探索/发现

巴伦支海的泥火山暗示存在未经证实的烃源岩

五月份的一次探险活动在挪威大陆架发现了 10 座泥火山,目前正在进行地球化学和生物地层学测试,以确定泥浆的年龄和碳氢化合物的潜力。

NOD-EXTREME24.jpeg
这些泥火山是 EXTREME24 探险队使用 RV Kronprins Haakon 研究船发现的。
来源:Rune Mattingsdal/NOD

五月底,巴伦支海研究探险队发现了几座海底泥火山,可能表明存在碳氢化合物源岩。

挪威海洋管理局 (NOD) 于 6 月 6 日表示,由挪威北极大学 UiT 指导的 EXTREME24 探险队使用RV Kronprins Haakon研究船在巴伦支海西部 1,440 英尺至 1,575 英尺深的水域发现了 10 座泥火山。去年,他们在同一大片区域发现了 Borealis 泥火山,这是 2023 年预定区域奖的一部分。

NOD 地质学家 Rune Mattingsdal 于 5 月 24 日至 31 日参加了此次探险。

他告诉《石油技术杂志》,泥火山通常与气体渗漏有关,有可能提供有关地下石油系统的信息。他说,气体渗漏在巴伦支海很常见,但在今年的探险之前,该地区只证实有两座泥火山。

他说,由于碳氢化合物与泥火山有关,他相信巴伦支海的发现将引起业界的兴趣。

NOD 通讯、公共关系和应急响应总监 Ola Anders Skauby 表示,NOD 分享这些信息,希望其他人能够利用自己的地质知识补充这些信息,以更好地了解在该地区寻找碳氢化合物的可能性。

1990年,第一座泥火山哈康莫斯比在巴伦支海被发现,而直到去年,北极光才被发现。

Mattingsdal 称 Borealis 泥火山的发现“有点令人意外”,但他表示,了解 Borealis 在地震中的出现方式,使得在现有的 2D 和 3D 地震中找到类似特征成为可能,然后绘制出其他潜在的泥火山位置(图 1)。遥控潜水器 (ROV) 调查了候选地点,并使用多波束回声测深法验证了泥火山。

NOD-海床地图-泥火山.jpg
图 1-左图:未经处理的 33 英尺分辨率海底地图显示了发现的泥火山之一。这里显示的泥火山是海底的一个土丘,直径约为 1,970 英尺至 2,300 英尺,比周围的海床高出约 23 英尺,有明显迹象表明周围的海床已被淤泥覆盖,淤泥在海床上形成了土丘。
右图:穿过泥火山的地震线清楚地显示了泥火山下方大片区域涌出的泥浆的地震迹象。泥浆的来源似乎很浅,不超过海底下约 1,300 英尺。
来源:NOD

候选泥火山的数量比已发现的数量还多。

他说道:“我们还得到迹象表明,北极星地区还有更多陨石,但我们无法进行探索。”

泥火山是粘土或其他细颗粒物质的堆积体,它们与气体、水,有时还有石油一起流出,出现在海床或地球表面(图 2)。

NOD-Mud-Fresh-Older-R1.jpg
图 2 —— ROV 照片显示新鲜泥浆(浅灰色)最近流过旧海床(深金灰色)。
来源:NOD

“这是一个由加压气体推动泥浆上升的过程,与上覆层相比,这种泥浆的压实程度较低。这就是在海洋环境中泥浆能够浮出海底的原因,”他说。“它们在世界某些地区的陆地上非常普遍。”

马廷斯达尔去年研究了阿塞拜疆陆上的泥火山,他表示这些泥火山与探险队用 ROV 看到的非常相似。

他说道:“为了证明它们是泥火山,我们需要证明喷出的泥浆是古老的,但我们还没有做到这一点。”

他补充说,ROV 收集了样本进行地球化学和生物地层学测试,预计几周后就会得到初步结果。

他说,地球化学测试结果将提供更多关于泥浆年龄的信息,包括沉积物中是否存在气体或其他碳氢化合物,以及这些碳氢化合物可能来自何处。他说,生物地层学结果将需要更多时间。

接下来是寻找更多的泥火山。

“我们非常肯定那里还有更多,”马丁斯达尔说。

泥火山的发现,结合石油和天然气渗漏研究,可能表明巴伦支海具有碳氢化合物勘探前景。

他说:“我们认为巴伦支海这部分地区可能存在尚未证实的烃源岩,因此发现泥火山是获取地球化学研究所需样本的绝佳机会,这些样本无需实际钻探就能告诉我们一些有关地下的情况。”

他说,他希望业内人士对泥火山的发现感兴趣,并在该地区进行后续探索。

原文链接/JPT
Exploration/discoveries

Mud Volcanos in Barents Sea Suggest Unproven Source Rocks

A May expedition identified 10 mud volcanos on the Norwegian Continental Shelf, and geochemical and biostratigraphy tests are underway to determine the age of the mud and the potential for hydrocarbons.

NOD-EXTREME24.jpeg
The mud volcanoes were discovered by the EXTREME24 expedition using the RV Kronprins Haakon research vessel.
Source: Rune Mattingsdal/NOD

A Barents Sea research expedition at the end of May located several subsea mud volcanos that may indicate hydrocarbon source rocks.

The Norwegian Offshore Directorate (NOD) on 6 June said the EXTREME24 expedition under the direction of UiT The Arctic University of Norway using the RV Kronprins Haakon research vessel proved 10 mud volcanos in water depths of 1,440–1,575 ft in the western Barents Sea. The discovery follows last year’s finding of the Borealis mud volcano in the same general area, which was part of the Awards in Predefined Areas 2023.

Rune Mattingsdal, a geologist with NOD, took part in the expedition from 24 to 31 May.

Mud volcanoes, typically associated with gas seeps, have the potential to provide information about subsurface petroleum systems, he told the Journal of Petroleum Technology. He said gas seeps are common in the Barents Sea but only two mud volcanoes had been proven in the area until this year’s expedition.

Because of the association of hydrocarbons with mud volcanoes, he said he believes the discoveries in the Barents Sea will be interesting to the industry.

Ola Anders Skauby, NOD’s director of communication, public relations, and emergency response, said the NOD is sharing the information in the hope that others will supplement the information with their own geological knowledge to better understand the potential for finding hydrocarbons in the region.

In 1990, Haakon Mosby, the first mud volcano, was discovered in the Barents Sea, and it was not until last year that Borealis was discovered.

Mattingsdal called the Borealis mud volcano discovery “a bit of a surprise” but said understanding how Borealis appeared on seismic made it possible to find similar features in existing 2D and 3D seismic and then to map out other potential mud volcano locations (Fig. 1). A remotely operated vehicle (ROV) investigated the candidates and used multibeam echo sounding to verify the mud volcanoes.

NOD-Seabed-Map-Mud-Volcano.jpg
Fig. 1—Left: An unprocessed seabed map at 33-ft resolution shows one of the mud volcanos that was discovered. The mud volcano shown here is a mound on the seabed, around 1,970–2,300 ft in diameter, about 23 ft higher than the surrounding seabed, with obvious signs that the surrounding seabed has been covered by mud that has built up the mound on the seabed.
Right: A seismic line through the mud volcano shows clear seismic indications of mud that comes up in a wide area under the mud volcano. The source of the mud appears to be shallow, no more than around 1,300 ft under the seabed.
Source: NOD

There were more candidate mud volcanoes than discovered.

“We also got indications that there were more in the area of Borealis, but we were not able to explore,” he said.

A mud volcano is an accumulation of clay or other fine-grained material that has flowed out together with gas, water, and sometimes oil, either on the seabed or the Earth’s surface (Fig. 2).

NOD-Mud-Fresh-Older-R1.jpg
Fig. 2— An ROV photo shows fresh mud (light gray) that has recently run out over older seabed (darker golden gray).
Source: NOD

“It’s a process driven by pressurized gas driving the mud up, and this mud is under-compacted compared to the overburden. That’s what’s making it possible for mud to come out to the surface at the seafloor in the case of a marine environment,” he said. “They are very widespread on land in some parts of the world.”

Mattingsdal studied onshore mud volcanoes in Azerbaijan last year, and he said those looked very similar to what the expedition saw with the ROV.

“In order to prove they are mud volcanoes, we need to show that the mud coming up is old, but we haven’t done that yet,” he said.

The ROV collected samples for geochemical and biostratigraphy testing, and preliminary results are expected in a few weeks, he added.

Geochemical test results will provide more information about the age of the mud, whether gas or other hydrocarbons are present in the sediment, and where those hydrocarbons might originate, he said. Biostratigraphy results will take more time, he said.

Next up is searching out more mud volcanoes.

“We’re pretty sure there are more out there,” Mattingsdal said.

The discovery of the mud volcanoes, taken alongside oil and gas seep studies, could indicate hydrocarbon prospectivity in the Barents Sea.

“We think there may be source rocks which are still not proven in this part of the Barents Sea, so finding mud volcanoes is a very good opportunity to get the samples needed for geochemical studies, which can tell us something about the subsurface without actually drilling into it,” he said.

He said he hopes someone in the industry finds the discovery of the mud volcanoes interesting and follows it up with their own exploration in the area.