黑金面临红、绿压力

石油行业的日子终于好起来了,但问题仍然是该行业是否会“再次陷入困境”。

美国石油和天然气行业发现自己陷入了一种生死存亡的交通拥堵之中。无论红灯还是绿灯闪烁,他们都会发现自己被困住了。

一方面,高管们被“红色问题”所困扰,认为账簿因损失而被染成了红色。另一方面是“绿色问题”——来自环保组织的压力和倡导,小组成员在八月份休斯顿 IMAGE 会议上的“能源投资的未来:未来五年”中表示。

Aventurine Partners负责人 Bryant Fulk表示,能源已从 2010 年代表现最差的行业转变为表现最好的行业。 

避免红色问题意味着找到一种方法来维持行业的连续业绩。

“直到 2021 年,我们真的迷失了方向,”标准普尔全球商品洞察首席上游策略师鲍勃·弗莱克伦德 (Bob Fryklund) 表示。 

他表示,许多石油公司将重点转向增长,而牺牲了投资者的利益,但现在该行业已将其商业模式转向关注自由现金流和 EBITDA。

“对于投资者来说,他们正在获得自由现金流,尤其是在美国,而且在海外也如此,占现金的 75%,”他说。这包括股息和股票回购。

“投资者很高兴。”

简而言之,他说,行业的范式已经发生了转变。一些投资者在经历了一系列的繁荣和萧条周期后,仍然没有重返该行业。但勘探与生产公司也面临着自己的创伤后综合症。

“问题是,展望未来,我们会再次把事情搞砸吗?我们真的很擅长,”弗里克伦德说。 

他说,在 20 世纪 80 年代的经济低迷时期,他在俄克拉荷马州看到了一张保险杠贴纸,上面写着:“上帝啊,再给我们一次机会吧。” 我们不会搞砸的。”

——但我们确实搞砸了。所以接下来的问题是,“我们还要再这样做吗?”

双重打击:红色和绿色

三菱日联银行有限公司企业咨询和能源主管罗布·李 (Rob Lee)表示,他认为“这个问题加剧了绿色问题”。

他表示,家族办公室和机构投资者需要围绕 ESG 进行叙述,才能考虑抓住这一机会。然而,如果没有回报,潜在投资者也会失去兴趣。

“我为什么要反对我们的 ESG 政策来投资历史回报率非常低的东西?”他说。

李说,该行业的纪律和对现金流的关注将事情从“投资领域转移到了现金分配领域”。“这一定是新的叙述——该行业正在向投资者提供自由现金流,其风险调整后的回报比他们在市场和更高的利率环境中可以获得的回报更好。”

弗里克伦德说,克服绿色问题的主要挑战之一是有多少人致力于绿色事业。

他说,当拟议的法案或法规供考虑时,“他们使用社交媒体的次数是传统能源集团的 20 到一倍。” “他们只是充斥市场。” 

EnergyFunders首席执行官 Laura Pommer 表示,该行业需要克服其声誉。

“石油和天然气并不是一个坏词,我认为我们在很长一段时间以来一直面临着一个需要克服的公关[公共关系]大问题,而且这也与人们的需求密切相关。”了解替代方案从何而来,”她说。 

李表示,世界不会停止使用碳氢化合物作为燃料。

“需要停止称其为过渡能源。” 这不是过渡。是加法。当你观察 300 年前的主要燃料时,你会发现它是木材。我猜我们今天燃烧了更多的木材,”他说。“我们不会停止使用碳氢化合物,我认为这会让每个人都明白没有灵丹妙药。我们需要一切。仅仅因为您将投资资金用于绿色解决方案并不意味着我们也不需要碳氢化合物解决方案。” 

GrayStreet Partners的管理合伙人凯文·科维 (Kevin Covey)表示,让全世界了解碳氢化合物的作用以及供应短缺的潜在后果非常重要。

“我认为世界需要我们不断从地下开采石油天然气,否则价格(即普通人分配给能源的金额)将在几十年内飙升,”他说。说。 

原文链接/hartenergy

Black Gold Faces Red, Green Pressures

Times are finally better for the oil industry, but the question remains whether the industry will "mess it up again."

The U.S. oil and gas industry finds itself in a kind of existential traffic jam; whether a light flashes red or green, they find themselves stuck.

On the one hand, executives are haunted by “the red problem” —think ledgers blotted crimson by losses. On the other is “the green problem” —pressure and advocacy from environmental groups, panelists said during “The Future of Energy Investment: The Next Five Years” during Houston’s IMAGE conference in August.

Bryant Fulk, principal at Aventurine Partners, said energy has moved from the worst-performing sector in the 2010s to the best-performing sector. 

Avoiding the red problem means finding a way to maintain the industry’s performance streak.

“Until 2021, we really lost our way,” said Bob Fryklund, chief upstream strategist at S&P Global Commodity Insights

Many oil companies turned their focus to growth at the expense of investors, he said, but now the industry has shifted its business models to focus on free cash flow and EBITDA.

“For the investors, they're getting, particularly here in the U.S. but also places overseas, the free cash flow, 75% of that cash,” he said. That includes dividends and stock buybacks.

“The investors are happy.”

In short, he said, the industry’s paradigm has shifted. Some investors still haven’t returned to the sector after getting burned in a series of booms and bust cycles. But E&Ps are also suffering their own form of post-traumatic syndrome.

“The question is, going forward, are we going to mess it up again? We're really good at that,” Fryklund said. 

He said during the 1980s downturn, he saw a bumper sticker in Oklahoma that said, “Please, God, give us another chance. We won’t screw it up.”

“But we did screw it up. So that's the question going forward is, ‘Are we going to do that again?’”

Double whammy: red and green

Rob Lee, head of corporate advisory and energy for MUFG Bank Ltd., said he believes the “red problem has exacerbated the green problem.”

He said family offices and institutional investors require a narrative around ESG to consider pursuing the opportunity. However, if the returns aren’t there, potential investors will also lose interest.

“Why would I make a fight to go against our ESG policy to invest in something that has very low historical returns?” he said.

The industry’s discipline and focus on cash flow shifted things from “an investment sector to a cash distribution sector,” Lee said. “That's got to be the new narrative … the sector is delivering free cash flow to investors at a risk-adjusted return better than what they can get in the market and higher interest rate environment.”

One of the chief challenges of overcoming the green problem, Fryklund said, is how many people devote themselves to the green cause.

When proposed bills or regulations are up for consideration, he said, “they go to social media 20-to-one times more than what the traditional energy group does. …They just flood the market.” 

EnergyFunders CEO Laura Pommer said the industry needs to overcome its reputation.

“Oil and gas isn't a bad word, and I think that there's a big PR [public relations] problem we've had for a very, very long time that needs to be overcome, and that goes in tandem with people also understanding where the alternatives come from,” she said. 

Lee said the world is not going to stop using hydrocarbons for fuel.

“We need to stop calling it transition energy. It's not transition. It's addition. When you look at the predominant fuel 300 years ago, it was wood. I'm going to guess that we burned more wood today,” he said. “We're not going to stop using hydrocarbons, and I think it's getting everyone to understand that there's no silver bullet. We need everything. And just because you are directing investment dollars towards green solutions doesn't mean that we don't need the hydrocarbon solutions as well.” 

Kevin Covey, managing partner at GrayStreet Partners, said it’s important to educate the world on the role of hydrocarbons and the potential ramifications of a supply shortage.

“I think that the world needs us to keep getting oil gas out of the ground or the prices—the amount of money the average person allocates to energy—is going to shoot through the roof in a couple of decades,” he said.