美国采取保障措施,保护纳税人免于支付石油和天然气分解费用

美国内政部海洋能源管理局(BOEM)已采取措施,通过加强海上石油和天然气行业的财务保证和风险管理要求,保护纳税人免于被迫承担退役费用。

插图。来源:BOEM

去年为确保美国纳税人免受石油和天然气行业在海上油井和基础设施达到使用寿命后退役的责任而承担的相关费用奠定了基础后,BOEM 更新了已有 20 年历史的法规最终规则确保纳税人免受海上平台需要退役时应由石油和天然气行业承担的费用的影响。通过这一行动,美国加强了对在美国外大陆架(OCS)运营的海上石油和天然气行业的财务保证要求。 

美国内政部长德布·哈兰德评论道: “当石油和天然气公司在自己作业后无法进行清理时,美国纳税人不应该承担责任。”内政部致力于确保联邦石油和天然气租赁计划以公平、问责和透明的方式实施。该最终规则更新、简化和加强了过时的要求,以确保纳税人受到保护,并且当前运营商对其外大陆架租约结束时的清理义务负责。” 

此前,政府问责办公室(GAO)发现,以前的做法并不能有效确保行业运营商在海上油井和平台使用寿命结束时满足其退役期限。如果公司未能履行退役义务,这些费用可能会由美国纳税人承担。然而,最终的 “OCS租赁和赠款义务的风险管理和财务保证”规则现已修订了现有法规,以回应这些担忧,并通过提高运营商需要提供的财务保证水平来降低与OCS开发相关的财务风险提前。 

土地和矿产管理部首席副助理部长史蒂夫·费尔德格斯 (Steve Feldgus) 博士强调:长期以来,联邦政府未能落实确保离岸石油和天然气公司问责的措施。结合土地管理局最近的公告,该部门正在确保我们拥有一个保护纳税人利益的现代石油和天然气租赁计划。”  

此外,新规则建立了两个指标,BOEM 将通过这两个指标评估一家公司对美国纳税人构成的风险,因为现有法规未能跟上行业变化,例如老化的 OCS 基础设施、即将报废的财产的转让从大公司到财务资源较少的小公司,或者公司之间和内部复杂的财务安全安排。

这两个指标需要使用国家认可的统计评级机构的信用评级或等效的代理信用评级来检查公司的财务状况,并考虑租赁中剩余探明石油和天然气储量的当前价值与估计成本的比较履行退役义务。如果租约仍有大量可用储备,那么一旦破产,租约可能会被另一家运营商收购,后者将承担堵塞和废弃责任。 

BOEM 董事Elizabeth Klein强调: “近海石油和天然气行业在过去 20 年里发生了巨大的变化,我们的财务保证法规也需要跟上步伐。”今天的行动解决了过时且不充分的补充担保方法,这种方法并不总能准确捕捉行业可能给美国纳税人带来的风险,例如公司的财务状况或承租人持有的资产的价值。 

据美国内政部称,没有投资级信用评级或充足探明储备的公司将需要提供补充财务保证才能遵守新规则。该规则还明确了当前赠款持有人和承租人需要持有财务保证以确保遵守租赁义务,并且不能依赖先前所有者的财务实力。

解决数十亿的解码价格标签

环境非政府组织“地球正义”指出,政府的数据显示,2010 年至 2022 年间,化石燃料行业错过了在墨西哥湾 10,600 个油井中超过 40% 的退役期限,以及 2,300 个平台中超过 50% 的退役期限。美国约97% 的 海上石油和天然气产量均来自该地区 。此外,政府统计,截至2023年6月,海湾地区有1000多口拖欠闲置油井,其中800多口已闲置十多年,近600口甚至没有被暂时封堵,因此更容易发生泄漏。

政府问责办公室估计需要40-700 亿美元来支付堵井、拆除平台和清理基础设施的费用。然而,政府仅持有化石燃料行业约 35 亿美元的集体财务保证,用于支付所有现有海上石油和天然气钻探项目退役的费用,这意味着纳税人将需要弥补这一差异。 

由于新规则的出台,BOEM 估计石油和天然气行业现在将需要提供69 亿美元的新财务保证,以保护美国纳税人免于承担退役成本。因此,当前承租人和补助金持有者将被允许在三年内请求分阶段付款,以满足更新规则所需的新的补充财务保证要求。 

地球正义组织的律师艾娃·伊巴内斯·阿玛多尔强调: “这一规则制定是朝着正确方向迈出的一步,将减轻美国纳税人的经济负担,因为他们为海洋石油工业后的清理工作埋单。”但还需要进行更多改革。

“石油行业继续逃避预先支付的过少的费用,获取最大的利润,而让我们其他人陷入困境。石油工业已经证明自己是我们公共水域中不负责任的租户,应该要求它在开始钻探之前支付更多的保证金。”

原文链接/offshore_energy

US puts safeguards in place to protect taxpayers from footing oil & gas decom bill

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) has taken steps to shield taxpayers from being forced to pick up the decommissioning tab by bolstering financial assurance and risk management requirements for the offshore oil and gas industry.

Illustration. Source: BOEM

After laying the groundwork last year to keep American taxpayers safe from incurring the costs associated with the oil and gas industry’s responsibility to decommission offshore wells and infrastructure after they reach the end of their service life, BOEM has updated 20-year-old regulations with a final rule to ensure taxpayers will be protected from covering costs that should be borne by the oil and gas industry when offshore platforms require decommissioning. With this action, the U.S. has strengthened financial assurance requirements for the offshore oil and gas industry operating on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). 

Deb Haaland, U.S. Secretary of the Interior, commented: “The American taxpayer should not be held responsible when oil and gas companies are unable to clean up after their own operations. The Interior Department is committed to ensuring that the federal oil and gas leasing program is implemented fairly, with accountability and transparency. This final rule updates, simplifies and strengthens outdated requirements to ensure that taxpayers are protected and current operators are held responsible for their end-of-lease cleanup obligations on the Outer Continental Shelf.” 

This came after the Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that previous practices did not effectively ensure that industry operators meet decommissioning deadlines for offshore wells and platforms at the end of their useful lives. In the cases where companies failed to meet their decommissioning obligations, those costs would potentially fall to American taxpayers. However, the final ‘Risk Management and Financial Assurance for OCS Lease and Grant Obligations’ rule has now amended existing regulations to respond to those concerns and reduce financial risks associated with OCS development by raising the level of financial assurances that operators need to provide in advance. 

Dr. Steve Feldgus, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Land and Minerals Management, highlighted: “For far too long, the federal government has failed to follow through on measures to ensure accountability for oil and gas companies operating offshore. Coupled with our recent announcement from the Bureau of Land Management, the Department is ensuring that we have a modern oil and gas leasing program that protects taxpayers’ interests.”  

Furthermore, the new rule establishes two metrics by which BOEM will assess the risk that a company poses for American taxpayers since the existing regulations have not kept pace with industry changes, such as aging OCS infrastructure, the transfer of near end-of-life properties from large companies to smaller companies with fewer financial resources, or the complex financial security arrangements between and within companies.

These two metrics entail examining the financial health of a company by using a credit rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization or a proxy credit rating equivalent and considering the current value of the remaining proved oil and gas reserves on the lease compared to the estimated cost of meeting decommissioning obligations. If the lease has significant reserves still available, then in the event of bankruptcy, the lease will likely be acquired by another operator who will assume the plugging and abandonment liabilities. 

Elizabeth Klein, BOEM’s Director, emphasized: “The offshore oil and gas industry has evolved significantly over the last 20 years, and our financial assurance regulations need to keep pace. Today’s action addresses the outdated and insufficient approach to supplemental bonding that does not always accurately capture the risks that industry may pose for the American taxpayer – like financial health of a company or the value of the assets that the lessee holds.” 

According to the U.S. Department of the Interior, companies without an investment-grade credit rating or sufficient proven reserves will need to provide supplemental financial assurance to comply with the new rule. This rule also clarifies that current grant holders and lessees need to hold financial assurance to ensure compliance with lease obligations and cannot rely on the financial strength of prior owners.

Tackling multi-billion decom price tag

Earthjustice, an environmental NGO, points out that the government’s data shows the fossil fuel industry missed deadlines for decommissioning over 40% of wells out of 10,600 and 50% of platforms out of 2,300 between 2010 and 2022 in the Gulf of Mexico, which is the source of about 97% of all U.S. offshore oil and gas production. In addition, the government counted more than 1,000 delinquent idle wells in the Gulf, as of June 2023, with over 800 inactive for more than ten years while nearly 600 had not even been temporarily plugged, leaving them more prone to leaks.

The Government Accountability Office estimates that between $40-70 billion is needed to cover the costs of plugging wells, removing platforms, and cleaning up infrastructure. However, the government only holds about $3.5 billion in collective financial assurances from the fossil fuel industry to cover the costs of decommissioning all existing offshore oil and gas drilling projects, meaning taxpayers are on the line to cover that discrepancy. 

Thanks to the new rule, BOEM estimates the oil and gas industry will now be required to provide $6.9 billion in new financial assurances to protect American taxpayers from assuming decommissioning costs. Due to this, current lessees and grant holders will be allowed to request phased-in payments over three years to meet the new supplemental financial assurance demands required by the updated rule. 

Ava Ibanez Amador, Earthjustice’s attorney, underlined: “This rulemaking is a step in the right direction and will alleviate the financial burden on American taxpayers who foot the bill for cleaning up after the oil industry in our oceans. But more reforms are needed.

“The oil industry continues to get away with paying far too little up front, extracting maximum profit, and leaving the rest of us on the hook. The oil industry has shown itself to be an irresponsible tenant in our public waters and it should be required to pay a much larger security deposit before it can start drilling.”