2024 年 9 月
专栏

分馏还是不分馏,这是个问题

我们在勘探工作中学到什么呢?不仅仅是找到有商业价值的碳氢化合物,还了解了化石燃料、水和其他气体之间的流体动力学。显然,我们学到了很多。
William (Bill) Head / 特约编辑

在勘探工作中,我们学到了什么?不仅仅是为了找到商业碳氢化合物,还为了了解化石燃料、水和其他气体之间的流体动力学?显然,我们学到了很多。看看世界各地在几年前没有人认为可能存在碳氢化合物的地方进行的所有新勘探。在物质平衡方程中稍微改变几个数字,记住水平水力压裂如何将油藏变成储层加上 70 美元的石油,你就明白了。使用水力压裂法是答案,但在进行诚实的评估之前,我们应该忽略旧的“经验法则”。 

如果你错过了,这里有两个启发来源: 

  • Steve Metzger:二氧化碳会议存档演示文稿。本次会议讨论了水库、水和二氧化碳问题,正在重塑“经验法则”。https: //co2conference.net/ 

开发非常规天然气 (DUG) 思维在世界各地产生了重大影响,增加了石油和凝析油等储量。但公寓和政府的反对者继续说:“等一下,在开始之前,可能还会有更多。”战斗开始了。 

如果您认为反对在北坡钻探的理由很新颖,那么请再想想。地图上的区域(图 1) ——新近的碳氢化合物勘探区——包含许多只有国家公园才能支持的独特栖息地。野生动物机构​​记录显示,由于大象数量过剩造成的破坏,公园内的所有野生动物都面临大规模饥饿的威胁。一头大象通常会砍伐树木和任何绿色植物,每天消耗约 500 磅。大象对植物的破坏程度远超任何石油活动。事实上,200 年前大象数量超过 100 万头,而现在有争议的是,大象数量约为 30 万至 40 万头,主要集中在地图上的博茨瓦纳地区。 

编辑观点。去过那里,做过那事。我参加了上述地图上同一地区的国际认可野生动物计划。我们亲眼目睹了这场灾难。适当的公园管理和保护和维持生命的国家政策是有争议的。一个常见的指控是,CITES 的欧洲美国成员的腐败和干涉阻碍了其他地方经常使用的有益保护措施。https://cites.org/eng/disc/what.php 

CITES 成员名单和成员数量的增加表明,几乎没有非洲国家能够决定野生动物管理的命运。为中国市场偷猎象牙比勘探更具影响力。世界自然基金会声称,中国最近同意禁止进口象牙,这减少了偷猎行为,但每年仍有近 20,000 头大象被杀。https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/two-years-after-china-bans-elephant-ivory-trade-demand-for-elephant-ivory-is-down 

因此,对于旧金山那些为拯救大象的努力而感到政治悲痛的公寓居民来说,这些影响者并没有孤立他们的意识形态。加州一位名人甚至最近向全世界表示,碳氢化合物勘探永远是坏事。请谨慎投票,图 2。 

关于作者
威廉(比尔)海德
特约编辑
威廉(比尔)·海德是一位技术专家,在美国和国际勘探领域拥有 40 多年的经验。
相关文章
原文链接/WorldOil
September 2024
COLUMNS

To frac, or not to frac, that is the question

What have we learned in exploration from working, not just to find commercial hydrocarbons, but also to understand fluid dynamics among fossil fuels, waters and other gases? Apparently, a lot.
William (Bill) Head / Contributing Editor

What have we learned in exploration from working, not just to find commercial hydrocarbons, but also to understand fluid dynamics among fossil fuels, waters and other gases? Apparently, a lot. Look at all the new exploration occurring around the world in places no one a few years ago thought of as hydrocarbon possible. Change a few numbers slightly in material balance equations, remember how fracking horizontally made shows into reservoirs plus $70 oil, and there you go. Using the fracking method is the answer, but we should ignore the old “rules of thumb” before conducting an honest evaluation. 

Two sources of enlightenment in case you missed them: 

  • Steve Metzger: CO2 conference archived presentations. This conference, which discusses reservoirs, water, and CO2 issues, is remaking the “rules of thumb.” https://co2conference.net/ 

The impact of developing unconventional gas (DUG) thinking around the world has been more than significant in exploration with the addition of reserves—including oil and condensates. But adversaries in apartments and governments continue to say, "Wait, before you start, there may be a bit more." The fight is on. 

If you think the objection to drilling on the North Slope was novel, well, think again. The area on the map (Fig. 1)—new to hydrocarbon exploration—contains many unique habitats seconded only by national parks. Wildlife agencies document that all wildlife in the parks is threatened with mass starvation, due to the devastation caused by elephant overpopulation. A typical elephant will tear down trees and about anything green, consuming about 500 lb daily. Elephants are destroying plant life on an order of magnitude beyond any oil activity. Indeed, elephant populations of over a million, 200 years ago, are now disputedly about 300,000 to 400,000, mainly concentrated in the Botswana area on the map. 

Editorial Opinion. Been there, done that. I participated in an internationally sanctioned wildlife program in the same area on the above map. We witnessed the devastation firsthand. Proper park management and national policies to protect and sustain life are controversial. A common allegation is that corruption and interference by the Euro Am members of CITES prevent beneficial conservation practices regularly used elsewhere. https://cites.org/eng/disc/what.php 

The names of CITES members and the increase in members show that few—if any—African nations get to decide their own destiny with wildlife management. Poaching ivory for the Chinese market is far more impactful than exploration. WWF claims that China's recent agreement to ban imports of ivory has reduced poaching, but killings remain near 20,000 elephants per year. https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/two-years-after-china-bans-elephant-ivory-trade-demand-for-elephant-ivory-is-down 

So, for apartment dwellers in San Fransico making political grief for the very efforts to save elephants, those influencers do not isolate their ideology. A famous person from California even recently stated to the world that hydrocarbon exploration will always be bad. Be careful what you vote for, Fig. 2

About the Authors
William (Bill) Head
Contributing Editor
William (Bill) Head is a technologist with over 40 years of experience in U.S. and international exploration.
Related Articles