勘探与生产动力:D茅j脿 Vu 再次出现

作为 EOR 的一种形式,循环注气使 Eagle Ford 页岩的石油增量增加了 80% 至 100%。

[编者注:这个故事的一个版本出现在《 石油和天然气投资者》 2019 年 12 月版中在这里订阅杂志 。]

由于勘探与生产的油井库存中有数万个地点,乍一看,讨论页岩 EOR 似乎有点早。

然而,在 Eagle Ford 的挥发性石油窗口中注入天然气的计划表明,循环气体注入(CGI),或者更通俗地讲,吞吐,已经超越了实验阶段,并且是一种经过验证的方法。经济地提高页岩采收率增量的方法。

此外,Eagle Ford 工艺正在丹佛-朱勒斯堡盆地和巴肯页岩进行实验。当然,最大的奖品是二叠纪盆地,那里多余的天然气收入为零,然后被烧掉,给该行业造成经济浪费和糟糕的前景,而环境、社会和治理正在成为与天然气相互作用的一个主要问题。公众。

在水力压裂占主导地位的时代,提高采收率作为新的致密地层石油来源一直被忽视。然而,过去 100 年来,EOR 使二叠纪盆地常规油田的产量翻了一番。早期的努力包括将油田天然气重新注入圣安德烈斯油田。在接下来的几十年里,二叠纪见证了涉及水驱的重大努力。到了 20 世纪 70 年代,EOR 演变成二氧化碳混相驱,几十年来,这种驱油技术在马蹄环礁、传奇的耶茨油田以及中央盆地平台沿线的多个圣安德烈斯油田中维持了传统的大型油田。累计产量以数十亿桶为单位。

然而,美国石油生产 160 年来的最新迭代——页岩油田,除了尝试对早期完井技术增产的井进行重复压裂之外,对二次采油或 EOR 兴趣不大。

目前,致密地层油区的产量为原始石油地质储量的 6% 至 9%。考虑到 EOR 将二叠纪盆地的常规石油采收率从 18% 提高到 20%,直至 40%,也许考虑将致密地层油气藏的寿命延长到未来几十年的方法是值得花时间的。

迄今为止,六家运营商已在 Eagle Ford 的 30 个井场上采用了循环注气。其中最活跃的是 EOG Resources Inc.,尚未与业界正式分享结果。然而,总部位于休斯敦的工程公司 Shale IOR LLC 对 Eagle Ford EOR 进行了详细的侦探和工程工作,并在 2019 年 9 月于圣安东尼奥举行的 DUG Eagle Ford 会议上公布了研究结果。

利用公共数据源,结合现场工作并通过油藏模拟模型进行增强,页岩 IOR 确定 Eagle Ford 挥发油窗口中的循环注气工作提供了一致、稳健的结果,平均第一周期 EOR 每天增加 200 桶油井,并在 10 年项目生命周期内将石油采收率提高 80% 至 100%。

页岩 IOR 对 Eagle Ford 六年 EOR 工作的回顾发现,从最简单的角度来看,新石油产量与注气量成正比,周期包括 30 至 40 天注入,随后是 30 天的收获。与传统 EOR 项目中滞后的产量增长不同,这种反应是可预测的、一致的和即时的。

这是一个再加压过程,而不是混相气驱中发现的驱替过程。如果操作员在第一个注气周期就达到目标压力,则增量油可能增加 100%。

在 Eagle Ford,该过程涉及每口井约 100 万美元的压缩机和基础设施资本支出,以及购买天然气的额外支出。最终,购买的天然气被未来出售的天然气清零,但在收益率变为正现金流之前,可能需要 12 至 1800 万美元的前期成本。

二叠纪盆地是扩大致密地层 EOR 实验的天然实验室,并且还增加了寻找结合 CO 2技术以提高致密地层油气藏采收率的方法的潜力。短期来看,能够回收自己的天然气并拥有自己的处理能力的二叠纪运营商可以通过 CGI 方法实现稳健的经济效益。此外,Eagle Ford 还发现了一个意想不到的附带好处。对主井(母井)进行再加压以提高采收率可以减轻未来的井干扰问题并解决日益令人烦恼的母井/子井现象。

敬请关注。

原文链接/hartenergy

E&P Momentum: Déjà Vu All Over Again

Cyclic gas injection as a form of EOR is producing 80% to 100% gains in incremental oil in the Eagle Ford Shale.

[Editor's note: A version of this story appears in the December 2019 edition of Oil and Gas Investor. Subscribe to the magazine here.]

With tens of thousands of locations populating the well inventory for E&Ps, it seems at first glance to be a little early discussing EOR in shale.

However, a program to inject natural gas in the volatile oil window of the Eagle Ford demonstrates that cyclic gas injec­tion (CGI) or, as more colloquially known, huff and puff, has moved beyond the ex­perimental stage and is a proven method to economically increase incremental oil recovery in shale.

Furthermore, the Eagle Ford process is undergoing experiments in both the Den­ver-Julesburg Basin and the Bakken Shale. The big prize, of course, is the Permian Basin, where excess natural gas earns zero revenue and is flared away, creating economic waste and bad optics for the in­dustry just as environmental, social and governance is becoming a major issue in interactions with the public.

EOR has been overlooked as a source of new tight formation oil in an era dominat­ed by hydraulic fracturing. However, EOR doubled Permian Basin production from conventional fields during the past 100 years. Early efforts involved re-injecting field gas into San Andres oil fields. During ensuing decades, the Permian witnessed significant efforts involving waterfloods. By the 1970s, EOR evolved to carbon-di­oxide miscible floods which have sustained conventional mega-fields for decades in the Horseshoe Atoll, the legendary Yates Field, and in multiple San Andres plays along the Central Basin Platform. Cumula­tive yield is measured in billions of barrels.

Yet, shale plays, the latest iteration in 160 years of American oil production, have unfolded with little interest in sec­ondary or EOR other than attempts to re­fracture wells that were stimulated with earlier generation completion techniques.

Tight formation oil plays currently yield 6% to 9% of original oil in place. Consid­ering EOR moved Permian Basin conven­tional oil recovery from 18% to 20% up to 40%, maybe contemplating methods to extend the life of tight formation plays de­cades into the future is time well spent.

To date, six operators have employed cy­clic gas injection on 30 well pads across the Eagle Ford. The most active of these, EOG Resources Inc., has not formally shared results with the industry. Howev­er, Houston-based engineering firm Shale IOR LLC conducted detailed detective and engineering work on Eagle Ford EOR and presented findings during the September 2019 DUG Eagle Ford conference in San Antonio.

Using public data sources, coupled with field work and enhanced via reservoir sim­ulation models, Shale IOR determined cyclic gas injection efforts in the Eagle Ford volatile oil window deliver consis­tent, robust results with average first cycle EOR adding 200 barrels per day per well and an increased incremental oil recovery between 80% and 100% during a 10-year project life.

Shale IOR’s review of six years of EOR effort in the Eagle Ford found at the sim­plest level that new oil production volume is proportional to gas injection volume on a cycle that includes 30 to 40 days of injec­tion followed by 30 days of harvest. This re­sponse is predictable, consistent and imme­diate, unlike the lagged production increase found in conventional EOR projects.

This is a repressuring process and not a displacement process as is found on misci­ble gas floods. If an operator reaches target pressure on the very first gas injection cy­cle, it is possible to generate a 100% in­crease in incremental oil.

In the Eagle Ford, the process involves capital spending of about $1 million per well for compressors and infrastructure and additional spending to purchase natu­ral gas. In the end, purchased gas is zeroed out by gas sold in the future, but it can en­tail an upfront cost of $12- to $18 million before the yield turns cash-flow positive.

The Permian Basin is a natural labora­tory for expanding the experiment in tight formation EOR and also adds the potential of finding ways to incorporate CO2 tech­nology for enhanced recovery in tight for­mation plays. Short term, a Permian oper­ator that can recycle its own gas and has its own processing capability can achieve ro­bust economics via the CGI methodology. Additionally, there was an unexpected side benefit discovered in the Eagle Ford. Re­pressurizing primary wells (parent wells) for enhanced recovery can alleviate future well interference issues and address the increasingly vexatious parent/child well phenomenon.

Stay tuned.