石油价格


埃克森美孚在赤道几内亚这个来自中部非洲的欧佩克成员国中存在了三年之久,之后将离开赤道几内亚。

这家超级巨头 告诉 彭博社,它将把在该国的股份转让给政府,“我们现在的重点是安全移交业务并照顾所有受这一变化影响的人。”

埃克森美孚还补充说,退出是该公司长期战略的一部分。彭博社在其报告中指出,该战略侧重于在成本最低和增长最快的地区进行投资。这些地点包括圭亚那和二叠纪。

与此同时,有报道称法国 TotalEnergies 计划效仿同为超级巨头壳牌的脚步,退出尼日利亚陆上石油业务。壳牌上个月表示, 将以 13 亿美元的价格出售其在尼日利亚的陆上业务。

TotalEnergies 首席执行官 Patrick Pouyanne 在发布 2023 年财务业绩时表示,“从根本上来说”是因为在尼日尔三角洲生产这种石油不符合我们的[健康、安全和环境]政策,“一个真正的困难。”

几十年来,尼日利亚的陆上石油生产一直存在问题,尽管政府努力控制,但管道破坏和基础设施破坏仍然猖獗。

然而,路透社在一份报告中指出,这两家超级巨头将继续留在尼日利亚的海上石油行业,该行业利润更高,问题也更少 

接受彭博社采访的一位分析师表示,说到问题,这些可能是埃克森美孚决定离开赤道几内亚的一个重要原因。

休斯敦贝克研究所莱斯大学能源研究中心主任肯·梅德洛克告诉新闻媒体,埃克森美孚在决定如何处理其几内亚业务之前,必须考虑不确定的监管制度和政治稳定。

“如果这些风险增加,如果公司有其他风险回报更好的机会,他们可能会收拾行李离开,”他解释道。

查尔斯·肯尼迪 (Charles Kennedy) 为 Oilprice.com 撰写

 


原文链接/oilandgas360

Oil Price


Exxon is leaving Equatorial Guinea after a three-decade presence in the OPEC member from Central Africa.

The supermajor told Bloomberg that it will transfer its holdings in the country to the government and that “Our focus now is on a safe handover of operations and caring for all impacted by this change.”

Exxon also added that the exit was part of the company’s long-term strategy. That strategy focuses on investments in the lowest-cost and fastest-growth locations, Bloomberg noted in its report. These locations include Guyana and the Permian.

The news coincided with reports that French TotalEnergies was planning to exit onshore oil in Nigeria, following in the footsteps of fellow supermajor Shell, which last month said it would sell its onshore business in the country for $1.3 billion.

Speaking at the release of TotalEnergies’ financial results for 2023, CEO Patrick Pouyanne said that “Fundamentally it’s because producing this oil in the Niger Delta is not in line with our [Health, Security and Environmental] policies, it’s a real difficulty.”

Onshore oil production in Nigeria has been problematic for decades, with pipeline vandalism and infrastructure sabotage rampant despite government efforts to rein these in.

Both supermajors, however, will remain in Nigeria’s offshore oil sector, which is more lucrative while less problematic, Reuters noted in a report.

Speaking of problems, these could have been a big reason for Exxon’s decision to leave Equatorial Guinea, according to one analyst interviewed by Bloomberg.

Uncertain regulatory regimes and political stability must have been among the factors Exxon considered before deciding what to do with its Guinea business, the director of Rice University’s Center for Energy Studies at the Baker Institute in Houston, Ken Medlock, told the news outlet.

“If those risks mount, companies could pack up and leave if they have other opportunities with a better risk-reward profile,” he explained.

By Charles Kennedy for Oilprice.com