雪佛龙削减加州“对抗”化石燃料政策的支出

Kevin Crowley 和 Chunzi Xu,彭博社 ,2023 年 12 月 15 日

(彭博社)“由于对化石燃料的“对抗”政策,雪佛龙公司正在削减在加州的炼油厂投资,此举可能会推高美国已经最高的汽油价格。

根据本周向加州能源委员会提交的评论,这家总部位于旧金山湾区的石油巨头已“自 2022 年以来削减了数亿美元”在金州的支出。雪佛龙是旧金山和洛杉矶机场航空燃油的主要供应商。  

此番言论发表之际,加州立法者正在考虑限制州内炼油厂可以获得的利润。美国人口最多的州已经制定了全国最严格的燃料标准以及碳排放总量控制与交易计划,批评者称该计划迫使消费者在加油时支付更多费用。

“加州的政策使其成为一个难以投资的地方,因此我们拒绝了该州的资本项目,”雪佛龙美洲产品业务总裁安迪·沃尔兹在文件中写道。“这种资本外逃反映了国家回报不足和敌对的商业环境。”

就在今年 9 月,州长加文·纽瑟姆 (Gavin Newsom) 指责石油行业在气候变化问题上撒谎,该州还起诉雪佛龙和其他公司以牺牲居民和环境为代价获取超额利润。雪佛龙拒绝了这些说法,称阻止气候变化需要全球政策反应,而不是诉讼。 

州长办公室没有立即回应对本文发表评论的请求。 

纽瑟姆去年宣布了一项计划,要求加州到 2045 年将破坏气候的排放量减少 85%,并在同一时间内将汽油需求减少 94%。在某些层面上它做得很好。该州的电动汽车采用率全国最高,随着可再生柴油和生物柴油等低碳替代品产量的增加,自 2016 年以来,该州的传统柴油需求已下降了一半。 

但加州仍然是美国最大的航空燃油消费国(目前尚无实用的低碳替代品),也是第二大汽油消费国。根据彭博社汇编的数据,该州的汽油价格通常是全国最高的,今年平均比全国平均水平高出 35%。 

近年来,加州的炼油能力有所萎缩,部分原因是一些设施转而使用可再生柴油,部分原因是燃料需求前景。但雪佛龙认为,国家政策和商业环境也发挥着重要作用。 

沃尔兹表示,限制投资的惩罚性规则“严重限制了炼油厂对价格上涨的反应能力”。“加州的政策不仅忽视了应对日益严重的供需失衡,而且还使供需失衡更加恶化。”

原文链接/worldoil

Chevron slashes California spending on ‘adversarial’ fossil-fuel policies

Kevin Crowley and Chunzi Xu, Bloomberg December 15, 2023

(Bloomberg) — Chevron Corp. is slashing oil-refinery investments in California because of “adversarial” policies toward fossil fuels, a move that may boost what already are the highest pump prices in the nation.

The oil giant headquartered in the San Francisco Bay area has cut spending in the Golden State by “hundreds of millions of dollars since 2022,” according to comments filed with the California Energy Commission this week. Chevron is a key supplier of jet fuel to the San Francisco and Los Angeles airports.  

The comments come as California lawmakers consider limiting the profits in-state refiners can reap. The most-populous U.S. state already has the nation’s toughest fuel standards as well as a carbon cap-and-trade program that critics say forces consumers to pay more at the pump.

“California’s policies have made it a difficult place to invest so we have rejected capital projects in the state,” Andy Walz, president of Chevron’s Americas Products business, wrote in the filing. “Such capital flight reflects the state’s inadequate returns and adversarial business climate.”

As recently as September, Governor Gavin Newsom accused the oil industry of lying about climate change, and the state has sued Chevron and other companies for reaping excessive profits at the expense of residents and the environment. Chevron rejected those claims, saying that halting climate change requires a global policy response rather than lawsuits. 

The governor’s office didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment for this story. 

Newsom last year announced a plan for California to reduce climate-damaging emissions 85% by 2045 and cut gasoline demand by 94% during the same time frame. On some levels it’s doing well. The state has the highest electric-vehicle adoption rate in the country and its conventional diesel demand has fallen by half since 2016 amid rising production of low-carbon alternatives such as renewable diesel and biodiesel. 

But California is still the country’s largest consumer of jet fuel, for which there’s currently no practical low-carbon alternative, and the second-largest user of gasoline. The state’s pump prices are typically the highest in the country, this year averaging 35% above the nationwide average, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. 

Refining capacity has shrunk in California in recent years, partly due to some facilities converting to renewable diesel, and partly due to the outlook for fuel demand. But Chevron believes the state’s policies and business environment are also playing a major role. 

Punitive rules that restrict investment have “severely limited refiners’ ability to react to higher prices,” Walz said. “California’s policies not only have neglected to respond to the increasing supply-and-demand imbalances — they have worsened them.”