切萨皮克液化天然气交易使其海恩斯维尔天然气价格更接近全球价格

在一项液化天然气交易中,运营商海恩斯维尔每年高达 100 Bcf 的产量将与日本韩国市场挂钩。

在一项液化天然气交易中,运营商海恩斯维尔每年高达 100 Bcf 的产量将与日本韩国市场挂钩。来源:Shutterstock.com

切萨皮克能源公司 (Chesapeake Energy Corp.) 距离海恩斯维尔页岩气的海外定价又近了一步,该公司签署了从 2027 年开始为期 15 年、每年近 100 Bcf 的主要协议 (HOA)。切萨皮克的交易是与大宗商品交易商 Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd 签署的根据切萨皮克的公告,切萨皮克的海恩斯维尔天然气价格已与日韩基准 (JKM) 挂钩。

切萨皮克总裁兼首席执行官尼克·德尔奥索表示,可能还会有更多交易。“我们期待在出口能力继续上线的同时签订更多协议。”

切萨皮克一直在等待赢得投资级信用评级,以承诺签订一份坚定的液化天然气供应合同。

Benchmark Co.分析师苏巴什·钱德拉(Subash Chandra)在谈到该协议时写道:“赫萨皮克在寻求垂直整合全球液化天然气市场的天然气独立公司中名列前茅。”

竣工后,切萨皮克将与 Devon Energy Corp. 和 EOG Resources Inc. 一起以高价签订直销合同。

钱德拉指出,《独立报》一直在为下一步做准备。“赫萨皮克拥有通往液化天然气走廊的天然气和稳定运输,[并且]与全球液化天然气营销商达成协议。”

交付预计于 2027 年开始。据两家公司报道,该公司和贡渥目前正在考虑液化天然气设施,贡渥将在这些设施中通过“船上交货”(FOB) 方式接收天然气。

钱德拉写道,“赫萨皮克可能会利用他们的资产来推动 FID(最终投资决策)前的液化天然气项目冲过终点线。” 他们还可以在最终投资决定前获得该设施的股权。”

他指出,预计有几个(预计多达六个)NG 项目将在今年做出最终投资决定,并且“有几个项目被推迟,因此有很多候选项目。”

他补充说,这可能不是什么令人兴奋的消息。


相关:切萨皮克能源公司、贡沃尔公司为海恩斯维尔天然气公司签署为期 15 年的液化天然气协议


“市场现在可能并不关心,因为 2027 年已经到来,JKM 价格比去年同期低 50%,而且总体天然气情绪[负面]。

“但切萨皮克的领先地位最终应该会通过 JKM 的曝光和任何液化天然气股份的货币化而得到回报,”他总结道。

戴尔奥索表示,“该协议反映了我们具有竞争力的海恩斯维尔天然气资产的优质岩石、回报和跑道的强大结合,以及我们安全供应全球液化天然气市场的资产负债表和财务状况的实力。”

海恩斯维尔液化天然气优势?

Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH) 分析师 Matt Portillo 写道,“在我们看来,这是个好消息,因为围绕上游参与全球液化天然气承包的讨论很多,但交易很少”到目前为止,仅向纯粹的天然气生产商展示。”

障碍是什么?“我们认为,在美国上游完成交易的一些限制因素是资源的位置”,因为]美国东北部大量的低成本库存仍然受到管道的限制”以及]信用质量和规模的交易对手——这]将大多数私人运营商和较小的公众排除在外。”

“赫萨皮克在寻求垂直整合全球液化天然气市场的天然气独立公司中名列前茅。”Subash Chandra,Benchmark Co.

还有一个障碍:“承保海恩斯维尔 10 至 15 年合同的库存深度对海恩斯维尔的许多生产商来说是一个限制。”

和钱德拉一样,他也喜欢这笔交易。“我们认为,它]验证了切萨皮克的交易对手和资源质量,并继续使该公司能够长期从多元化的营销组合中受益。”

与此同时,切萨皮克首席财务官莫希特·辛格表示,切萨皮克继续致力于达到投资级信用评分。“我们将继续积极与评级机构合作,”他在 2 月 22 日的公司财报电话会议上表示。

他补充说,在完成出售其三个 Eagle Ford 投资组合中的两个后,该公司收到了 17 亿美元的税后现金,再加上几年后额外的 4.5 亿美元,“从评级机构的角度来看,这被认为是积极的”。

“总的来说,他们需要看到的只是更多的调味和时间以及金融政策和金融纪律,我们将继续展示这一点。他们喜欢这一切,”他说。

“这只是时间和持续参与的问题。” 我们仍然相信,达到投资率只是时间问题。”

原文链接/hartenergy

Chesapeake LNG Deal Moves Its Haynesville Gas Closer to Global Price

In an LNG deal, up to 100 Bcf/year of the operator’s Haynesville production will be indexed to the Japan Korea Marker.

In an LNG deal, up to 100 Bcf/year of the operator’s Haynesville production will be indexed to the Japan Korea Marker. (Source: Shutterstock.com)

Chesapeake Energy Corp. has moved closer to getting overseas pricing for its Haynesville Shale gas, signing a heads of agreement (HOA) on nearly 100 Bcf/year for 15 years beginning in 2027.Chesapeake’s deal is with commodities trader Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd. and has Chesapeake’s Haynesville gas price indexed to the Japan Korea Marker (JKM), according to Chesapeake’s announcement.

And there could be more deals, according to Nick Dell'Osso, Chesapeake president and CEO. “… We look forward to entering into additional agreements while export capacity continues to come online."

Chesapeake has been waiting to win an investment-grade credit rating to commit to a firm LNG supply contract.

“Chesapeake jumps to the head of the queue among gas independents seeking vertical integrated exposure to global LNG markets,” Subash Chandra, analyst for Benchmark Co., wrote about the agreement.

Upon consummation, Chesapeake will join Devon Energy Corp. and EOG Resources Inc. in direct-sales contracts for a premium price.

Chandra noted that the independent has been teeing up for this next step. “Chesapeake has the gas, firm transport to the LNG corridor [and] an agreement with a global LNG marketer.”

The delivery start is targeted for 2027. It and Gunvor are now looking at LNG facilities at which Gunvor will receive the gas via a “free on board” (FOB) basis, the two companies reported.

Chandra wrote, “Chesapeake may use their assets to push a pre-FID [final investment decision] LNG project across the finish line. They could also take an equity interest in the facility on a pre-FID basis.”

He noted that several—estimated at up to six—LNG projects are anticipated to make their FID this year and “several are delayed, so there are many candidates.”

It might not be exciting news, he added.


RELATED: Chesapeake Energy, Gunvor Sign 15-year LNG Agreement for Haynesville Gas


“The market may not care right now because 2027 is out there, JKM prices are 50% below year-ago levels and [negative,] general gas sentiment.

“But Chesapeake’s pole position should ultimately pay off with JKM exposure and monetization of any LNG stake,” he concluded.

Dell'Osso said that the “agreement reflects the powerful combination of the premium rock, returns and runway of our competitively positioned Haynesville natural gas assets, combined with the strength of our balance sheet and financial position to securely supply global LNG markets.”

Haynesville LNG advantage?

Matt Portillo, analyst for Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. (TPH), wrote that it was “good news to see, in our view, as there has been a lot of discussion around upstream participation in global LNG contracting but few deals to show so far for pure-play gas producers.”

What’s been the impediment? “In our view, some of the limiting factors to get deals across the finish line in U.S. upstream have been location of resource—[as] significant low-cost Northeast U.S. inventory remains constrained by pipe—[and] credit quality and the scale of counterparties—[that] precludes most private operators and smaller publics.”

“Chesapeake jumps to the head of the queue among gas independents seeking vertical integrated exposure to global LNG markets.” Subash Chandra, Benchmark Co.

And there is this hurdle too: “Inventory depth to underwrite 10- to 15-year contracts from the Haynesville [is] a constraint for a number of producers in the Haynesville ….”

Like Chandra, he liked the deal. “[It] validates the counterparty- and resource-quality boxes for Chesapeake in our view, and continues to position the company to benefit from a diversified marketing portfolio longer term.”

Meanwhile, Chesapeake continues to work on reaching an investment-grade credit score, according to Mohit Singh, CFO. “We remain actively engaged with the rating agencies,” he said in the company’s earnings call Feb. 22.

The $1.7 billion in after-tax cash it receives upon closing the sale of two of its three Eagle Ford portfolios, plus an additional $450 million in a few years is “considered positive from the rating agency perspective,” he added.

“Overall, what they need to see is just some more seasoning and time and financial policy and financial discipline, which we continue to demonstrate. They like all of that,” he said.

“It’s just more a matter of time and continued engagement. And we remain confident it’s a matter of time until we get to investment rate.”