团体披露石油监管机构将担保金额减半,加州 2024 年新石油钻探许可证数量降至 73 个

来源:www.gulfoilandgas.com 2025 年 2 月 5 日,地点:北美

消费者监督机构和 FracTracker Alliance 今天表示,虽然加州新油井钻探许可证的批准数量从州长纽森上任时的 2019 年的 2,664 个减少到 2024 年的 73 个,但 2024 年结束时,石油监管机构未能要求提供足够的担保以保护纳税人免受大规模石油收购交易中的封堵和清理工作的影响。

相反,监管机构通过法律漏洞将加州资源公司 (CRC) 收购 Aera Energy 的担保要求减半,降至 3000 万美元,用于一笔“共同责任”债券,而不是考虑两笔总额最高 6000 万美元的债券,尽管 ProPublica 报告称 Aera 的封堵成本起价为 11 亿美元。

消费者权益倡导者 Liza Tucker 说:“我们赞扬纽森政府减少许可证批准数量。” “但现在石油钻探即将结束,州政府正将加州人置于严重的财政风险之中,而不是确保石油公司有足够的资金来封堵油井并清理他们的烂摊子。证据一是政府对 CRC 和 Aera Energy 的纵容,这两家公司现在是加州最大的陆上石油生产商。纽森政府减少了而不是增加了油井的担保金额。”

FracTracker Alliance 西部项目总监 Kyle Ferrar 表示:“CRC 一直是加州低产油气井的海绵,该公司已经进行了第 11 章重组。”“我们的研究表明,CRC 和 Aera 的平均日产量低得不可持续,很难从这些油井中获利以妥善封堵它们,更不用说补救 Aera 油田的环境污染了。因此,加州为这些公司获得足够的担保至关重要。”


州长纽森于 2023 年签署了 AB 1167(Carrillo)法案,要求油气井运营商对从其他公司收购的油井和生产设施进行充分担保。与环境保护部 (DOC) 下属的加州地质能源管理部门 (CalGEM) 的这种担保确保了最终的封堵和复垦成本由运营商承担,而不是公众承担,纽森因签署该法案而受到环保倡导者的广泛赞扬。

去年 6 月,时任环境保护部主任的戴维·沙巴齐安 (David Shabazian) 拒绝遵守该法律。在给该法案作者、众议员温迪·卡里洛 (Wendy Carrillo) 的一封似是而非的信中,沙巴齐安表示:“根据美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 的文件和提供给该部门的材料,很明显,只有 Aera Energy LLC 的所有权被转让,而不是 Aera 的任何资产。”


卡里洛和其他九名加州议员曾致信 CalGEM,要求强制执行对 Aera 收购的全额担保。议员们写道:“该措辞触发了任何类型的转让的全额担保要求,列举了各种例子(‘通过购买、转让、分配、让与、交换或其他处置’)。”迄今为止,还没有律师提起诉讼要求强制执行该法律。

消费者监督组织和 FracTracker Alliance 指出,Shabazian 破坏了这项法律,并指出他与 Jason Marshall 的关系,Shabazian 辞职。Jason Marshall 在 DOC 工作了 28 年,之后转而为 CRC 工作,而 Shabazian 在 CRC/Aera 交易中做出的担保决定也让 CRC 受益匪浅。

收购 Aera 后,CRC 现在控制着 38,000 多口油井,其中 14,000 口处于闲置状态。这些闲置油井现在占该州所有闲置油井的 40% 左右,是所有运营商中持有油井最多的。研究表明,在加州调查的闲置油井中,65% 存在可测量的甲烷等碳氢化合物气体泄漏,而甲烷是气候变化的主要驱动因素。气候变化的影响增加了加州乃至全世界野火发生的频率和严重程度。据生物多样性中心、自然资源保护委员会、中央环境正义网络和 ClientEarth USA 称,封堵所有油井至少需要花费 45 亿美元。CRC 至少应该维持 24 亿美元的债券,才能覆盖 Aera 的闲置和产量微乎其微的油井。

据 ProPublica 报道,在被收购之前,Aera 的债券价值仅为 300 万美元。“CalGEM 没有遵守法律并要求 Aera Energy 为其油井提供 3000 万美元的债券,而是取消了 Aera 的 300 万美元债券,”费拉尔说。 “CalGEM 文件显示,Aera 的油井现在已纳入 CRC 与 CRC 其他子公司的责任分担协议的保护范围,这显然看起来像是资产所有权和资产管理的转变。”


据 ProPublica 报道,在收购 Aera Energy 后,CRC 现在只有 3000 万美元的担保金来覆盖 38,000 口油井。监管机构声称,这些实体的资产仍然是分开的,但监管漏洞允许这两个实体分担责任。“一方面,石油监管机构表示,根据新法律,这是两家公司,不负责全额担保,另一方面,这些公司通过作为单一实体分担责任,减少了担保要求,”塔克说。“这不是对公众的保护,而是对石油钻探者的保护。”

2019 年的一项法律 AB 1057(Limon)授权 CalGEM 要求运营商提供额外的财务担保,以支付正确封堵和废弃运营商油井以及退役任何基础设施的合理费用,但不得超过 3000 万美元。这可以采取为所有油井提供综合担保的形式。

但法律允许运营商与其他运营商签订“责任分担协议”,并被视为单一运营商,担保金的上限同样为 3000 万美元。 “从理论上讲,这意味着一个团体的所有成员,比如加州独立石油协会,都可以签署这样的协议,只需为 500 家原油和天然气生产商的油井提供 3000 万美元的担保,”塔克说。“这是一个荒谬的漏洞,立法者必须立即填补,此外还要取消 3000 万美元的担保上限。”

CRC 本身于 2014 年从西方石油公司分拆出来,以摆脱加州的债务,其总部仍设在洛杉矶,加州历史上最严重的野火正在这里发生。“对于一家总部位于洛杉矶的公司来说,封堵闲置油井以减少气候变化的加剧应该是首要任务,但 CRC 的封堵记录在加州石油巨头中是最差的之一,”费拉尔说。根据 AB 2729 的要求,根据 CRC 向 CalGEM 提交的年度闲置油井报告,Ferrar 估计,CRC 在 2023 年封堵了 10% 的闲置油井。根据加州游说记录,CRC 没有封堵更多油井,而是在 2024 年花费了近 220 万美元用于竞选资金和游说。


“其他州有加州所没有的勇气,”塔克说。“虽然加州没有勇气强制 Aera 的油井进行充分担保,但阿拉斯加在处理将 BP 油井出售给另一家石油公司时却毫不犹豫,”塔克说。

在石油公司破产重创阿拉斯加之后,该州加强了收购交易中的担保要求。为了完成 BP 以 56 亿美元的价格将其石油业务转让给 Hilcorp,负责监管石油和天然气活动的阿拉斯加石油和天然气保护委员会要求 BP 在 2022 年前为其 1,776 口油井维持 3000 万美元的担保,Hilcorp 在同一期限前为其 1,042 口油井提供相同金额的担保。负责开发该州自然资源的自然资源部与公司签订了财务担保协议,其中还对关闭州土地上所有石油基础设施的预期成本进行了严格的财务实力审查。

在过去两年中,与纽森上任后的头四年相比,加州每年批准的新钻探许可证数量下降了数千个。这是由于大多数地区的储备资源枯竭,以及加州能源管理部门 (CalGEM) 对环境影响评估的要求越来越严格,导致没有完成环境影响评估的项目无法推进。塔克说:“下一章是关于避免财政灾难。”

FracTracker Alliance 分析了 CalGEM 油井许可证数量
2024 年,新的钻探许可达到 73 个,而返工许可证达到 1,468 个。其中 33 个许可证是在土地管理局控制的联邦土地上颁发的。环境律师表示,CalGEM 也签署了这些许可证,但做得不好,使用了过时且不充分的 BLM 环境审查来签署。此外,2024 年第四季度的封堵许可证减少了 38%,与 2023 年第四季度形成鲜明对比。(见图 2。)如需了解更多信息,请访问由消费者监督组织和 FracTracker Alliance 运营的 Newsomwellwatch.com。

美国钻井新闻 >>



美国 >> 2025 年 2 月 5 日 ——虽然加州新油井钻探许可证的批准数量从州长纽森上任时的 2019 年的 2,664 个减少到 2024 年的 73 个,但 2024 年结束时……
西班牙 >> 2025 年 2 月 4 日 - Prospex Energy plc (AIM: PXEN) 是一家专注于欧洲天然气和电力项目的 AIM 上市投资公司,该公司欣然宣布已收到...

挪威 >> 2025 年 1 月 31 日 - 挪威海上管理局已向 Vær Energi ASA 颁发了 1090 号生产许可证中 7/1-4 S 井眼的钻探许可证,参见《挪威海上油气法》第 13 条...
加拿大>> 2025 年 1 月 30 日 - NexGen Energy Ltd.(“NexGen”)(多伦多证券交易所代码:NXE)(纽约证券交易所代码:NXE)(澳大利亚证券交易所代码:NXG)很高兴地宣布开始 43,000 米(m)的勘探钻探计划......




原文链接/GulfOilandGas

New 2024 CA Oil Drilling Permits Drop to 73 As Groups Reveal Oil Regulators Halved Bonding

Source: www.gulfoilandgas.com 2/5/2025, Location: North America

While approvals for new oil well drilling permits in California dwindled to 73 in 2024–from 2,664 in 2019 when Governor Newsom took office, 2024 ended with oil regulators dropping the ball on requiring adequate amounts of bonding to protect taxpayers from plugging and cleanup in a massive oil acquisition deal, Consumer Watchdog and FracTracker Alliance said today.

Instead, regulators halved the bonding requirement for the California Resources Corp. (CRC) acquisition of Aera Energy to $30 million for one "shared liability" bond instead of considering two bonds totaling a maximum $60 million, via a legal loophole, even though ProPublica reports Aera's well plugging costs start at $1.1 billion.

"We commend the Newsom Administration for dwindling permit approvals," said Consumer Advocate Liza Tucker. "But now that oil drilling is sunsetting, the state is exposing Californians to grave fiscal risk instead of making sure the money is there for oil companies to plug wells and clean up their messes. Exhibit A is the Administration's coddling of CRC and Aera Energy that now make up the biggest onshore oil producer in California. The Newsom Administration reduced the amount of their bonding of wells instead of increasing it."

"CRC has been a sponge for low producing oil and gas wells in California, and the company has already undergone Chapter 11 reorganization," said Kyle Ferrar, Western Program Director at FracTracker Alliance. "Our research shows that average daily per well production for CRC and Aera is unsustainably low, and it will be hard to generate profit from these wells to properly plug them, much less remediate the environmental contamination of Aera's oil fields. It's therefore incredibly vital that California obtains sufficient bonding for these companies."


Governor Newsom signed AB 1167 (Carrillo) into law in 2023, requiring oil and gas well operators to adequately bond wells and production facilities acquired from another company. This bonding with the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM) under the Department of Conservation (DOC) ensures the eventual plugging and reclamation costs are covered by the operator, not the public, and Newsom was widely praised by environmental advocates for its signing.

Last June, David Shabazian, the then director of the Department of Conservation, refused to honor the law. In a specious letter to the bill's author, Assembly Member Wendy Carrillo, Shabazian stated, "Based on the SEC filings and materials provided to the Department, it is evident that only ownership of Aera Energy LLC is being transferred, not any of Aera's assets."


Carrillo and nine other California lawmakers had written to CalGEM to argue that full bonding of the Aera purchase should be enforced. "The wording triggers the full-cost bonding requirement upon any type of transfer, with a broad array of examples listed ('by purchase, transfer, assignment, conveyance, exchange, or other disposition')," the lawmakers wrote. To date, no attorneys have sued to enforce the law.

Shabazian stepped down after Consumer Watchdog and FracTracker Alliance pointed out Shabazian's undermining of this law and his relationship with Jason Marshall, who spent 28 years at the DOC before going to work for CRC that benefited from Shabazian's questionable decisions on bonding in the CRC/Aera deal.

After the Aera acquisition, CRC now controls more than 38,000 wells—14,000 of them idle. These idle wells now make up about 40% of all idle wells in the state, the most held by any operator. Research shows that 65% of idle wells surveyed in California have measurable leaks of hydrocarbon gases like methane, a major driver of climate change. The effects of climate change have increased the frequency and severity of wildfires in California and around the world. Plugging all the wells would cost at least $4.5 billion, according to the Center for Biological Diversity, NRDC, the Central Environmental Justice Network, and ClientEarth USA. At the very least, CRC should have to maintain a bond of $2.4 billion just to cover Aera's idle and marginally producing wells.

Prior to being acquired, Aera had only $3 million worth of bonding, according to ProPublica. "Instead of following the law and requiring Aera Energy to put up $30 million in bonding for its wells, CalGEM eliminated Aera's $3 million bond," said Ferrar. "CalGEM documents show that now Aera's wells are now covered under the umbrella of CRC's liability sharing agreement with CRC's other subsidiaries, which certainly seems like a change in ownership of assets and asset management."


After acquiring Aera Energy, CRC now has just $30 million in bonding to cover 38,000 wells, ProPublica reported. Regulators assert the entities' assets remained separate, but a regulatory loophole allows the two entities to share liability. "On the one hand, oil regulators say these are two companies and not responsible for full bonding under new laws, on the other hand the companies reduced their bonding requirement by sharing liability as a single entity," said Tucker. "This isn't public protection, it's oil driller protection."

A 2019 law, AB 1057 (Limon), authorizes CalGEM to require operators to provide additional financial security covering reasonable costs of properly plugging and abandoning the operator's wells and decommissioning any infrastructure, but not to exceed $30 million. This can be in the form of a blanket bond for all wells owned.

But the law allows operators to enter a "liability sharing agreement" with other operators and be treated as a single operator, again with an upper limit of $30 million in bonding. "Theoretically, this means that all the members of a group, say in the California Independent Petroleum Association, could enter into such an agreement and only have to put up $30 million in bonding covering wells belonging to 500 crude oil and natural gas producers," said Tucker. "This is a ridiculous loophole that lawmakers must immediately close, in addition to removing the $30 million bonding cap."

CRC itself was spun off from Occidental Petroleum in 2014 to shed California liabilities, and is still headquartered in Los Angeles, where the most devastating wildfires in California history are actively occurring. "For an LA-based company, plugging idle wells to reduce the exacerbation of climate change should be a top priority, but CRC maintains one of the poorest well plugging track records of California's oil majors," said Ferrar. CRC plugged 10% of their idle well portfolio in 2023, Ferrar estimates, based on annual idle well reports to CalGEM as required by AB 2729. Instead of plugging more, CRC spent almost $2.2 million in campaign finance and lobbying in 2024, according to California state lobbying records.


"Other states have the courage that California doesn't," said Tucker. "While California didn't have the nerve to compel the adequate bonding of Aera's wells, Alaska didn't blink when it came to how they handled the sale of BP wells to another oil company," Tucker said.

After oil company bankruptcies hurt Alaska, the state toughened up bonding requirements in acquisition deals. For BP to close a $5.6 billion deal to transfer its oil business to Hilcorp, the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission that oversees oil and gas activities required BP to maintain $30 million in bonding for its 1,776 wells by 2022 and Hilcorp to put up the same amount for its 1,042 wells by the same deadline. The Department of Natural Resources that develops the state's natural resources enters into financial assurance agreements with companies in which rigorous reviews of financial strength are also conducted on the expected cost to retire all of the oil infrastructure on state lands.

Over the last two years, annual counts of California's new drilling permit approvals have fallen by thousands compared to Newsom's first four years in office. This is the result of exhausted reserves in most regions, and stricter California Energy Management Division (CalGEM) requirements for environmental impact reviews preventing projects without complete environmental impact assessments from moving forward. "The next chapter is all about avoiding a fiscal trainwreck," said Tucker.

CalGEM well permit numbers analyzed by FracTracker Alliance
In 2024, new drilling approvals came to 73, while rework permits came to 1,468. 33 of the permits were issued on federal land controlled by the Bureau of Land Management. CalGEM also signs off on these permits but did a bad job, using an outdated and inadequate BLM environmental review to do so, according to environmental lawyers. Additionally plugging permits decreased by 38% in the fourth quarter of 2024, a stark contrast to the fourth quarter of 2023. (See Figure 2.) Go to Newsomwellwatch.com, operated by Consumer Watchdog and FracTracker Alliance, for more information.

Drilling News in United States >>



United States >>  2/5/2025 - While approvals for new oil well drilling permits in California dwindled to 73 in 2024–from 2,664 in 2019 when Governor Newsom took office, 2024 ended...
Spain >>  2/4/2025 - Prospex Energy plc (AIM: PXEN), the AIM quoted investment company focused on European gas and power projects, is pleased to announce that it has recei...

Norway >>  1/31/2025 - The Norwegian Offshore Directorate has granted Vår Energi ASA drilling permit for wellbore 7/1-4 S in production licence 1090, cf. Section 13 of the R...
Canada >>  1/30/2025 - NexGen Energy Ltd. ("NexGen") (TSX: NXE) (NYSE: NXE) (ASX: NXG) is excited to announce the commencement of a 43,000 meter (m) exploration drill progra...