国际能源署表示,二叠纪和阿巴拉契亚盆地是天然气增产的最大参与者

国际能源署的新报告描绘了美国提高产量以及欧洲对俄罗斯天然气供应高度敏感的情况。

根据国际能源署 (IEA) 的数据,美国干天然气产量增长了 5.5%,尤其是二叠纪盆地,同比增长 15%,其中大部分来自美国页岩气区的额外天然气供应。全球天然气安全审查。

该评论最突出的一点是警告,如果俄罗斯在冬季减少对欧洲的供应,天然气价格可能会波动,但该评论还详细介绍了美国页岩在天然气生产中发挥的重要作用。

IEA 7月17日审查称,二叠纪盆地增量占美国天然气增量的35%以上,但阿巴拉契亚盆地总计占美国天然气总产量的30%,是美国最大的天然气来源地2023 年上半年,阿巴拉契亚山脉的巨大份额仅同比下降了 0.5%。

审查将Haynesville页岩气田列为2023年前六个月美国第二大天然气增量来源。该页岩气田位于德克萨斯州东北部和路易斯安那州西部,与之前相比,干气产量增加了近20%年。2023 年 5 月,阿卡迪亚海恩斯维尔延伸管道竣工,每年增加从海恩斯维尔区块到墨西哥湾沿岸的出口能力 4 Bcm。

稳定的钻井活动支持了产量的增长,2023 年第一季度平均每月钻探 471 口新井。评论称,完井量同比增长超过 15%。

此次审查下调了IEA的中长期天然气需求,但也说明了欧洲的不稳定局势,指出欧盟达到工作储气能力95%的可能性并不能保证得到保护抵御冬季的波动。寒冷的冬天和俄罗斯管道天然气的中断“很容易再次导致价格波动和市场紧张。”

贝克研究所全球天然气研究员史蒂文·迈尔斯 (Steven R. Miles) 表示,审查正确地指出,欧盟面临现货市场上涨的风险,但如果不签署更多长期合同,情况会比审查中描述的还要糟糕。莱斯大学能源研究系。

“根据我们的计算,欧洲每年依赖未合同液化天然气近 1500 亿立方米。正如 IEA 指出的那样,另外 150 Bcm/年的固定天然气合同将在未来几年到期,如果这些合同不续签并且签署其他新产量的长期合同,欧盟将严重面临液化天然气现货市场的风险,”迈尔斯说。

“即使假设供应总是可用的,”迈尔斯补充道,“基于现货市场前提的欧盟能源政策,‘无论我们需要什么,我们都会出价高于所有人’,当政府牺牲社会利益时,可能会导致价格过高和社会混乱。”为欧洲和北亚除最富有的能源地区以外的所有地区提供能源和能源贫困计划。 国际能源署在其报告中忽略了这些令人不安的事实。”

原文链接/hartenergy

Permian, Appalachian Basins Biggest Players in NatGas Production Increase, IEA Says

New IEA report depicts the U.S. boosting production and Europe’s high sensitivity to Russia’s gas supply.

Additional gas supply from U.S. shale plays made up most of America’s 5.5% increase in dry natural gas production, particularly in the Permian Basin with a 15% year-on-year increase, according to the International Energy Agency’s (IEA) Global Gas Security Review.

The review’s most salient point was a warning of possible gas price volatility if Russia squeezes off supply to Europe in the winter, but the review also detailed the American shale plays’ prominent roles in gas production.

The July 17 IEA review says the Permian Basin increases accounted for more than 35% of incremental gas output in the U.S., but in total, the Appalachian Basin is responsible for 30% of all U.S. gas production and the largest source of gas in the U.S. That hefty Appalachian share contracted just a bit—0.5% year-on-year in the first half of 2023.

The review put the Haynesville shale gas play as the second largest source of incremental gas in the U.S. in the first six months of 2023. The shale gas play located in northeastern Texas and western Louisiana boosted dry gas output by nearly 20% compared to the previous year. The May 2023 completion of the Acadian Haynesville Extension pipeline added 4 Bcm/year of exit capacity from the Haynesville play to the Gulf Coast.

Steady drilling activity supported the production increases with an average of 471 new wells drilled each month in the first quarter of 2023. Well completions increased more than 15% year-on-year, the review said.

The review revised down the IEA’s medium-to-long-term natural gas demand, but it also illustrated a precarious situation in Europe, stating that the EU’s likelihood of reaching 95% of working gas storage capacity is no guarantee of protection against volatility in the winter. A cold winter and a halt of Russian piped gas “could easily renew price volatility and market tensions.”

The review correctly states that the EU is exposed to spot market increases, but the situation is even worse than the review depicts if more long-term contracts are not signed, Steven R. Miles said, the Fellow of Global Natural Gas at the Baker Institute of Energy Studies at Rice University.

“Europe is by our calculation relying on uncontracted LNG for almost 150 billion cubic meters annually. As the IEA notes, an additional 150 Bcm/annually of firm gas contracts will be expiring in the next few years, leaving the EU heavily exposed to the LNG spot market if those contracts are not renewed and other long-term contracts for new volumes signed,” Miles said.

“Even assuming supplies will always be available," Miles added, "an EU energy policy based on a spot market premise of ‘we will outbid everyone for whatever we need’ can lead to exorbitant prices, social disruption when governments sacrifice social programs for energy and energy poverty for all but the richest energy blocks in Europe and North Asia. The IEA leaves these uncomfortable truths out of its report.”