律师:新的甲烷法规可能会引发法庭之争

拜登政府于 12 月 2 日宣布了新的甲烷法规,能源律师 L. Poe Leggette 批评该法规令人困惑且草率。

编者注:本文的部分内容已进行澄清,以区分 L. Poe Leggette 对《通货膨胀削减法案》和拜登政府 12 月 2 日发布的新甲烷法规的评论。 


匹兹堡——一位能源行业的长期律师表示,拜登政府 12 月 2 日在 COP28 联合国气候峰会上发布的新甲烷法规将使许多石油和天然气生产商的业务变得更加昂贵和复杂。

Baker & Hostetler LLP 能源团队联席主管 L. Poe Leggette 于 12 月 5 日表示,他预计会有各种诉讼“挑战法律的各个方面”。

11 月 29 日,Leggette 在 Hart Energy 于 11 月 29 日举行的 DUG 阿巴拉契亚会议上向观众表示,新规则将吸引更多生产商进行监管和征税,而跟踪甲烷排放量是一项复杂且常常不准确的任务。

新的甲烷法规作为 2022 年 8 月通过的通货膨胀减少法案 (IRA) 的一部分获得国会批准。新法规的部分内容计划于 2024 年初生效。

拜登政府宣布了新法规的最终版本,作为减少全球甲烷排放的国际承诺的一部分。经过两年多的制定,美国环保署在其网站上发布了一份长达 1,690 页的新规则。

在会议上,莱格特在拟议的法规发布之前对其进行了嘲笑。

他还把矛头指向了爱尔兰共和军。“如果你真的通读了这条法律条款,你会说,‘现在,这听起来就像是有人在法案通过的那天晚上的午夜把这些东西拼凑在一起一样。之所以看起来是这样,是因为这就是发生的事情,”他说。

12月2日发布的新政策禁止对新钻油井生产的天然气进行常规火炬燃烧;要求公司监测井场和压缩机站的泄漏情况;该机构在一份声明中表示,其中还包括一项监测计划,需要第三方遥感技术来检测所谓“超级排放源”的大量甲烷排放。EPA 相信,这些规则将在 2024 年至 2038 年间减少 5800 万吨甲烷排放到大气中。

能源劳动力和技术委员会表示,运营商已经制定了自愿协议,并积极实时监控和检测甲烷泄漏。

能源劳动力主席蒂姆·塔普利表示,该组织担心这些规则允许“根据规则进行第三方排放监测”。 

他在 12 月 2 日的新闻稿中表示,“联邦政府已采取前所未有的措施,允许可能存在偏见的第三方收集数据并向 EPA 报告排放情况。”

该法规还实施了国会于 2022 年批准的甲烷税。当设施排放的二氧化碳当量超过 25,000 吨时,新的税收开始生效。2024 年排放的甲烷费用将从每吨 900 美元开始;2025 年将增加至 1,200 美元;2026 年将达到 1,500 美元。

塔普利表示,这些规定实际上是对消费者征收新税。

“对石油和天然气行业实施新税将直接影响美国人获取能源以满足日常需求的能力,增加石油和天然气价格成本并降低国内能源安全,”他说。

莱盖特表示,石油和天然气生产商现在面临的主要问题是新的报告要求以及由报告数据确定的新税收负担。

莱盖特表示,“美国环保署的首要目标是“扩大报告范围,将新的排放源纳入其中,以准确反映甲烷排放总量”。因此,新规则中“设施”的定义扩大到包括一些未包括在内的石油和天然气生产部分,或合并以前单独的设施。

“结果是,一家公司目前估计每年排放 18,000 吨,在排放量没有实际增加的情况下,现在估计排放量超过 25,000 吨,因此需要进行年度报告,”Legette说。

另一个困难是,任何给定地点的甲烷排放量测量可能会随着时间的推移而发生很大变化。

“有时即使你每小时测量[甲烷排放量],”莱盖特说。“我在休斯敦的文件显示,[数据显示] 在 17 天的时间里,一个地点的甲烷含量从 72% 到略高于 90% 不等。”

目前,莱盖特表示,他的法律术语一直在与客户合作,为美国环保局提议的变革制定计划。

他说,运营商应该检查适合其网站的衡量选项,以提出“良好的基础来开始弄清楚他们的责任是什么。”

Leggette 从事石油和天然气行业的诉讼工作,并因其在政府法规方面的商业宣传工作而于 6 月获得美国独立石油协会的表彰。

EPA 认为减少甲烷排放是减少温室气体排放的短期解决方案,因为甲烷吸收的热量是 CO 2的 25 倍以上。然而,甲烷是一种短暂的污染物,大约八年后就会在大气中分解。相比之下,CO 2可以在大气中停留100多年。

据政府估计,石油和天然气行业每年排放 80 百万吨甲烷。

最终法律公布后,几家主要石油和天然气公司宣布接受新规则。据路透社报道,埃克森美孚首席执行官达伦·伍兹表示,他的员工正在审查新规定,但只要这些规定“合理”,他们就会表示支持。

美国最大的天然气生产商殷拓集团发表声明称,该公司支持这一行动,并且已经在“努力减少甲烷排放”。

原文链接/hartenergy

Attorney: New Methane Regulations Likely to Spur Court Battles

The Biden administration announced new methane regulations on Dec. 2, which energy attorney L. Poe Leggette blasted as confusing and sloppy.

Editor's note: Portions of this article have been clarified to differentiate L. Poe Leggette's comments about the Inflation Reduction Act and new methane regulations released by the Biden administration on Dec. 2. 


PITTSBURGH — New methane regulations released Dec. 2 by the Biden administration at the COP28 U.N. climate summit will make business for many oil and gas producers more expensive and complicated, a longtime attorney for the energy industry said.

L. Poe Leggette, co-head of the energy team at Baker & Hostetler LLP, said on Dec. 5 that he anticipates various lawsuits "challenging the aspects of the law."

On Nov. 29, Leggette told the audience at Hart Energy’s DUG Appalachia Conference on Nov. 29 that the new rules would capture more producers for regulation and taxes, and that tracking methane emissions was a complicated and often inaccurate task.

The new methane regulations were approved by Congress as part of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) passed in August 2022. Part of the new regulations are scheduled to go into effect at the start of 2024.

The Biden administration announced the finalized version of the new regulations as part of an international pledge to reduce methane emissions globally. The EPA posted the new rules in a 1,690-page document on its web site after more than two years spent formulating the regulations.

At the conference, Leggette derided the proposed regulations prior to their release.

He also took aim at the IRA. “If you actually read through the statutory provision, you will say, ‘Wow, this reads like someone just threw this together at midnight the night the bill was passed. And the reason it looks that way is because that's what happened,'” he said.

As released on Dec. 2, the new policies ban routine flaring of natural gas produced by newly drilled oil wells; require companies to monitor for leaks from well sites and compressor stations; and include a monitoring program that requires third-party remote sensing to detect large methane releases from so-called "super emitters," the agency said in a statement. The EPA believes the rules will eliminate 58 million tons (MMton) of methane from reaching the atmosphere between 2024 and 2038.

The Energy Workforce and Technology Council said operators already have in place voluntary protocols and actively monitor and detect methane leaks in real time.

Energy Workforce President Tim Tarpley said the organization was concerned the rules allow “third-party emissions monitoring under the rule.” 

“The federal government has taken unprecedented steps to allow potentially biased third parties to gather data and report emissions to the EPA,” he said in a Dec. 2 press release.

The regulations also implement a methane tax approved by Congress in 2022. The new tax kicks in when a facility emits more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent. The fees will begin at $900 per metric ton of methane emitted in 2024; will increase to $1,200 in 2025; and $1,500 in 2026.

Tarpley said the rules effectively levy new taxes on consumers.

“The implementation of a new tax on the oil and gas industry will directly impact the ability of Americans to obtain energy to fulfill daily needs, increasing the cost of oil and natural gas prices and decreasing domestic energy security,” he said.

Legette said the major issue now facing oil and gas producers are the new reporting requirements and the new tax burden determined by what the reporting data says.

“The EPA’s prime goal is ‘to expand reporting to include new emission sources in order to accurately reflect total methane emissions,’” Legette said. The definition of “facility” in the new rules has therefore broadened to count some sections of oil and gas production that had not been included or to combine facilities that were separate before.

“The result is that a company currently estimated to emit, say, 18,000 tons per year may — with no actual increase in emissions — now be estimated to emit more than 25,000 tons, making it subject to annual reporting,” Legette said.

The other difficulty is that measurement of methane emissions on any given site can vary wildly over time.

“Sometimes even if you are measuring [methane emissions] on an hourly basis,” Legette said. “I have, in my files back in Houston, [data that show] during a 17-day span one site had methane content vary from 72% to a little over 90%.”

For now, Legette said his legal term has been working with clients to plan for the EPA’s proposed changes.

Operators should examine measuring options that fit with their sites, he said, to come up with a “good-faith basis to start figuring out what their liability would be.”

Leggette works in litigation for the oil and gas industry and was honored by the Independent Petroleum Association of America in June for his business advocacy work with government regulations.

The EPA considers methane reduction a short-term solution to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, as methane traps more than 25 times more heat than CO2. Methane is a short-lived pollutant, however, and breaks down in the atmosphere after about eight years. That compares to CO2, which can linger in the atmosphere for more than 100 years.

According to government estimates, the oil and gas industry emits 80 MMton of methane a year.

Following the announcement of the finalized law, several major oil and gas companies announced their acceptance of the new rules. Exxon Mobil’s CEO Darren Woods said his staff was reviewing the new regulations but was supportive as long as the rules were “reasonable,” Reuters reported.

EQT, the largest natural gas producer in the U.S., released a statement saying the company was supporting the action and was already undertaking “vigorous efforts to reduce methane emissions.”