Seneca Resources 与 NexTier 分享压裂船队研究结果

宾夕法尼亚州页岩油运营商 Seneca Resources 解释了在与 NexTier Oilfield Services 进行全面研究后最终选择 Tier 4 双燃料设备的原因。

匹兹堡——随着越来越多的生产商寻求降低排放的方法,天然气驱动的电压裂的好处一直是页岩行业广泛讨论的话题。

“电力和双燃料之间的争论在过去的一年里确实爆发了,”Seneca Resources 的钻井和完井经理 Tom Cannon 告诉 Hart Energy 的 DUG East 会议的与会者。

这家宾夕法尼亚州生产商是为数不多的分享其关于电动压裂或 e-frac 船队采用决策分析的公司之一,于 12 月在 DUG East 与合作伙伴 NexTier Oilfield Services 一起展示了其研究结果。

Seneca Resources 是多元化能源公司 National Fuel Gas Co. 的勘探与生产部门,在 Marcellus 和 Utica 页岩区经营约 120 万净英亩的天然气,日产量超过 1 Bcf。该公司最近获得了 100%的阿巴拉契亚天然气生产符合 Equitable Origin 负责任能源开发 EO100™ 标准(一系列严格的 ESG 绩效目标)的认证。

据 Seneca Resources 称,到 2021 年,使用天然气且 100% 电动的船队约占美国所有陆地船队的三分之一。但他们预计,到今年年底,这些船队将占美国所有船队的一半以上。美国

坎农解释说,塞内卡采取了多项钻探和完井减排举措,包括使用双燃料钻机和压裂、天然气输水泵、天然气运行水井、为办公室和营地外部供电的天然气发电机。

Seneca 也在考虑在其运营中采用 e-frac,但首先想了解什么最适合该公司,这促使其率先与 NexTier Oilfield Solutions 进行一项研究

Seneca 和 NexTier 于 2021 年 7 月启动了这项研究,旨在为页岩油行业提供关于使用 Tier 2 柴油和动态气体混合 (DGB) 发动机、Tier 4 柴油和 DGB 发动机、天然燃料的水力压裂技术的排放概况的比较见解。燃气涡轮发动机和由天然气燃料往复式发动机提供动力的电子压裂设备。

“我们确实试图进行一项尽可能公正的研究,”坎农说。“我们对这些技术中的任何一种都没有任何偏见。我们真的很想了解什么是真正最好的排放量,并使用这些排放数据来做出我们作为塞内卡的最佳决策。”

Cannon 解释说,与每加仑柴油相比,天然气每加仑成本为 33 美分,而运送到现场的柴油成本为 3 美元。但塞内卡还评估了不同压裂车队选项的可用性、马力要求、灵活性和可靠性。

“节省的燃料是否抵消了天然气车队的市场溢价,主要是因为您不仅关注燃料节省,而且还关注这些新一代设备的市场价格上涨出来了,”他说。“这些车队的供应有限,导致这些设备的成本要高得多。”

该研究最终重点关注三种不同类型的压裂设备——Tier 2 和 Tier 4 双燃料设备以及下一代天然气动力设备。

“这项研究非常全面,包括空气质量污染物和温室气体排放,”NexTier 业务开发副总裁 Allen Crum 告诉 DUG East 会议与会者。

Crum 解释说,通过 70% 的天然气替代,双燃料发电每年可节省高达 800 万美元的成本,而 100% 天然气动力的车队每年可节省 1000 万美元以上。

“当然,并不是每个地点都能获得贫乏、干燥的天然气,”他说。“但即使使用压缩天然气,成本节约仍然有利于使用天然气的车队。”

Cannon 表示,最终,Seneca 选择部署 NexTier 提供的 Tier 4 双燃料车队。

“持续的技术进步为减排和增加天然气替代提供了空间,”他说。“作为一个行业,我们不断发展,技术也在不断发展。今天对我们来说的答案可能是第 4 级,但随着运营计划的变化,明天很可能是其他问题。”

原文链接/hartenergy

Seneca Resources Shares Results of Frac Fleet Study with NexTier

Pennsylvania shale operator Seneca Resources explains why it ultimately chose Tier 4 dual fuel equipment after a comprehensive study with NexTier Oilfield Services.

PITTSBURGH—The benefits of natural gas-powered electric fracturing has been the subject of much discussion in the shale industry as a growing number of producers seek ways to lower their emissions.

“The debate between electric and dual fuel has really exploded over the past year,” Tom Cannon, drilling and completions manager for Seneca Resources, told attendees of Hart Energy’s DUG East Conference.

One of the few to share their decision-making analysis on electric frac, or e-frac, fleet adoption, the Pennsylvania producer presented its findings alongside partner NexTier Oilfield Services at DUG East in December.

Seneca Resources, the E&P segment of diversified energy company National Fuel Gas Co., operates roughly 1.2 million net acres producing over 1 Bcf/d of natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shale plays. The company recently achieved certification of 100% of its Appalachian natural gas production under Equitable Origin’s EO100™ standard for responsible energy development, a series of rigorous ESG performance targets.

According to Seneca Resources, natural gas-capable and 100% electric fleets made up about one-third of all U.S. land fleets in 2021. But they expect that by the end of the year, those will account for more than half of all fleets in the U.S.

Cannon explained that Seneca has employed several drilling and completions emissions reduction initiatives, including using dual fuel rigs and fracs, natural gas water transfer pumps, and natural gas-run water wells, natural gas generators that power outside lighting offices and camps.

Seneca was also considering adopting e-frac into their operations but first wanted to understand what was the best fit for the company, which led it to pioneer a study with NexTier Oilfield Solutions.

Launched in July 2021, the study by Seneca and NexTier aimed to provide the shale industry with a comparative insight on the emissions profile of hydraulic fracturing technologies utilizing Tier 2 diesel and dynamic gas blending (DGB) engines, Tier 4 diesel and DGB engines, natural gas-powered turbine engines, and e-frac equipment powered by natural gas-fueled reciprocating engines.

“We really tried to get a study that was as unbiased as possible,” Cannon said. “We didn’t have any bias toward any one of these technologies. We really wanted to understand what truly is the best with emissions, and use that emissions data to make our best decisions as Seneca.”

Cannon explained that compared to diesel fuel on a per gallon basis, natural gas costs 33 cents per gallon, where diesel delivered to location costs $3. But Seneca evaluated different frac fleet options on availability, horsepower requirements, flexibility and reliability as well.

“Does the fuel savings offset the market premium of natural gas-capable fleets, mainly because you’re not only looking at the fuel savings, but you’re also looking at the market increase price at what these new generation equipment is coming out,” he said. “Limited supply of these fleets causes the cost of this equipment to be a lot higher.”

The study ultimately focused on three different types of frac equipment—Tier 2 and Tier 4 dual fuel equipment and next-generation natural gas-powered equipment.

“The study was comprehensive in that included both air quality pollutants and greenhouse-gas emissions,” Allen Crum, vice president of business development for NexTier, told DUG East conference attendees.

Crum explained that cost savings for dual fuel power generation can save up to $8 million annually with a 70% natural gas replacement, while a 100% gas-powered fleet can save upwards of $10 million annually.

“Of course, not every location will have access to lean, dry field gas,” he said. “But even on CNG, the cost savings still favor natural gas-capable fleets.”

Ultimately, Cannon said, Seneca opted to deploy the Tier 4 dual fuel fleets offered by NexTier.

“Ongoing technology improvements provide room for emissions reductions and increased gas substitution,” he said. “And as an industry we continue to evolve, and technology continues to evolve. And today’s answer for us may be Tier 4, but tomorrow could very well be something else with changing operational plans.”