Kinetik 和 Energy Transfer 陷入 1 亿美元 NGL 法律纠纷

中游公司 Kinetik 和 Energy Transfer 已在特拉华盆地争夺 NGL 产量三年。


KinetikEnergy Transfer因 2021 年爆发的 NGL 合同纠纷陷入了 1 亿美元的法律纠纷。

此次纠纷涉及EagleClaw Midstream、CR Permian Processing and Energy Transfer 的关联公司 Lone Star NGL。(Eagle Claw 和Altus Midstream于 2022 年 合并,成立了 Kinetik。)

2021年5月,Lone Star向休斯顿地区法院提起诉讼。诉状称,EagleClaw未能履行协议,未能将德克萨斯州里夫斯县工厂生产的首批8.4亿立方英尺/天的Y级液化天然气(NGL)100%出售给Lone Star。

此次纠纷源于EagleClaw与Targa签署NGL销售协议。Lone Star声称其线路上的NGL流量下降,并估计其损失高达1亿美元。East Daley Analytics在7月2日的诉讼分析中指出,Lone Star表示,流量下降意味着NGL被转移到Targa的网络。

EagleClaw 否认了这些指控。

该案随后三年在地区法院审理。2024年12月,诉讼转移到由州政府于2024年9月设立的德克萨斯州商业法庭。

法庭文件显示,新法院几乎没有处理该纠纷,只是裁定商业法院对该诉讼没有管辖权,并将其发回地区法院审理。

该诉讼的进展尚不清楚。Energy Transfer 尚未回应置评请求。Kinetik 发言人在给 Hart Energy 的一封电子邮件中表示,公司对未决诉讼不予置评是公司的标准做法。

声明称:“我们正在进行法律程序,并将在案件审理过程中继续捍卫我们的立场。”

评论

添加新评论

本次对话将根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客服团队。

原文链接/HartEnergy

Kinetik, Energy Transfer Locked in $100MM NGL Legal Dispute

Midstream companies Kinetik and Energy Transfer have been battling for three years over NGL production in the Delaware Basin.


Kinetik and Energy Transfer have been locked in a $100 million legal battle over an NGL contract dispute dating back to 2021.

The dispute involved EagleClaw Midstream, CR Permian Processing and Energy Transfer affiliate company Lone Star NGL. (Eagle Claw and Altus Midstream merged in 2022, creating Kinetik.)

In May 2021, Lone Star filed a lawsuit in a Houston district court. The petition claimed that EagleClaw had not fulfilled an agreement to sell Lone Star 100% of the Y-grade NGL produced from the first 840 MMcf/d processed at plants in Reeves County, Texas.

The dispute arose after EagleClaw signed an NGL sale agreement with Targa. Lone Star claimed the NGL traffic declined on its line and estimated the value of its losses at $100 million. Lone Star said the decline in traffic meant that the NGLs were being diverted to Targa’s network instead, East Daley Analytics said in an analysis of the lawsuit on July 2.

EagleClaw denied the accusations.

The case spent the next three years in district court. In December 2024, the lawsuit moved to the Texas Business Court, created by the state government in September 2024.

The new court spent little time on the dispute, ruling that the business court did not have jurisdiction over the lawsuit and remanding it back to the district court venue, according to court documents.

The status of the lawsuit is not clear. Energy Transfer did not respond to a request for comment. In an email to Hart Energy, a Kinetik spokeswoman said the company does not comment on pending litigation as a standard practice.

“We are engaged in the legal process and will continue to defend our position as the matter proceeds through the courts,” the statement said.

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.