E&Ps 的地下魔法将地热、锂和氢转化为现实

勘探、钻探和其他协同作用将地下石油钻探和可再生能源领域结合在一起。


如果德文能源公司的地球化学家托尼·普格利亚诺 (Tony Pugliano) 有一根可以挥动能量的魔杖,他就会创造出一些区域,在这些区域,公司可以生产石油和天然气,并可以利用现场的地热能从盐水中提取关键矿物——所有这些都集中在一个地方。

Grounded Energy 的咨询地质学家 Galen Huling 会对每个人的水进行测试,以确定锂资源,而无需经历如今的数据收集麻烦。

德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校经济地质局环境部副主任肯·维西安 (Ken Wisian) 则将力推更多早期商业项目,以证明增强型地热系统等可再生能源项目的价值和可扩展性。

“我们需要用实际的生产系统向所有人展示它的效果,”Wisian 说道,“这样一来,扩大规模的潜力就非常巨大了。”

鉴于勘探、钻探和其他协同作用已将地下石油和可再生能源领域聚集在一起,以寻求更清洁、可靠和负担得起的能源,这些愿望可能并非遥不可及。在休斯顿举行的 NAPE 峰会上,专家们聚集在一起参加技术会议,讨论的重点是地热、锂和氢。

维西安表示,地热领域正在发生一场革命。他说,几乎所有的地热能源都来自热液,即产生热的天然流体,但“革命来自于生产自己的地热系统、设计自己的系统以及从岩石本身中提取热量。”

低温地热

石油和天然气钻探技术的进步正在应用于地热领域,使得钻探到足够深的岩石以产生电力的成本更低。他说,创新还使得在较低温度下转换电力成为可能。

“到目前为止,你通常必须前往落基山脉以西才能找到热液系统。现在,落基山脉以东的非传统地热区也开始了一些项目,包括德克萨斯州的一些项目,”维西安说,并补充说北美是世界地热革命的中心。

他说,石油和天然气技术进入地热领域的滞后时间通常为两年到二十年。但大约五年前,随着跨行业技术应用的出现,这一隐喻性的灯泡终于开始亮了起来。

他说:“钻井速度的提高降低了成本,控制裂缝产生的能力增强了,能够钻穿困难的几何形状,这些可能是实现地热能利用的最大单一驱动力。”

他补充说,发电效率的提高是推动因素之一,并特别提到了Ormat Technologies的工作。该公司使用先进的二元循环系统,可以将低温地热转化为电能。

“我们认为,任何地方的地热能源都很快会与其他能源展开竞争。传统热液能源已经具备了这种能力,”维西安说道。

紧追

德文能源 (Devon Energy) 是活跃于地热能源领域的公司之一,其投资的包括Fervo Energy等公司,该公司将分布式光纤传感、水平钻井和多级完井技术应用于地热井。

“在内部,我们也在研究美国各地的地热特性,但主要在美国西部,”普利亚诺说。“除此之外,我们还在研究我们目前拥有的石油和天然气资产中的一些低温地热潜力,主要在威利斯顿盆地和南德克萨斯州。”

他补充说,地热目标是大多数石油和天然气储量所在的沉积盆地还是火山系统取决于目标。对于沉积盆地,较低温度的地热系统可用于为局部油田作业发电。但当目标是为更大规模的电厂发电时,重点可能更多地放在美国西部

“我们有很大潜力,特别是在犹他州、内华达州、加利福尼亚州和爱达荷州等地。我们在这些地方有一些重要的热源,”普利亚诺说。“我们确实掌握的数据较少。风险稍高一些。有很多未知数,但我认为更大规模的一般潜力还有更大的上升空间,而且你也会接触到超热地热潜力。”

普利亚诺表示,德文还在对关键矿产项目进行描述和评估,主要是锂。该公司正在仔细研究油田盐水、索尔顿海、大盆地和阿肯色州的斯马科弗地层。锂用于电池储能系统和电动汽车电池。

阿肯色州的 Smackover 吸引了Equinor埃克森美孚西方石油等关键矿产开采公司和石油生产商的兴趣。这些公司正在使用直接锂提取 (DLE) 技术,通过离子交换、溶剂萃取或膜从盐水中提取锂。与使用蒸发池的锂提取工艺相比,DLE 速度更快,占用空间更小。

锂浓度以百万分率 (ppm) 为单位,各不相同,对经济产生影响。胡林说,每个盆地和每个项目都有各自独特的问题需要克服。

他说,PPM 介于 150 和 200 之间被认为是经济下限。然而,一种盐水可能具有较高的总溶解溶剂含量,可能需要更多努力来过滤、加工和重新注入;而另一种盐水可能温度较高——因此也许你可以获得地热和锂,以增强项目经济性。

普利亚诺表示,有多种地质类型可供勘探,包括沉积系统或存在较暖流体的系统,例如火山沉积物。

锂浓度只是开采锂资源时要考虑的一个因素。普利亚诺说,了解盐水化学对于确定使用哪种 DLE 技术至关重要。他说,锂离子与其他离子相比的电荷和大小会影响 DLE 技术的有效性。“与锂具有类似大小和电荷比的离子,如镁、钙……可能会非常成问题,并可能迅速损坏树脂或用于 DLE 的材料。”

作为一家全球管道解决方案制造商,Vallourec的地下专业知识包括输送二氧化碳并将其封存在地下。其技术还在地下提供氢气储存,以替代并非随处可见的盐穴。

Vallourec 储氢业务开发经理 Andrew Cassidy 表示:“我们开发了一种全自动地下储氢系统,单个腔体最多可储存 100 吨氢气。”

该公司的 Delphy 氢存储系统技术瞄准的是氢基础设施挑战。

“我们正在深入研究绿色氨、电子甲醇和液态氢。如果谈论绿色,挑战就在于可再生能源,”卡西迪说。“当你合成氢和氮来制造氨时,你需要不断有分子进入反应堆。可再生能源不能给你 24 小时的时间,所以你需要一个缓冲储存,而且需要大量的缓冲储存。”

对于卡西迪来说,这根魔杖将释放出一种技术,使开采天然氢矿变得更容易。

与天然气一样,天然氢可以通过在储层中钻井并将其泵回地面进行净化后再使用来获取。美国地质调查局 (USGS) 于 1 月发布了首张地图,标出了美国各地可能存在地质氢矿床的地区。据媒体报道,两名美国地质调查局研究人员估计,地球可能蕴藏着 6.2 万亿吨氢气。

地质氢图
(来源:美国地质调查局)

目前,氢气主要由天然气通过蒸汽甲烷重整制成,但也会产生二氧化碳使用可再生能源驱动的电解器将水分子分解为氢气和氧气是更清洁的氢气生产方法之一,但成本很高——据卡西迪估计,每公斤约 4 至 7 美元。

他说道:“如果将价格降至接近 1 美元,那么氢气市场就会真正开放。”

评论

添加新评论

此对话根据 Hart Energy 社区规则进行。请在加入讨论前阅读规则。如果您遇到任何技术问题,请联系我们的客户服务团队。

原文链接/HartEnergy

E&Ps’ Subsurface Wizardry Transforming Geothermal, Lithium, Hydrogen

Exploration, drilling and other synergies have brought together the worlds of subsurface oil drilling and renewable energies.


If Devon Energy geochemist Tony Pugliano had a magic wand to wave in energy, he would create areas where companies could produce oil and gas and extract critical minerals from brine with geothermal energy onsite—all at one location.

Galen Huling, a consulting geologist for Grounded Energy, would have everyone’s water tested to pinpoint lithium resources without going through data-gathering hassles experienced today.

And Ken Wisian, associate director of the Environmental Division of the University of Texas at Austin’s Bureau of Economic Geology, would cast a spell to advance more early commercial projects to prove the value and scalability of renewable energy projects like enhanced geothermal systems.

“We need to show everyone out there with actual producing systems it works,” Wisian said. “And with that, a potential for scale up is just immense.”

The aspirations may not be farfetched given exploration, drilling and other synergies have brought the subsurface oil and renewable energy worlds together in the quest for cleaner, reliable and affordable energy. Talk focused on geothermal, lithium and hydrogen when the experts gathered for a technical session at the NAPE Summit in Houston.

A revolution is already happening in geothermal, according to Wisian. Nearly all geothermal energy is from hydrothermal producing natural fluids that are hot, he said, but “the revolution is coming from producing your own geothermal system, engineering your own system and extracting the heat from the rock itself.”

Low temperature geothermal

Advances in oil and gas drilling technologies are being put to use in the geothermal sector, making it cheaper to drill to depths needed to access rock that is hot enough to generate power. Innovation has also enabled the conversion of power at lower temperatures, he said.

“Until now, you generally had to go west of the Rockies to find a hydrothermal system. Now there are projects kicking off east of the Rockies in nontraditional geothermal areas, including a handful of projects here in Texas,” Wisian said, adding that North America is the world’s epicenter of the geothermal revolution.

The lag time between oil and gas technology moving into the geothermal space used to range between two years and two decades, he said. But the metaphorical lightbulbs finally started coming on about five years ago when cross-sector technology applications emerged.

“The increases in drilling speed which reduced the cost, the ability to control fracture generation, to case through difficult geometries, those are probably the biggest single driver,” to enabling geothermal anywhere, he said.

Efficiency improvements on the generation side are among the drivers, he added, singling out work by Ormat Technologies. The company uses advanced binary cycle systems that can convert low-temperature geothermal heat into electricity.

“We think that geothermal anywhere is going to be competitive with other power sources pretty quickly. Conventional hydrothermal already is,” Wisian said.

Hot pursuit

Devon Energy is among the companies active in geothermal energy with investments in companies such as Fervo Energy, which applies distributed fiber optic sensing, horizontal drilling and multistage well completion to its geothermal wells.

“Internally, we’re also looking at geothermal characterization across the United States, but primarily in the western U.S.,” Pugliano said. “In addition to that, we are looking at some low temperature geothermal potential in our currently owned oil and gas assets, primarily in the Williston Basin and in South Texas.”

Whether the geothermal target is a sedimentary basin where most oil and gas reserves are located or a volcanic system depends on the goal, he added. For sedimentary basins, lower temperature geothermal systems can be used to generate power for localized oilfield operations. But when the target is generating grid power for a larger-scale plant, the focus is likely more on the Western U.S.

“We have a lot of potential, especially in places like Utah, Nevada, California, Idaho. We have some significant sources of heat in those places,” Pugliano said. “We do have less data. It’s a little higher risk. There’s a lot of unknowns, but I think there’s more upside for larger scale general potential and you’re getting into the superhot geothermal potential as well.”

Devon is also characterizing and evaluating critical mineral projects, primarily lithium, Pugliano said. The company is scrutinizing oilfield brines, the Salton Sea, Great Basin and the Smackover Formation in Arkansas. Lithium is used in battery energy storage systems and electric vehicle batteries.

Lithium

Arkansas’ Smackover has attracted interest from critical mineral extraction companies and oil producers such as Equinor, Exxon Mobil and Occidental Petroleum. There, direct lithium extraction (DLE) technologies are being used to pull lithium from brine using ion exchange, solvent extraction or membranes. DLE is faster and takes less space compared to lithium extraction processes that use evaporation ponds.

Lithium concentrations, measured in parts per million (ppm), vary and impact economics. Each basin and each project have their own unique problems to overcome, Huling said.

PPMs between 150 and 200 are considered to be the lower economic limit, he said. However, one brine may have a high total dissolved solvent content that may take more effort to filter, process and reinject; while another may have high temperatures “so maybe you get geothermal plus lithium” to strengthen project economics.

A variety of geologic play types are available to chase, Pugliano said— including sedimentary systems or systems where warmer fluids are present, such as volcanic deposits.

Lithium concentrations are only one factor to consider when pursuing the resource. Understanding brine chemistry is essential in informing which DLE technology to utilize, Pugliano said. The charge and size of the lithium ion compared to other ions can influence DLE technology’s effectiveness, he said. “Ions of similar size to charge ratio to lithium like magnesium, calcium ... can be very problematic and can quickly deteriorate your resin or the material that you’re using for DLE.”

Hydrogen

As a global tubular solutions manufacturer, Vallourec’s subsurface expertise includes transferring CO2 and sequestering it underground. Its technology is also underground providing hydrogen storage as an alternative to salt caverns, which aren’t available everywhere.

“We have developed an underground hydrogen storage system that is fully automated, that can store up to 100 tonnes of hydrogen in a single cavity,” said Andrew Cassidy, hydrogen storage business development manager for Vallourec.

The company’s Delphy hydrogen storage system technology takes aim at the hydrogen infrastructure challenge.

“We’re diving into where you have green ammonia, e-methanol, liquid hydrogen. If you talk green, the challenge is renewables,” Cassidy said. “You need a constant flow of molecules going into that reactor when you synthesize, let’s say, hydrogen and nitrogen to make ammonia. Renewable power is not giving you that 24 hours, so you need to have a buffer storage and you need a lot of it.”

For Cassidy, the magic wand would unleash technology that makes it easier to extract natural hydrogen deposits.

Like natural gas, naturally occurring hydrogen can be tapped by drilling wells into reservoirs and pumping it back to surface where it is purified before use. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) in January released its first map identifying potential areas across the U.S. with geologic hydrogen deposits. Two USGS researchers have estimated the Earth may hold 6.2 trillion tons of hydrogen, according to media reports.

geologic hydrogen map
(Source: U.S. Geological Survey)

Currently, hydrogen is mostly made from natural gas using steam methane reforming but CO2 is also produced. Using renewable energy-powered electrolyzers to split water molecules into hydrogen and oxygen is among the cleaner hydrogen production methods but costs are high—about $4 to $7 per kilogram by Cassidy’s estimates.

“If you get that down closer to $1, that unlocks really the hydrogen market,” he said.

Comments

Add new comment

This conversation is moderated according to Hart Energy community rules. Please read the rules before joining the discussion. If you’re experiencing any technical problems, please contact our customer care team.