initiated in 2018. Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and Shell Exploration and Production Co. agreed to host a new field site in Loving County, Texas, within the Permian-Delaware Basin, that features different depths, pressures and permeability than HFTS 1.

As of mid-2019, all wells on the eight-well pad were drilled, and two were fitted with fiber-optic sensors. An additional vertical pilot well was drilled, cored and instrumented with permanent fiber-optic cable and pressure gauges. Fracturing operations were underway, with associated analyses pending.

While the goal of HFTS 1 was to understand and define the relationships of shale geology and fracture dynamics, HFTS 2 is focused on optimizing hydraulic fracturing and well spacing.

The NETL-funded HFTS 1 and HFTS 2 are located about 140 miles apart in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. (Source: NETL)
The NETL-funded HFTS 1 and HFTS 2 are located about 140 miles apart in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico. (Source: NETL)

Impacts of fracturing operations
More than 400 fracture stages were completed in the 11 wells at HFTS 1. The core description was completed by multiple teams, and results have been incorporated into a final core description report. Two main sets of natural opening-mode fractures filled with calcite cement were identified, trending broadly northeast to southeast and west-northwest to east-southeast. Eleven faults were identified, all within the Upper Wolfcamp Formation. More than 700 fractures (natural and induced) were identified in the core.

Fracture insights
Results indicate that fracture quantity and complexity are far beyond what current simulators/models can predict. Stimulation creates multiple far-field fractures (100 ft away), which are not uniform in distribution with fracture clusters and voids. Variable-rate fracturing provides an uplift to production by improving perforation efficiency without adding extra costs. 

Air and water impacts
Air and water samples were collected prior to, during and after hydraulic fracturing operations. Air quality data and analysis indicated a little-to-no increase in regulated air quality compounds during fracturing and production operations at the test site, though there is potential for elevated emissions during flowback when open systems are used. In addition, there was no evidence of natural gas or produced water migration to the groundwater aquifer. Research to date shows that hydraulic fractures do not grow into freshwater zones.

Proppant impacts
Vertical proppant distribution measured in the core is only a fraction (5%) of the measured microseismic geometry. Multiple proppant packs were found. Others were likely washed out during coring, indicating inefficient proppant placement. Propped fracture dimensions are very different from hydraulic fracturing dimensions.

Geological distinctions
A slant core well was successfully drilled through the stimulated rock volume between two horizontal wells, recovering 595 ft of core spanning the upper and middle portions of the Wolfcamp Formation. This was the first such core ever taken as part of a publicly funded research project. Analysis indicated that the Upper and Middle Wolfcamp formations vary considerably. The Upper Wolfcamp features many times more hydraulic and natural fractures, leading to very different fracture half-lengths and spacing implications.

Fracturing & production

Variable-rate fracturing provides an uplift to production by improving perforation efficiency without adding extra costs.

A proppant pack is shown in a hydraulic fracture of an Upper Wolfcamp Formation core. (Source: NETL)
A proppant pack is shown in a hydraulic fracture of an Upper Wolfcamp Formation core. (Source: NETL)
Core samples from HFTS 1 show unique distinctions between natural fractures and those produced via hydraulic fracturing. (Source: NETL)
Core samples from HFTS 1 show unique distinctions between natural fractures and those produced via hydraulic fracturing. (Source: NETL)

Next steps
The HFTS projects are capturing fundamental hydraulic fracturing insights that will influence the exploration and development of different shale formations for many years. Researchers are continuing to analyze and integrate various datasets to gain an enhanced understanding of the fracturing process.

As the primary research work at HFTS 2 proceeds, HFTS 1 has moved on to Phase 2, which focuses on EOR methods. The EOR field pilot involves a new set of wells about 1 mile northwest of the existing Phase 1 experimental wells, with an updated completion design that reflects lessons learned in Phase 1. The site includes a central injector/producer to test cyclic gas injection, offset by horizontal and vertical wells equipped with downhole pressure and temperature gauges used to monitor gas movement during injection in the reservoir.

Both HFTS projects offer an immediate impact to the industry because each effort involves a joint industry partnership (JIP) composed of more than a dozen oil and gas companies and operators (including six involved in both projects) that provide technical support and share costs. The JIPs will accelerate the adoption of technology innovations and best practices being developed.


Bakken/Eagle Ford Laboratories

As hydraulic fracturing methods continue to evolve and allow improvements in stimulated volume, a large percentage of recoverable oil remains in the ground after IP. The NETL partnered with the University of North Dakota’s Energy & Environmental Research Center (UND-EERC) to initiate an EOR-focused field laboratory
project at the Stomping Horse complex within the Williston Basin’s Bakken Shale play in western North Dakota. The collaboration began in September 2017.

Preliminary laboratory investigations suggest that ethane and mixtures of methane and ethane may be used to mobilize oil from the Bakken reservoir and be viable injectate for tertiary EOR operations. The EERC engaged Liberty Resources and the North Dakota Industrial Commission, through the Bakken Production Optimization Program, to design and conduct an EOR pilot test using rich gas. The primary goal of the project, along with the newer Eagle Ford Shale Laboratory launched in 2018, is to better characterize existing fracture networks, stimulated reservoir volume and fluid flow dynamics to improve EOR opportunities.

Baseline reservoir characterization data collection has been completed for all wells within the Leon-Gohrick drill spacing units in the Stomping Horse complex. Parameters measured included analysis of produced oil, water and gas as well as bottomhole pressure and temperature for wells permitted for injection and offset wells.

Pressure
Minimum miscibility pressure (MMP) studies have been conducted to determine the MMP of rich gas components and different rich gas mixtures in oil from the Stomping Horse complex. MMP data for methane, ethane, propane and different relevant mixtures have shown that “richer” gas mixtures will result in lower MMP values (e.g., methane MMP > ethane MMP > propane MMP).

Types of injection gas
Rock extraction studies of the rich gas components on Bakken shale and nonshale samples show that, when it comes to mobilizing hydrocarbons from Bakken rocks, methane is the least effective, propane is the most effective and ethane has an intermediate effect. The rock extraction studies also show that propane is effective at all pressures; ethane is effective at higher pressures and methane is the least effective at any pressure.

Modeling studies
Modeling-based studies of the potential effects of rich gas EOR operations on the surface infrastructure of the Stomping Horse complex predict that the process will not adversely affect surface facility operations. Reservoir modeling of selected injection/production scenarios predicts that incremental oil recovery may exceed 25%.

Injection testing
Small-scale injectivity tests were conducted in two wells in the Stomping Horse complex during summer 2018. A total of 24.6 MMscf of rich gas was injected during three tests. The maximum injection rate achieved was 1.14 MMscf/d. Downhole pressure and temperature data were collected before, during and after the injection tests from six wells in the drill spacing unit, including the injection wells and the immediately adjacent offset wells. Data obtained from the small-scale injection tests were used to refine the design of the subsequent larger pilot tests.

Fast flow pathways
A tracer was introduced to the injection well during large-scale pilot tests. Multiple sampling events from multiple wells were conducted in the Stomping Horse complex as a means of identifying fast flow pathways between the injector and various offset wells. The maximum injection rate for the large-scale test is 2 MMscf/d. In general, each cycle injection is conducted until one of three criteria is achieved: total injection of 60 MMscf, 30 days of injection or clear evidence of substantial breakthrough at an offset well.

Next steps
Management of rich gas production from the Bakken is a high priority for government and industry stakeholders in North Dakota, due to economic challenges associated with expanding gas-gathering infrastructure in the relatively geographically isolated location. The NETL’s efforts with UND-EERC aim to demonstrate the viability of using rich gas for EOR in the Bakken, which would result in reduced flaring and improve oil recovery.

A pilot injection test and associated monitoring activities are ongoing, and shale permeability and shale sorption studies, using a flow-through testing approach, continue. The effects of rich gas exposure on the properties of Bakken shale and nonshale tight rocks, including clays and mineralogy, wettability and relative permeability, are being examined using a variety of laboratory techniques, such as nuclear magnetic resonance and field emission scanning electron microscopy. The potential for preferential sorption of different rich gas components in Bakken rocks also is being examined using flow-through experiments under reservoir pressure and temperature conditions.

Similarly, the emerging Eagle Ford Shale Laboratory seeks to improve the efficiency of oil and gas recovery from hydraulically fractured horizontal wells on INPEX Eagle Ford LLC’s shale properties in LaSalle County, Texas. The project teams Texas A&M University with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Stanford University. Funding is provided by the NETL, with a match from INPEX Eagle Ford LLC and contributions by other operators and service companies via a JIP agreement.

Field-based research within the Eagle Ford Shale formation began in April 2018 and is ongoing. Using newly developed and comprehensive monitoring solutions, the team will deliver unprecedented and comprehensive high-quality field data to improve scientific knowledge of the hydraulic fracturing process, refracturing and subsequent huff-and-puff gas injection. This knowledge will facilitate optimized production from a reduced number of new wells, with less material and energy use.


Key Takeaways and Future Steps

The research conducted by the NETL’s field laboratories has helped to redefine the public’s perception of unconventional oil and natural gas exploration by delivering an unbiased view of the environmental impacts of the drilling and stimulation processes, which research has demonstrated to be relatively benign. Simultaneously, the NETL is identifying new possibilities for hydraulic fracturing technologies that offer the potential to optimize operations and boost resource recovery beyond current levels.

For instance, several technologies have been developed since the MSEEL began that, when coupled with advanced modeling, could allow the acquisition of the same type of information in a much more cost-effective way. If the project’s current efforts prove that these innovations work and lead to improved production results, the project will lead to more efficient and effective resource recovery within the Marcellus Shale region and possibly throughout other shale plays nationwide—particularly when combined with insights from HFTS 1 and 2.

The Phase 2 work at HFTS 1 complements the EOR field research underway at the Bakken laboratory site. Each project ultimately seeks to improve the effectiveness of shale oil production by providing new scientific knowledge related to stimulation and production as well as enhanced recovery via refracturing and EOR.

Research by the NETL and its partners is providing new insights into the fracture stimulation and EOR processes, which will aid in the development of new methodologies and tools to maximize the production of oil from fractured shale. While some research results will apply to specific formations, many realistic and practical learnings will be applicable to other unconventional plays and subsurface applications, such as tight gas sand reservoirs and even saline formations for CO2 storage.

The DOE is using data collected from these demonstration projects and new field laboratory projects awarded in fiscal year 2019 to support artificial intelligence and machine learning. The results of this work will yield fundamental knowledge of shale fracture and matrix properties. Additionally, analytical tools for assessing hydraulic fracture performance and methods of targeting distinct features of the hydraulic fracture system will be developed to improve production efficiency and increase resource recovery.


Read E&P's other January cover stories:

Key Frac Ingredients Moving In Different Directions

A Comparison Of Proppant Crush Strengths