一些私营企业在市场波动中利用较低的完成成本

Liberty Energy 首席执行官 Ron Gusek 表示,他看到财务状况良好的私营公司在完井成本较低时增加钻井平台,然后等待强劲的价格信号来推进生产。


Video Player is loading.
Current Time 0:00
Duration 0:00
Loaded: 0%
Stream Type LIVE
Remaining Time 0:00
 
1x
    • Chapters
    • descriptions off, selected
    • captions off, selected
      罗恩·古塞克(Ron Gusek),自由能源

      《石油和天然气投资者》主编迪翁·多尔蒂:大家好。我是沃斯堡SUPER DUG公司《石油和天然气投资者》的主编迪翁·多尔蒂。今天我们很荣幸邀请到自由能源公司首席执行官罗恩·古塞克,他刚刚在台上为我们做了精彩的演讲,今天我们将回答几个问题。罗恩,感谢您今天来参加我们的节目。

      自由能源公司首席执行官 Ron Gusek:很高兴来到这里。

      DD:我们想简单介绍一下Liberty Energy的现状。它成立于2011年,最初是一家油田服务公司。请您介绍一下Liberty Energy的发展历程。

      RG:是的,当然。我们2011年成立时是一家压裂公司,这在我们发展的大部分时间里都是重点,至今仍然是我们业务的重要组成部分,当然也是最重要的部分。但随着我们在压裂领域多年来的发展,最终增加了电缆作业、一些砂矿和一些物流业务,但所有业务都集中在核心完井领域,我们意识到我们有机会拓展更广泛的业务。

      我们的使命非常简单,那就是改善人类生活。我们坚信,通过能源的普及,我们能够实现这一目标。能源或许是当今世界一切事物的基石。但或许能源并非摆脱贫困的捷径——没有能源,就无法摆脱贫困。因此,我们很快意识到,我们有机会拓展到比最初专注的领域(尤其是完井业务)更广泛的领域。因此,我们将公司更名为自由能源公司 (Liberty Energy),目前正在进军几个不同的方向,尤其是在电力领域。我们在小型模块化核能、先进的地热能电池以及天然气发电方面进行了一些投资,目标是比以往更广泛地支持能源普及。

      DD:好吧,我们来谈谈发电。我想,您在台上提到的关于控制力所能及的事情,可能引起了很多人的共鸣。就您而言,控制力指的是在现场所能控制的事情,比如使用天然气作为燃料,自己发电。您能不能也跟我们讲讲这个思路?

      RG:所以我们开始着手转向所谓的下一代压裂设备。我们的想法是用天然气驱动压裂泵,而不是像以前那样使用柴油。我们最初启动时,默认的方案是用电动泵。也就是说,我们不再用柴油发动机驱动泵本身,而是用电动机驱动,然后利用天然气发电。我们为自己在现场提供的高效服务感到自豪。我们不希望转向下一代压裂设备对这一目标产生负面影响。我们希望客户也能拥有同样流畅的体验。

      对我们来说,这意味着掌控那些可能显著改变油田结果的因素。这包括发电,也包括燃料供应。柴油随处可见,而压缩天然气则不然。因此,我们成立了LPI(自由电力创新公司),旨在掌控我们业务的这两个方面。自此以后,我们在发电方面的能力不断增强。目前,我们拥有130兆瓦的发电能力,为我们的压裂作业队提供电力,并供应这些作业队在作业过程中消耗的所有天然气。

      DD:那么,在将压缩天然气输送到油田作为燃料的基础设施建设方面是否存在困难?

      RG:这对我们来说确实是一个学习的过程,需要一定的发展。我们确实收购了一家小公司来启动这项业务。我们收购了一家已经从事压缩天然气输送业务的公司,这在某种程度上让我们在这方面领先了一些。但最终,我们扩展了基础设施和能力,不仅覆盖了二叠纪盆地,还覆盖了DJ和Haynesville,这在一定程度上增强了我们的基础设施和能力,也提升了我们在这方面的专业知识和能力。

      当然,这其中有一个学习的过程。我们发现,使用天然气为设备加油与使用柴油不同,操作起来更加复杂,但最终我们实现了无缝衔接的运营。我认为,我们的客户在使用这些下一代设备时,能够体验到与过去 Liberty 系统相同的效率,甚至可能更高的效率。

      DD:嗯,太棒了。我的意思是,尤其是在二叠纪盆地,他们可能25年前就用上这项技术了,这样就能节省大量的火炬气,还能用来做点别的,而不是白白损失利润。

      RG:当然。这确实很重要。

      DD:是的。是的,这很有意思。然后让我们回到今天的话题。我不是唯一一个说“市场动荡、不确定”的人。这对你们现在的工作以及对2026年的展望有什么影响?

      RG:当然,这并非没有挑战。规划业务的能力需要我们能够从长远角度了解客户的投资前景,以便我们能够进行适当的投资来满足这些需求。在这样的环境下,当市场出现波动,最终迫使我们的客户重新评估今年乃至明年的预算时,这无疑是一项挑战。因此,我们必须为各种结果做好准备。我们必须评估各种方案,从最坏的情况到最好的情况,做最坏的打算,抱最好的希望,最终我们很可能处于两者之间。但对我们来说,这意味着,上半年的业绩看起来相当稳健。我们正在为下半年业务的减少做准备,因此,我们必须了解这些可能性,然后找到最佳应对方案。

      我总是说,挑战伴随机遇。在过去的两次经济衰退中,我们经历了两次绝佳的机会,一次是在2015年和2016年的经济衰退。我们收购了破产的Sanjel;在新冠疫情期间,我们完成了斯伦贝谢的交易,并收购了其北美陆上完井业务。所以,我不知道在这种环境下是否还会出现类似的机会,但这些都是我们一直希望做好准备并密切关注的事情。

      DD:是的。嗯,我之前一直在说,昨天是我的金融日,所以我和一些投资银行和私募股权集团聊过,他们都说,这里有机会,因为价格会影响估值,但接下来可能会出现买卖价差的难题。这很有意思。我之前没有从服务业的角度考虑过这里也有机会。

      从我对第一季度业绩的报道来看,我听到了各种各样的说法。数据有点混乱,因为我认为现在预测太多还为时过早。但实际上,我关注的每一家勘探生产公司都在削减一些钻井平台,有些甚至削减了几亿美元,有些甚至更多,但这在数十亿美元的巨额资本支出预算中,基本上只是微不足道的一部分。您预计这种情况会持续一季度吗?您现在能预测出来吗?或者说,这种情况是否会趋于平稳,达到TPH所说的年底削减10%到25%的水平?考虑到目前的情况,他们的预测可能偏低,但现在下结论还为时过早,对吧?从客户反映的情况和您目前看到的油田开采情况来看,您认为今年的削减幅度是多少?

      RG:首先,我确实认为现在判断全部影响还为时过早。我认为勘探和生产部门仍在权衡各种可能的结果。虽然我们对贸易形势及其对全球经济增长的潜在影响有了一定的了解,但在供应方面,我们可能仍然对未来发展方向存在一些未知数。

      我们将面临供需失衡。我们将面临石油储备短缺。我认为这是肯定的,但我预计我们还需要拭目以待,看看全球库存量会增长多少。这可能会给WTI原油价格带来一些方向,并最终明确我们客户的预算目标。因此,根据我们今天听到的消息,我确实认为未来可能还会有更多下行潜力。

      当然,与此相反的是天然气方面的情况。我们看到一些资金流入天然气盆地。我们也看到了关于新增钻井数量和完井活动的公告,因此我们有一些利弊。我认为天然气方面不会完全抵消石油方面的影响,但在我们的世界里也能看到一些积极的迹象是件好事。

      DD:嗯,昨天我还听到了另外一件事,我忘了,一位小组成员说,上市公司削减了一两座钻井平台,而私营公司却增加了一两座。您也观察到了这种情况吗?

      RG:我认为两者都有。对于私营公司来说,这可能取决于它们的规模。我认为一些规模较小的公司会寻求保护资产负债表,因此可能会更加谨慎一些。而一些财务状况良好、可能有机会利用目前非常低的钻井和完井成本的公司,可能会钻一些增量井。

      DD:那么这对他们来说是一个机会吗?

      RG:是的。

      DD:好的。

      RG:是的,他们当然会与上市公司对现金流动态的思考方式略有不同,所以现在投入一些资金,可能能够以非常低的成本完成这些油井的钻探和完井,然后等待强劲的价格信号真正开始生产,这可能是合理的。对于上市公司来说,走这条路可能更难。

      DD:罗恩,今天的信息太棒了!非常感谢!谢谢你回来和我们聊天。我真的很感激。

      RG:真的很享受。

      DD:感谢大家关注 SUPER DUG 的工作。我是《石油和天然气投资者》的 Deon Daugherty,以及 Liberty Energy 首席执行官 Ron Gusek。非常感谢。

      评论

      添加新评论

      本次对话遵循 Hart Energy 社区规则。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客服团队。

      原文链接/HartEnergy

      Some Privates Capitalizing on Low Completion Costs Amidst Volatility

      Liberty Energy CEO Ron Gusek says he sees private companies in strong financial positions adding rigs to drill while completion costs are low and then waiting for a strong price signal to move ahead on production.


      Video Player is loading.
      Current Time 0:00
      Duration 0:00
      Loaded: 0%
      Stream Type LIVE
      Remaining Time 0:00
       
      1x
        • Chapters
        • descriptions off, selected
        • captions off, selected
          Ron Gusek, Liberty Energy

          Deon Daugherty, editor-in-chief, Oil and Gas Investor: Hi there. I'm Deon Daugherty, editor-in-chief of Oil and Gas Investor here at SUPER DUG in Fort Worth. And today we are fortunate to have Ron Gusek, the CEO of Liberty Energy here to answer a few questions after he just gave us a stellar presentation on stage. So Ron, thank you for joining us here today.

          Ron Gusek, CEO, Liberty Energy: Great to be here.

          DD: We want to talk a little bit about getting folks acquainted with Liberty Energy as it is today. It started out in 2011 as an oilfield services company. So kind of walk us through that evolution into Liberty Energy now.

          RG: Yeah, certainly. We got started as a frac company back in 2011, and that was our focus for certainly a significant amount of our history and remains a big, big part of our world today. Certainly the largest part. But as we grew over the years in the space of fracturing, ultimately adding wire line, a few sand mines, some logistics to our business, but all focused in that core completion space, we recognized there was an opportunity for us to maybe be a little broader than that.

          Our mission was a very simple one, and that was to better human lives. It was our belief that we would do that through access to energy. Energy is maybe the foundation to all that happens in the world today. Well, maybe energy isn't directly the path out of poverty—you don't get out of poverty without access to it. And so we quickly recognized that we had an opportunity to be broader than where we had started our focus, specifically completions. And so we rebranded ourselves Liberty Energy and are now embarking in a few different directions, particularly in the power space. We've made some investments in small modular nuclear, in advanced geothermal in batteries and natural gas fired power generation, with the goal of supporting energy access more broadly than we had.

          DD: Well, and let's talk a little bit about power generation. Something that you said on stage resonated, I think, probably with a lot of folks about controlling what you ca. And in your case then it's having control over what we can in the field, and that's thing with things like using natural gas as a fuel source, generating your own power. I mean, kind of walk us through that thought process as well.

          RG: So we had started down a path of moving to what we would call a next generation frac asset. The idea that you would power a frac pump with natural gas rather than diesel fuel as it had historically done. The default path to do that when we first started was to do so with an electric pump. So rather than drive the pump itself with a diesel motor, to drive it with electric motors and then use natural gas to generate electricity. We pride ourselves on the level of efficiency we deliver in the field. And we didn't want moving to a next generation frac asset to negatively impact that. We wanted our customers to have the same seamless experience.

          And so that meant for us controlling those things that could dramatically change an outcome in the field. That included the power generation and also included the fueling of that. Diesel's ubiquitous; compressed natural gas, less so. And so we launched LPI [Liberty Power Innovations] with the goal of controlling both of those aspects of our business. And so we have since grown in our capabilities around power generation. We now run 130 megawatts of power generation to run our frack crews and supply all of the natural gas that those fleets consume in that exercise.

          DD: So was there any struggle as far as having the infrastructure in place to get that compressed natural gas to the field as fuel?

          RG: It certainly was a bit of a learning curve for us and required some growth. We did buy a small company to start that business. We acquired a company that was already in the compressed natural gas delivery business, and that kind of gave us a bit of a head start in that regard. But ultimately, we have expanded that infrastructure and capability beyond just the Permian to include the D-J and the Haynesville, have strengthened and maybe fortified that a little bit, and grown our expertise and capability in that.

          There's been a learning curve, of course. We found out that fueling an asset with natural gas is not the same as fueling one with diesel, that there's some more complexities to it, but ultimately now have a very seamless operation there. And I think our customers experience the same efficiencies and maybe even better efficiencies with these next generation assets as they've come to expect from Liberty in the past.

          DD: Well, that's fantastic. I mean, especially in the Permian, they probably could have used this technology 25 years ago and would've saved so much of flared gas, been able to do something with it instead of just lose that profit.

          RG: Absolutely. It certainly makes a difference.

          DD: Yeah. Yeah, it's fascinating. And then let's kind of bring it back down to where we are today. I'm not the only one saying these words, volatile, uncertain market. How is that affecting what you guys are doing now and kind of looking into 2026?

          RG: Certainly not without some challenges, of course. The ability to plan a business requires the ability to understand sort of the long-term what investments are going to look like for our customers, such that we can make appropriate investments to support whatever those needs would be. That's a challenge when you get into an environment like this, when you get some volatility and that ultimately has our customers reevaluating their budgets for this year and very likely for next year as well. And so we have to prepare for a range of outcomes. We have to evaluate scenarios from the worst case to the best case, be prepared for the worst, hope for the best and likely find ourselves somewhere in the middle of that. But for us, what that's meant is, well, the first half of the year looks pretty solid. We're preparing for some reduction in activity in the second half of the year, and so up to us to understand what those possibilities are and then figure out how best to deal with that.

          I always say though, that with challenge comes opportunity. We've had in the last two downturns, two great chances in the ’15, ‘16 downturn. We acquired Sanjel out of bankruptcy; the COVID downturn, we completed the Schlumberger transaction and bought their North American onshore completions business. So I don't know if there will be a similar opportunity in this environment, but those are things we always want to be ready for and on the lookout for.

          DD: Yeah. Well, I was talking, I mean yesterday was finance day for me, so I was talking with some of these investor banks and private equity groups and they were all saying, there are opportunities here because just the way the price affects valuation, but then you've got the bid-ask spread conundrum that can pop up. So that's interesting. I hadn't thought about it from a services sort of perspective that there are opportunities there as well.

          And so from my coverage of the first quarter earnings, I've heard different things. The numbers are kind of all over the place because I think it's early on to really predict too much, but literally every E&P that I looked at was cutting a couple rigs here and there, or a couple hundred million in some cases a little more, but still a negligible part of budget dust, basically, in these enormous multi-billion dollar capex budgets. But do you expect that to continue quarter-over-quarter? Can you tell yet or if it's going to sort of plateau to the point that I think it was TPH said 10% to 25% reduction by the end of the year. And given where things are, they're kind of biased toward the lower end, but it's early, right? From what your customers are telling you from what you're looking at on strip, what are you thinking as far as reductions this year?

          RG: So first of all, I do think it's too early to know the full impact. I think we still have E&Ps weighing the range of potential outcomes. While we have some more certainty on the trade situation and the potential impacts of that on the global economic growth, we still have maybe a bit of an unknown around the supply side on exactly how that plays out.

          We're going to have a supply demand imbalance. We are going to be long barrels of oil. I think that is a certainty, but I expect we're going to have to wait and see what global storage inventory numbers grow to be. That probably provides some direction for WTI and ultimately some clarity around where budgets will land for our customers. So I do think there probably is a little more downside potential to come from based on what we have heard today.

          The counter to that, of course, is the gas side of things. We have seen some dollars flowing into gas basins. We've seen announcements around incremental rig count and completions activity there, and so we have some puts and takes. I don't think the gas side's going to completely offset the oil side of things, but it is nice to have a little positivity in our world as well.

          DD: Well, and something else that I heard yesterday, I forgot it was one of the panelists was saying that while you're seeing public companies cutting a rig or two; private companies are adding a rig or two. Is that something that you're observing as well?

          RG: I'd say some of both. For the private companies, it probably depends a little on the size that you are. Some of the smaller ones, I think looking to protect the balance sheet and so maybe being a little bit more cautious. Some of those who are in a strong financial position and maybe have the opportunity to take advantage of arguably very low drilling and completion costs right now may be in a situation where they're going to drill some incremental wells.

          DD: So that's an opportunity for them?

          RG: Yes.

          DD: Okay.

          RG: Yeah, certainly they would think about the cashflow dynamics a little differently than a public company would, and so it may make sense to deploy some capital now and potentially be in a situation to have those wells drilled and completed at very low cost but then wait for a strong price signal to actually start the production. That would probably be more difficult for a public company to take that path.

          DD: Ron, awesome information today. Thank you so much. Thank you for coming back and talking with us. I really appreciate it.

          RG: Really enjoyed it.

          DD: And thank you guys for checking in with what we're doing here at SUPER DUG. I'm Deon Daugherty with Oil and Gas Investor, with Ron Gusek, CEO of Liberty Energy. Thank you so much.

          Comments

          Add new comment

          This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.