公共和私人勘探与生产公司在二叠纪盆地钻探策略上存在分歧

去年,二叠纪盆地的钻机活动领先全国,数据显示,增长的大部分来自大型公共上游运营商,而 CrownQuest Operating、Iskandia Energy 和 Mack Energy 等私营公司的增速已放缓。

数据显示,二叠纪盆地钻探活动的增长是由大型公共勘探和生产公司带动的,而小型私人生产商则减少了钻机活动。

尽管石油和天然气价格波动,美国页岩油生产商继续在主要盆地增加钻井平台。

油田服务公司贝克休斯 (Baker Hughes) 3 月 24 日报道称,过去一周,二叠纪地区新增了 3 座石油导向钻井平台。Lower 48 E&Ps 去年投入运营的 88 座钻井平台中,有 34 座是在二叠纪地区新增的。根据贝克休斯的数据,二叠纪。

根据 Blackbird BI 和 WellDatabase 截至 3 月 17 日的数据分析,去年在二叠纪盆地新增钻井平台最多的公司都是大型公开交易的勘探与生产公司。

埃克森美孚公司、戴文能源公司、雪佛龙公司、阿帕奇公司、英国石油公司和二叠纪资源公司等运营商自 2023 年初以来一直保持活跃,特别是在特拉华次盆地。

今年到目前为止,规模较小的私人勘探与生产公司缩减了二叠纪盆地的钻探规模。数据显示,CrownQuest Operating、Iskandia Energy Operating 和 Mack Energy 等公司在 2023 年率先削减了私人钻机数量。

来源:Blackbird BI 和 WellDatabase

按钻机数量划分的最活跃的二叠纪运营商

操作员 3月17日 1月6日 改变
先锋自然资源公司  22 22 0
西方人  16 23 -7
莫伯恩石油公司  20 19 1
响尾蛇  16 22 -6
眼电图资源 19  17 号 2
埃克森美孚 17 号 15 2
德文郡 18 14 4
奋进 15 14 1
康菲石油公司 10 12 -2
雪佛龙 9 6 3

包括西方石油公司和响尾蛇能源公司在内的一些大型公众今年也取消了二叠纪盆地的钻探活动。


相关:  KAPSARC 表示美国页岩油继续采用两级系统


两块页岩的故事

East Daley Analytics 高级分析师詹姆斯·泰勒 (James Taylor) 表示,当谈到二叠纪盆地公共和私人钻井活动之间的分歧时,大宗商品价格和中游因素似乎正在给生产商带来压力。

运营商主要瞄准二叠纪盆地开采原油。但泰勒说,二叠纪油井正在生产大量伴生气,这限制了外运能力。

泰勒说,“这是那些拥有离开盆地的固定交通的大型公众,他们已经在主要出口管道上签署了空间,这些管道似乎正在增加”钻井平台。

据美国能源情报署称,自 2012 年以来,二叠纪盆地的天然气产量一直在稳步增长。EIA本月早些时候预测,尽管亨利中心天然气价格已跌至2020年9月以来的最低点,但二叠纪天然气产量预计将在4月份增至创纪录的224.9亿立方英尺/日。

由于银行业危机、对更广泛的经济放缓和需求疲软的担忧,近几周原油价格也被压低。


相关:由于银行业担忧,油价跌至 2021 年以来的最低水平


虽然公共超级巨头和大型石油公司更容易受到石油和天然气价格波动的影响,但在米德兰盆地运营一些钻井平台的私人生产商可能不得不减少钻探活动。

“私人部门]对 WTI 10% 的价格波动更加敏感,尤其是天然气,”泰勒说。

现在钻井和完井的成本也比几年前贵得多。

Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. 的分析师在 3 月 23 日的一份研究报告中写道,石油和天然气盆地的上游运营商愿意支付与 80 美元石油和 5 美元天然气相一致的更高的服务成本。 

钻机重组进入中流

泰勒说,公共和私人运营商的钻机分配变化正在对二叠纪中游系统产生影响,具体取决于他们所服务的生产商。

East Daley 在 3 月 22 日的一份研究报告中报告称,受益于特拉华次流域变化的中游收集和加工运营商包括 Enterprise Products Partners、Targa Resources 的 Lucid South Carlsbad 系统、EnLink Midstream、DCP Midstream 和 Brazos Midstream。

与此同时,Kinetik、Energy Transfer 和 Targa 的特拉华系统的钻机活动有所放缓,这主要是由于私人钻机的减少。

“如果我们在 Targa 管道旁边看到 EOG [资源] 钻机,通常位于 G&P [收集和处理] 系统上,那么很有可能是 Targa 体积,”泰勒说。“对于每台钻机,我们都会将其分配给特定的 G&P 系统。”


相关:Targa、EnLink、ONEOK 匆忙建设


本周更多钻机

根据贝克休斯最新的钻机数量,在截至 3 月 24 日的一周内,Lower 48 盆地的运营商又增加了 4 个钻机。

二叠纪钻井平台处于领先地位,本周又增加了三座钻井平台。

科罗拉多州和怀俄明州的丹佛-朱尔斯堡盆地(DJ盆地)和尼奥布拉拉盆地增加了另一个钻井平台。根据贝克休斯的数据,俄克拉荷马州的 Cana Woodford 页岩区自 2019 年 9 月以来增加了第一座天然气导向钻机。

密西西比和 Granite Wash 矿区钻机数量的减少抵消了增加的钻机数量。

原文链接/hartenergy

Public, Private E&Ps Split on Permian Basin Drilling Strategies

The Permian led the nation in drilling rig activity in the past year, with data showing much of that growth coming from large, public upstream operators as private companies such as CrownQuest Operating, Iskandia Energy and Mack Energy have downshifted.

Growth in Permian Basin drilling activity is being led by large, public E&Ps as smaller, private producers pull back on rig activity, data shows.

U.S. shale producers continue to add drilling rigs in key basins, despite volatility in oil and gas prices.

Three oil-directed drilling rigs were added in the Permian region in the past week, oilfield services company Baker Hughes reported on March 24. Of the 88 additional rigs that Lower 48 E&Ps put into operation in the past year, 34 of them were added to the Permian, per Baker Hughes data.

The companies that added the most drilling rigs in the Permian over the past year have been large, publicly traded E&Ps, according to data analysis from Blackbird BI and WellDatabase through March 17.

Operators such as Exxon Mobil Corp., Devon Energy Corp., Chevron Corp., Apache Corp., BP and Permian Resources have continued to be active since the start of 2023, particularly in the Delaware sub-basin.

Smaller, private E&Ps scaled back on drilling in the Permian so far this year. Companies such as CrownQuest Operating, Iskandia Energy Operating and Mack Energy led private rig reductions in 2023, data shows.

Source: Blackbird BI and WellDatabase

Most Active Permian Operators by Rig Count

Operator March 17 Jan. 6 Change
Pioneer Natural Resources  22 22 0
Occidental  16 23 -7
Mewbourne Oil  20 19 1
Diamondback  16 22 -6
EOG Resources 19  17 2
Exxon Mobil 17 15 2
Devon 18 14 4
Endeavor 15 14 1
ConocoPhillips 10 12 -2
Chevron 9 6 3

A few large publics, including Occidental Petroleum Corp. and Diamondback Energy, also pulled back on their drilling efforts in the Permian this year.


RELATED: KAPSARC Says US Shale Continues in Two-Tier System


Tale of two shales

When it comes to the split between public and private rig activity in the Permian, commodity prices and midstream considerations seem to be weighing on producers, said James Taylor, senior analyst with East Daley Analytics.

Operators are largely targeting the Permian Basin for crude oil. But Permian oil wells are producing a lot of associated gas, which is constraining takeaway capacity, Taylor said.

“It’s the big publics with fixed transport out of the basin and that have signed space on the major egress pipelines that seem to be adding” rigs, Taylor said.

Natural gas production in the Permian has been rising steadily since 2012, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Even while Henry Hub gas prices have slumped to their lowest point since September 2020, Permian gas production is expected to grow to a record 22.49 billion cubic feet per day in April, the EIA forecasted earlier this month.

Crude oil prices have also been pushed down in recent weeks due to the crisis in the banking sector, concerns about a broader economic slowdown and weakening demand.


RELATED: Oil Hits Lowest Since 2021 on Banking Fears


While public supermajors and majors are more insulated from volatility in oil and gas prices, private producers running a few rigs in the Midland Basin might have to pull back on drilling.

“[Privates] are a lot more sensitive to these 10% price fluctuations in WTI, and especially gas,” Taylor said.

Drilling and completing wells is also a lot more expensive now than it was just a few years ago.

Upstream operators in both oil and gas basins have been willing to pay inflated service costs more in line with $80 oil and $5 gas, analysts at Tudor, Pickering, Holt & Co. wrote in a March 23 research note. 

Rig reshuffle hits midstream

The changes in rig allocations by public and private operators are having effects on midstream systems in the Permian depending on the producers they serve, Taylor said.

Midstream gathering and processing operators benefitting from changes in the Delaware sub-basin include Enterprise Products Partners, Targa Resources’ Lucid South Carlsbad system, EnLink Midstream, DCP Midstream and Brazos Midstream, East Daley reported in a March 22 research note.

Meanwhile, Kinetik, Energy Transfer and Targa’s Delaware system have seen slowing rig activity, mostly due to reductions of private rigs.

“If we see an EOG [Resources] rig next to a Targa pipe, generally on the G&P [gathering and processing] system that is a very, very high chance of being a Targa volume,” Taylor said. “With every rig, we assign it to a specific G&P system.”


RELATED: Targa, EnLink, ONEOK Building Out in a Hurry


More rigs this week

Operators in Lower 48 basins added four more rigs during the week ended March 24, according to the most recent Baker Hughes rig count.

The Permian led the group, adding three more drilling rigs over the week.

The Denver-Julesburg Basin (D-J Basin) and Niobrara Basin in Colorado and Wyoming added another rig. Oklahoma’s Cana Woodford Shale play added its first natural gas-directed drilling rig since September 2019, per Baker Hughes data.

Additions were offset by rig reductions in the Mississippian and Granite Wash plays.